Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

Options
1292293295297298315

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Donbas never had a chance, or a choice. Polls showed that while they wanted more independence from Kyiv, they didn't want to be Russian. And that's with heavy Russian meddling for years and years prior. Doesn't matter, Putin took a fringe separatist movement and used them as the cover to invade Eastern Ukraine with Russian troops and hardware.

    Fringe left wing and right wing nuts are never people to listen to on any conflict, let alone Putin's long-planned take-over of Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Serious reports of militia breaking through the Russian border and taken over a village towards Belgorod.

    videos of people fleeing the city. Some turn of events even if short lived.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,454 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    ##Mod Note##

    Thread ban lifted following discussion



  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭DonegalBay


    I may be pessimistic as I cannot see the Ukrainians pushing the Russians out with this counter-offensive, so this is my humble peace plan.

    1. Russia to withdraw completely from Ukraine, but Crimea to be ceded to Russia.

    2. Donbas/ Luhansk to remain part of Ukraine as autonomous regions like in Spain or Trentino/Alto Adige, but under UN supervision. Russian to be recognised as an official language in these regions, bi-lingual signs, etc as well as recognition as a minority language in all of Ukraine.

    3. Independently supervised referendums to be held after a 20 year cooling off period on A/ Status of Donbas/Luhansk as part of Ukraine or Russia B/Ascension of Ukraine to NATO. Both referendums to be held simultaneously and one cannot pass without the other. If Donbas/Luhansk joins Russia, Ukraine joins NATO. Otherwise status quo remains. The timeframe may be changed if stability returns quicker.

    4. Any further encroachment by Russia onto Ukranian territory to result in NATO intervention.

    5. Russia to have no objections to Ukraine joining the EU.

    Some of this may be pie in the sky to some, but I feel it is a realistic starting frame in which both sides get/lose something. Let the criticism begin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,843 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Russia isn't interested in peace but may not have a choice now. Seems as though they have lost significant soldiers and equipment in the flood. I doubt that they are even interested in holding the occupied areas now given the scale of the disaster that they have caused, they might not even want Crimea anymore. They might just pull out now rather than deal with the mess they made. They have fucked up on a level nobody thought possible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭DonegalBay


    Such incisive analysis there. Any actual insight as to why it is a comical plan? Neither side would entertain it or what?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Absolutely not ,the Ukrainans are taking it all back ,donesk and lughansk,and Crimea,the only Way there Will peace is the mass slaughter of the Russian forces inside ukraine and the return of all occupied territories, Russia has zero veto over who and who can't join the eu or anything else,not that ukraine will be joining the eu anytime soon,it's at least another decade+ away and that's only if they completely satisfy all of the criteria set out by the Eu for membership,Nato membership is the same they can apply to join Nato but there is zero guarantees that they will actually get accepted by all other states ,



  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭DonegalBay


    And if the Ukrainian counter-offensive does not succeed in ousting the Russians, then what?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Look at the damage Ukraine has already done to the second biggest and second best army in the world, with a thrown together military that barely existed 9 years ago when Russia first invaded,now they have several armored divisions equipped with modern Western tanks and IFVs and another armored vehicles, along with Nato providing the training and reorganization of tens of thousands of Ukrainans soldiers while providing 24/7 live Intelligence,it took tens of thousands of Russian 9 months to take the town of bakhmut from Ukraine,

    There's not a chance Ukraines counter offensive won't achieve it's goals ,



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Those are bold claims about there being "no chance" Ukraine doesn't achieve its goals cos firstly, and importantly, we don't KNOW anything about the counter offensive: not Its starting point, its aims, its constituent forces - only that there's one happening "soon". While Ukraine's army is now leagues ahead of the Russian one thanks to equipment given by Western allies, as the financial saying goes, past success does not indicate future outcomes. Russia has had time to prepare, consolidate; they should be more ready, even if their logistics are now arguably worse than the last big offensive.

    Russia's destruction of the dam could be a distraction to stall the start of this offensive; or some attempt to stymy its coalescence; maybe it's a last ditch attempt to hobble Ukrainian infrastructure knowing the Russians are about to get trampled and retreat inevtiable. Either way, I'd be slow to predict total success for Ukraine. By all account though: they HAVE to succeed cos the world is watching and with all those demonstrably superior vehicles Kyiv is expected to make gains here. If support is to continue then there needs to be a sign the pendulum is swinging in one, clear, direction



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    My question is what happens to western support if Ukraines counteroffensive doesn’t succeed.

    US intelligence is now pointing at Ukraine having blown up the nord stream pipeline, what’s to say they aren’t also equally responsible for the dam? Although the Americans are also saying they have intelligence that the Russians blew up the dam. It’s a **** show on all sides as of now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    would the ukrainians cause that much suffering to their own people? highly unlikely



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Probably not but at the end of the day, how much do we really know?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,660 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, the dam was built by the Soviets in cold war times when nuclear war was not far from everyone's mind. It is almost certain it was mined in that time.

    The Russians were in control of it when it exploded, which would point to a Russian act, as they have made the river impassable for tanks and such vehicles. That would suggest a Russian bomb within the dam.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I can't squeeze out a credible narrative that would explain Ukraine destroying its own dam; not without indulging in some serious Conspiratorial Thinking that amounts to a "false flag" attack ... and you'd have to imagine that causing widespread suffering and damage to hundreds of square KMs of the country would be more of an own-goal than some kind of Machiavellian subterfuge - all to achieve <insert end-result here>??? Whereas Russia blowing up a dam in its own territory, knowing the suffering it'd cause to Ukraine downstream, plus given attacking civilians is already their modus operandi? Well that does pass the Smell Test. As Sam also points out, the breaking of the dam will have made the river harder to pass for heavy equipment.

    As to the Wester Support: if the counter offensive doesn't achieve its goals (and you can be damn sure Kyiv will let its allies know what the intent will be before the tanks are sent off), Zelensky will need to do another round of public meetings and general "your continued support is valued; please give us jets". But then this is probably why they've been very public about delaying this offensive 'til every needed battalion is trained & up to speed with the various equipment being delivered. All those tanks and APCs will be like gold dust, even if they're technically superior to what Russia is bringing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭Field east


    “——- thanks to equipment given by western allies ———- “. Why are we always / constantly referring to the outside assistance that UKr Receives and not a syllable about the outside assistance that Ru receives eg drones from Iran. God only knows what it is getting from NK, China , etc



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Because Ukraine's continued existence is down to a supply of arms it cannot create for itself; at first it was reliant on Russian equipment some of it Soviet era, ensuring a level playing field of sorts. The ramp of supply from Western nations is noteworthy and worth remarking upon however because the equipment is both modern, and by many accounts, superior to what Russia can offer in response. Russian outlets gleefully declared leopard 2s had been destroyed in that supposed rebuttal of a Ukrainian advance around Bakhmut - though this is disputed by online sleuths. Russia specified the Leopards because of their reputation as a higher class of tank.

    Why don't we bring up the Russian dependence on outside supplies? Well, we do and it is. Russia's use of Iranian drones has been noted and publicised about in the press so it's known just how desperate Moscow has become to keep its war machine going. Indeed it's a sign sanctions are working that a country that should be able to maintain a war footing, can't.

    But in terms of what this segue revolves around - the borderline mythic counter offensive everyone's waiting for - the delay has been precisely because Kyiv is waiting for all the promised munitions, equipment and training up of the battalions who'll use them. Zelensky has literally travelled the globe to negotiate the supply of these weapons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭Field east


    To date, nobody has reported on seeing or hearing anything in relation to the destruction of the dam. Ukr were of the opinion for a few months that the Ru had mined it or /and could trigger a bomb already in place remotely when an opportune time presented itself. So why did not UKr have the place under 24/ 7 survailance by CCTV or whatever from its side of the dividing line ?

    So up till now nobody has reported hearing or seeing anything.

    It’s of interest how the attack on theKersh bridge was captured on camera



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Who can say? Probably because there was no reason to believe the dam was under threat. Or indeed that the Russians were that maniacally intent on having the local population turn against them. It's still unclear how many have been affected on the Russian side; this has been a particularly sudden and extreme scenario, I can't imagine it was expected by any sober assessment on Russian mindsets.

    Though if indeed it has made traversal of the river impossible for heavy equipment - that has effectively blocked off Kherson as a potential counter offensive target - so maybe that was the simple explanation for the destruction. Which in turn would suggest a panic in Russia's thinking that it's taking such drastic action that it might sabotage not just Ukrainian infrastructure - but russian too.

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 416 ✭✭jonnreeks


    When you look at the war in Ukraine, where do most people get their information, RTE, BBC, SKY news?

    Or do you go to Youtube, just curious to understand how people form their opinions if everything we see is based on the same neews services!



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    OSINT, broad range of European outlets, some US outlets, UK broadsheets, independents and even a bevy of Russian military bloggers and telegram groups - if you want to really want to get into it and a broad corroborated picture (and trim out the propaganda)

    Otherwise a mix of RTE, BBC, Guardian are not bad either, they haven't got much wrong so far. Surprisingly intelligence services (e.g. US and UK) have been quite accurate during this entire war and build-up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,444 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well if the worst comes to the worst, and Putin is not completely defeated, and it has to be 100% defeat, then prepare for Ukraine mk2 down the road. Putin has to be stopped permanently for the Terrorism he is responsible for to be stopped. No matter the cost, it will have to be paid or else be prepared to pay higher costs down the road. Unfortunate but true.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,444 ✭✭✭jmreire


    What we do know is that its an accepted fact that it would take explosives to breach that dam. One or two missiles would not do it, as it was designed to withstand a nuclear strike, and for success the explosives would have to be placed inside the structure. In Oct 2022, Zelensky warned the world that the Russians had placed explosives on the dam. Entirely possible, because the Russians controlled that area then, as they do now also. On the morning of the explosion Norsar, the Norwegian Seismic monitoring centre recorded explosions from the site at 02:45. The dam collapsed shortly afterwards. A US Spy Sat also recorded the explosions. Ukrainians recorded a conversation between two Russians discussing the dam destruction. One suggests the Ukrainians themselves did it, but the other one corrects him saying " No, it was our guys, We have a saboteur group working there, and they did it. Since the start of this war Bear, Russia has a horrendous record of destroying civilian infrastructure, this is just more of the same.

    So, if it walks like a Duck, Quack's like a Duck, its as Duck. Russia did it, End of story.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,444 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Plus to evade sanction's Iranian/ Chinese + Others supplies to Russia are pretty much shrouded in secrecy. What's not in dispute is the fact that they are supplying weapons to the Russians. The qty's and times are something else though



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Ukrainian and Russian sources confirming a few villages have been taken back by the Ukrainians.

    Train line in crimea also blown up so it seems there’s no longer a connection between mainland Russia via crimea into Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    With friends like these? An article that geopolitically, asks if perhaps some in Moscow are recreating the "are we the baddies?" sketch from That Mitchel & Webb Look.

    Arguably, we have past Ukraine MK2 and are in MK3 already given 2014 was supposed to be an end to it. Suddenly 2022 rolls around, we had another flimsy pretext from Moscow - only this time Ukraine had had enough, as had the West.

    If Ukraine doesn't prevail this time around then it basically validates any Russo-nationalist who believes the dissolution of the USSR or prior was a bad idea. And at this stage the only long term goal Russia can hope for is waning support from the US/EU, and or a Trump 2024 win.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,444 ✭✭✭jmreire


    You could go back even further if you wanted to timeline Putins madness if you wanted to, and in fact when he didn't have to pay much of a price for his previous wrong doing, actually encouraged him to invade Ukraine. But if it paved the way for the invasion, it also paved the way for his downfall, because this time he had bitten off more than he could chew, and hopefully his end will happen in the not to distant future.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Well this is it, yes: you got instances like South Ossetia et al, where Putin chipped and poked and prodded at the margins, to see what and how much he could get away with across the former USSR states. By and large countries West of Ukraine didn't care. He has been pretty open about how the dissolution of the USSR was a mistake - Ukraine's independence in particular seen as a mistake - and has formally written to this effect. One would be curious about what Putin thought would happen when he ordered the invasion into Ukraine.

    I'm guessing the intent was a lightning attack - a Blitzkrieg if you will, given Russians remains obsessed with WW2 - so fast and effective Western governments would have been napping while Kyiv fell. We know units packed dress uniforms for the presumed parade down Kyiv's boulevards, so it doesn't seem too wild a thought. Kyiv didn't fall, the Western mood quickly turned to outright anger, and thus began the Sunk Cost. Putin balls'ed up the first months so badly it gave Europe - noted foot-dragger that we are - time to assess and arm Ukraine to the teeth. The situation became so unique it caused a historical, transformative change in Germany's approach to its very robust arms industry (albeit again, kicking and screaming all the way, but there's a reason Moscow has been quick to think it downed some Leopards. "German engineering" 'n all that). If you roused Germany into a front-foot strategy, you fúcked up.

    Problem is, whilst I think we'd cheer at Putin's downfall, I've said before the worry is the person who replaces him. Putin's Russia has basically expunged itself of any cool heads or moderates, with Ultra-nationalists and people not that distant from Putin's own mindset now the default individuals in positions of authority. While I would suspect Putin V2 would quickly try to claw back some international reputation and roll back sanctions - their medium-term goal would probably be that of Putin's: restore the USSR and the borders of "historical Russia".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    I typically check the headlines on RTE, BBC and Reuters.

    For more up to date and in-depth stuff I check Twitter. Be warned with Twitter though that it's only going to be as good as whoever you follow. Basically if you want to follow people who don't care about verifiable facts and cheerlead for one side or the other - the place is infested with them. It's very easy therefore to get yourself into an echo-chamber that isn't based on anything apart from various people eagerly repeating a bunch of lies that they all want to be true.

    I don't mind sources having an obviously pro-Ukrainian stance, just so long as they're giving me news that is based on actual evidence. Now in some cases that evidence will be things that they have learned on Telegram (which is the main source used by both Russians and Ukranians). You won't have any way to know if that is true or not so the best thing is to see if accounts like that have a good track record (the stuff on Telegram gets verified eventually). Tendar is a good example of an account like that that has a good track record of accuracy.



Advertisement