Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Should Metal Detecting Be Legalised In Ireland Too?

  • 26-06-2023 12:47pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭


    It's legal in the UK England and Wales with permission of the land owners. Same goes for the United States and France. However in Ireland there are very strict laws where the hobby is concerned. Wikipedia has all the legal status. Here's the link.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_detector

    Post edited by Jonathan1990 on


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,724 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    Are you a metal detector? ...Or a detectorist?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,050 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    If it's illegal then it doesn't seem to be enforced as I've seen a few people out with metal detectors over the years

    Maybe he is the metal detector, he can find metal by holding out his hands, and he's worried he might get arrested for accidentally detecting metal 😂

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Problem is if people go on public land and start digging up parks, beaches and wherever else.

    shouldn’t be a problem using it on your own land, land of a friend or family member once permission has been sought and granted but unfortunately if they were made legal tomorrow you’d have every headbanger digging up pitches, golf courses, peoples private property etc… just to satisfy their curiosity and weird obsession with these things.

    Get a proper hobby..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,636 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Could there be a limited licensing system through clubs? Some sort of middle ground between free for all and none.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,856 ✭✭✭Allinall


    It’s up there with train spotting.

    That should be made illegal as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,490 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It is legal, but regulated. Just like driving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,535 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Kinda like fireworks.

    Blue movies were illegal once and pirated blue movies.

    Some guy get into trouble selling dodgy VHS from a van.

    If it was a cloud service he would have been a tech visionary.

    😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,058 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    The problem is the damage done when digging up the metal. Something of major archeology importance, timber or leather etc, might be destroyed to get something that isn't, an old nail. So it's better to leave it in the ground than have people destroy our history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,362 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Then have some sort of certification system in place. make them do a one day course.

    they're not going around with a JCB. They're just people with a trowel



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Count Dracula


    There is nothing illegal about it. You can walk around with a metal detector, detecting metal, all day long.

    But you can't do it on someone else's land or property without their permission.

    There are stronger laws surrounding what you find also.

    Finders keepers losers wheepers is no such thing. if you detect and find a 6th century gold Coptic cross in a bog near Bansha woods, you don't get to sell it at Sotheby's either. You get to donate it to the National Trust. That's the law.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,058 ✭✭✭✭Del2005



    It takes years to become an archaeologist yet you think a 1 day course will teach people enough not to destroy our history! You don't need a JCB to destroy an artifact, a trowel will do just as good a job.

    I can't see any good from letting people metal detect and I can see plenty of issues. The biggest issue is that anything found belongs to the State.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,569 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    What is a "proper hobby?" Are you the hobby police?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,636 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    If it on private land though what is there to stop the owner at sone point digging the area for farming or gardening purposes, and doing far more damage?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,771 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Nothing. But any land apt for farming or gardening has already likely been used for that many times. Metal detectorists choose land precisely because they think there may be artefacts of interest there, so they pose a risk to artefacts, and sites, that haven't already been damaged by agricultural, gardening use, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,362 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    They're not going to be archaeologists. They're not going to be performing huge digs. They're some people with metal detectors walking across a field. If they find anything, they call in archaeologists who perform a proper escalation on the site. It's ridiculous to hold them to the same standards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,058 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    And what about what they destroy before they realise that they have found something of importance?

    I'm not trying to hold them to the standards of archaeologist, I'm saying that they shouldn't be digging because they aren't archaeologis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,362 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    So let me get this straight? Someone shouldn't be allowed go through a field with a metal detector in case they destroy something with a trowel? But it's ok to plough or dig up the field?

    And it's better to leave something to never be discovered rather than risk a guy with a trowel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,771 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    There's a couple of differences. One is that metal detectorists are specifically looking for artefacts of interest in order to dig them up. The chances of their damaging artefacts/sites by digging them up are therefore somewhat higher than random damage from farming land. Another is that farming use actually has a value that needs to be taken into account; we all like to eat food, and agribusiness is a major economic force in this country. So the risk of damage to sites/artefacts has to be set against that. I don't see any similar countervailing factor to set against the risk of damage from amateur detectoring. Sure, the dectorist himself derives satisfaction/pleasure from pursuing his hobby, but that doesn't have quite the same weight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Fields have been ploughed for hundreds of years. Farmers aren't ploughing any deeper.


    But some fool with a metal detector will go out and start digging holes where they shouldn't, damaging artefacts and destroying the context in which they're found.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,362 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Someone specifically looking for something is more likely to damage it than someone destroying the whole field? You get why I'm not getting that argument. Someone walking through a field with a metal detector and using a trowel to dig up and around something is more dangerous than a plough or a digger?

    And you say that because farming generates money it's ok? So this priceless heritage that you say we can't trust amateurs with, you're ok with destroying it for spuds? Because apparently you're fine with ploughing up a field but not letting someone with a metal detector at it.

    I think you just don't like amateurs and are a bit of a snob. Let people do this. Get a course that they can do. Get a register that they have to fill out before they do it so that it can be tracked. Get an escalation process in place so they can contact archaeologists when they find something and the site needs to be examined. They can be a valuable addition to the archaeology community. Don't gate-keep and look down on them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,771 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    You're not thinking straight, Grayson. People don't use their metal detectors in already-ploughed fields. They use them in sites where they hope to find interesting artefacts. They focus their efforts on sites that haven't already been degraded by agriculture. So, yeah, they are much more likely to damage an artefact or its site than is a farmer ploughing a field that has been ploughed many hundreds of times already.

    Archeological artefacts aren't randomly distributed; they are concentrated around early settlements or other sites of historic activities. A metal detectorist isn't interested in wandering up and down the furrows of an onion-field; he heads for ring-forts, cairns, passage graves, the sites of ecclesiastical ruins or ruined tower-houses, votive lakes, the likely location of river crossings, estuary flats, bogs, that kind of thing.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    it's not just the issue with destroying say a leather good; it's also the fact that the good can be removed from its context, or the context destroyed.

    a leather shoe in situ in undisturbed ground is a hell of a lot more valuable archaeologically than one presented to an archaeologist across a desk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,362 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    My point was that in a field that's unploughed, it's ok to plough it but not ok to use a metal detector.

    I realise that certain areas might be off limits. That's fine. That's why I suggested a register. But the law currently is that you're not allowed do it anywhere. That's a bit nuts. We don't want you doing it in place X so we're going to make it illegal to do it anywhere. I could understand banning it on the hill of tara but it's not allowed on Bull island?

    BTW, you mentioned bogs. That's another weird example. It's ok to drain it and dig turf but not use a metal detector?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,636 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Why does the UK accomodate it legally? Don't the same concerns apply there about contextual damage?

    Are they prepared to take on more regulatory oversight?

    https://www.newforestnpa.gov.uk/visiting/visitor-information/metal-detecting/#:~:text=Under%20UK%20law%20there%20is,you%20find%20on%20their%20land.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    drawing up a map where it would or wouldn't be allowed would be a mammoth task, and probably muddy the waters legally even more.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yes, and many archaeologists in the UK hate the fact that it's allowed. i remember seeing a team special where they had to smuggle tony robinson in under a blanket because they didn't want word getting out a dig was going on, in case detectorists came down at night and ruined their work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,636 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    As this is AH I'll say that flagged up visions of a zombie horde descending chasing poor Tony R.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,724 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,362 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    No. They just put forward key areas where they suspect it shouldn't be allowed.

    And I understand the issues with Tony Robinson under a blanket but that's not going to stop illegal activities. Archaeologists are worried about someone going into a site they're digging and looting the place at night. That's illegal now and would be illegal even if detectoring was legal.

    Looters will loot anyway. Stopping a hobbyist from doing it legally won't stop looters.

    Archaeology and history are fascinating subjects. They should be available to all. This is academic gate keeping. It's keeping everyone out. There's an opportunity to invite people in and educate them. To share this with people who have a passion for it. To let them participate and help, but pure snobbishness is keeping the plebs out.

    They could help set the rules. They could build a framework. They don't.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Archaeology and history are fascinating subjects. They should be available to all

    Uh, no. Archaeology is a specialist discipline needing training and/or supervision. It should not be 'available' to untrained people by dint of letting them dig things up for their own entertainment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,752 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    The other day i saw a dude walking up and down Tramore beach waving a detector in front of him as he walked up and down the length of the beach .... Its a Loooong beach !

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,636 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Could he be looking for lost keys or something?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,752 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    didnt look like it ....

    Gloves on, little trowel, bag on his hip ..

    It looked like he does it regularly ..

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    I have a little spade which I use when camping, basically to sh*t in the woods. Or bury greenwaste like banana skins at the roadside.

    Never found any archaeology! Because I usually choose a bit of ground where somebody has dug already, eg, edge of a ploughed field or off the path in woodland.

    Am I destroying heritage? Don't think so...

    I also have a metal detector - have used it on the beach. Mostly bottle tops and rusty nails, a couple of small coins like 2p.

    Also in a garden to find a lost engagement ring.

    It is nonsensical to propose that I'm some sort of Indiana Jones, throwing vital ancient finds over my shoulder as I mine for treasure. It just isn't so! A trowel or small spade? Anyone digging foundations for a shed will go much deeper!

    The vandals who would do so, are doing so already, by night, with dark torches and dogs.

    Much better if it was sensibly regulated - like by a simple training course, a certificate, a licensed club. Or something reasonable like this - not just a diehard change-phobic NIMBY!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,752 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    I agree...

    Its not like they are going out with mini diggers....

    Just more red tape created for the sake of it 🙄

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    Meanwhile, in County Carlow: there is a huge, amazing, massive cromlech called the Brownshill Dolmen. Biggest one in Ireland. Never been excavated.

    It used to have near neighbours in the form of two other monuments - in the fields nearby. These are now gone - just disappeared. Presumably ploughed under by the owner, to gain more land, with never a word said by anyone about preserving ancient remains or anything cultural like that.

    Seriously doubt if it was metal-detectorists who managed to bury two megalithic sites with their little trowels.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    gave me a chuckle - was watching an old time team at lunch, and it's not going well for them in the episode; they're having big trouble finding anything.

    after finding modern nails, tony robinson asks one of the detectorists 'but why aren't we finding anything older?'

    the detectorist laughs nervously and says 'probably because we've had it'.

    23:30 in.




  • Registered Users Posts: 45 eddie r


    You are 100 % allowed metal detect on any irish beach without permission it is the only place they have no issue with, the Irish laws are stupid strict here nothing like the uk



  • Registered Users Posts: 45 eddie r


    I metal detect on beachs all the time they are no law against it thats a fact



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,752 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    i didnt say there was.😏

    I just said the lad was walking the whole beach....

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    lidl are clearly encouraging the young people of ireland to be lawbreakers!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Can you point out the location of the other two on the old OSI historical map viewer? That map is from the 1840's and there is no mention of any other one that I can see.

    Or are you blaming farmers ploughing the land pre-1840 for the disappearance of an old monument? Your confident anecdote presents it like these monuments disappeared within living memory. They may have - I'm just asking you where they are on that old map



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭bmc58


    You won't make thousands or more (possibly) from trainspotting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    regardless of that, whether someone ploughed out archaeological features or not, has no bearing on the seeming argument (that you were quoting) that metal detecting is harmless.

    'someone without a metal detector destroyed a monument' is not an argument for or against metal detecting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It was a silly argument to begin with but looks even sillier if it is effectively - "there used to be something there a few thousand years ago. It disappeared somehow at least more than 180 years ago. Therefore I am attributing that to some farmer ploughing his land and that consequently entitles me to go off on a "treasure hunting" spree damaging the sh1t out of any historica monument I like because I watched too many issues of Time Team on the telly and bought a metal detector in Lidl for 20 quid"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,958 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    And realistically it seems like Ireland has a lot of archaeology that's barely explored, but nothing like the UK.

    Even ploughs here occasionally find something interesting, and luckily the farmer recognised he'd found a site of interest:https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/farmer-uncovers-nearly-4000-year-old-tomb-ireland-180977554/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,636 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It's ok, they forgot to bundle it with a spade...

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭bmc58




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




  • Advertisement
Advertisement