Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Republic of Ireland Team 2023/24 [old thread]

1308309311313314464

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    The idea that a manager should have been sacked after one result is genuinely crazy to me - especially a result that ultimately had no bearing on the finishing position of the campaign, and it was the second game in his first attempt.

    That is short-termism that is off the scale.

    I won’t argue that it wasn’t a terrible performance against Luxembourg because it obviously was, but treating it like it was some unforgivable sin is completely OTT. It’s football, nothing is guaranteed, results like that can happen - if they happen consistently then sure, look to replace the manager(which is where we are now).

    What happens if Roy came in for the WC and lost to the fourth seed in his first game? Just bin him then, pay the rest of his contract, start looking for someone else?

    In the 2016 qualifiers O’Neill lost and drew with Scotland which were the 4th seed. Should he have been given his marching orders?

    It’s not football manager, you can’t just replace someone the moment they get a result you don’t like. It’s extremely entitled and we would have the highest manager wage bill in Europe with all the payouts we’d have to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,230 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    Like what? Constant misery or inane defence of Trap?

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users Posts: 455 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    What annoyed me most about last night was seeing how organised and dogged Gibraltar were at the back. Contrast this with our defence against Greece.

    A solid defensive structure should be the bread and butter of any team and it's not a good look for Kenny that he wasnt able to have one in place on Friday. As we saw last night you don't need world beaters on the pitch to achieve it. I've been a Kenny backer since he took over but Friday really has me questioning things now.

    Love it or loathe it but international football generally comes down to two or three key matches and ultimately you have to get results/big performances in those matches. Greece was one such match for us and we failed miserably on both fronts.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,823 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    They had a montage before the game after which Joanne Cantwell apologized to Brady as it was clear he had requested that no fuss was made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    That shows up the flimsiness of the "we dont have the players" excuse oft used to wave away the disorganised mess we are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 739 ✭✭✭athlone99


    Its amazing how quite the forum become when Kenny gets a win.....


    Solid win in the end. Missed the first half but by all accounts it was fairly typical of Ireland the last 10 years? Slow build up, struggling to create good chance etc. Formation from the start was clearly wrong and I think I said it here and many others have, should be going 4-3-3 against the so called weaker teams. The 5-3-2/3-5-2 definitely seems to work against the better teams but it is a waste of time against the better teams.

    The win probably changes nothing, but the September window could. Hard to know if he backed into finishing 3rd again should he be kept on? Probably not at this stage but I think the FAI will take into account crowds and the match going fans etc.

    We will lack decent creative players to pick passes and create chances. Johnston looks like the only real lively player up top, he makes defenders think. Again September will all depend on players getting into their club sides, if they are not getting games we will struggle and Kenny will likely be out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    The forum is only quiet because you dont have people making nonsensical excuses that have to be repeatedly dismissed. Any teams thread in any sports forum is the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,518 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    We hadn't been out of a qualification campaign after two games in my lifetime.

    It was new territory and losing to Luxembourg at home is a disaster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,518 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    Absolute nonsense.

    Using an unconvincing home performance against Gib to make a point.

    Really scraping now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,705 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    Ehm, Steve Staunton in 2006/07 basically had us out after 2 games thanks to being hammered by Cyprus



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    And only for Stephen Ireland we would have drawn with San Marino.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Gibraltar were organised in a similar way(if possibly more extreme) to how we used to play, in fairness.

    2 lines of 4 behind the ball at most times up until the final third and would crowd the box to make it difficult to find space.

    Makes it difficult to create clear cut chances against them, but the trade-off is obviously that they carry virtually zero attacking threat because they have nobody to get the ball to once they are in possession.

    I absolutely wouldn’t criticise them for that approach, but it beggars belief that people would look at them and aspire to that for Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,985 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    I would say Greece have a fair crack at finishing second in that group.

    Netherlands are poor enough.

    We would need to win our next 2 games to get back in it, but to be honest I would say Greece will turn us over in Dublin as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,341 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Netherlands aren’t poor on paper. Koeman seems to be the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I think only qualification would/should save him now, really.

    Finishing third might be enough to keep him on should we get a playoff though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,516 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    It wasn't retaken for keeper off the line. It was because the Greece defender who cleared the ball after the save was inside the box when the kick was taken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    It's not because of 1 game, it's because of 5 major failures and counting. You know this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    The FAI meet next week. We'll get a good indication on how the new version of them is shaping up after that. They have to sack Kenny, that's a given but the process of hiring a new manager and the depths of thier research into that will tell us a lot. If they actually keep Kenny, then any hope of a new positive era will take a severe dent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I was responding to the multiple comments that he should have been sacked after the second game of his first qualification campaign - Luxembourg.

    I have said multiple times on this thread that he should go after this campaign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    Well, it was clear early on that he was out of his depth. What's the point in keeping him till after this campaign?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike


    We don't need to win our next two games. It's the games vs Holland and Greece where we need to win.


    France will likely have top spot sealed by the end of the next window, unless something out of the ordinary happens in their games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    You could literally just read my original post.

    No manager should be sacked because of a result in their second game of their starting campaign. It is literally madness to try and run anything in such reactionary terms and would cost the FAI a fortune.

    Although I’m sure if Roy came for the WC qualifiers and lost to Luxembourg at home, the same people wouldn’t be calling for his head - it would still somehow be Kenny’s fault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    I asked you what's the point in keeping him till the end of this campaign? Completely pointless. He's long proven that he is not up to it. Let someone else in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,919 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Not the same at all Ireland have better player’s than Gibraltar therefore logic dictates they would put it up to teams more. Greece won a Euros in 2004 when they went high energy. Also direct football does not mean hoofing it for the sake of it. That is the wrong way to play it. Has to be thought out and high energy

    When people hear direct football the kennyites with big dreams just think of crazy gang Wimbledon etc But football is not as black and white as that.

    Niall Quinn said it here off the ball Jack’s Ireland played a form of Gegenpressing.


    Ireland we’re one of the first international teams to use gegenpressing under Big Jack. It was about the runners like Aldo or Ray making the defenders turn unsettling them. When Liverpool do it is called Gegenpressing.

    But it was not called that when big Jack did it. Granted Jack played more direct than Liverpool but bemoaned the fact that Denmark copied Ireland’s style called it ‘pressing’ and won a Euros doing it. It was about putting it in the corners of the opponents pitch for Jack that really rattled even the most skilful oppponents.

    So there are plenty of ways that a team can play football to be competitive. Those who think the ‘rightway’ to play football is only one way are idealistic fools.

    A good manager finds a style to frustrate the opponent. Inter beating Barcelona under Mourinho is another example of a well drilled structured side beating a superior technical side.

    -

    Also who was Ireland’s biggest threat yesterday- answer McLean with high energy. Direct crossing. Simple effective. People need to rid themselves of dreamland idealistic notions and cop themselves on. The fans, Kenny and large sections Irish media. What happened the Irish media it never used to be so idealistic? Generational change? Really odd.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,424 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    We won't make playoffs either as things stand apparently.

    Might as well just enjoy the next 5 months



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Literally nobody else would come in and get us qualified so no damage done there.

    The FAI should take their time in finding a replacement, and they’re strapped for cash so no point in paying him off early.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike


    Again, that is not definitive. Based on modelling, it suggests we won't make it. There are so a lot of matches to be played that will have an impact on the play off places.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    A new manager can come in and get their own style, tactics etc introduced to the players. We might get a playoff, we need to have the new manager ready to go for that. Qualifying for major tournaments would be massive for the FAI and their finances. Sack Kenny now and the FAI have until September to get a new manager. It makes zero sense to keep a failed manager in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Not going as far back as Charlton when I think of us playing hoofball.

    Thinking Trap, O’Neill, Mick. Keep it tight, kick it forward to Shane Long, hope he can hold it up, try and win a set piece. Loads of our games followed this pattern, and that’s practically what Gibraltar were doing last night.

    I can understand Gibraltar doing it with the quality they have but Ireland shouldn’t be so risk-averse. There is a middle ground to be had - there’s no reason why we can’t be more organised in defence while being more constructive while transitioning to attack.

    Kenny hasn’t been able to implement an effective, consistent way for Ireland to do this so he’ll be moved on.

    But hopefully the next manager will be able to add a bit more organisation while continuing to try and develop how we create chances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Or they just start looking for a manager now, and if they find one then they can transition Kenny out if they choose to?

    Instead of paying him off and putting a time limit on getting someone in.

    It’s no great disaster to leave him where he is, it doesn’t stop the FAI from looking for a replacement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,705 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,341 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    We drew with Albania under Kerr, we’ve not played them since.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,919 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Direct football done properly is not hoofball. It is an extremely effective and successful style of play for technically poor teams it must be done with high energy aka gegenpressing. You just sound like an idealist football snob. You are not the only one on this thread in fairness. Plenty of dreamers.

    International football is about cutting your cloth to suit. Making a team hard to beat in whatever way possible is no1! Be structured especially for technical inferior teams.

    Winning the ball back closing down high energy is the second crucial part. That was always in Ireland’s DNA but Kenny destroyed that making Ireland slow paced easy to play against. That is the most unforgivable stupid thing he has done IMO. High Energy fitness is a must for Ireland. Close down shots! That is nothing to do with skill. Even fecking Gibraltar caused a few scares yesterday for Ireland.

    Set pieces - Ireland are poor at defending them under Kenny. And should focus on them more as an attacking threat oShea Collins good weapons for Ireland perfect it focus on it.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,705 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    They're not poor but they're not remotely outstanding either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    If the FAI haven't already been looking for a replacement, then we're in big trouble. You have to believe they have identified some candidates. Also, with Kenny gone, they can start approaching potential managers and encourage applications. The playoffs are March next year, there are only 3 international windows until then. Waiting until the end of the campaign to sack Kenny would be a disaster. Cut him loose now, we've already wasted 3 years with him in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    We don’t know who the FAI want, or who’s available now, so you can’t say it would be a disaster to wait.

    There is nothing stopping the FAI from working in the background, and when they remove him could be entirely dependent on who from their list is available.

    No point in them chucking money away while getting a new person in(who would have to be paid for the rest of this campaign with a contract for the entire next campaign at a minimum) unless they’re absolutely sure of who they want and if it’s the right time to get them.

    Leaving Kenny where he is while the FAI do their work in the background does no damage to Irish football.

    The only other thing that might hasten his departure is if match going fans turn on him but considering the numbers at the game last night that doesn’t look likely to happen soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Under Trap, Mick and 2018 onwards O’Neill, we weren’t playing direct football well, we were playing hoofball. That was my point.

    We weren’t doing any variation of pressing, we were packing the final third to leave little space for the opponent to play through. We’d win in back and have a lone striker as an outlet to hope he could hold a ball to bring others into play. But most of the time we’d lose the ball and invite pressure back on.

    Nothing wrong with direct football - nothing wrong with any style of football if it’s effective. But the type we had been playing prior to Kenny wasn’t anywhere close to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,341 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    France, England and Portugal have more talent on paper. Not sure anyone else do in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,006 ✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Unless he wins the U21 Euros it's likely gonna be Carsley. Don't see the FA keeping him on unless they have a good tournament and there's no smoke without fire that last summer he was named as the FAIs long term target post Kenny and again now people in the media and his agent getting stories out there again this summer.

    Whether he should or shouldn't get the job he'll likely be the FAIs first choice if he's out of a job this summer. Doubt they'll put much effort into seeing all the options out there and will just go with Carsley given Hill and Canham (new DOF) are both ex FA and would have probably worked with Carsley at the FA.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,518 ✭✭✭✭noodler




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    There is also the other possibility that the FAI aren’t thinking along these lines at all and that they’ll keep him if he wants to stay on as long as they’re still getting people into the stadium.

    I can’t imagine the state of this thread if it happens!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    Someone might be available now who won't be available in September. It would be a disaster to leave Kenny until the end of this campaign like you want. We have to give the new manager time to prepare for the playoffs. Qualifying for major tournaments is the goal for the FAI, it's a huge deal. So it wouldn't be chucking away money, it would be an investment in giving our team a chance of qualification. This in turn is is huge for all other areas of football as they would receive further investment. Kenny's failures has been a disaster for everyone in this regard. Not only has he not come close to qualification but he has also left the next manager hugely disadvantaged in qualifying for future tournaments. The FAI made a huge error in giving Kenny a new contract, well hiring him in the first place was the original error but no need to compound the error by wasting more time on him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    It's the state of our senior team you should be worried about. How low do you want Kenny to drag us before you're satisfied?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,518 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    We always get people into the stadium and the match going fans always get behind the team.

    Any narrative that either of these two things imply unique support for Kenny specifically is incorrect as far as I am concerned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,495 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Regarding the play-offs. We basically need no more than 7 of the teams head of us in the queue for League B and League A play-offs for us to qualify for either of them. Estonia, as the best ranked League D team are nailed on for a spot in the League A playoff ahead of us because of the ordering rules for non-League A teams getting those spots. Right now I would say that there are 4 teams who are ahead of us in the queue who are looking very unlikely to finish in the top 2 in their respective groups:


    However it gets worse. Finland, Denmark and Slovenia are all in the same group. Since Kazakhstan are so far exceeding expectations 2 of them are currently taking up play-off spots. If we look at a best case scenario for Ireland, kazakhstan won't finish in the top 2 so only 1 of those slots will be taken. So that'll be 5 ahead us.

    Italy and Ukraine are also in the same group, fighting over 1 spot. So 1 of them will require a play-off spot as well. So that's 6 teams almost guaranteed to be ahead of us

    So we are aiming for one of those final 2 spots. If any two of the following scenarios occur then we're goosed:

    • Slovakia qualifying ahead of Bosnia in Group J (looking quite likely, right now although Bosnia have played their toughest fixtures on paper)
    • Kazakhstan qualifying automatically in Group H (they've beaten Denmark so I'm not going to write them off. Would be some story)
    • Romania qualifying ahead of Israel in Group I
    • Montenegro qualifying ahead of Hungary or Serbia in Group G (probably unlikely)
    • Armenia qualifying in group D (probably unlikely given how inconsistent they are)
    • Sweden qualifying in Group F (probably unlikely given their current form)
    • Greece qualifying ahead of Netherlands in our group

    and lots of other scenarios that are increasingly unlikely to happen (e.g. Georgia qualifying ahead of Spain)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭McFly85


    How many times do I have to say that I personally think he should go?

    But I’m not the FAI, I don’t have to balance the books. If they’re happy with how we finish the campaign and are seeing bums on seats, they might keep him on. Not likely but not impossible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,424 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    True, but it's not looking good

    We don't deserve it anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,195 ✭✭✭Xander10


    Still think the sensible decision is for Kenny to see out this campaign at least.

    I think he realises they got the team selection and tactics wrong for the Greece game.

    Building a new squad from scratch takes time.

    Positionally, I think we are ok when it comes to GKs, defenders and forwards.

    Midfield is where the glaring lack of quality is. Cullen is very limited, Mullamby likewise. What a difference Rice would have made, but no use crying over spilt milk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,945 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Think we badly lack full/wing backs also especially left backs. McClean and O'Dowda are not great options really. And Coleman and McClean are aging.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,919 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I agree there is no point in getting rid of Kenny now might as well experiment with the players/tactics at this stage. Treating it like free shots. He might land on something that the would benefit the next manager.

    I was wondering do posters think that Kenny should go back to the u21's Crawford does not seem popular on here. Let Kenny have the u21's and see if he can develop players for the senior squad manager which was the theory in the first place.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement