Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What’s the obstacle against downing illegally flown drones?

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 51 ✭✭mrmanor


    Heathrow has anti drone technology, and it works wonders. Dublin, and the government need to sort it out. There are options… it’s just up to the government/ DAA to research and invest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 344 ✭✭IQO






  • He’s quite right. Approved legalised Technology is the only solution. Disgruntled blow-ins to Swords etc are a major part of problem. Of an aircraft crashed upon them (destroying house but all survivors) because of this activity it would be nemesis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Went searching for recent London UK drone incidents and can't find any. I wonder are they suppressing the reporting of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,002 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    As they have the tech to bring down any illegal drones and anyone thinking about trying to fly a drone knows this, plus the potential for lengthy prison stays then why would there be a need to "suppress reporting of them?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,002 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    If that's the case then they're playing a very dangerous game, I hope the Gardai get extra resources to track down these psychopaths..

    With the potential of massive loss of life as well as the closure of vital national infrastructure it makes you wonder why Eamonn Ryan is sitting on his hands doing nothing about this...

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭Tippman24


    All Eamonn Ryan wants to do is to announce the closure of Dublin Airport and its conversion to a giant cycle path. Buildings to be converted to hostels for refugees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,002 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Yet himself and his merry group of environmentally friendly Greens are jetting off around the world this coming St. Patrick's week, generating 11 tonnes of Greenhouse gasses, but it's fine cos the Irish taxpayer will offset all the pollution by paying more taxes...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,437 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Michael O'Leary gave Ryan some roasting on Morning Ireland. Worth a listen for comedic value alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,002 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    I thought this was good: "If there was a cycle lane blocked in Ranelagh, Ryan would be all over it..."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,437 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,175 ✭✭✭screamer


    What better way to reduce the carbon footprint, drones disrupting flights. Now if Ryanair would just refuse to fly into and out of Dublin, bingo, a Green Party dream come true. Nothing will be done about this, like so many other issues…….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    And then when they jam them

    They'll evolve and have anti-jamming technology



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,569 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    It'll be some craic if Biden's plane was forced to circle on his upcoming visit. Red faces all round.

    Doesn't matter if some 'little peoples' travel plans are affects, shur twill be grand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    Long prison sentences is the obvious deterrent

    Might only catch the 1% but the risk of a checkpoint works similarly



  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭plasterman


    Is there anything actually known about these drones save for the one person apprehended so far?

    I haven't heard any specifics. The restriction is 5 kilometres. How far away can DAA's detection system see the drones? Is there any chance this is due to increased surveillance detecting drones that have been flying in a similar fashion for years and not necessarily due to an increase in drone activity? Or is it definitely the case that some people are deliberately breaching the airport perimeter with this outcome in mind?

    It's a problem either way but the latter case is a huge safety threat requiring immediate action whereas the former requires further analysis to see if there is actually a real safety risk. A technical breach of the 5km limit is still a problem but mainly for the culprit who'll be caught doing it and it's not necessarily a safety threat. I expect it is the latter I'm just curious due to the lack of details provided.

    As to the identity of the drone operators I expect it's just idiots who think it's great fun to disrupt an airport, if it's deliberate. I doubt if it's climate activists or noise protesters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,948 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Don’t always agree with MOL but he’s right.

    Arrest, convict and sentence… set someone up with an appropriate sentence . If it’s a little 23 year old geek, no priors, so be it…This is too dangerous just to have the government and associated organisations just pay the problem occasional lip service, via signs, advertising and other media.

    gloves need to be taken off. These geek morons need sorting out. No regard, or respect is being paid towards the flying public, or their safety, so any volume of respect enabled to them can be forgotten about.

    they know the rules, know what they are at, they know the risks, dangers, facilitate them to forfeit their freedoms if they don’t facilitate respect the safety of others…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,569 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Knowing our judiciary, probably get a telling off not to be naughty again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 404 ✭✭NH2013



    Last week ATC reported that the drone was flying past the tower windows so I'd tend to believe it's a deliberate attempt to interfere with the airport operation. Surely after an aircraft being forced into declaring a fuel emergency yesterday they'll have to take more action than simply reminding people that it's illegal to fly within 5km of the airport. Safety is being compromised by this criminal and yesterday's fuel MAYDAY just highlights the level of risk this criminal is exposing the flying public to.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭Get Real


    O'Leary is right. Its simply a case of funding anti drone technology and doing it now.

    I said on this thread about a month ago and it's as clear as day. Theres simply politics in the background over who pays for it.

    The Daa want the govt to pay and the department want the Daa to pay from their own funds. Its a clear as day.

    Rte reporting the DAA write to govt seeking funding and have received no response.

    The rest, strong words, talking about punishment is pure fluff. If the drone system was in, it'd nip the issue in the bud and the legislation would almost be irrelevant.

    Theres two before the courts for flying drones over the airport. Nothing to stop them continuing, copycat incidents or a group of irritated residents doing it on rotation every week, so it's all pretty pointless. Legislation can't account for human behaviour and disregard.

    This nonsense of discussing it and wasting time has to stop. Anti drone technology, done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 45 padraig47


    eamonn Ryan is a spoofer. He is not ministerial material. MOL is bang on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Correct.

    We are into negligence and/or incompetence territory at this stage.

    Having the controlled airspace of our major Airports free from illegal obstruction, is as vital for the economy and the image of the State among investors, as would be mains water supply, power supply with plenty of redundancy and reliable broadband.

    And recent Governments in general and this Minister in particular, have a pretty poor record in securing all of those.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,948 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    1000% one of the least credible humans to be elected to public office. Anywhere..

    More of these fûcking drone dweebs and nerds, think it’s ok to use these drones in a dangerous and illegal manner, ie. tonight, fly it into United Park in Drogheda with a few thousand spectators, players and officials….this has happened multiple times just there …

    the FAI now have a ‘Drone Interference Protocol’ which I’m sure the little dweebs are delighted about, the twerps get.. attention, recognition and influence in a sports event. ie. them stopping it and having people sit down to develop a protocol….which involves players leaving the field of play.

    Going to be a thing where I’d say people will invest in affordable anti drone tech… too many of these useless as fûck geeks out there with nothing better to do then to court attention, by disrupting and endangering people…flying and in public spaces.





  • Wait til personal electric VTOL aircraft become affordable, there will be any number of idiots flying them unless they are strictly regulated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I doubt very much that it's simple , welding a a high powered jamming device , at the perimeter of the busiest airport in the land could not be simple , realistically if the DAA wanted it sorted immediately then they'd be a long way down that route ...

    I'd rather a minister or an airline boss with feic all knowledge of drones and their exclusion from certain areas to keep stum

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,175 ✭✭✭screamer


    I think the best punishment for the drone operators is a lifetime ban from every commercial airline. That’s keep them grounded. However as I said nothing will be done a case of here too short and there too long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    What are the US doing re drones ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,876 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    on the recent disruption - many groups are absolutely furious with dublin airport for various reasons - my guess is this isn’t going away any time soon



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,876 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Simplistic stuff. There is no issue with aviation once it cleans up and is carbon neutral.

    Until then, of course the greens will be sceptical of the “aero sexual” community who seem to just want to see the “big birds” fly regardless of rocketing cO2 levels not seen in literally millions of years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭walterking


    Easy solution

    Ryanair and any other airline that had to divert aircraft simply sue any drone operator caught.

    All you need is a couple of cases, a large headline cash figure and MOL swearing that he will collect from the person at some point even if it means taking any inheritance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21 CharlieDickens


    Was there another incident ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,948 ✭✭✭✭Strumms






  • With Eamon Ryan at the helm we can be sure Dublin Airport won’t function well. He’s already delighted at lack of further parking, if he could cancel the planes flying that would be the ultimate goal.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,948 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    In fairness, his tenure as minister for transport has been a disaster .. completely out of his depth with such a diverse and imperative portfolio…. Shît decision making by MM & Leo… one wonders was Ryan and the Greens being set up to fail…. That’s no good for the Irish taxpayer …I’d say it’s a melt for Ryan too, his own crowd won’t want him enabling activities that promote air travel, but he can’t be seen to decry it either…

    hes been none to proactive on this drone stuff… almost wonder if he’s enjoying it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    The Italians are banning short haul flights

    Is that true about ryan getting a lift and cycling through the dail gates !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,742 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    There's no problem banning short haul flights if you have a decent high-speed rail system.

    We instead subsidise flights to Kerry (which has a mainline rail line going right past the airport, but a slow service) and Donegal which has no rail and very poor road links.

    There was a small private airstrip built near Clifden which has never been used, I wonder if its backers had been hoping to get a PSO route?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,282 ✭✭✭p_haugh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    That mentions - safely landing the drones , not frying their electronics and just crashing them ,

    Would the anti-drone device need to be between the drone and its operator ?

    Certain devices can also locate the position of the operator ( to what accuracy i dont know , ) but i doubt that there'll be a garda on hand to go rushing to the general area looking for a guy who might have a drone controller ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,742 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Would the anti-drone device need to be between the drone and its operator ?

    Not if it's powerful enough to drown out the operator's transmitter.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Gravity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,731 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That was built by the state, with the intention of flights to Inishboffin (which also got a strip built). They were built in ~2011, the proposal for flights ended with the financial crash and is very unlikely to come back. Aer Arran Islands have been paid to keep the runways in usable condition, at least in the past - not sure about now.

    70s plans that lead to Donegal and Kerry airports being built included two more airports in Donegal, one out towards Killybegs and one at Letterkenny, the Letterkenny plans only died in the 00s.

    Donegal Airport was there for nearly 20 years before it actually got the PSO flights to Dublin; it had commercial UK flights for over a decade before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,742 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    For some reason I always thought it was some businessman's folly, no, just the usual marriage of Eamon O'Cuiv, taxpayers' money, a wall, and zero return (although no doubt some fools gave him a vote over it).

    Scrap the cap!



Advertisement