Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Yeah, she interviewed the high profile guests herself, and left the others to someone else.

Classy when she only managed to get 12 podcasts together, and only one guest at a time unlike your LLS example.

Yes, it's a mystery alright. Many people have said over the years that they are rude, entitled, lazy people who bully and/or blank those they deem beneath them. Maybe it really is as simple as they actually are rude, entitled, lazy people who bully and/or blank those they deem beneath them. I mean, how many people have said this now?

Ah I remember the horror of when she was called a diva by Mariah Carey, good times! 😂😂😂😂😂

Her parents were divorced. I don't think there is anything 'silver spoonish' about the way she was brought up. By your reckoning everyone has a silver spoon in their mouth if they got a half decent education.

Doria was put through college by Meghan in the last couple of years when Meghan got the 'Suits' role and could afford to do it. Thomas seems to have had a great ability to blow money.

Of course that is all bullshit. Not one person has had a bad word to say about Meghan. All her 'Suits' colleagues have said what a really nice person she is. Simon Case, who is in deep **** over Boris Johnson's partying (this is the guy who set himself up to investigate the parties at No. 10 even though he was at the parties!) was the one who brought the bullying charges without the consent of those who claimed to have been bullied) and which the Palace failed to make public its findings which is a form of abuse because Meghan was not given the opportunity to clear her name.

The so-called bullying amounted to staff getting emails which were sent by Meghan at 5.30am in the morning! Hardly sounds like a lazy person to me.

Harry is the exact opposite of being entitled, lazy or deem people to be beneath him if you just look at the charities he founded.

Now, name the many people who have said that they are rude*, entitled and lazy etc.

*Piers Morgan doesn't count.

edit: PS - neither does Dan Wootton count. Is this where you get your information. GB News. LOL.

Of course, the bold part is a lie.

Well yes. Everyone who earns their own money is self-made. The opposite would be someone who inheritated wealth and didn't have to work. For example, Kate Middleton's parents are (or were) self-made millionaires. Prince William inheritated all his wealth. William is not self-made.

Yea, in a few years period, Meghan had a baby, moved country, had a miscarriage, won a lawsuit against Daily Mail, moved country, set up new enterprises, moved country again, got pregnant, had a second baby, made documentary, won loads of awards for her work, and executive produced and presented 12 podcasts.

Phew. She sure is lazy.

Dangerous driving is a criminal charge as is reckless endangerment, and with a little time reviewing NY State criminal code I'm sure further criminal charges could be applied. Don't confuse administrative penalty and criminal liability. If footage exists of a road user acting in a manner which places others at risk if harm? It's far more serious than just a traffic ticket.

But anyway onto the question that you swerved. You believe that Harry is in possession of footage showing the truth of the high speed chase? That he is saving for his documentary? That despite having his, his wife's and his staffs reputation trashed on the basis of a claim that has been dismissed by NYPD and any reporter that's reviewed the claims?

That despite the immediate good it would for H&M, for their claims and in reinforcing their narrative, that Harry is keeping that footage for his next Documentary? That he would rather what, give the anti H&M media enough rope to hang themselves, before pouncing at some much later time with the video evidence that kicks the stool out from under them?

More from the Guardian

Enjoying the thread lads keep it up!

Absolutely nothing, other than the RF probably realised that they were all made up allegations and decided to replace the investigation into producing guidelines/procedures on how to report bullying etc. They decided they wouldn't publish these.

So, in summary, the RF decided not to report back that the bullying claims were total nonsense and yet again failed Meghan by not clearing her good name.

Ah, jm, that is just priceless! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Harry Windsor, Prince of Trials.

The conclusion you draw is a bit of a stretch for even the most ardent of Meghan's supporters. perhaps if there weren't numerous reports of her bullying behaviour over the years?

You are suggesting that the NYPD were told to stand down and pretend this high-speed lethal chase didn't happen? Or at least not log any wrongdoing of any description in relation to this insane high-speed, near-catastrophic chase?

Who could have ordered such a thing, and more importantly why would they make that order?

What benefit would it be to them? What if injuries or fatalities did result from the high-speed chase? What then? What if members of the public came forward with video evidence showing the chase did in fact take place? Would that not make the police force appear incompetent?

If Harry has footage of this crazy chase and you think he isn't going to pursue another legal case, why would he not show the footage to the world? Why would he not vindicate his/his wife's claims? Why keep that footage secret? Why not share the footage that would put an end to the ridicule that he and his wife are enduring over this? Why hold back that footage for a year or two when nobody cares anyway?

Sounds like you need to take off your tinfoil hat there for a minute buddy and let your noodle cool down a bit.

I don't recall either Harry, Meghan or any of their agents, PR asking for the contents of that report to be released. It was always going to be private but wouldn't you or I, knowing we'd done nothing wrong, be shouting from the proverbial roof tops for it to be released so we could clear our name? That didn't happen here. Also still waiting for them to sue Valentine Low who was the first to detail bullying allegations in The Times. Funny that they still haven't.