You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the Left - read OP

Ah you're an "ally" so, explains why you've got your back up so much trying to assert that down is up and up is down.

And I'm not being rude at all, as I said I'm an adult man and I decide what I do and how I act. Nobody is going to tell me. If a man in a dress is fully equivalent to a female in your eyes that's your reality, it's not mine and it never will be.

Ooh edgy, why don't you throw out another hollow soundbite? Maybe a transphobe or some sort of ist?

How's it a slur if that is what they refer to themselves as? Even official literature refers to being a good "ally".

If you ask me personally, hearing someone is an ally is the same as hearing someone describe themselves as a male feminist. Best given an eye roll and a wide berth.

They didn’t refer to themselves as that in that post? You placed that label on them derisively.

Its not the left that attempted to murder migrants by burning out there tents. I think its a classic threat of the far right to paint the left as being much more dangerous than it actually is.

I can tell you as someone who has trans and non binary friends that if you constantly referred to them as not their chosen gender or even describing a trans woman as “a man in a dress”, that it would be considered extremely rude.

Transphobia is passé now. The term is Transmisia, which is a lot more descriptive than being fearful of transgenders.

someone who would tick those boxes above would be a transmisiac, like yourself.

You learn something new every day.

Lol more makey uppey words that mean **** all. Here's a more appropriate one, Trans-apathetic. I don't hate trans people (which is what your made up word implies), I'm not scared of trans people (so it's not a phobia), I simply don't care in the slightest about playing along with it.

(Pssst… all words were made up once)

as Overheal has pointed out, you’re not apathetic. You actively dislike trans people or you wouldn’t be putting them down by describing them as “a man in a dress”.

Why can’t you own up to that?

Well if you categorise disinterest as dislike I can't help you there, I've made my point clear. To me they are a man in a dress - there's nothing offensive about that, it's a fact as far I'm concerned (as already stated I'm not playing along with it so why would I call them anything else?).

You seem to think that anyone refusing to acknowledge them is an act of hatred or dislike but it's not. Believe it or not some of us have adult lives, adult pressures and adult stuff to deal with,and nodding along or pretending that something is what it isn't is not even in the list of things to be concerned about. I'll play along with my daughter pretending she is a princess when Frozen is on, a male stranger demanding I refer to them as a woman is not even remotely a runner.

I’m saying I cannot trust 3 newspapers that misled their readers through their use of headlines.

So the question is, do you trust the 3 organisations that have conclusively misled their audience, or do you trust the organisation that just says, “trust us”.

I actually choose neither, but I’m going to give the benefit of the doubt to the organisation that hasn’t been proven that they misled their audience in the first place.

do you trust other peoples biases more than your own?

Toodle pip so.

If you’re willing to give a partisan outlet the benefit of the doubt when they have provided no evidence for what they're claiming and then proceed to attempt to take the moral high ground on that basis all you're doing is highlighting your own personal bias.

You say three publications weren't honest in how they reported the story yet you're rowing in behind an outlet that is dyed in the wool pro trans lobby in their reporting who have made a statement with absolutely zero evidence to support it and you appropriated that as the virtuous choice between the two in terms of the veracity of the arguments being made.

The question isn't do I trust any organisation, that's a question you're setting and answering in your above post when you supported the pro trans lobby outlet that said something you would broadly agree with so you therefore anointed that outlet as the more trustworthy of those listed.

Like I said, all this does is speak to your own bias, as your initial response to that article being posted showed...

An almost gleeful response to an article that confirmed in your mind the malfeasance of the outlets that you disagreed with. An article who's central premise the author refused to substantiate in any way whatsoever.

So you'll excuse me if I don't just take their or your word for it.

There is literally a recording of what happened which completely refutes your article 😂 Believe what you want though brave and stunning social warrior 🙄

The recording begins with the teacher asking one of the pupils: 'How dare you? You just really upset someone, saying things like [you] should be in an asylum.'

One of the girls responds: 'I didn't say that, I just said if they want to identify as a cow or something, then they are genuinely unwell, and they're crazy.'

The political violence experienced in this country in my lifetime has been almost exclusively left wing. From the shootings and bombings of those seeking to establish a socialist republic to the hammer attack last year on a political meeting.