Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

EU Biodiversity strategy 2030

15791011

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lots of good stuff on his Twitter account too, results that can't be argued with.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,952 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    From what I can remember, his "Future" section is about making a living by providing a public/environmental good and being paid for it as much as producing food.

    Maybe the Ivory Tower dwellers in Dublin and Brussels read the book and simply assumed that's what we all should do, on all types of land, in all regions, on all farm sizes and structures, etc. And we should do it within the next 5 years.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think there's more confirmation bias in what they read than that unfortunately. It's a while since I read his books, my take away aligned with what I'd like to do with my own place (my own bias I suppose). That livestock can still be farmed, more productively in many ways. Our heritage, a farming heritage is important and can adapt. How & ever, I see the battle as solely down to control, who get's to tell the peasants how it is. That's a large chunk of my objection.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    All kicking off in Europe at the minute, a good sign so far looks like it will have to be scaled back big time if it has any way of passing.

    I think the main way the might get major concessions on this is not for food security or agriculture or the rural communities but more so what this law will mean in terms of renewable energy projects and their green energy transition.

    Designating vast quantities of land and sea as 'strictly protected' meaning sticker regulation than for example the Serengeti national park, good luck trying to get planning for offshore/onshore windfarms, solar farms etc.

    The more you actually think about the knock on effects of this 'Law' the more and more its drives us into the hand of the East - Brazil Russia and China. Food security would have to be farmed out to Brazil, Energy to Russia/Saudis as strict protection measures would mean theses renewable projects would never get even through the planning stage and manufacture to China. Its nearly like the EU are self sabotaging themselves.

    Wonder what our commissioner Mairead McGuinness has to say seeing as she's is a member of the EPP group, personally I suspect it will the same sort of waffle retorick she was coming out with in the Fine Gael tent at the ploughing last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Ten Pin


    Don't forget there's elections in 2024, be wary of MEPs siding with farmers if it's inconsistent with how they voted / spoke on issues up until now.

    Post edited by Ten Pin on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Not really - the EU has already passed a law(last year) allowing fast tracking of renewable energy projects in "go to" areas that will already be accessed as environmentally suitable outside of any restoration law. The industry players against the restoration bill want to be given carte blanch to shoe horn them in where they like, including sensitive peatland sites and marine sites vital for fisheries, seabirds etc. Unfortunately the mis-information being pumped out on these matters could well bite back farmers in marginal areas in a few years when the CAP cake has to stretch much farther to accomodate EU Eastward expansion while the likes of the IFA and Copa Cogeaca ensure that industrial scale operators retain the bulk of their payments at the expense of folk on poorer land who were likely going to see increased payments via CAP to support the aims of the restoration law. Also the EPP are lying about lack of impact assesments as all EU proposals are subject to impact assessments prior to being put to the EU parliament votes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The evolving science on agri emissions needs to be always kept impacting the rules on farming. Equally their should be no rush ahead without comprehensive baseline analysis.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No doubt there's a longer video of all contributions somewhere, weather is too good for me to go digging soz 🤷‍♂️

    I got a reply on Twitter the last day, which I regarded with some mistrust, that in relation tot he NRL the legally binding parts would be burdened on the state (only). I don't believe that for a second, sh1t runs down hill, it always has. People are looking to get the NRL in, and once it is, we're screwed.

    https://fb.watch/kUk-F-DLik/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,680 ✭✭✭White Clover


    Once the NRL is buried, the focus needs to be on overturning all these designations placed on private land.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm not burying it just yet, long way to go.

    As some eNGO's are fond of saying, there are aspects to the NRL that are behind the ambition of our own national commitments.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Honestly the articles in the proposed regulation that Fitzmaurice reads are the basically the gospel. When McConalougue et al. actively downplay ramifications and effectively mislead people with the help of mainstream media - things are in a very very bad and precarious place.

    Realistically any one that's thinks logically can really see through the bullshit that politicians and eNGOs are trying to spin in terms of land designation valuations and socio economic destruction of these areas.

    Why was a full economic and social impact assessment done of how this law would affect areas with high densities of peatland etc (30% of Ireland give or take), because everybody knows and can logically foresee what the outcome would be - slip it in under the radar and demonise any person that questions it as a stupid ignorant farmer that is a climate denier and a conspiracy nut.

    Personally I have lost all faith and more importantly TRUST in the Irish government and the European Union, and I doubt I'm the only one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Myself and OH were talking about this rewetting of farms on drained peat land. What happens if a farmer has a loan/security on that land and it then becomes devalued due to rewetting. Does it open a potential door to give the two fingers to the bank and renege on the repayments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,760 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    No it doesn't. That won't even be considered. There's been no cost analysis done on any of this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭alps


    No chance that there won't have been a personal guarentee included in the loan documentation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭Hard Knocks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    I would have thought the same. The only reason that I ask is that there is a bit of land coming up for sale near us some of which (12-15 acres) maybe included in this rewetting scheme/mapped area. We're toying with having a go at buying it but know of another person who is actively interested in it. The other person has a history of "buying" land and then using every excuse under the sun to avoid paying for it yet manages to hold onto his portfolio iykwim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I don't think the rewetting will become a large issue. The BNM lands should cover almost all the country's requirements. As the science on GHSs, develops and solutions are found and put into practice. Depends on how much of a gamble it would be for you, but if you can afford it, why not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    What about after 2030, that's only 7 years away. Depending on what passes in the EU there may be alot of forced rewetting in 10-15 years time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    BNM lands "should" cover almost all the Countries requirements doesn't wash with me to be honest. Call me a whimp but I don't want to make a financial commitment with the Nature Restoration Legislation in the background. We've bought a few bits of property over the years and you could foresee the future potential. This NRL brings a new and different complexity that we can't predict - I suppose I want to look into the crystal ball and see the future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭memorystick


    I was walking in the fields today at midday. I couldn't believe how few flies and bees I saw. Usually they'd be annoying me but nothing. Plenty of flowers in the dithces and under the fence but no insects.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I suspect most are in the shade as the hard drying wind isn't to their liking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Horseflies are out now too. It's a bit early I thought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Amazing how the EU Commission (not elected by the people) are forcing EU Parliament MEPs (Elected by the people) to do what they say.

    "Frans Timmermans, has held meetings with some EPP MEPS and told them that, if the party did not back the restoration law, other legislative proposals the EPP deem important may not be forthcoming from the commission"

    What a great European democracy we live in.

    Hopefully in this case democracy does prevail as voting even looks tight in the Environmental Committee. Honestly if MEPs are not allowed to freely vote (especially in this instance as the people they supposedly represent will be extremely negatively affected) and this Law as it stands passes then I think trust will be entirely lost in the EU project as a whole.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Plenty of lies and midges at us, was absolutely tormented by them checking the cattle and sheep on Saturday evening



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,914 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    Ducks and drakes, sounds like UKIP waffle.

    The commissioners are nominated by our directly elected TDs through government as are many other offices. They then act like Ministers of their various areas representing the EU, not national government, but with much less power as no country or party has unilateral control like a government.

    Timmerman's statement is only normal politics, negotiation, finding middle ground etc.

    Our few MEPs in the EPP haven't much say over that groupings positions either, as per our size in Europe. Is that anti-democratic? Au contraire, it is its essence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    It does sound like UKIP waffle and the sad thing is that if this law is passed in its current proposed form these areas will turn exactly like the midlands of England.

    When you take away someone's livelihood farming on peatsoil and devalue their property/assets (steel works/mining industry in midland of England these places ended up being really euro sceptic) resentment grows and in this case people will turn on the EU project.

    When people feel beaten down by the establishment populist ideas flourish. Populism throughout history never ended well.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No shortage of insects here, seen tons of dragonflies lately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,914 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    While I think I get your point, it's not clear whether your happy to embrace the populism, ie anti democratic EU post, or wary of it as per your last.

    Ironically, the anti EU Brexit movement would have come from the Thatcherite wing of the Tories/UKIP, who, according to your post, subsequently benfitted from her government's policies.

    Also ironically, many hqve said that Scargill's controversial belligerent and uncompromising stance played into that government's hands and did those affected communities no favours after.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Noticed a big drop in bumblebees these last few years - seems to be a similar pattern across Western Europe and have seen recent reports on Twitter of clutches of insect eating birds like Flycatchers, Tit etc. completely failing this spring for lack of food with much comments that the likes of Butterfly, Moth, Hoverfly populations all apparently collapsing over the past 10 years over large parts of England and Wales. Combined with the likes of Spain and Italy now seeking emergency EU supports measures for their own farmers due to increasing issues with drought and general soil loss issues, its clear that "business as usual" is not going to end well for citizens or biodiversity over the coming years:(



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    https://www.youtube.com/live/i-8ez5BHs5c?feature=share 

    Extremely worrying in terms of the EU Commission over stepping the mark. Go to 20:50, certainly doesn't make great listening.

    If this turns out to be true, there is effectively a 'shell' group set up and funded by DG Environment in the European Commission. This shell group is giving specific information, emails etc to Industry Companies to then go and lobby the MEPs on the EU Commissions behalf.

    Note a few days ago Wind Europe came out backing the EU Nature restoration law in its entirety.

    Really looks like the EU Commissions are trying to do a full solo run, but funding a group to lobby Industry to then go and lobby MEPs not in favor of the Law sounds corrupt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Chris McManus indicates that changes adopted will be agreeable to farmers.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Did you ever have any luck pitching this idea to farm reps/politicians?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,368 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    The same around here although I note that there aren't as many swallows nesting in the sheds as other years. Someone mentioned the lack of swallows last year but we had the same nests repaired and occupied. This time of the year the sky would be full of swallows and housmartins and in the early morning/dusk of the evening you'd hear/see them chattering on the telephone/esb wires but there isn't as many around this year. I checked some of the sheds to see if there was nests - the old turf shed always had three nests but only one now, the garage beside the old house has one nest where there was four other years, the old dairy still has two and the old tie up byre has new nest but no activity/repairs in the other two. Our only pair of housemartins returned about a week to 10 days earlier than the swallows this year for the first time as it's normally the other way around. I presume it's down to weather conditions in sub Saharan Africa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    An Taisce: Rise in dairy herd ‘main driver for nitrate pollution’ https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/an-taisce-rise-in-dairy-herd-main-driver-for-nitrate-pollution/


    Well colour me shocked.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Phosphate and Nitrate results for rivers in Ireland. Note its all along the western sea board where they want a full scale rewetting and land out of agriculture purely for 'so called' CO2 emissions of land on peat soil.

    Funnily this land type according to the EPA is doing no damage to bio diversity in terms of aquatic sources. Taking this land out of agriculture would put further pressure on the more intensive agricultural land in the East to take up the slack resulting in more fertilizer etc and making these rivers far worse than they already are.

    These EU top down approach proposals are nothing but virtue signaling that only make problems worse.

    Also note the 'unintentional' optics on the Phosphate chart above, the real values are on the lower right hand side, the ring chart on the left hand side showing 'High' in blue at 58% at first glance a reader would presume High readings of Phosphate and match the blue with the all the dots on the Ireland map. Instead of High it should have been labelled as Very Good and colored green to indicate that - Just simple subtle things like that shows how narratives and agendas are pushed

    Post edited by Jonnyc135 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭youllbemine


    Even the word ‘quality’ after ‘High’ would make sense if it.

    If I pulled together that graph for a client it wouldn’t make it passed the review stage as the report reviewer or lead reviewer would cop. Therefore I can only conclude that this is not by accident.

    they are two separate graphs really. Shouldn’t be shown beside one another.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135




  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Those visuals should be burned and whoever made them, fired. Talk about a mess



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,445 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭LasersGoPewPew


    The result of intensive farming over the years, had a major part to play. Almost every farmer is guilty of it. Spraying all grassland destroying our native flowers/weeds, decimating hedgerows and cutting of trees, spreading slurry too close to rivers, spraying hedgerows, setting poison, sheep destroying our mountainous/commonage areas. Nitrates polluting our rivers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Anything else?

    Or is it only livestock farmers get your gripe?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,952 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Turn off the phone/laptop. Go for a walk.

    Come and visit my farm any time. Or visit any farm. And stop reading doomsday reports by academics with nothing better to do.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,760 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Welcome into the "People who destroy the planet & Forestry" forum. You'll enjoy it, and maybe learn something



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,914 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    How're things going in your off grid GIY world? Has the weather been kind to you this year so far?



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭LasersGoPewPew


    Everyone is a stakeholder in this, not only farmers, multiple industries, councils, governments, regulatory agencies, everyday citizens. I don't have a gripe against anyone. I'm merely pointing out that farming has a negative impact on ireland's environment. While the situation will improve thanks to stricter regulations and hopefully this incoming EU strategy, however, sadly things will get worse elsewhere in the world.

    It's very easy to dismiss academics as unproductive or irrelevant when you're a stakeholder and it's part of your livelihood but dismissive comments like yours is rooted in confirmation bias, they benefit nobody. Instead, it stifles debate, impedes the transfer of knowledge, and prevents us farmers from recognising and addressing the shortcomings in our current practices. Without studies, we would continue to damage our ecosystems unknowingly risking irreversible harm.

    Engineers continually analyse and improve upon technology, so we must continually analyse and improve upon our farming practices to ensure they're sustainable for the next generation and those to come. Would you dismiss engineering or medical research in the same way due to confirmation bias, even when it goes against what you believe or want to be true? While you may be the posterboy for environmentally friendly farming doesn't mean the majority of farmers are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    The vote is tomorrow/ today now Thursday.

    This country and media is choreographed to the hilt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,914 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    I've just re read your post, and you know, most of what you say is correct in many instances, but does not apply to many more. It seemed like you were an outsider having a dig when I read it first.

    But just to bear in mind, every human who participates in our modern society is having a massive negative impact on the natural environment, locally and internationally.

    I'm not defending mainstream agricultural systems, far from it, but they're a key part of our whole industrial system.

    Energy consumption and emissions are constantly increasing from road use, air travel, data centres, construction, manufacturing and international trade, all driven by consumers, and so called sustainable foods are really in the last xx number of crops territory.

    The trees have been cut down here for a thousand years, the Brits only finished the job off quickly for us.

    So while my initial reply might seem snark to you, it actually is what sustainable living is about.

    How do you see your lifestyle fitting in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,833 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    You can see from the above how it's only livestock farmers gets the ire of the so called environmentalist in Ireland. The Monbiot effect or whatever. Critical thinking left outside the door.

    There's another Nitrates map published yesterday by the epa with Athy in red excessive to waterways. Any rational view would question and address the reason. Here our Dublin based lot look at results which are the same as last time and then look at dairy cow numbers and put two and two together and come up with 10.

    Another headline could have been results show no disimprovement amid an increase in dairy herd.

    Until one zealot puts their head up and says yes tilled ground loses carbon and let's N flow then we're back to the above and the calling for more land to be tilled and the more N applications on tilled ground in various forms to be spread on such ground. Which increases the load into waterways. The above if implemented is a vicious circle once it starts. More N in waterways. Then cows get the blame as the tillage won't be blamed. So calls for a cap and cull of animals. The cap and cull happens as these guys must know better. They don't but it's inter departmental work at play to meet emissions targets. Targets which only include methane from the cow. Not the methane produced outside the cow in decaying vegetation. It didn't fit the aim at the start. Anyway on this road. We'll reduce numbers. Increase tillage as it has a free pass. The N increases in waterways. More cuts in livestock numbers are called for. We're in la la land at this stage. But nobody shouts stop. More plant based are required as it's woke and Monbiot friendly. I disregard the cocktails of chems required on for plant protection as it's not livestock. But tell ourselves this is good for the environment and health. I go further down the road and start busting sods for anaerobic digestion. It's a positive though as it's a carbon loop, livestock are not with the same rational. But we now have ad plants busting ground with maize in and digestate out with feedstock from municipal sources included so your medications and cleaning agents. The land continues to worsen now. At this stage we're promoting Guinness and whiskey in secondary schools and exporting to the moon but it's not milk which is fine. The above happens, N still increases in waterways so more calls to cull the last livestock in Ireland. At this stage some enviros get a little concerned but are put in their place by the moonbot club. They are given shares in a cricket producing factory and the swallow and beetles go extinct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,760 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    And you came in and attacked. Remember, farmers are doing what the regulations say, and following the best practice advice from advisory bodies and government. They have been doing so for many years. Surprisingly, when they weren't doing that you could raise a family and live a good, albeit tough, life on small marginal acres. Then things changed and it was N, then specialisation, then CAP, then beuracracy. That meant the old farming ways were replaced and farmers had to do more for less, while food prices plummetted and exports rocketed. But now the narrative is farmers are a law onto themselves and must be curtailed, ignoring the fact they are one of the most regulated and public private industires there are. How many other individuals get there name printed in all and sundry showing what payments they received from goverenment?

    I was going to write about the EPA report yesterday but @Say my name covered it. Though he left out the recent news about water quality impprovements in Cork which happened alongside an increase in dairy numbers. Ya see what can happen when people with know how, with some finance, work with the the farmers and land owners. Instead it seems they'd rather pay a pittance and cull cows instead of actually doing something constructive.

    From my point of view, the whole climate and environment circus isn't driven by people who are really into that, but by people who see animal farming as terrible and the worse thing humans can be doing and it must be ended.

    Finally, cow/animal numbers in this country are relatively static for many years. But emissions overall go up? Why is that? Hardly more cars on the road? More electricity requirements? More waste? More people???

    Post edited by roosterman71 on


  • Advertisement
Advertisement