You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the Left - read OP

When the East India existed was this not capitalism? I know they used to refer to mercantilism back then but they still had private enterprise and private property and multiple political parties so it does sound very close to modern captialism.

And the nazi era germany economy had tonnes of private enterprise so although it had a war time economy it just seemed like you had to keep on the good side of the nazi party but they didnt control you.

Googling intersectionality it appears to be an obscure concept from 30 years ago with only a few entries from 2019. Very odd that you think the greatest current threat is this theory that most leftists on boards probably dont know the meaning of.

I think most threads in current affairs/after hours/politics including this one are divisive. Or perhaps they are just allowing differing opinions which is what free speech is all about and is not inherently bad.

Im sure there are alot of left wing academic theories that are influencing public policy but the evidence for the influence of intersectionality seems pretty bare, and no i cant just take your word for it.

That is your opinion. Can you point to a periodical going into more detail on this theory.

@Danzy

The more you try to spread this lie. The more desperate you seem.

I have often found that deep down, people that have a problem with intersectionality, truly believe they are above certain people. That a social hierarchy exists and needs to exist, and if that is at the expense of some poor unfortunate, so be it.

I meant poor as in unlucky, unlucky to be born a different race/disabled/etc. Not just financially poor (but that too)

That would make all your anti trans rhetoric intersectionality don’t look now.

Fair point, apologies about the "waffle" accusatrion, but the longer and more imprecise you posts, the more you'll find yourself misquoted. If I may make the observation, you have a habit of using five or six sentences when one wil do. And I'm gettting the (pehraps mistaken) impression you do it intentionally to muddy the waters.

Anyway.

I'm not denying intersectionality exists, and I think we're on the same-ish page as to what it is, I just think you see it as a threat because it's different and portraying unrelated problems in order to try and back it up.

I'll take the first two: race-baiting. Race baiting is faused by fear and ignorance, like any other form of trolling.

Cancel culture. cancel culture is a form of protest that passes into unofficial censorship. It's also caused by ignorance and an inability to reslolve conflict. Nor is it new - a certain Captain Boycott gave his name to the cancel culture back of the mid 1800s.

It honestly sounds like you're saying "here's a problem I can blame on intersectionality" when in fact it's two groups just failing to talk to each other.

I've no idea who he is or what he's saying or how it challenges the points I made in responce to you, so can we stick to one topic at a time?

Your efforts to try and make out that the Nazis and Communists to be bedfellows will always be a lie. A lie you damn well know to be a lie.

All through the history of both types of dictatorships, they were at each others throats. The likes of Nazism came into being as a response to the rise of Communist attitudes in Europe. The Nazis gained power because of a fear of the spread of Communism in Europe and from its very inception it hinged on an anti Communist set of beliefs. They were on the ballot box as the primary opposition to the likes of the left wing KPD and SPD. Everywhere the Nazis went they installed RIGHT WING proxies to discharge their deeds and they hunted down left wingers of all types. Every country they invaded they set up right wingers in power.

Hitler, from the outset, made no secret that his No.1 enemy was Communism. Nazi propaganda warned of the Communist threat from Eastern Europe. His sent the Condor Legion to Spain to fight against Communists and Socialists during the Spanish Civil War. He launched the most devastating war the world has ever seen in 1941 in an effort to wipe out the USSR for fuck sake.

But, of course, you know all of this. But you still persist in trying to spread a lie, because your petty politics makes you a liar.

The prime target for "rounding up" by Fascists and Nazis were Communists. The first people through the gates of Dachau were Communists. They were at the top of the list of enemies. And some of the most prominent Communists were Jews. It's one of the reasons why Hitler and the Nazis were so anti Communist and why they conflated Communism/Marxism into a "Jewish invention". Many Jews also remained loyal to Communism all the way through the war. They were entire brigades of Jewish Communist partisans operating all around west Russia. There were Jews involved in all facets of Soviet apparatus and the Nazis seized upon that make the claim that it was the Jews who were behind the "Communist threat".

There was never time that Hitler didn't have the destruction of "Judeo Bolshevism" in mind, even when Molotov/Ribbetrop pact put an uneasy halt on their animosity for 22 months.

Just because both types of dictatorships had enemies that they rounded up, doesn't make them the same thing no matter much you wish it were so.

What an absolutely scurrilous effort.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

I think your answer is in the post its half a dozen people, so why would that be news worthy enough to report.

To be honest i think we will see much more flags like that in Dublin on victory day itself