Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1249250252254255851

Comments

  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,131 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Posts deleted

    Do not discuss anything that is before the Courts

    Any questions, PM me - do not respond to this warning in thread



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,474 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    As I've mentioned before, I think it would be nigh on impossible for SF to pivot to being an anti-immigration party. They describe themselves as left wing and as a "social justice" party.

    Bizarrely though, from recent polls it seems that many SF voters are anti-immigration....as if they expect (or want) SF to be some sort of right wing Irish nationalist party instead of a left wing one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    No they won't, not at leadership level anyway. No good reason to link the fall in the polls to their position on immigration, as all significant parties are on a very similar page on that issue...



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,024 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    No, they are not " the root cause".

    War, persecution, torture, and inequality are the root cause.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,024 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    As a populist party I would agree that they will try to pivot to reflect their voter's stance. Which would be antiimmigration.

    How they manage to do that with so many left leaning liberal tds will be interesting especially as they claim to have ditched the bullying.

    It'll definitely be one to watch, especially as they have taken a strong prorefugee stance so far.

    If they don't many will have to give them credit for sticking with it. Incl. me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,335 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,024 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    And people stirring on social media. Constantly...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    No , it isn’t the role of Irish people to solve the issues which bedevil all those countries, the NGO,s would happily sink Ireland in order to satisfy their idealogical vanity



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,474 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I can't see how a left wing 'social justice' party could pitch itself as being an anti-immigration and anti-refugee party though. Social justice is all about equality for everyone and especially for those most in need.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But when is this 'pivot' going to start? The Ukraine crisisb has been going on for nearly a year and a half now and I'm seeing no sign of it, at an SF leadership level anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,335 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Wonder can any of these new arrivals of which €3 billion is allocated for next year help with the childrens scoiliosis waiting lists?


    €3 billion.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,390 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    SF appear to be the Irish lightning rod for the anti-Government/anti-establishment vote that seems to attract c. 33% of the vote in western democracies. Its the same type of vote that deflects to Trump/UKIP/Le Pen etc.

    The issue is that it’s pretty evident that with many of these voters they just see them as the alternative/opposite without any fundamental understanding of what their policies actually are. It’s a case that if “FFG” are in favour of something then SF must be the alternative.

    The issue, as described in an article I saw before sometime last year, is what happens when SF don’t meet these people’s wishes? Who do you turn to when SF are in Government for a few years and they haven’t magicked up 100k houses, kicked all the foreigners out and made everyone’s lives perfect?

    SF seem to be the gateway drug similar to the Tea Party in the US or Farage’s early activities in the UK.

    The good news is that the hardcore support for this lark never seems to drift much higher than 33% of the electorate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭rgossip30



    They still come the fines 1500 euro are obviously not big enough !! I assume at least they get the passenger details as some refuse to state their nationality and use false names .

    https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/ireland-cracks-down-airlines-staggering-30261502?utm_source=irish_mirror_newsletter&utm_campaign=daily_newsletter2&utm_medium=email



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,474 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes indeed, it seems SF voters are looking at the party as an anti-establishment populist one with strong working class roots. But expecting them to be anti-immigration and anti-refugee would suggest that their voters don't really understand that 'populism' doesn't always extend to being anti-immigration or multiculturalism. It would be extremely odd, bizarre in fact, for SF to pivot in this direction and effectively become the most right wing main party in the country instead of the most left wing one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,024 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Not if they are a true left wing socialist party.

    They are called a populist party by most commentators, all the time.


    So IF they are, a populist party, I am saying, we will see a pivot to anti immigration.

    If not I will be the first to say..

    "fair enough, can take you seriously so. "



  • Registered Users Posts: 86,108 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Isn't SF mantra a "United Ireland" get British out., but want "open borders"

    There isn't many TDs speaking out about the amount Ireland is taking in and I would bet many people are likely complaining more now to their local TDs especially with the lack of student accommodations available for students



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,474 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    But Sinn Fein saying there are too many refugees would make them sound more like right wing nationalist parties such as the former UKIP in Britain, the Front Nationale in France, AfD in Germany etc. It would be a very strange direction for them to go in given their history and roots.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,131 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    0ph0rce0 threadbanned



  • Registered Users Posts: 500 ✭✭✭Marcos


    Sorry Jinglejangle the government doesn't seem to care about scoliosis or other children on waiting lists as much as it does bringing in people new to the parish. My understanding of scoliosis is that there is a timeline for treating it otherwise it gets worse, am I correct. If it affects someone you know, have you heard of the treatment abroad scheme? Maybe that could work.

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,024 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    There is money allocated and ringfenced for this surgery . This link specifically deals with this question here ..

    The issue with scoliosis surgery in CHI is the training , recruitment and retention of the highly specialised ancillary staff needed to care for these children's specialised needs .

    Very disingenuous and a strawman from you as this has nothing whatsoever to do with refugees in Ireland .



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,131 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Posts deleted

    No posting from articles behind a paywall permitted

    And under this Site's copyright policy any quote from a non-paywalled article is limited to a single paragraph and a link must be provided

    Any questions PM me - do not respond to this post in thread



  • Registered Users Posts: 172 ✭✭Honesty Policy


    My sister is a PAED nurse. Late last year, a child with scoliosis got a call for surgery. The poor child was gowned up and ready for surgery, all the staff were actively ready to go ahead with the surgery that day but the hospital did not have an ICU bed to care for that child post surgery. The surgery had to be cancelled at the 11th hour and obviously, the parents were livid and went to the media about it. That is why Scoliosis came back into the media spotlight then because the parents kicked up a fuss and rightly so!

    It is not right that a child is in pain for years and has a halo keeping her poor head up! 100% they deserve priority over anyone else.

    Again, this was not a staffing issue.

    You could blame the HSE but there was huge overcrowding in the hospital then. I suppose that what happens when the population surges without thinking of the consequences and money spent on housing refugees isn't spent on vital services. Especially housing the Fakeugees who come from safe countries! One cent spent on them is a cent too much!

    You see, vicious circle!



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,024 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    This IS an emotive issue. No question.

    It is a very difficult and painful process for the children and the families.

    As a nurse myself I have seen and looked after those children and I agree in part with what you and jinglejangle are saying. ie. that delays in scoliosis surgery cannot be tolerated.

    However, it is a staffing issue... theatre /ICU/ specialised Investigative tech , and it is a matter of lack of specialised nursing care. None of these are solved quickly nor by throwing money at it. Training and recruitment and increasing Paeduatric ICU beds with all the expertise that is needed takes time. Thats the problem. Not money.

    But the money is there. It IS ringfenced for these surgeries.

    But it is totally and completely unrelated to the subject of refugees and however much they are costing the state.

    People here have brought housing, GP services, disability care, homeless, university students, all into the discussions here at different stages, and fair enough, we can all see effects from refugees on these areas.

    But using children with scoliosis is not only completely irrelevant to the discussion, it is a low blow using these children to further an anti refugee debate.

    You can give me any anecdote you want, but this is one that is totally unrelated.

    I am not buying it as a valid discussion point here on this thread from either of you.

    There will be lots who will, and you will get lots of thanks, but its not on topic, and as far as I am concerned, not on.

    Just using an emotive subject, sick children, to score points.



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭WheelieKing


    Real world effects unfortunately. Some with a pro immigrant agenda will say "all lives are equal" and "one world" or some happy clappy hippy nonsense akin to that but Irish children/people are more important than some lad who's just rocked up to the hospital from some kip in the middle east or Africa for me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,762 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    What is the link between this and refugees? Is there evidence available that money or staffing that would have otherwise absolutely been dedicated to ensuring the swift performance of these surgeries were instead devoted to refugees?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭enricoh


    I posted a week or so ago that the local council was not accepting anymore applications in 2023 for people looking for a grant to adapt their house due to an illness or disability. This is solely down to a lack of government funding according to local td. No lack of funds whatsoever for our new neighbours, it's an open chequebook.

    Some are more equal than others.




  • Registered Users Posts: 172 ✭✭Honesty Policy


    On another note...I recently returned to work after my maternity leave, to work in my Special Class. I was Livid to find out that none of our children with autism were allowed to be integrated into Mainstream classes as they normally would as there was 'no space' because our class sizes had increased by 20-25% because of all the Ukrainian children we took in.

    I was told parents had to be told it was for Covid reasons and not the above!

    So we have to look after one group of people who were here a wet weekend and shaft another group who have their own special needs.

    It would not have happened if I was in the school and is basically discrimination to my special needs children.

    Seriously, people need to cop on to this and wise up. It's like some people can't link up A with B.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    33%? The fact is Marno we don't know the percentage of those who would vote for much tighter controls on immigration. The last time it was specifically put to the Irish electorate was in the '04 referendum to close or not close the Jus Soli loophole that was one of the main drivers of the first phase of non EU migration to Ireland. There were calls of racism from outfits like Labour, SF, various immigration orgs and lobbies and talking heads in the media. FG pretty much abstained waiting to see the outcome. The result? One of the most definitive majorities of any referendum in the state's history to close it. There wasn't a single constituency in the country that voted to keep it open.

    Much more recent polls have suggested general discontent is much higher than 33%. Even with Ukrainian refugees who are fleeing a war beamed into our brains every days. And let's face it they're White, European and mostly women, kids and old people. I suspect those who aren't ticking those boxes get even less sympathy. Not long after Russia's invasion and the first group of Ukrainians showed up on our shores a poll, by the Indo IIRC, found 50% of those polled would put up Ukrainians themselves, with the caveat; if they had the room. Which left the other 50% who it seems might be less open, room or not.

    The other problem with gauging support or not for immigration is our political landscape. Even if a voter has genuine non nutters on facebook concerns about how immigration is being handled who do they vote for in the elections? The mainstream parties are all singing from the exact same hymn sheet on this subject. It's a hobson's choice. The only "alternatives" are a few absolutely tiny fringe parties that vanisingly few sane people would vote for.

    In essence if you don't give people a choice how do you know what choice they would make? You don't.

    The other concern of course is if you don't give people a reasonable choice, or gaslight reasonable questions, you run the very real risk of more and more seeking out those unreasonable voices and we have seen that time and time again in every single European nation when it comes to the knotty problems of immigration and multiculturalism.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,567 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    No one nationality is more important then any other nationality.



Advertisement