Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

GAA Go

Options
1568101120

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,696 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    If it's a scheduling issue, then what are the reasons that RTE can't shift all the games onto a dedicated sports channel?

    They already show football, hurling, soccer, rugby, horse racing, athletics and more. As others mentioned, they showed World Cup matches on their news channel. They could add in (and/or absorb from TG4) some extra GAA games like the clubs, u21s, college games etc during the Winter months. They could fill out a lovely weekend schedule there and not have to worry about clashing with the Late Late Show, Home & Away or the Saturday night movie every other weekend.

    I've read previously that RTE only show the bare minimum League of Ireland games on purpose, as they can't be bothered with the hassle and prefer to show the rugby on Friday nights instead as it's more popular. They don't help the national league at all. The LOI is as popular as it's ever been with higher gate numbers now with some good games. I'd like to see more games on TV, with Virgin Media now coming in to show more as RTE don't show enough. Do they not want to bother with the GAA now aswell? They already have cameras at the games to record as it is.

    All these top inter-county games could be shown on this channel. Maybe show your big clashes on your RTE 1 on a Sunday at 12:00 (eg Clare v Limerick) and still also have the alternative game (eg Waterford vs Cork) on the subscription channel if you really want to keep some games FTA. No harm in a bit of choice. Give the viewer a viable choice. The cameras are already rolling afterall. Show a classic game from the archives on a Sunday night if you need to flesh out the schedule.

    Would this RTE sports channel cost extra to the TV licence? If it was ~€5 a month, I wouldn't mind having to pay for it, with such a depth of sporting action - the majority of it Irish. Unlocking a channel the same way you have to unlock Sky Sports on any TV package deal. But the key thing is that is live onto your TV box, be it Sky, VM or Saorview, with no messing around with broadband, laptops, cables or having to bring in the grandson to set it up for you. Every person with a TV has the access to it and doesn't rely on broadband etc. You are not 3 minutes behind live action, no buffering and no turning off GAA GO in a pub to listen on the radio as the coverage is so bad when streaming in rural areas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    Short answer to your top line question - the sheer economics of it.

    And for a slightly longer answer, a few other considerations:

    For a dedicated sports channel, you'd not only need lots of live sport for it - you'd also need programming to fill the gaps between live events. Unless you'd be content with a channel that might only be on air for three hours some days, ten hours on other days, and not at all on many days, especially during the winter?

    You'd also need extra programming of some sort of other to plug the hole where sport is currently shown on the existing channels, and that's a very considerable amount of airtime.

    Also, what do you do when there's a clash of sporting fixtures, and you've only one "RTE Sports" on the go? Put one of the events back on one of the regular channels? Cue an avalanche of complaints from people who don't like sport, or who don't like that particular sport, saying "why is this on here, I thought RTE Sport was set up to take all that sports crap that the rest of us don't want to watch......"



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,696 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    I'm actually glad to hear some counter points to my fool-proof plan of having a dedicated RTE Sports channel! 😀

    I don't see a problem with only having the 10 hours 'live' time per day or whatever is needed. Alternatively, RTE has an archive hidden away that is rarely used. Show the 1987 football final or the 2013 hurling final etc. TG4 have a brilliant Laochra Gael programmes that deserves more viewers and has the added benefit of showing some programs in Irish. Stick on the Stephen Roche Tour de France win. Is Wimbledon still covered live in depth here? You'd be surprised at just how much sport RTE (or TG4) currently shows live when you write it all down.

    The Sunday game could have a proper highlights show - one for Hurling, one for Football, not squashing them all into the one show. Keep your Monday night Rugby highlights etc. Tuesday, Wednesday & Thursday already have soccer shown live in Ireland although RTE only have the rights to one of those nights with Virgin Media having the other two. They used to have a lot more matches on VM, on dedicated sports channels that were only live during matches. Friday nights can have League or Ireland and/or Rugby matches shown live and the weekend takes care of itself again.

    Maybe just keep the Provisional finals / All Ireland SF & Final on both FTA TV & RTE Sport (similar to the arrangement with Sky) and the rest can be on the dedicated Sport channel? Sports fans usually are willing to pay to watch sport. €5 a month is not bad. There would be an increase in advertising revenue too.

    I think a big problem with the GAA GO is the reliability and value for money compared to other platforms. €12 for one GAA match v €12 for a full day of sport, covering multiple sports etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Mac_Lad71


    Abolish the license fee and if people want to watch GAA matches..let them subscribe to GAAGO.

    Ditto for other sports.

    Let RTE stand on its own feet as a commercial entity and see how its overpaid untalented presenters get on in the real world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,824 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Much of what you say about your hypothetical new channel has been done in the past by TG4. Some days it is wall to wall coverage two matches and a deferred one during the league for example. Plus TG4 do great coverage of the club championship.

    I would say it comes down to cost for RTE - can you imagine the moaning if the licence fee went up to fund it from non sports fans?

    I know a lot of counties might not have the demand to do another alternative but groups could band together. Dublin GAA on youtube does great coverage of Dublin club matches/hurling and football if TG4/RTE don't get it.

    I don't know why other counties don't do the same. Not sure it would work fully at intercounty level as there are probably rights issues. But these days all a person needs is a camera and upload their own reports. There does not seem to be much/any of that type of thing on youtube from a youtube perspective by GAA fans at all.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    In theory, a €5 a month subscription for a TV channel of wall-to-wall Irish sport (including copious amounts of GAA) sounds great. BUT.....

    • Unlikely any subscription fee would be as low as €5
    • Any subscription TV channel tends to need special equipment - e.g. a dish & Sky box for Sky Sports. So there'd be the purchase and/or installation cost of the equipment itself. Could be €100, €200, or more....anybody's guess. Unless you've more technical knowledge than me about how to access a subscription TV channel without needing extra equipment or an internet connection?
    • Now you'd have arguments about it being unfair that anybody wanting to watch sport on the national broadcaster would have to buy extra equipment and pay extra money, on top of the TV licence fee. While those who just want to watch soaps, movie re-runs, talk shows, news and current affairs, etc., wouldn't have to pay extra at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,601 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Would it be false if 20/30 years ago games at the same stage of the munster championship weren't available on TV at all?

    How is the games "quality" determined?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,995 Mod ✭✭✭✭GoldFour4


    RTÉ are clearly the problem in all this as they have a dictatorship over the games shown. Their role as the national broadcaster showing the games free to air has allowed for this.

    Regardless of whether it’s sky/tg4/virgin etc they will always be second fiddle to RTÉ.

    If every single game last weekend was televised across RTÉ/Virgin/TG4 then we know which games would be on which. RTÉ would have kept the hurling and put the two dud finals on the other channels. The current version of this is putting the marquee hurling games on GAAGO where they can get additional revenue (€1m of profit last year - likely more this year) and screwing anyone who can’t pay with the unattractive games.

    This debate will happen every year until the RTÉ cartel is taken down on gaa rights. An approach similar to rugby should be followed where marquee games can alternate between channels.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,308 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    Number 8 is a cop out and they're looking for time to sweep things under the carpet and go again, or just bin the idea. They shouldn't be let away with this. There should be an independent inquiry by an independent, overseas body hired by the government. This is too serious.


    On Tuesday May 9th, VMTV (Virgin Media Television) issued a statement that called into question the integrity of the GAA Media Rights process.

    The statement contained several factual errors and misleading comments.

    The GAA contacted VMTV and requested that they correct their statement. Since this has not been forthcoming, the GAA, reluctantly, issues the following to correct the record.

    Strategically, the GAA media rights are designed to:

    a) Maximise coverage. We bias toward ‘Free To Air’.

    b) Support the Irish language. We bias toward TG4.

    c) Generate a fair commercial value for our rights. We seek to keep commercial tension to the fore by seeking an agile, competent third party.

    1. From as early as February 2021, the GAA contacted VMTV and other parties to gauge their interest in acquiring rights packages that would become available in the renewal of the GAA media rights in 2022. The initial call was followed up by a detailed description of the various packages available.

    2. Thereafter followed several meetings, telephone calls, emails and document exchanges between the parties.

    3. The GAA did not receive a formal bid from VMTV or an expression of interest.

    4. In June 2022, VMTV were again contacted to clarify that they did not intend to make a bid. VMTV were clear that their model was not to acquire rights but rather to acquire ‘ready to go’ packages ie productions which don’t require outside broadcast set-ups for live match coverage.

    5. In short, VMTV were afforded every opportunity to discuss options, variations to packages and to submit a confidential offer. VMTV choose not to bid.

    6. GAA continued discussions with other parties.

    7. Specifically in respect of one party, the GAA was unable to deliver Sky’s preferred selection as strategically we wanted greater free to air coverage for our National League Package. These rights subsequently went to TG4 and RTÉ. Whilst Sky did bid for a lesser package, the GAA decided to progress with GAAGO.

    This was because GAAGO could facilitate greater flexibility on match schedules, provide coverage for an additional 24 games and offer the opportunity for more flexible pricing for viewers and members. The finances involved were in fact similar.

    8. Recently GAAGO has been the subject of considerable commentary and we will conduct a comprehensive review of its operation at season end.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,308 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    Did GAAGO do the draw for the group games???? ....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,064 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Certainly not hired by the government, they are up to their necks in this conspiracy as well. The United Nations should do it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,308 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    The United Nations...🤣🤣

    Will we send in Tom Cruise to get the emails on a memory stick? Jumping over McBennett's laser-riddled office?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,308 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    Just announced - This is how Virgin Media reported it: The GAA and RTÉ are going to be called before an Oireachtas committee to face questions.

    This is how RTE reported it:

    The Oireachtas Committee on Tourism, Sport and Media has decided to hold two meetings on the future of sports broadcasting, in the aftermath of the row over GAAGO.

    The first meeting will involve sporting organisations which include the GAA, FAI, Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU) and the Federation of Irish Sport.

    A separate meeting will be held with the broadcasters of sporting events: RTÉ, TG4, Virgin Media and Sky.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭legendary.xix


    There is a fair balance of games on RTÉ, GAAGO and radio. The 3 for 2 offer is a good deal on GAAGO. There are two weekends of provincial football finals. Any hurling on these weekends are going going to be on GAAGO. In a few weeks it will be football group games on GAAGO like Kerry v Mayo. The hurling provincial finals will be on RTÉ.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,095 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Games being unavailable on TV years ago is not false, just irrelevant. It's no different to saying that we should be glad television was invented.

    The quality of games is determined to an extent by interest in them. Tipperary Cork had 36k at the match, and GAAgo still decided to put it behind a paywall confident it would be purchased. Compare and contrast with Dublin-Westmeath, or Kilkenny-Laois. Let's not be coy and falsely picky about standards. We all privately know which games are more likely to be watchable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,601 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Well that's a red herring and a half. The simple FACT is that there are more games than ever on FTA (and RTE is as close to FTA as you will get anywhere).

    Is the "quality" of music or a movie determined by the interest in them or is it a matter of opinion? Would that match have been a quality match were it completely one sided despite the amount of people at it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,095 ✭✭✭Rosita


    The point about the number of games has been dealt with already. It itself is a discredited red herring. Nobody cares how many games or what the average price is except someone with a particular interest in defending GAAgo.

    I'll leave you to dance on the head of a semantic pin in relation to what "quality" means but suffice it to say that there's a reason Limerick-Clare is televised live and Kerry-Offaly wasn't. Nobody will know the outcome or margin of victory (if you assume that a large margin of victory automatically means poor quality of course,which you appear to be implying) in advance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,008 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Problem for hurling is that in 18 days time there will only be 7 hurling games left for the season not involving Joe McDonagh teams. So now is when hurling needs to be on TV, these are the big games.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,682 ✭✭✭Trampas


    Never watched a game on gaago. A td says something that only means he’ll only get praise from voters I wouldn’t take much notice of it.

    Gaa go gives people the option to watch a game they’d have to wait for a few minutes highlights on the Sunday game.

    Can win in situation like this



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,601 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    You can't discredit a point based on a fact, just blur the lines.

    Ultimately you'll be more pissed off if it's your county that ends up behind a subscription service versus someone else and the perceived quality of the match really doesn't come into it.

    The fact that match would most likely not have been broadcast a number of years ago in any event doesn't come into the equation as people just want what will suit them.

    I provided a simple solution a few posts back no matter what your view point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,064 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    What is relevant, is that the channels are still public service, and not just for sport. Games are being played on Saturdays and well as Sundays. A game starting at 7 pm on Saturday uses up a big chunk of viewing time which non sports types would be used to having. And that would have been two Saturdays in a row, if RTE had diverted their output to Clare Limerick and Cork Tipp.

    RTE 2 has set aside a big time slot for rugby on Saturday, in direct competition to Waterford Clare throw in 6 pm on GAAGO. I can see even more outrage about the "national game" being sidelined for a foreign game on TV.

    16:45 URC Live

    Leinster v Munster (Kick-off 5.30pm). Coverage of the semi-final which comes from Aviva Stadium, as the teams battle if out for a place in the showpiece match on May 27



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,264 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    But is it growing that rapidly or are broadcasters and sports organizations countering it by stemming it with good value online offerings ?

    The arrival of platforms like Spotify and YouTube Music legitimized the online music consumption industry.

    Now TV is doing the same for the sports carried by Sky and BT.

    I used to hunt high and low for free online streams of soccer, NFL, baseball etc.

    Now I just get a Now TV sub for a month with a code I find on the Bargain Alerts thread.

    And even though I have a Sky box I have not bought a sports package through it in over two years.

    GAA Go offers good value for money if you want to watch as many games as you can on it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭YabaDabaDooley


    So another rugby game on that RTE Radio will spend a lot of time covering this Saturday evening. Last Saturday i waited until 20 minutes into the Dublin v Wexford game for RTE Sport to give the first update from Croke Park as there was a rugby game on. It lasted only a few minutes before back to the rugby. I turned it off soon after. I will not listen to RTE Sport this Saturday evening but tune into Clare FM or Waterford FM for uninterupted coverage of the game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,095 ✭✭✭Rosita


    There are plenty of people who like watching hurling matches involving counties other than their own. And Tipperary-Cork, Limerick-Clare (as far back as 1995 & 1996) championship games have been broadcast many times in the past. There is no question that GAAgo is giving people something that was never available before in respect of those games. If the want to do that why not televise Galway-Westmeath?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,696 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Everybody that has access to RTE currently already has the equipment required to watch all RTE channels. The Saorview box that everyone was given a few years ago allows for this. That box, and the pre existing Sky/VM boxes, allow everyone to just wake up one day and have an extra channel available to view, without even needing to ask for it.

    There is no extra equipment required. The hypothetical channel is already live, you just need to 'unlock' your access to view it.

    Every body already received all the current RTE Sport for free (well, apart from the one time TV licence fee). So that tells me that RTE are content enough to give it away 'for free'. This new GAA GO stuff has added a Pay Per View elementary to it. RTE getting €5 per month extra per account is only a bonus to them on top of what we already pay in licence fees and what they already earn in advertising revenue. And it's probably more money than they would make fron GAA GO in the couple months that GAA is actually in action.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,696 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Games not been shown live 30 years ago should be irrelevant as to the number of games that could/should be shown live today.

    There was probably only enough equipment in the country for one or two live broadcast set ups at the time.

    That's not the case any more, there is so much more capability and opportunities because of the advantage of technology. Just because games were shown in black and white at one stage doesn't mean they still have to be shown in black and white now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Of course but all these matches to be televised/ recorded need to be staffed and people paid etc.

    Stick them all behind a pay wall and then people can choose with their pockets if they're worth it.

    If something has value, then punters should be prepared to pay for it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,696 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    They are not worth it under the current guise IMO. Too many problems with internet, buffering and accessibility.

    And I say that as a 'young' person who is perfectly capable at utilizing the technology and content to use similar services for other sports.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,308 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    Picture quality is not great. I've used the catch up service many times. Not the live. I'd imagine the live can't be much better.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,737 ✭✭✭shmeee


    Tipp and Cork had 36k at it because both teams came out of the blocks strong this year and people wanted to go to the game. That's the simple answer. Must have been over 10k more than when both teams meet last year in the Munster Championship. GaaGo games are decided months beforehand (Dec 2022), so no one knew how many were going to be at the game early on in the year when the GaaGo schedule was released so your point makes zero sense.

    This game would have been on Sky on a Saturday evening in the package and not on FTA no matter how much of a "quality" game it was. Due to provisional finals getting the Sunday slot.



Advertisement