President Biden closes gun control speech in USA with 'God save the Queen'

Translation: I have demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt the partisan basis of your attacks, and you have no legitimate response.

You know what they say about glass houses

Well, keep telling voters Joe needs to go and you’ll be setting up instead for Trump to pardon himself. 🤷🏻‍♂️

I don't think everyone who criticises Biden is a Trump supporter but it explains a lot of the criticism.

So yes it is entirely valid to point out double standards and hypocrisy in the attacks on Biden when they occur.

I saw Biden in action here. I see nothing on this thread or elsewhere to suggest he is unfit for office.

By contrast Trump as you note fit for jail the only question being for which of his multiple offences.

In what post did I say that about 'everyone'? I have called out the blatant double standards on display as being a factor explaining many of the attacks and demonstrating beyond doubt their hypocrisy and insincerity.

I literally wrote in the post you replied to:

"I don't think everyone who criticises Biden is a Trump supporter but it explains a lot of the criticism."

To then accuse me of saying it about everyone is a bad faith argument.

I have multiple times on the thread said that if someone thinks an 80 year old is too old and applies that standard equally that is a different thing entirely. Another reason why your claims are false.

I have also repeatedly challenged specific claims that were made and provided alternative explanations without reference to Trump eg why he was led to a particular point to stand. So again your claim is false.

I have posted recent videos of Biden speaking in a relaxed and fluent manner without gaffes. No mention of Trump. Did anyone watch them? Are we only allowed to say bad things about Biden on this thread?

If fitness for office for an American politician is being discussed I see no reason why other politicians conduct should not be referenced.

Your post is a complete misrepresentation of my posts on the thread.

Hyporcrisy doesnt falsify facts.

But you dont have any. Nada. You have zero facts that Biden is unfit for office.

Which is why you have to resort to misrepresentation by selectively quoting the poll even the headline if the article! The poll found that they would still vote for Biden. They would hardly do so if they had serious concerns about his fitness for office.

And resort to scurrilous attacks on Biden.

It is entirely reasonable to query your view of what counts as 'fitness' for office with reference to other American politicians. It is not whataboutery, it is about establishing your frame of reference and basis. And what standard you are applying or does it reek of double standards.

It is entirely valid to point out how 'concerned' you are about fitness for office wrt Bidens inconsequential gaffes while turning a blind eye or actively defending far worse conduct from other US politicians. It reeks of blatant partisanship and hypocrisy and double standards.

Eh, I didn't skip any paragraphs. I just highlighted the third line.

But seeing as you want me to mention them. Below is the post I made about highlighting what I see as a pattern of behaviour that would indicate that Biden appears to me to be getting too old for the job.

Then you went off on big deflection in the your first sentence (see your post below) asking to see my posts highlighting patterns with regard to Trump's conduct. Trump had absolutely nothing to do with my post. Why the fcuk would I want to highlight patters with regard to Trump's conduct when we are talking about Biden. An absolute attempt to deflect away from any criticism of Biden.

Your second sentence, or paragraph as you call it, is still about Trump so why would I bother researching Trump's gaffes and cock-ups (if you'll pardon the pun). My point was about Biden, not Trump.

And your third sentence is where you claimed my comment was made because it was made for blatant partisan reasons, i.e. you think I'm a Trump supporter.

That's exactly what people thought in 2016, for almost the exact same reason.

It could all cling to him, and he could still win the election. Especially if a majority of voters are inundated with Goebbels-blushing constant propaganda that Joe is mentally unfit for office. The base is already talking pardons, a conviction isn't going to change their minds.

That's basically what Meidi Hasan said:

I went to pick up my cat's prescription at the vet and bought a scented candle too. The young receptionist asked "do you want a candle to put your bag in?"

I made sure to alert the owner of the practice right away because the staff were in clearly evident cognitive decline. :(

Have they anyone better than Trump?

Any chance the legal stuff will stop Trump running?

As opposed to slowly approaching 90? That sentence means nothing.

Presumably Harris is competent given her previous role, why does favourability come into it now? Because if that's the case Biden/Harris beats the GOP challengers all day long.