Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1250251253255256851

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 41,062 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    There's no way a school told you children couldn't be mixing for covid reasons.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    Perhaps the Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth of Ireland should prioritise the children part of his remit rather than the majority of his department’s time and resources being spent on the integration section.

    How long does it take to train a specialist nurse for operations on scoliosis children? Correct me if I’m wrong but I am sure there was a big prime time programme about these kids long before covid hit. His department spends their time sourcing and quickly finding solutions for the integration part. Could they not spend their time and money sourcing specialists from around the world to help these kids?

    Why is there no money left to adapt houses for those with disabilities? His department has a bottomless pit to pay for anything to do with integration.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    So the equality part of his remit means diddly squat too!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    There wasn't any question on immigration put to the people of Ireland.

    The 2004 referendum was merely a reaction to the mistake that was made by the Good Friday agreement. The GFA changed article 2 of the constitution to read that all people born on the island of Ireland were entitled to be part of the nation of Ireland. It was clearly in relation to domestic matters. An unintended consequence occured when it resulted in a birthright citizenship for anyone born in Ireland. This unintentional consequence was righted by referendum in 2004, when the 27th amendment limited the right to those born in Ireland to Irish citizens.

    Merely correcting a mistake that had been made 5 years earlier.

    Most people wouldn't imagine you should be a citizen of a country just because you were born there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I don't believe that you were told parents must be told it's because of COVID.

    Parents are not stupid and everybody is aware the pandemic is over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    What is a fukeugee?

    And was the hospital full of them and no other patients thereby cancelling this operation? I seriously doubt that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,267 ✭✭✭emo72


    I'm not really clever but I'd guess it refers to a fake refugee.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I'm not really super clever either, but at least I know it's literally impossible to have a fake refugee.

    In fact, I wonder about the intellect of a lot of people in Ireland that they don't know the difference in a refugee and asylum seeker.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,762 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    But on the specific point of refugees and asylum seekers, how do you even formulate the "options" for giving people a choice?

    It seems to be routinely ignored on this thread that there is a fairly significant dual context at play in the surge of refugees recently (i.e. the relaxation of global travel restrictions following Covid and a conflict in Eastern Europe) that our system has struggled to handle well — with the preferred narrative appearing to be that this is all simply explained away by Ireland being soft touch, ministers being traitorous, lefty happy clappy snowflakery. That narrative is a convenient one, because it suggests that all that stands between us and a perfect system is a simple choice to not do the things we are doing.

    And that's the problem really with how you formulate a specific targeted choice that is capable of both being presented in some tangibly democratic way and which can actually be sustained — the options are not strictly binary and circumstances change. And ultimately, this in itself is borne out in how the parties who offer the binary "just turn it all off" option have (as you say) vanishingly small support — because the Irish people are still aware that the problems of the world (foreign and domestic) simply are not capable of being handled by simple narratives in a way that guarantees outcomes that work to our perpetual benefit. The same applies to multiculturalism as it does to refugee policy — it's not something that is easy to present in binary terms.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    "Domestic matters" my eye. You must have both a short memory and a convenient capacity for spinning realities to suit your position, because at the time there were many of the usual talking heads, vested interests and politicians stating quite clearly it was about immigration and "racist" and accused McDowell of scaremongering over the number of remarkably fecund women from outside the EU showing up in Ireland's maternity hospitals because of this loophole. Since the change outfits like Labour have been talking about rowing back on that vote. I doubt they'd say the same of the SSM and Repeal votes, and rightfully. Even though they both passed with a smaller majority.

    Indeed, the 19th Amendment itself that came out of the GFA noted in the commissions information leaflet that this amendment "will make it very difficult to change the laws on citizenship and it may prevent the enactment of necessary laws to regulate immigration". So from the get go immigration was seen as an issue and by '04 very much was. To deny that is a clear nonsense.

    Most people wouldn't imagine you should be a citizen of a country just because you were born there.

    Depends entirely on where you are. For example and largely because as ex European colonies who required immigration to grow Jus Soli is the norm.

    In Lalaland maybe where they speak deluded fluently. Throughout time and place in reality and the realities of human nature they are. We're a social animal and have hierarchies of social connection and belonging and pretty strong feelings around "Us" and "Them" with it. When some tragic disaster happens in the world, look at national TV news reports from around the world. If their citizens number among the casualties they give far more coverage and focus and give far more of a damn than if they're not. "100 dead from bomb in Kabul". Terrible, just awful, thoughts and prayers if it's even noticed, but right down the news feed in RTE. "Irish aid worker killed in bombing in Kabul". Headline.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    The whole Irish system needs reforming, but here's a fairly binary one taking a leaf from Denmark's example: Should Ireland only accept numbers of refugees in line with the UN's quota system? Yes/No. That and the Dane's other measures dropped the numbers of asylum applicants from 20,000+ to 1500 pre covid. While other EU nations are waking up to and tackling the problems around immigration and indeed the shaky politic of multiculturalism itself, Ireland as usual is at least a decade behind. It seems hoping that this time, somehow and magically, Ireland won't face the clear issues of both that every single other EU nation has had to deal with going back generations.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭WheelieKing


    Rubbish, absolute rubbish. Irish people are more important to me than any other nationality.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    'In Lalaland maybe where they speak deluded fluently. Throughout time and place in reality and the realities of human nature they are'

    No. Treating one nationality as more important than another, based on their nationality is pure racism. Doesn't matter if some people believe it to be 'them and us ' there is no place in Irish society for a two tier system based on someone's race


    And I think you must have read my post incorrectly. I said that article 2 of the constitution inserted because of the referendum on the GFA, was in regard to domestic issues. Obviously.

    And 33 countries in the world offering unrestricted birthright citizenship isn't a lot. Like I said, most people wouldn't imagine that someone should be a citizen just because they were born in a country. We merely righted a mistake that had been made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Really?

    Where? Everywhere? Or do you believe that's just in Ireland?

    In what way are they more important?



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭WheelieKing


    Every citizen of any nation has a right to put the people of their nation above people from other countries. They are more important because they are born and reside in our nation. Their parents, grandparents etc... gave them that right.

    Listen i'm a nationalist and you from what i can read are not. You aren't going to believe that we as a people should put our own before others (just like our government) and that's fair enough but iv'e a question for you, what is enough. Another million? 10 million? a Billion? Should we just open the doors and invite the whole of Africa in because people like you and your ilk believe we are all equal? House them, educate them, provide them services etc....



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I've long noted those who use "literally" in a debate generally use it for effect, don't know what it means, or is the opposite of what their position holds. Of course you can have a fake refugee. You can have fake asylum seekers who if they fool enough people in the asylum process can gain refugee status. Ergo fake refugee.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I'm not a nationalist? You can totally be a nationalist without being racist.

    You do know that people born and raised in Ireland are not automatically Irish? You seem confused as to who Irish people are.

    Everybody living in a country has the right to equal treatment. Perhaps you may have seen other countries that treated people's differently?

    Treating other people as second class citizens is not acceptable in a modern democratic state.

    I have never stated that there shouldn't be limits. I believe they should be dealt with at an EU level, as this is going to be an even greater issue for the EU in the coming years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Nope. A refugee has been given international protection. Therefore cannot be fake.



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭WheelieKing


    Ah the racist card 🤣

    You where doing alright also.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,362 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Here is an example of a bogus refugee:


    She used a fake name, and a forged passport.

    She made a bogus claim for asylum.

    She is one of the vast majority of asylum-seekers who are making false claims.


    The article does not mention the outcome of her asylum claim, but as she stayed here, we can conclude that it was either successful (refugee status), or she was given leave to remain.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    In your apparent keeness to wheel out the racism angle you make a clumsy error. Nationality does not equal race. Indeed it's even "racist" to suggest it does.

    And you can guarantee there will be a two tier system based on "race" in Ireland. There already is. Just like every other European nation dealing with the sociopolitic of multiculturalism for many decades. In Ireland today after barely a generation of newly minted Irish multiculturalism who is more likely to be unemployed/in receipt of state benefits, more likely to be a victim of racism? Ask a smattering of Dubliners where are the Black areas in Dublin and you should get an answer. Ask the same Dubliners where the Polish areas are and they'll struggle to do so. Yet at last count there are four times as many Poles in Ireland as Black African folks. The latter(though I doubt they were ever asked if they wanted it) get a Black History month, the former don't get a wet Tuesday in November. Why? The squeaky wheel gets the grease. A sop to cover questions that may have complex and difficult answers.

    Again these are the hard realities, realities that are observable in every single EU nation and in most cases over a few generations with it. Pick any EU nation with all their different histories, cultures, politics and migration histories. Show me an example of one where those who are Black/Brown/most different to the local population aren't more likely to be under employed, poorer, etc. Hint; you can't. And you think Ireland of all nations will be the magical outlier? Them and Us exists, racism exists, from "mild" to overt. It's not going away and you can't magic it away with hopes and dreams.

    The joke is it's nearly always the White "locals" who have this optimism, nay magical thinking around this matter. Those who are Black and living with the realities of modern multiculturalist societies can have very different views. The first generations not so much. It's their kids and grandkids who have far more of the feeling that they've been sold a pup and in ways the kids and grandkids of White immigrants rarely have to consider.

    The asylum process? The Syrian war raging for over a decade caused one of the largest mass migrations of refugees since WW2. How many Syrians did Ireland take in? 3000, over a decade, all vetted to beat the band. Within a month of the Ukrainian war breaking out we took in ten times that number, with zero vetting, just show up. I can't help but muse that the latter's European Whiteness was one factor that influenced this.

    And I think you must have read my post incorrectly.

    I don't think I did. You stated quite clearly as an opener: "There wasn't any question on immigration put to the people of Ireland." When quite clearly there was. Those who promoted the change said it was. Those who opposed the change couldn't stop themselves from saying it was and called it "racist" in intent. The 19th Amendment that backed the GFA and brought in this Jus Soli loophole noted in the information literature that is could raise problems around immigration.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Even if they were granted that status under false pretences via their deception of the authorities?

    C’mon even you must realise you’re talking total nonsense here



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    A simplistic absolutist eh? You can have fake asylum seekers. We have processes to weed those out. If they didn't exist we wouldn't. If a fake asylum seeker happens to pass those processes and becomes an official refugee, they are by definition a fake refugee. This is pretty basic logic here.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    So it doesn't say anything about her being a refugee.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Yes. Because they have been granted that status. It cannot be fake.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Nope.

    They have been given refugee status. It cannot be fake.

    There can of course be fake asylum seekers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Oh okay so it’s just silly pedantry you’re hiding behind then.

    If I totally falsify my medical qualifications and yet manage to get registered in your eyes I’m a doctor, not a fake doctor. Interesting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Didn't address anything in the post.

    You do know the definition of racism?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Merely being registered doesn't make you a doctor. It's just a list.

    To become a doctor, one must qualify, if one qualifies through false pretences/cheats on exams/ gets someone else to do them, then they will still be qualified as a doctor.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    But that’s the thing suvigirl, they’re not actually qualified though are they? They’ve cheated the system because they know in reality they don’t meet the requirements for genuine qualification.

    Just like all these false asylum seekers gaining what I would call false refugee status. They have misrepresented their situation to take advantage of a benefactor acting in good faith.

    You acknowledge the reality that this is going on too - I don’t understand why some people are so apathetic about their country being taken for a complete chump.



Advertisement