Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
17827837857877881190

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    But it is a relentless complaining about the non selection of players who are peripheral at best and not nearly good enough at worst.

    It is not an objective discussion of the rights and wrongs of squad selection.

    And at the heart of it all is an unshakeable conviction that Munster players, and only Munster, are not getting a fair shake by dint of being from Munster.

    Abuse is a emotive word fair enough but equally this is not fair comment and it is not fair criticism.

    Post edited by Former Former Former on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But it is a relentless complaining about the non selection of players who are peripheral at best and not nearly good enough at worst.

    I think it's fair to say the average person who posts here in the off season is a big rugby fan. In that context, peripheral and minor decisions are always going to be discussed here.

    And the complaining has only seemed relentless because the defending has been equally relentless.

    And at the heart of it all is an unshakeable conviction that Munster players, and only Munster, are not getting a fair shake by dint of being from Munster.

    If there are posters claiming Kleyn isn't getting a fair shake by dint of being from Munster, they're in a minority.

    The majority are saying he isn't getting a fair shake because they think he's better than Treadwell, or McCarthy etc. (Tbh, he's been in better form than Henderson this season too).

    The dismissiveness that's being met with, even tho imo it's a very credible argument, is heightening things as much as the pro-Kleyn side are.

    It is not an objective discussion of the rights and wrongs of squad selection.

    Maybe I'm not entirely objective when it comes to Kleyn. But I'll always trying and explain my reasoning. But equally would you say a comment like the following is objective or helps the discussion? (Bearing in mind this is the 3rd time I'll have flagged this to you):

    Funny no Munster fan ever wants to debate Munster guy vs Ulster guy. Only ever Munster v Leinster

    Plenty of Munster fans on here have mentioned Treadwell. I think that's a grossly unfair characterisation and doesn't really help things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,531 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    England should call up Haley. That would complete things here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I think that's a grossly unfair characterisation and doesn't really help things.

    It's a characterisation borne of more than the Kleyn v Treadwell v McCarthy debate. If you'd like me to elaborate, I will, but I really don't think that will help things.

    The dismissiveness that's being met with, even tho imo it's a very credible argument, is heightening things as much as the pro-Kleyn side are.

    "Jean Kleyn was unlucky to miss out" is perhaps a credible argument. I don't agree with it, but it's not outlandish. I couldn't give a shyte which of Kleyn or Treadwell is in the squad, neither were ever going to be a big part of our RWC.

    However, today's argument is "Kleyn has been called up by SA and this proves Farrell (note, always Farrell, never POC) got it wrong, it'll bite us in the ass etc". That is not credible. Nothing has changed since yesterday, nothing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    It's hard to take your posts seriously when you are so imprecise with language.

    "Funny no Munster fan ever wants to debate Munster guy vs Ulster guy. Only ever Munster v Leinster"

    This is an objectively incorrect statement. Aloooof was the first person to bring up Treadwell's name after the news broke about Kleyn. You then backtracked with claims of the statement being "borne of more than the Kleyn v Treadwell v McCarthy debate", but whatever about the broader conversation, that statement was simply not justified by the available evidence.

    And before that, you claimed Irish coaches were getting "abuse" for not picking Kleyn, which again, is a statement so objectively incorrect that you eventually (and to your credit) backtracked on.

    Loose inflammatory language like this is always going to draw a reaction, and ironically, it's a huge reason for the "pages and pages" of what you call criticism.

    It's also simply a matter of statistical probability that most selection arguments will involve player X and a Leinster incumbent. It's nothing personal, it's a cost you bear for such a productive academy system.

    The Irish coaches are excellent, we are blessed to have them, they have us playing the best rugby I've ever seen an Irish team play, and I'm more confident than I've ever been that Ireland might win a RWC (or at least get to a semi final). I doubt there is a Munster fan who would disagree with a word of what I've just written.

    We are not challenging a single one of those points if we also claim that it's a (rare) mistake on the coaches part to have McCarthy, Treadwell (and arguably) Henderson ahead of Jean Kleyn.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    We are actually missing the best conspiracy theory here.

    The incoming leinster coach picks kleyn to weaken munster rivals over the next couple of years. Get out your tinfoil hats!



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,590 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    You've said I backtracked on two arguments there. I backtracked on neither and I absolutely stand by both. You cannot criticise me for imprecision of language and then also criticise me when I attempt to make it more precise, and not wanting to go further down a rabbit hole of sh1t isn't backtracking.

    Since it's semantics and syntax that seem to matter most, let's look at your last paragraph above. Given all that we have read on this forum over the last few weeks and months about Coombes, Hodnett, Haley, Frisch, Healy and Kleyn, it's hard to take your posts seriously when you can be so imprecise as to use the word "rare" in relation to criticism of the Kleyn non-selection. That statement was simply not justified by the available evidence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Evidence which you failed to present.

    And you stand by readily refutable nonsense? Good to know.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    You want... evidence that there has been a lot of criticism of the non-selection of many more players than Kleyn? Sure thing, click below.

    Now I'm sure you don't personally agree with all of them, of course.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    The problem is, you're conflating duration with frequency.

    There is rare criticism* of the Irish coaches on this site. You list six selection calls over their three-and-a-half-year tenure. I can't think of any other points of discussion outside of that, certainly since 6N 2021 when it all started to click.

    Whether said discussions are resolved (between boards.ie users) in a couple of posts, or "pages and pages" of back and forth, that does not amount to "a lot of criticism". It amounts to infrequent but often lengthy discussion. And probably because we have nothing better to do...

    (And tbh, I'm not comfortable with the term "criticism" in this context. Personally at least, I am some distance from any sense of "disapproval" when I speculate how selection decisions like that over Kleyn may prove to be a mistake in the future...)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I keep on hearing the same adjectives here, e.g. ‘tired’ and ‘lazy’, about a dissenting view on Leinster's repeated failure against one particular team. If anything I would prefer ‘poorly informed’ which I am in fairness. However, I’m afraid we’re going to get the same result again unless the team offers a different challenge.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    It was PART of the losing of the game of a team under pressure that had built a big early lead but was being pounded after that. I got a sinking feeling fairly early on. How many times out of ten would Leinster win against LaR at the moment? More than four? I don’t see it. The result was fair.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Because I think it is a lazy narrative - I’ve clearly given my reasons for why I believe the game was lost, feel free to engage with those if you like.

    This is entirely speculative, and I don’t know what you think it tells you about the Irish team.

    The French National side more closely resembles Toulouse in terms of style of play and composition of players, and Leinster have beaten them (with an average winning margin of 14 points plus) 5 out of the last 6 times they’ve played them. Does that mean France can’t possibly beat Ireland at a RWC?

    Of course it doesn’t.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I couldn't give a shyte which of Kleyn or Treadwell is in the squad, neither were ever going to be a big part of our RWC.

    But again, it’s a rugby forum; the minutiae are going to be discussed.

    If you don’t give a shyte, fair enough, but others might want to discuss it.

    However, today's argument is "Kleyn has been called up by SA and this proves Farrell (note, always Farrell, never POC) got it wrong, it'll bite us in the ass etc". That is not credible. Nothing has changed since yesterday, nothing.

    Something has changed. Kleyn, a player who’s been in very good form and some think has deserved a look in with Ireland, may no longer be available for us.

    With regards POC, Tom made the very good point about Farrell himself doing things very differently than under Joe. Or Rowntree under, Rassie.

    So people say Farrell because ultimately he has the final say; we know who Farrell wanted.

    But whatever influence POC has, and he plumped for Treadwell over Kleyn, I think that’s a mistake too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    You list six selection calls over their three-and-a-half-year tenure.

    Lol, that's an interesting approach. An absolute sh1tstorm of criticism in the last two weeks but sure if you average it out over three and half years, it's not that bad at all at all.

    Come on, there has been a lot of criticism of late, and it was exactly the same in the Six Nations.

    A small number of people are very, very unhappy with the coaches. If you are not one of them, that is great. It is absolutely not universal. Nor should it be, in case I'm accused of trying to shut down debate.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    A small number of people are very, very unhappy with the coaches.

    Has anyone actually said that? Or are you reading that into what has been criticism of individual selection calls?

    Cos the 2 things aren’t the same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭hold my beer




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,631 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    The selection of who is going to be our fifth choice lock is not and never will be a big deal. Just take a moment to realise the hill you've decided to die on is the selection of a fifth choice player.


    I can understand the concerns on not picking specialist 15s or 7s but this Jean Kleyn stuff is pretty laughable. Also is nobody considering that he may have been approached by South Africa months ago and thus excluded himself from Irish selection?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Nope. Nobody ever thought of that...hold on a second.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I can understand the concerns on not picking specialist 15s or 7s but this Jean Kleyn stuff is pretty laughable

    A perfect example of the type of dismissiveness I’ve been talking about.

    Also is nobody considering that he may have been approached by South Africa months ago and thus excluded himself from Irish selection?

    This is speculation until we know any different. But I’ve already addressed this. What we do know is he said the following as recently as January:

    I’m very much, if it happens, it happens. Obviously, I’d be delighted to play for Ireland again and represent the country. It would be massive for me but if it doesn’t happen, it’s just part of life.

    “I’m doing as much as I can here at Munster to put my hand up and at the end of the day, that’s all I can do. I can’t do more than my best. That’s what I feel like I’m putting out there.”

    He’ll also be well aware of how SA selection may affect his Munster career. And we also know he’s someone who has put down roots in Limerick.

    So, tbh, based on what we actually do know, I’d be amazed if he did exclude himself from Irish selection.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Did I say anything about Treadwell? Maybe you're confusing me with somebody else.

    Coombes deserves nothing. A player I'd love to see succeed.

    Doris or Conan (medical condition at the time, which I'm sure are aware of and was still a better 8) are starting 8s.

    Crowely I hoe succeeds. Like the cut of his jib. Still lacking experience but 6 months is a long time.

    Also my comment on insulting me. I see the difference in your posting style between the Ireland and muster threads and your moderation of each.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'll start with this first as it's the most egregious accusation:

    Also my comment on insulting me. I see the difference in your posting style between the Ireland and muster threads and your moderation of each.

    I've yet to see you produce a single post from me where I've insulted your love of Irish rugby. And you won't be able to produce one either. It's absolute rubbish to suggest I have.

    (And a reminder: if you have an issue with a post, report it. I haven't seen you report a single one).

    But onto the rest:

    Did I say anything about Treadwell? Maybe you're confusing me with somebody else.

    Exactly, you haven’t. And that’s exactly who Kleyn is/was competing with. There's a perfectly credibile argument for Kleyn's inclusion, even if you think he is average.

    Coombes deserves nothing.

    Rubbish. He was nominated on the longlist for EPCR player of the year and we still had a poster on here saying he had done nothing in Europe.

    Doris or Conan (medical condition at the time, which I'm sure are aware of and was still a better 8) are starting 8s.

    Yep, absolutely aware that Conan had a medical condition at the time. But here's the thing; he did have a drop in form during that time. something some posters on here still wanted to deny.

    There was a very credible argument for Coombes to get into the 23 ahead of him.

    Crowely I hoe succeeds. Like the cut of his jib. Still lacking experience but 6 months is a long time.

    So you don't think Crowley is average? Progress of a kind...



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Why are all your posts so condescending? You know more about rugby than me?

    Your last "cutting" remark of "progress of sorts". Very snide.

    Also your comment on Treadwell...well it wasn't a point. Exactly? Why bring it in a reply to me? Absolute rubbish.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    When you accuse me of "insulting your love of Irish rugby" when I absolutely haven't, yes, I am going to reply with a bit more vinegar.

    Again, I'm yet to see you produce a single post where I have. Because I haven't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭Former Former Former



    He was nominated on the longlist for EPCR player of the year

    So was Jamie Osborne yet Farrell was lambasted for picking him over Frisch and Haley.

    Edit; to confirm. It's utterly meaningless. But it's utterly meaningless for Coombes too.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    We've had two weeks of constant criticism since the squad was announced, which followed a Grand Slam 6N which was also marked by constant criticism.

    We can't look at thousands of posts accusing Farrell of everything from multiple mistakes at every turn to outright Leinster bias, and still come to the conclusion that everyone thinks he's doing a spiffing job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    So I didn't mention Treadwell?

    Also your condescending replies of my posts is enough proof for me of your questioning my love for irish rugby. It isn't a provisional battle.



Advertisement