Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1646647649651652808

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I agree completely with your proposals on the second half in terms of how better to fund upgrades.

    Disagree with first part. Generally speaking someone who’s able spend several hundred thousand buying and fitting out a house along with solicitor fees and stamp can afford sub €10k for modest energy improvements with half decent finance management.

    If you really really can’t, pay less for the house or buy a more efficient one in the first place (or take the penalty of higher mortgage costs). I guess it’s part of the point. Drive down value of older houses to make a clear incentive for existing owners/new buyers to increase energy efficiency of their homes



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    have you looked at any of the upgrades on social housing units….it’s not just the wealthy benefiting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The state is going to have to move to a far more interventionist policy like this in the middle/late part of this decade. We're currently on track to achieve an _at best_ 29 per cent reduction in our emissions by 2030, instead of our commitment of 51 per cent. To make up the difference (or at least narrow it) the state is going to have get far more involved.

    BER upgrades, and solar panel installation, for all houses paid up front by the government (not just those households that can afford to pay for the upgrade and claim a % of back in tax as its done right now) are an easy way to make a big difference. They can recoup the costs over years on electricity bills like you suggest - give 20% of the savings to the household, 80% to the government until the cost is cleared. Everyone wins.

    It should be politically popular too as its actually improving people's lives/finances, instead of our far more common to date green taxes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Disagree with first part. Generally speaking someone who’s able spend several hundred thousand buying and fitting out a house along with solicitor fees and stamp can afford sub €10k for modest energy improvements with half decent finance management.

    If what you say we're true, it would be extremely odd that the proportion of ftb buyers in the market over the last decade were so low when rent was double the repayment terms of a mortgage. It only recovered with loosening of lending limits and shared ownership schemes

    If you really really can’t, pay less for the house or buy a more efficient one in the first place (or take the penalty of higher mortgage costs). I guess it’s part of the point. Drive down value of older houses to make a clear incentive for existing owners/new buyers to increase energy efficiency of their homes

    I'd be very careful about a policy of deliberately devaluing older homes as this may encourage dilapidation which is already a huge issue

    The most environmentally friendly thing anyone can do is make what you have last longer. Current ESG policies widely discourage and penalise this



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    How do you think the real squeezed middle (median income +/- 15%) feel about that?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    It's also a method of turning nimbys into yimbys plus free real estate for a solar farm



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden




  • Registered Users Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Ozark707



    Looks like no immediate letup in rates hiking by ECB

    The UK’s stubbornly high inflation has convinced senior policymakers at the European Central Bank to maintain their aggressive stance on raising interest rates to avoid being accused of failing to contain price pressures. Several members of the ECB’s rate-setting governing council told the Financial Times that recent criticism of the Bank of England over its struggle to bring down inflation had served as a cautionary tale during private discussions at their annual conference in Sintra, Portugal. “We have seen what happened in the UK and we don’t want the same thing to happen to us,” said a eurozone rate-setter. “It is better to sound a little more hawkish and be prudent about how fast inflation will fall than to be caught out by a negative surprise, which is a problem for a central bank.”


    https://www.ft.com/content/92448a30-3740-4ebd-98a9-27757fb3ced0



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,921 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Do you they really describe it as a point in time estimate? I would think the whole idea of the census is that it is accurate at that point in time. That accuracy can then be used to make estimates about other timescales.

    And it is worth remembering that the CSO never felt the need for another form of analysis. Those questioning the accuracy and feeling the need for another measure consisted entirely people who had a vested interest in what the vacancy figure was.

    The CSO themselves under quite intense criticism, steadfastly defended the accuracy of their census vacancy count.

    Given the controversy generated by their 2016 census vacancy count, I think the following explanatory statement is laden with meaning in it's brevity.

    Pathway four of Housing for All: A New Housing Plan for Ireland, published in September 2021 by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, looks to address vacancy and the efficient use of existing housing stock. A requirement for more data in this area was identified.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭wassie


    The most environmentally friendly thing anyone can do is make what you have last longer. Current ESG policies widely discourage and penalise this

    What are these ESG policies you refer to?

    Genuine question and not saying your wrong - I ask because I am aware of a several medium rise buildings in Dublin where the owners have decided to gut the building, but retain the shell and core in order to be redeveloped, instead of completely demolishing the existing and build new, specifically as a response to EU Taxonomy requirements.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 171 ✭✭Beigepaint


    Listed buildings no?

    A building may be a protected structure even if it’s a wreck or has limited value to the disinterested observer.

    So legally you can’t just tear down anything you want and start from scratch, even if that would be the most sensible business decision.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭wassie


    No. These are investment driven decisions by the owners.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,921 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Article in the IT today touches on some of this in a local micromarket context - Dingle. The youth have been priced out, most have left and those that remain are crammed into multigenerational housing.

    Michael O’Shea, a local auctioneer and a Fianna Fáil municipal district councillor (amazing how often the two go hand in hand), can see there is problem:

    “the indigenous people” of Dingle could not afford a house, nor could they get planning to build one, and this was creating the problem in Dingle where commercial interests were buying up new properties to let.

    Young people who wanted to live in Dingle town typically had to stay with their parents, and he had come across situations where three, or even four, generations were living in one house across the peninsula from Camp to Annauscaul.

    Dingle was virtually “a no-go area” for planning it was so difficult to get permission to build, and at the same time any property coming on the market in the town was being bought up for letting as an Airbnb, he said.

    Three or four generations crammed into a house is not ideal, we'd all agree, because commercial interests are snapping up ever property for Airbnb. He's identified both the problem and the cause of the problem.

    So what's the auctioneer and Fianna Fail district councillor's solution?

    Mr O’Shea has called for more affordable housing, rather than just social housing and has said the option of boat accommodation for summer staff should be looked into.

    Build more new housing!! And make it affordable. Who'd have thought it.

    Might there be an easier and quicker solution to the problem?

    Dr Ó Fionnáin, a local GP who recently announced his intention of running for the Green Party in the next local elections thinks there might be:

    There were 1,000 properties billed as Airbnbs in and around Dingle in a search he did recently. Plans to regulate Airbnbs and short-term letting by creating a register would help to free up housing for younger people, he said. “We don’t have a problem with housing stock in Dingle – we have a problem with distribution.”

    Good luck to the GP in his election bid. Though if his message is "we have a problem with distribution" and he's running against the Fianna Fail "more affordable housing" auctioneer he might struggle.

    Because according to the electricity meter of these 1,000 properties, Dr Ó Fionnáin doesn't know his arse from elbow, and Mr O'Shea will solve all these problems.




  • Registered Users Posts: 68,654 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Plenty of office buildings have had skeletons retained rather than fully knocked due to wanting better LEED standards. Also there's a number of hotels in Dublin which were built on the skeleton of an old office building for the same reason in whatever the hotel certs are.

    It does prevent a lot of new concrete being poured



  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭drogon.


    In regards to Mortgage relief, what are people's opinions on it ?

    There seems to be a cohort of people that seems to be dead set against it, which is fair enough since it goes against interest rate hikes in the first place. But why should buy to let and other investors be able to write off some or all of the interest they pay against the rental income, while the average Joe shouldn't be able to do the same ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 861 ✭✭✭Zenify


    Same reason they are able to claim lots of other things like insurance, maintenance, rates etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭Mr Hindley


    Supply still going nowhere fast...




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭The Student


    Because the average Joe does not pay income tax or capital gains tax on their property unlike landlords.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05



    This is the area of non-ESG (environmental, social and governance) compliant offices, many of which are already on their way to becoming “stranded assets”.

    If a building does not meet ESG requirements and the cost of improving it to satisfy these exceeds the required market return, the building in question can be considered a stranded asset.

    A scarcity of materials and competition for labour and expertise is unlikely to see these costs abate in the next few years as the scale of the issue becomes apparent. The Bannon office team estimates than less than 15 per cent of Dublin’s current office stock is actually ESG compliant


    Uk

    Without these changes, there remains a real risk that the office sector will face the same blight currently impacting many of the UK’s more secondary high street and shopping centre assets, with redundant office buildings left to become vacant as they fail to meet legislative or investor needs.

    Post edited by Villa05 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    That story belongs in the Waterford Whisperer not the Irish Times

    Ireland: where facts Trump satire.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 615 ✭✭✭J_1980


    Just been to couple of viewings today.

    first one totally overrun despite being priced at feb23 price at ask.

    second one cheaper house. Foreign buyer making cash offer 10% above ask straight away in front of everyone.

    not surprised about the low supply, you’re mad net selling here. Property is still too cheap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A decent forecast on US inflation predicting the falls will reverse next month in regular inflation and by September in core inflation. This would result in interest rates rising further than many general forecasts




  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Well the average Joe pays enough tax to the tax man.. The interest relief will just offset some of the tax they pay to the tax man.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭The Student


    The vast majority of landlords are also your " average joe". Very few of them sole source of income comes from rental income.



  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Fair enough, I am just saying why when corporation, business or landlords gets tax cuts and subsidies they somehow don't add to the inflation. But hey give something to the average Joe that is a different story.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭The Student


    I agree with you in so far as I am a landlord and feel we are being unfairly treated in comparison to corporate landlords and tax.

    The tax situation for small landlords is one (not the only) of reasons we are leaving the sector in our droves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭drogon.


    I totally agree with you there in regards to small landlord and taxation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭wassie


    So this is not ESG policies at play, this is legislation (EU Taxonomy) at work.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Can you explain that statement?

    Surely assets becoming stranded due to non compliance with ESG regulations is due to ESG policies?



Advertisement