Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022 - Read OP

Options
13738404243143

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    The biggest issue I have with this is "hate" will be defined in eye of the beholder as far as initial charges go anyway.

    You mentioned boards, well as a mod over the years particularly in more contentious forums we'd get posts reported. This was very helpful. However there was always a small group of posters that after a while if I saw their handles come up I'd simply ignore the reports. And unless another non neurotically sensitive normal poster also reported the post(very rarely), I could safely ignore the report. These eejits were as sensitive as an exposed eyeball to anything that even sniffed of what they defined as "offence". Society has a small but very loud minority of this kind of bedwetters and they love the attention. This law is very vulnerable to such people.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    It's terrifying legislation in terms of personal liberty and it's not something I'd ever thought I'd see in this formerly moderate republic.

    It evidences the disgraceful state the Irish media is in. A healthy media in a healthy democracy would be leading the charge against this. Instead? Radio silence because its seen as detrimental to a largely imaginary "Far Right" which they themselves have invented and inflated.

    The greatest blow to Irish democracy in my lifetime.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    Pretty shocking, but at least some of them are being honest.

    We're all literally losing our liberty because of the feelings of some.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users Posts: 235 ✭✭Hodger


    In other words if you believe there are only two genders, and this happens to cause discomfort or offence to someone, you can be guilty of " hate speech " .



  • Registered Users Posts: 235 ✭✭Hodger


    The only radio host I can think of that has voiced opposition to this is Niall Boylan.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 650 ✭✭✭mjsc1970


    Jesus wept



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    Non stop screeching about the far right and here you have an actual Green Party Senator going full on hard line commie but sure that's grand. The common good of stopping people questioning anything we do or say must prevail.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "If your views on other people's identities cause them deep discomfort, then it is our job as legislators to restrict those freedoms"

    This is chilling stuff.

    It's pretty obvious they are bringing it in because they are intent on pushing transgenderism and they don't want people to be able to express dissent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Ahh here, that’s Gript taking what she’s saying there out of context. The context in which she makes the point though, is that she begins by saying “when you think about it, all law, all legislation, is about the restriction of freedom…”

    I guess if that’s as far as your thinking goes, you’d come to the same conclusions as she has, which follows on from that initial, faulty premise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,363 ✭✭✭1800_Ladladlad


    Ben Scanlon of Gript as usual, calls McEntee out on her crap, claiming that the vast majority of Irish people want these laws, using her own govs public consultation outs her as an absolute liar. She avoided the initial question and then is bailed out by the "reporter", avoiding answering Scanlon completely. The day before this she was pontificating about “misinformation”...

    It's a good contribution here from Chambers, but I cannot help but be suspicious for a reason.

    2016 census showed the Jewish community in Ireland to be 2,892, the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland was the largest submission, a 56-page document for their input there hate speech laws. For comparison, Facebook has the 2nd which consisted of 15 pages. I work with a Jewish man, he said he experienced no "antisemitism" as he called it, and neither has his wife who was born and raised here. Ifind this submission a but mad

    Restricting freedom for the common good” to hear such words entered into the official record in the Seanad from an Oireachtas member.... Green Party Chair and local senator Pauline O’ Reilly....

    The problem of freedom! Yes, Freedom. Insofar as the interest of the national community gives the individual freedom, it is given! Where his freedom, or even impairs the interest of the national community, the freedom of the individual ceases. Then the freedom of the national community takes the place of the freedom of the individual. 

    No, sorry that was the tyrant in the Hugo Boss gear.....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,363 ✭✭✭1800_Ladladlad


    Is it a coincidence that Helen McEntee is bringing in legislation that criminalizes disagreement with trans ideologies & sneaks in a new definition of ‘gender’ while her husband, Paul Hickey, Director of Market Access & Stakeholder Relations for pharmaceutical giant AbbVie?

    AbbVie manufactures Lupron Depot (aka Leuprorelin), the puberty blockers given as ‘gender-affirming healthcare’ to kids....

    Given the primary function of McEntee's husband as Director of Market Access & Stakeholder Relations, how is that not a conflict of interest?


    Post edited by 1800_Ladladlad on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    Ben Scanlon shows up the other government lackeys ( journalists) for what they are



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,535 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    MacEntee was like a rabbit in the headlights when Ben started questioning her, but of course she was saved by one of the D4 lib media who were also there before she was made to look even more incompetent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,363 ✭✭✭1800_Ladladlad


    Is this yet another case of Sinn Fein misjudging the direction of the wind when they were sat up on the fence? SF TDs voted in favor of the bill in both stages of the Dáil.




  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    By lying?

    Ben Scallan constantly talks about the consultations as if that is the barometer for public mood. Public consultations regularly have significantly more negative responses than they have positive. People who agree with proposals aren’t as likely to just contribute than those who disagree. Like if a boss was bringing in a new workplace policy. Who is more like to respond to it? Those who disagree with the decision. Public consultations are exactly the same.

    Him and his editor John McGuirk are regularly trying to stoke the flames against other media outlets as well, very often incorrectly. Irish Times and Irish Independent as well as RTE ran polls about the number of asylum seekers and refugees being let in and gript piggyback off that for a day or two and then try to tell disillusioned people that the other media aren’t doing their job.

    Based on the responses here, it’s working. Thankfully a lot of people can see it for what it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    Irish Times and Irish Independent as well as RTE ran polls about the number of asylum seekers and refugees being let in and gript piggyback off that for a day or two and then try to tell disillusioned people that the other media aren’t doing their job.

    No matter where you are on the spectrum, it's impossible to say that they are not adding to journalism in Ireland, by simply asking very basic questions to politicians that the head nodding, establishment journalists refuse to ask. I feel like Gript will do very well for themselves in the future, all by just doing their jobs as journalists, something the rest of them haven't done in a long time. They are filling a gap that needed filling.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    Keep drinking the McEntee kool- aid that states “ the majority of the public support the new hate speech laws “

    some people refuse to step outside their cosy bubble



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    Indeed and while unlikely to grow big enough to rival the main media outlets, they might hopefully inspire the birth of a centre right media outlet which does have a major impact , this has to happen before a proper conservative political party emerges as any party would be strangled at birth as things currently stand



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    This idea that they are ‘refusing to ask’ is absolute nonsense though.

    The press conference that the video was posted here, John McGuirk tweeted that the other media asked about maternity leave and leadership ambitions.

    He was then corrected by a journalist that was actually there, who gave a full list of topics the other media asked and, low and behold, included was questions about the hate speech bill.

    McGuirk said he ‘stood corrected’, but yet his tweet which completely misleads what was asked of McEntee is still there because it was part of his thread, and that tweet is more likely to be seen than the reply of the journalist who corrected him due to Twitter’s algorithm.

    Not only that, but he made those claims when he wasn’t even there himself.

    It’s complete scumbag behaviour and it’s the exact type of sh*te we saw from him. Misleading, emotive language and in many cases outright lying.

    However, he does it because he knows people will fall for it and never ask any questions of him.

    Gript are constantly using their stories to attack other journalists and other media outlets. No other outlet does this because they’re not using their platforms to get people to turn on each other.

    If Gript are the media outlet you want to follow, be my guest, but make no mistake about they are completely agenda-driven, and when you’re agenda-driven you will find any way you can to mislead the public.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Show me where I said I agreed with McEntee, please?

    And when you don’t, you can apologise for misleading other posters.

    Funnily enough, straight out of the Gript fearmongering playbook.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Next to nobody has asked for this legislation. It's being imposed without a mandate. If a referendum were held on the legislation, I've no doubt it would be rejected in overwhelming number. Existing legislation is sufficient to handle all cases of "hate", such as violence against people based on any characteristic. This legislation seeks to resolve a non-existent problem, all at the expense of freedom of speech.

    Helen McEntee's possible conflict of interest, given who her husband works for, only adds to the awfulness of this legislation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    More of it please from Gript , the vast majority of journalists in Ireland bring disgrace to the profession and are actively anti journalism

    Shona Murray regularly calls for Nigel Farrage to be deplatformed by media , that is anti journalism

    and you think Gript are the only outlet with an “ agenda “ ?


    Bless



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    You do agree with her as you enthusiastically cheer on the suppression of certain opinions like all good little progressives



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,557 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    1. Can you reference another public consultation in Ireland that received majority 'against' views which are not in keeping with opinion polls?
    2. The government tried to 'throw' the consultation by launching it quietly and then tweeting the consultation link to their crony NGOs and literally asked them to get as many of their members as possible to make submissions. They still couldn't overcome the majority opinion.
    3. You completely ignore that in the very same question to McEntee, Scallan also references opinion pools showing 65% of the public are against the legislation - i.e. that the consultation received submissions broadly in line with public opinion.

    Criticism of this extreme legislation is not confined to "fringe commentators". The large majority of the public are against it and McEntee's claim that the "vast majority" of people are in favour is an outright, bare faced lie - that she knows damn well is a lie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 930 ✭✭✭Salvation Tambourine


    Do you think if the responses were 70% positive the government would use the public consultations in their favour? I believe they would. Same with Citizens Assemblies. 100 people paid to sit in a room a listen to selected experts on a topic. The government have definitely used these 100 people to indicate the voice of a nation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,329 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    disagreement with trans ideologies & sneaks

    Hang on a second - disagreement is not hate! I'm not a fan of the new bill, but it doesn't criminalise "disgreement" (at least i don't think so - unless somoene can point to a section of it that uses this exact word or a synonym for it)- unless you can't express your disagreement without expressing hate...?

    Post edited by Princess Consuela Bananahammock on

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 500 ✭✭✭Marcos


    "The press conference that the video was posted here, John McGuirk tweeted that the other media asked about maternity leave and leadership ambitions.

    He was then corrected by a journalist that was actually there, who gave a full list of topics the other media asked and, low and behold, included was questions about the hate speech bill."

    So I, being the fool that I am sometimes, decided to check for myself what journalist told him that and couldn't find that tweet. I checked his tweets and those of Gript and went through all the replies, but I couldn't find it. Now maybe that is down to an oversight. But please feel free to correct me and show the tweet in question, if you can.

    "Gript are constantly using their stories to attack other journalists and other media outlets. No other outlet does this because they’re not using their platforms to get people to turn on each other."

    What you refer to as constantly attacking other journalists and media outlets, others might see as pointing out that the mainstream media in Ireland is in lockstep with each other, with no other opinions allowed. Anything that is "problematic" to the current narrative of the day is quietly ignored. Nobody is allowed to disrupt the narrative, and anyone that does is seen as attacking it, and those who push it. As Tom Fitzgerald, father of Kate Fitzgerald put it on the Late Late Show I think when referring to the Irish Times awful behaviour in that affair. When he asked why no other media outlets called the Times to account for their behaviour he was told that with Irish media "one hand washes the other."

    I don't carry any candle for any media organisation, and only really aware of gript over the last year. To me they are a very obscure publication that I wouldn't normally touch. But they are the only organisation that is challenging the official narrative and are asking the awkward questions as a result. If other journalists asked Helen McEntee questions about the Hate Speech bill, how many of her quotes about it from that press conference were broadcast or published by other outlets?

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    No matter where you are on the spectrum, it's impossible to say that they are not adding to journalism in Ireland


    I’m assuming you’re referring to a political spectrum, and not… anyways, I don’t share your idea of politics being a spectrum in the first place. It’s easy for anyone to point out that they are not adding anything of any significance or value or substance to journalism in Ireland when they put their sharticles behind a paywall.

    I’m not interested in paying to read anyone’s opinion of their idea of free speech, or their hot takes on the new Irish legislation regarding hate crimes that brings us into alignment with the EU, as opposed to any conspiracy theorists wet dreams about there being any sort of a conflict of interest between Helen McEntee’s responsibilities as the Minister for Justice, and her husband’s occupation as a salesman for a pharmaceutical company.

    And certainly not when I’m aware that the legislation covers several grounds which already existed in Irish legislation, and will undoubtedly be weaponised by the likes of McGuirk and those who don’t need viagra to get all worked up about nothing, portraying themselves as martyrs of anyone who doesn’t recognise their superior intellectual prowess.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,062 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Off the wall insane lunatic crazed conspiracies about McEntees Husband really add zero to this discussion.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 41,062 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Has anyone actually read the public consultation submissions referenced by Gript. They are quite mixed but A lot of those in favour give detailed rationale backed up by research, whereas a lot against are actually just racist, homophobic, transphobic rants with no rationale, no evidence, no back up.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



Advertisement