Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Private to Public sector: Salary

1235»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,257 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko






  • Time spent within the public service = added experience and knowledge of the role. Newbies always require training in, no matter how elevated a notion they have of themselves. People imagine public service = easy job. It’s a different beast on the inside than visualised by outsiders. You work your way up through knowledge gains specific to public service roles. If you want a chunk of big money given to you with taxed benefits in kind, stay in the private sector.





  • Outside vendors have let down the public sector I worked in, was up to in house staff of mainly bottom grade to unravel a mess of a new computer system. The very experienced staff did a terrific job of this having known how the system should be adopted and developed, their years of experience in the role is testimony of how a success was made of the system. Newer recruits just didn’t have the old system sufficiently in muscle memory to assist as well in the adaption. The experienced were worth their higher pay scale.





  • As another poster or two pointed out Public Service is a hugely diverse group of roles. Missing out on experienced people? Well if you are working in the Public Sector does this not mean you can’t become experienced there? Or is it your idea that every single person in a public service time ought to be experienced. There are plenty of people in the private sector building up experience. At the end of the day your argument doesn’t really make sense.





  • And there’s equally be no private sector without public sector infrastructure and services.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭spuddy


    The point OP makes is a good one, it's fair to pay people in line with with their experience, whether that comes from within the public, or private sector. It's clear that there is a disincentive for private sector employees to join the public service as-is, which ultimately isn't good for the public service either as diversity of experience will make for a better outcomes. It sounds like a simple enough change to make too; make the exceptional process whereby a candidate can join at a higher point on the scale, with the appropriate justification, become the standard practice for all hires.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,257 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    And presumably every existing public sector employee, who has past experience, public or private, of value to their relevant role can apply to the same process and make a justification for their salary increase, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭Daith


    I don't get this. Most private sector orgs will expect you to name your salary expectations and justify or negotiate it.

    Admittedly places that doesn't even give you a guide as to the salary range is annoying, but there's no difference between a public sector employee interviewing and a private sector employee interviewing in this case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,257 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I was referring to the existing public sector staff who came in under the current restricted regime. If you’re going to give outsiders the opportunity to be paid based on experience, you need to give the same opportunity to insiders too, in fairness.



  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭Educate


    Public sector here. Worked private for a bit before entering public sector. The time I worked in private sector in the same job role was taken into account, so I didn't start on point 1 of the scale. When I go up a scale now, it's based on when I first started working in the same job role / title in the private sector, and not on when I first started in the public sector.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭Daith


    Sure why not. It could benefit lots of people if existing public servants are treated the same as new entrants to the public service



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭spuddy


    Absolutely, although isn't that already the case? The point the OP makes is that there is an in-built disincentive in the public sector hiring process for people with experience from the private sector. Those individuals will not have accrued points on the scale, and will be offered a starting salary lower than those with public sector experience, who are being paid for their experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,257 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,508 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    The solution is to apply for roles that are at a grade that match your private sector experience and salary. You might usually have to start at the lowest level in a particular grade but you don't have to start at the lowest grade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,448 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The OP said even the top of scale was also a disincentive. Which means he should be looking at roles at the next grade.

    Starting in the middle of grade is irrelevant in that context.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭DubCount


    External candidates to senior public sector jobs dont stand a chance, as there is always a bias to pick senior managers who are coming from existing public sector roles. This means the only available roles to outsiders tend to be at lower levels. Private sector workers at senior levels either need to join at point 1 of a lower level scale, or stay in the private sector. I think the civil service would benefit from some external experience that might freshen things up, but it is not going to happen. As with OP, after you climb the ranks in the private sector, public sector careers are just not an option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,257 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    That’s not my experience, with a fair selection of people who’ve joined at PO or higher level from private sector roles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,266 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    This is one of the greatest challenges in PS recruitment imo. To match private sector experience and salary (or come close enough to make the paycut reasonable when the other benefits of public sector work) for technical roles, you have to look at Grade VII or Grade VIII roles and these are almost exclusively senior management positions. As Flinty pointed out (correctly imo) in this thread, great technical staff can often make very poor managers (and frequently have no interest in such work).

    I've seen some moves towards adressing this within some engineering and IS Analyst / Developer roles in Local Authorities but only so far that it might help attract a recent graduate with a 3-5 years experience to stay for a few years (40k - 60k range, i.e. approximately half what a senior technical resource could expect for equivalent positions in the private sector). That level of paycut might be worthwhile if your family happened to have land you could get a parcel of approved for building a house on near a rural council but for Dublin/Cork/Galway it'd be consigning yourself to never being able to buy your own home unless you were already independently wealthy (or partnered to someone with a much higher salary)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,448 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I disagree. I think a good external with recent certifications and qualification is likely to have an advantage in getting a role, (at least in IT) an internal candidate is likely to have been siloed in a legacy system or area. However the recruitment process and business culture is different and you'd have prep for that differently than private sector interviews etc. Qualifications are important, at least to get past HR.

    In the places I've had experience of, a lot of roles maybe 40% or more at all levels are filled people coming from the private sector. I don't know if thats a outlier. I think they are bouncing through to tick that box on their CV. Age profile across public sector means a lot are retiring and leaving. Lots of Jobs on Public Jobs site.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,142 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I think the distinction between 'public sector' and the 'civil service' is very important here.

    If you're a physiotherapist working in the Beacon and you go for a job in a HSE hospital, it's no big deal. Or an IT admin, or a HR specialist.

    I cannot conceive of any job in the private sector that would qualify you as an EO or AP in the civil service.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭Daith


    I think the last sentence is very funny when you consider the history of the Civil Service outsourcing to private consultants.

    On your other point, would you concede that certain roles, like IT, may not require previous experience in the Civil Service and therefore having to start at the first point on the scale should be reviewed?



Advertisement