Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

Options
1181182184186187199

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Spitfire 2030... cheap and quick to build... Aer Corps already have experience operating the type, easy and cheap to maintain... win win



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,108 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    That's a very good point about having to build up know how first before jumping into an advanced Gen 4 or 5 aircraft. I think buy half a dozen L139 NG first as a lift plane which can be retained in this role ongoing even after purchasing either Gripen or KAI for air policing. Damn useful for ceremonial duties and for formation training etc. The Breitliing display team use them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    For about the 50th time on this thread, a plane like the Alca is superfluous to the Air Corps. Redundant.

    The PC-9M offers full primary and advanced trainer features. It is literally all a trainee pilot would need prior to advancing to frontline fighter training, in simulator and practical form. Especially to a simpler multi-role Gen 4/4.5 like F-16 or Gripen. Including formation training.

    The PC-9M will be replaced in the next 5 years, probably by PC-21. And that will close the gap somewhat, but ostensibly in the same role.

    And do you know what looks really well in ceremonial formation? The F-16.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    To be fair I’m still calling BS on the PC9s being replaced in the next 5 years, at the rate our procurement goes we would have to start this year at even talking about thinking about maybe going for an RFI let alone a tender. That’s not even counting the lifespan left on the planes.

    If the replacement project starts by 2030 let alone physical hardware.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,454 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Advanced trainer is not LIFT. PC21 does LIFT, but its very different to the PC9



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    PC-9's will be sweat until extinction



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Will they? Why?

    It's not as if funding isn't available to replace them. And if the DoD/DF/AC are to bear fruit for all this additional budget over the rest of the decade, new Trainers is a simple enough acquisition to move on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Everything is a simple acquisition... somehow the Government manage to drag it out over multiple election periods..

    PC-9's won't get replaced until they're falling apart



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Air Corps has ordered and / or acquired seven new Aircraft in the last three years, including two additional to existing orders, at relatively short order to historical norms.

    If you think there isn't the will to modernise and procure, across both the civilian and uniformed branches of Defence, the evidence doesn't really support that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭JayBee66


    The question is part political, part economical and part historical (sometimes hysterical).

    There are those who wish Ireland to remain a neutral state. Easily done 80 years ago but maybe not so in this modern interconnected world that we live in that has Russian strategic bombers probing the Atlantic seaboard. Some might say they are testing the RAF but they do so with transponders off and are therefore a threat to civil traffic passing through Irish air space.

    If European countries of similar size (both in population and economy) to Ireland can have a fast jet air force to protect their skies then why not Ireland? An update of the radar system is welcomed but that will only show the presence of aggressors, it doesn't defend against them. Air defence is not only aircraft but a fully integrated system with radar and SAMs.

    Since independence, Ireland has always had a somewhat makeshift armed force with castoffs from here and there, mostly the UK. The Air Corps is just that and not a "Force". More of a transport corps. The "navy" is no more than an armed coast guard. Does Ireland have an army if it doesn't have main battle tanks and artillery? With Twitter bleating #UnitedIreland every other week, I wonder how our army could cope with a "Troubles" style conflict that gave a then much larger Cold War British Army a hard time.

    For Ireland to have credible armed forces would probably mean integration within NATO. As with Finland's accession, the US could then set up forward bases here with air defence and a ground force presence. It would probably be a lot cheaper than upgrading and remaining neutral.

    Talking of making things cheaper, if we don't currently have credible (expensive) armed forces nor a national health service, where exactly do our high taxes go?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Ordering and delivery are the easy part, if you have a regular supply chain. The government made it difficult, and 3 years isn't exactly true is it?

    PC-12 order went in, in 2017 .... after YEARS of humming and hawing and the last push being the Cessna's being retired (after 40+ years service)... additional to that order went in because Pilatus had spare on the production line.

    Likewise with the Casa's which were ordered in 2019, again after YEARS of humming and hawing, and the only push was maintenance was becoming too expensive and downtime was occurring more and more (highlighted during the Coastguard contract negotiations, and a number of NATO and Russian monitoring incidents), the IAC declined a 3rd available one specifically for lift capabilities (if we had something else in the pipeline, I could see the rationale, but we don't, we turned down a cheap capability starter).

    So yes, the evidence does show the IAC will sweat whatever assets they have until they HAVE to change it... The PC-9's are due to be replaced 2025, which would mean initial options for tender would have to have been raised months ago.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The question of whether remaining a credible neutral State in the Western Hemisphere is possible, without a robust defence force to assert it, has been settled.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Has anyone told Finance, DOD and DPER? Cause again even without the long lead before an actual tender for the ACs new aircraft we have the example of the MRV hanging around for 20 years. The idea that suddenly the collective departments that have slow rolled ever purchase is going to turn around and start writing checks is nonsense when we haven't even seen an RFI for the latest "issue" of Radar Purchases or the aforementioned MRV which isn't even an unplanned purchase.

    No the PC 9's are going to be doing what they are doing well into the 2030s I would say.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747




  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They're in feckin NATO you moron, since it was founded.

    They are one big icy aircraft carrier for Alliance Air forces, with Keflavik air station accommodating hardened shelter for dozens of fighters, tankers, AWACS and P-8 multirole maritime patrol aircraft.

    They also host in Iceland, huge NATO anti-submarine war games every few years, under the Northern Viking banner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    How about these to get jet experience? Cheap and next step..




  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    They're as neutral as Ireland... in fact I'm almost certain Ireland has committed more troops to NATO missions than what they have.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,978 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Being a member of NATO does not equal contributing military personnel. You probably already know this, of course. 🙄

    https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/declassified_162083.htm



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,454 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    First flew 60 years ago. About to retire from Active use by Sweden to be replaced with Grob G120TP.

    Thanks but no.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    now flip that and ask why does Ireland contribute to NATO missions then? Partnership for peace is the step before full membership.

    It's difficult that someone who claims to be so learned still thinks Ireland is neutral in any other way other than in title.

    At the end of the day... IAC aren't getting jets in the next 10-15 years... sign up to NATO and get Air Policing rotations and you'll have regular jets in Irish airspace, maybe by the time that happens the IAC could deploy the Giraffe radar system on the NE coast as an interim until a long range primary head is fitted... oh wait, that won't work because the Giraffe system is obsolete also... be grand, I'm sure a new AWACS orbit area over Ireland would be welcomed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,115 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    What I make of Ireland's neutrality is irrelevant right now, this is the thread about fighter jet acquisition.

    You have made a comparison between the defence policies of Ireland and Iceland, as if they are comparable, when that is obviously not the case.

    Our military non-alignment and Iceland's NATO founding partner status, hosting all manner of Alliance military assets could scarcely be more different.

    Are you advocating for Ireland to change to a position similar to Iceland's?



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Ireland should have been in NATO years ago,and could have been founding members along with Iceland... we wouldn't be in this embarrassing mess with regards to defence..

    This pseudo neutrality is embarrassing also, and if we don't make the jump off the fence, it's a stance that may come back to bite us in some shape or form.

    Just waiting for a "but what threats and from who??"... same people and threats Iceland have... funny thing about it is, Ireland declined obviously due to the UK being in it, but also because they had a modestly equipped defence force, where they anticipated to be able to monitor and intercept any potential targets....something we can't say about it today.

    Also, military movements in Ireland were very interesting pre- 00's when the anti war folk couldn't pester the government with real time pics of what's in Shannon etc... to say Ireland hasn't hosted it's fair share of NATO assets is a lie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    We never had such ability to monitor or control our environment at any stage, that’s just fantasy, as for our defence position, we tried blagging a deal with the US when we refused NATO,mbut they weren’t going to waste their time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    So daily Avro Anson coastal watch patrols by multiple aircraft, with DF equipment along the west and north coast in the 50's and 60's, then long range PSR coverage of the west and north approaches from the 70's to 90's was all just made up then?

    ability to counter threats peaked in 70's.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭sparky42


    It was an Irish answer to the problem to say we could do something while letting the U.K. handle things, it was never a capable force that would have had any impact on a situation, to put it in context it’s like saying the two CASAs give us full surveillance now. The bulk of the Ansons were retired in 1947, leaving 3 to serve into the 60s, with nothing more than the crews eyeballs for observation, maybe they can see underwater? Or be able to cover all our coasts? Our Corvettes were barely capable in the 40s, after that the idea they were anything capable is laughable with fishing boats being able to outrun them, and then they were replaced by ships of even less capability.

    We have never have had the ability to “counter threats” at any point, with neither trained personnel or equipment capable of performing such roles, because neither the Irish public or politicians willing to make the investment needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,978 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    This is fantasy stuff - to what purpose I don't know. Hopping the ball again, I guess. The capacity of the Air Corps in the Second World War was very limited, to put it mildly, and accidents led to the loss of several aircraft in the early months such that activity had to be scaled back to a bare minimum. Ireland never had surveillance radar for military purposes, just primary radar for ATC until SSR was acquired and installed. Shannon did not see some sort of covert military activity prior to the the internet era either. There have always been occasional military diversions in emergency and indeed some very unusual types did visit in such circumstances, but that doesn't make it systematic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,108 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,396 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    [MOD]Yet again, I seem to have to observe that the issues of whether Ireland -should- be in NATO or have its own aircraft is not a subject for this thread.[/MOD]

    However, I do find myself in some general agreement with Aerlingus that there seems little indication that the PC-9s won't be flown until the wings fall off, much as the Fougas and Aermaccis before them. Certainly it seems unlikely that any tender process will be completed by the 2025 date if it hasn't already started.

    The recent investment in PC-12s and CASAs are not, I don't think, evidence of a willingness to invest in infrastructure to the extent that the PC-9s are concerned. The PC-12s and CASAs are heavily used for practical daily purposes which are evident to the population, but just what is the purpose of the PC-9 fleet? Ireland doesn't send them anywhere for their weapons capability. They aren't used for intercepts that I'm aware of. The country has no jets to train for, one of their primary roles. The PC-12s do better at surveillance. If half the things end up grounded due airframe life being reached, is anyone going to particularly care?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭roadmaster




Advertisement