Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Irish politics discussion thread

15657596162238

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Which could not be disclosed at that point for procedural and legal reasons. I'm not supporting RTE or Tubs in this cock up but getting the truth out there takes priority over swift justice. AK 47 may be right in that RTE will have drop all these independent contracts. The only downside of that is, are you stuck with a turkey until they reach 65?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,607 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    If she didn’t know, she didn’t lie. She absolutely should have known, but if she didn’t know, that’s a matter of incompetence, not lying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If you think the board is there just to look pretty then you will believe they didn’t lie. They signed off on the accounts.

    I happen to think they are there as guardians of licence/taxpayers money with oversight powers.

    They didn’t do their job here and need to stand aside until all is investigated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,607 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I agree that they didn’t do their job. That’s a very different allegation to saying that they lied.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Technically they did when they signed off and submitted the accounts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,607 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It’s not a lie if they were deliberately lied to by others, which is a distinct possibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Afraid to say Board of Directors are given information on a need to know basis. Senior managers may have decided the Board were better off, not knowing. It also would be a management operation and not come across their view. Directors sign off on accounts having been given the ok by the Auditors and senior management, namely the CFO and DG. It may or possibly should have been discussed by the Chairperson and the DG. A Chairperson would have very regular contact, almost daily with a CEO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You are making excuses lads.

    The Board represent us. They presided over lying to us. They need to stand aside until a root and branch inquiry is complete.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,607 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Maybe, but that doesn’t mean that they actually lied.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Hang them first, and we'll ask questions later. Remember when the Stickies had the strong sway in RTE. We wouldn't want something like that happening again.

    I know what the high earners in RTE have been getting and was always appalled. I thought Duffy was the worst value for money. I don't think only the very best should be anywhere near €150K. As AK47 said if they don't like being directly employed they can leave. Pat Kenny has shown them the alternative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Calm down. Nobody is hanging at dawn.

    They should be asked to stand aside until an inquiry is over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Should Minister Martin step into the role or should she appoint an interim overlord?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Minister Martin needs to make sure nobody obstructs a proper root and branch inquiry.

    Clear the pitch, stand down the board and executive and send in independent inquirers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    So nobody is in charge? That would be interesting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,357 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Civil Servants (at appropriate level and experience) would be drafted in to take over either the Exec boar or the main board.

    At least that is the normal response to a melt down in a semi-state company.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    This is a good analysis of the issues;

    My main concern is that removing the Board might be seen as lancing the boil, whilst no really solving the issue. As the article above says we have a bit of white washing and continue as before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,150 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Runners – general production assistants – working for the national broadcaster were paid €10.50 per hour up until the beginning of March of this year.

    The national minimum wage increased to €11.30 per hour on 1 January 2023. 

    The workers were on casual contracts which do not have minimum or maximum hours of work.

    RTE is a disgrace.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    What are the back of an envelope calculations on each episode of the LLs? 25 shows per year. give Tubs €375K for his LLS and €150K for his radio work. €15K per LLS.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The SBP editor is indicating that RTE are considering can they have Tubs on air at all, since he no longer can hold politicians to account. Also that RTE may not deal with Noel Kelly who represents many of their high earners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    “There was an explicit instruction by RTE to anonymise the transactions and use no names" - Sunday Times

    Sounds like something from the mob. The contempt they have for the general public is sickening. I don't see how this can be rectified with a few sacrificial lambs. This suggests something far deeper: a culture that is rotten to the core.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,488 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Executives who wish to hide something from the Board will, in the short term at least, really not find it that difficult. While I wouldn't rule out the Board being complicit or neglectful, being lied to is not really a reason to have to step aside. An inquiry will be done and this may change based on the outcome, but calls for the Board to stand down are over the top.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I agree that it is premature at the this point to call for the Board to step down. However, they appear to have taken their eye off the ball and not asked questions.

    The posters on here calling for them to resign or be fired for lying to the public don't appear to understand company law or the facts that are known to date. It is just the usual hyperbolic response.

    If the CEO and CFO kept these arrangements from the Board and effectively knew that the figures being given to the public were lies, they were misleading their own board, and may face criminal charges. If they told the Board that as well as the salaries from RTE, the presenter(s) were getting extra commercial income and the Board didn't ask questions, that is a matter of competence of the Board and just shady practice from the CEO. Depending on what comes out, either the CEO and CFO were breaking the law (or sailing close to it) or the Board was incompetent. We don't know at this stage, but if it is the former, and there is a trial, we will need witnesses from the Board to testify on the issue. All of that means there is not information at this point to call for the Board to resign, but it is not necessarily ruled out in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I suspect we will get the usual behaviour here. Lofty words about reform and accountability, lessons to be learned etc etc. In reality the wagons will be circled, the whole thing will be buried in lenghty inquiries that just obscure and off we'll go again.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Time for action like this. Forbes being allowed resign without committing to be questioned is the last straw.

    Stand aside the boards and send in independent auditors.

    It will be interesting to see if PAC can get this through the Dàil or if it will be blocked




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    All on the political side know there are certain legal constraints on inquiries by Dail subcommittees. Wish it were otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Yes they did.

    In retrospect it was an awful time for this to be held. After the housing bubble had popped and the general credit crunch, the economy was on the floor, unemployment was at huge levels and the country was a month away from near bankruptcy and having to be bailed out. People were absolutely fuming with politicians and then up comes this referendum to give them more powers. No wonder it got shot down.

    It's a shame.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,494 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The system set up by givernment to give cover and to avoid accountability swings into motion.




Advertisement