Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Has President Higgins overstepped the mark?

1246720

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,159 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Yaretzi Early Sorbet


    Didn't vote for him either time but respect to Higgins.

    The one person in the country the government seem to take notice of when he speaks out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,329 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Ireland won’t be joining NATO anytime in anyone here’s lifetime. Lefty freak out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    That would be like Jackie chan in reverse gear



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Britain has a population of about 2/3rds of Henan province.


    Where does such comparisons end and where does their utility even begin?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Don’t agree with 99% of what he says but he is correct on this issue

    I don’t know who or what is in control of this government now but it is blatantly obvious they are not acting in the interest of the Irish people

    Post edited by SEPT 23 1989 on




  • You are about to be on the receiving end of some guff about Treason, sovereignty and 32 counties from a true believer 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,900 ✭✭✭thomas 123



    In reply to the lefty freak out part of your comment…

    Ah yeah that’s why MM and the gov are ramming this through, I wonder why we aren’t doing a forum on the housing crisis or health crisis where experts all on one side of the opinion tell them that we need to fix those.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,376 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    There have been many forums of interest groups on both Housing and Health down the years.

    It just suits your agenda to tell people that such a thing never happened.

    This forum next week is a discussion on security and foreign policy challenges, for Ireland, in a changed global context. It's not just about neutrality, or just about considering NATO membership.

    But then, it wouldn't suit your agenda to acknowledge that either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,753 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The little fella knows his time in the Árus is nearly done, just getting a few kicks in before he goes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,376 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Ostensibly he has 2 years and 5 months left.

    He could find it reduced to weeks if he keeps this nonsense up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,630 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Zero chance they will ever touch him. They wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Zero chance. I saw other posters suggest he would be removed. Complete bollox and I think ye all know it. Suck it up for the next 2+ years.

    In the meantime the coalition of chaos will lose local elections and a general election and FFG won't get their candidates into the Aras next time out.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,004 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Who would/could sack the President?

    That would be far more interesting to see. As for MDH getting the boot in on the last spin on the merry go around, FG/FF are probably doing the same on their side.

    SF to the rescue!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,608 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    He did not travel to Cuba to attend Castro's funeral.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,913 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I think that is it I was amazed when I heard it. Over the years past Presidents have got themselves in hot water for a lot less. He not only mentioned neutrality but 'positive neutrality'.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    To be honest I initially critical of MDH when I heard the story, you know the usual wishy washy anti American stuff. But you know what when I saw the makeup of the forum I changed my mind and know agree with him, it's a complete whitewash of a thing with no balance.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    While Higgins should have kept his mouth shut as it isn't the president's place to make such commentary, he isn't actually wrong. The government seem determined to make Ireland an an aligned state. The upcoming security forum is yet another convention that has a predetermined outcome. They didn't choose their favourite method of legitimising an unpopular policy - the citizens assembly, because they knew they'd never be able to convince people that dropping neutrality was a good idea.

    This is a perfect example of the rot at the heart of politics in Ireland, that official Ireland sees its views and only it's views as worthy of consideration. It has stifled debate across a whole range of policy issues and there is no plurality of views - there is only one and must be only one.



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Yaretzi Early Sorbet


    It is not remotely unconstitutional for the President to criticise the government.

    It has always merely been a gentleman/lady's agreement.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 77,656 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    A number of posts deleted

    Now back to the actual topic.

    If you need further clarification please PM me. Do not respond to this post in thread



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,913 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It makes a farce of the office of President. The Office of President is supposed to be above party politics and hold the balance between the Executive and Legislature. If a President becomes very overt like this they might as well abolish the office entirely.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,376 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    A chinese wall that has been respected by both sides, for good reason.

    The Constitution may not expressly prohibit it, but the Constitution DOES describe the roles of both the executive and the presidency very clearly, so the custom has been derived from the clear intent in the Constitution.

    Higgins has put a coach and horses through that wall today.

    And in doing so, he has ensured that any action he takes around legislation put across his desk for assent, must be viewed with some suspicion.

    That suspicion being, is Higgins referring X Bill to the Supreme Court because he doesn't like the idealogy of it, or because he thinks it may be unsound, constitutionally?

    It's a very bad day for him and a worse day for the office of Uachtarán na hÉireann.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,331 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    They didn't choose their favourite method of legitimising an unpopular policy - the citizens assembly

    SSM and the repeal of the 8th were unpopular? The actual outcome of the referenda that followed would suggest otherwise.

    Given the absolute meltdown about so much as questioning our current anaemic military standpoint, I would suggest it is not "official Ireland" who deem any other opinion unworthy of discussion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,913 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It was not even subtle normally the President couches an opinion leading to interoperation etc. But he came right out, at a sensitive time in world politics and sensitive time in Ireland's decision on neutrality.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 474 ✭✭Ramasun


    I'd actually forgotten about his wife using the Office of the President to share her personal views.

    That was probably worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭francois


    Popular elected man makes comments those who elected him makes popular comment shocker



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,813 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Maybe that's why he said it right now, because why exactly is now a sensitive time in Ireland's decision on neutrality when there is a clear majority (70% of people who gave an opinion) in favour of keeping things the way they are. It shouldn't be a sensitive time at all



  • Registered Users Posts: 932 ✭✭✭snowstorm445


    One thing this whole debate has shown us is how childish the current view of defence seems to be. Unfortunately I suspect Michael D harbours it as well.

    Spending any money on defence in a rapidly changing world is "warmongering". Collective responsibility and solidarity with our European neighbours is "imperialism". A debate on the subject is "dragging us into NATO".

    Whether or not we should be part of the NATO alliance specifically is up for debate. But Irish neutrality as it currently exists is mostly patronising, self-serving ivory tower-esque rubbish. Using our lucky geography as an excuse not to spend any money on our defence whilst simultaneously parading this as a virtue to the rest of the world. As if other countries in Europe are a bunch of salivating trigger-happy Dr. Strangeloves - and not people that have had to fight for their existence in living memory and are aware of the many dangers of infiltration.

    The real clue to all this is that we'd be trampling over ourselves to get help from NATO if trouble ever came knocking (and in this day and age trouble can come from many quarters). Other European neutrals generally have some sort of defence to show for it. It's not warmongering - it's lending weight to our non-aligned position, and relying on our own strength. Not sponging off of others.

    Again, it's all about our lucky geography. Someone on another thread said it once - if we were located in the Black Sea or the Baltic we would have had this debate a long time ago.

    It's one thing to choose to stay out of NATO - there are many reasons why we might. But we need to stop pretending we there's some special virtue that underpins our current stance. And more importantly, we need to approach the NATO question from a mature angle - not from some sheltered student activist or me féiner frame of mind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 932 ✭✭✭snowstorm445


    We are aligned.

    Our whole defence strategy is based on the idea of others coming to help us if we're ever in trouble. Britain, France, the US, the whole lot. The RAF already effectively responds for us if there's ever an incursion. If we were non-aligned we'd have something to show for it.

    Almost no one outside of the Irish public believes that we're non-aligned. Least of all the Russians.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yep . Because he shouldn't be speaking out ! :)

    Seriously people voted for him because he always spoke his mind and not what the current Gov wanted .

    Think this crowd are already so unpopular it would bring them down if they reprimanded Miggledy , right or wrong .

    This is not to say I agree with him but he is an extremely popular president .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    100% .

    We gave up our neutrality if we ever had it , when we let the US planes stopover and refuel and Shannon was used for troop and rendition layovers .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    In fairness Mary Kelly bravely stood up for Irish neutrality when she attacked the criminal US aeroplanes in Shannon airport. I salute her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Count Dracula




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,617 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Ending neutral and joining NATO is the inevitable consequence our of weird closeness with America, American politics and culture. I'm not sure sometimes if people realise that we're not part of America.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭supermans ghost


    Excellent post, some very valid points.

    As for Mickey D, I loathe the guy, he’s your typical champagne socialist, he also has an ego the size of his belly, loves to hear himself talk.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Michael D is 100% correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,617 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    He also wants us not Bury ourselves in other people's agendas.

    I wish the woke crowd here would listen to this when it comes to commenting and get excited about every culture war rubbish in America.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    Of course we dont. We go cap in hand to or neigbours , those colonising , war mongering , pro NATO , 800 years , blah blah blah.

    The absolute definition of neutrality. We are defenceless. We havent the ability to patrol our own skies or monitor our territorial waters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    Most people don’t understand the technical parameters of the presidents office and thus freely spout off about how wonderful Miggeldy is to opine on everything the government is involved in

    he’s been bang out of order on numerous occasions now and has treated the office of the presidency with utter contempt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    No hut he offered condolences on behalf of the Irish people on loss of a great a leader , he later had to retract.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    We are not neutral. How can you be neutral when you have an agreement with another military power regarding our defense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭howiya


    Have you a link to this retraction? I don't recall it



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Overstepped the mark? He can't even see the mark!

    In all seriousness, there are very few arguments against joining NATO now. The invasion of Ukraine was needed to wake us up. It's an interesting fact that some people feel our neutrality, which leaves us defenceless and relying on the kindness of the Brits, makes us somehow superior to the people we rely on.

    Unfortunately we need to do our bit and at least be prepared to defend the people we'd like to defend us if the need arose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,608 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I was correcting the other poster who said he went to the funeral in Cuba.

    He did not retract the original condolences statement but did issue a second clarification statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    We could at least have a ground radar system to assist our helpful neighbours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,573 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The President of Ireland is the Supreme Commander of the Irish Defence Forces. He has every right to make a comment on whether Ireland should or should not join NATO.

    All this thread is is the usual bunch getting red faced and stamping their feet just because Higgins said something.

    Fucking laughable carry on. 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 807 ✭✭✭CreadanLady


    Ireland is a neutral, non-combabtant country. It is consitutionally illegal for ireland to declare or engage in war. End of.

    Our defence ought to be restricted to supporting the Gardai, and having a small domestic counter terrorism force. Nothing more. No peacekeeping, no supporting missions, no heavy armaments, and no INS cruises picking up marine hitchhikers the mediterranean.

    The MFV Creadan Lady is a mussel dredger from Dunmore East.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    I guess he has and not for the first time either. If he says something you agree with it seems ok but if not then..

    I guess mant people voted for him knwoing what he'd be like so we were warned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 807 ✭✭✭CreadanLady


    I happen to think he is right, but saying it from his position as president was a dodgy move.

    With repsect to the quoted post, it makes no difference. Neither Ukraine nor Russia gives a toss about what Ireland does or says. Ireland is irrelevant on the global geopolitics stage. And we would be well advised to keep it that way. Stay out of trouble and the best way to do that is to not go out looking for it.

    The MFV Creadan Lady is a mussel dredger from Dunmore East.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement