Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The future of RTE after Tubsgate.

  • 02-07-2023 11:57am
    #1


    If the front of todays Irish Mail on Sunday is to be believed, the government is planning to take the axe to RTE. I’d definitely agree with selling off 2FM. Playing pop music is not a public service obligation.

    After all thats come to light in the last 10 days or so it’s clear that fundamental reform of RTE is needed. Merely changing the way the top brass operates or bringing in a broadcasting charge as solutions just won’t cut it anymore IMO.

    RTE’s dual funding model needs looking at as its created this opaque hybrid entity we have now. Personally i would strip it of it’s commercial income and redistribute that to the independents. If that meant a dramatically slimmed down RTE living off a license fee/broadcasting charge only then so be it. If that’s not gonna happen then a more clear separation of RTE’s PSB obligations and it’s commercial activities should occur.




«1345678

Comments

  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    I note there are several other threads on this elsewhere. However there’s none here, and this being the Broadcasting forum, it would be very odd if we couldn’t discuss a major broadcasting issue just because there was a thread on it elesewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,425 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I'm actually in favour of the dual funding model for public broadcasters. If you take the BBC as an example of a public broadcaster fully funded by license fees, it's been quite vulnerable to political interference over the years.

    They would often push climate deniers and other conspiracy theories because they were required to present a "balanced" argument. And when they start asking too many difficult questions of the government, some party crony gets put in charge to quickly crush any investigative journalism

    So I'm fine with the likes of a public broadcaster having a second income source to give them independence from political interference

    However, it's quite clear that the public is not getting good value for their licence fees and reform is needed of how the money is distributed and the level of oversight involved

    In terms of the broadcasting infrastructure, I think it's pretty obvious that it should be funded, however there's a good debate over exactly what is worth funding.

    For example the government could turn around and say that most content is delivered online now and they're already funding high speed internet rollout so there's no need to fund TV and radio infrastructure

    I don't think that'd realistically happen, however it does remain a possibility

    I would like to see more distribution of the licence fees towards the content side. Independent journalism is one obvious beneficiary of the licence fees. I realise that it's hard to consider any journalism fully independent when it receives government money, however we can see from examples like Fox News that fully commercial journalism is at least as bad, if not worse.

    I think funding should be directed to multiple news outlets through different forms of media (TV, radio, print and online) and legislation should be introduced requiring that a broad range of viewpoints be supported, so one party couldn't simply remove funding from opposition news platforms

    I would also like to see more funding directed towards Irish media companies. A lot of that has just been money thrown at RTE to develop media, and frankly I would say they have yet to produce a single good original show in nearly a century of operations

    We've seen that there are plenty of Irish studios who can produce much more interesting content and they deserve to be supported. Frankly I've always felt TG4 to produce far superior original shows on a fraction of the budget (despite the fact that I can barely understand the Irish language)

    Even if we aren't producing original shows, there's plenty of supporting industries around filmmaking in Ireland which would probably benefit from some extra money and be more competitive to international companies

    On the flip side, I think it's fair to say the whole industry has a pretty rotten core to it. I've spoken with several people who have worked in and around the industry and the view is pretty common that the whole thing runs on a combination of alcohol, drugs, abusive workplaces, dodgy finances and backhanders

    No one company is named, but if a bunch of unrelated people claim to have witnessed similar things then there's likely some truth there

    This might be something that commercial investors are willing to accept, but as license payers we should expect more IMO. So any company receiving public funds should have to sign up to greater oversight of their spending and workplace to ensure everything is above board. I think it'll be telling if some media companies refuse to agree to those terms 😏

    Anyway, those are my long winded and meandering thoughts on the topic, and are probably way off the purpose of the broadcasting forum 😂

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14 Testcard


    RTÉ as it stands is not at all fit for purpose. I fully agree with the selling off of RTÉ2 TV and 2FM. I would liquidate RTÉ and absorb RTÉ One, Radio 1, RnaG and Lyric FM into the TG4 organisation who would then become the national broadcaster.

    RTÉ One (maybe rebrand it Telefís Éireann!) should only show Irish made programming but I would not kill off entertainment programming on the channel.

    Commercial sponsorship needs to come to an end. By all means sell spot advertising as they do now.

    The RTÉ player is a broken joke; scrap it and add its content to the TG4 player and offer a subscription to overseas viewers to watch the content. RTÉ deliberately ignore overseas viewers using grey market Sky subs and subscriptions to illegal IPTV services. That’s a loss of significant revenue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 916 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth Randomer


    Over Reliance on Sports programming . Especially for Radio 1.

    Just look at the Weekend fare on offer.

    I suppose I can still listen to Lyric FM though.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    I’ve seen a few posts advocating merging with TG4, I’d maybe consider what that would do to TG4, and it’s particular mission of promoting the Irish language, to suddenly swamp it with an English language broadcasting remit.

    My own view is that RTE will survive, but ironically a more commercial RTE, one with, with the absence of public funding reform, is forced to rely more heavily on advertising and sponsorship.

    The Mail article in the OP has been officially denied, i understand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,425 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    From what I've read the only bit that was denied was the 400 redundancies and the plan to sell off segments

    Breaking up RTE and redirecting the license fees are possibly still on the table

    Also it's worth remembering how fond the government is of testing public opinion by "leaking" various plans and ideas. One common theme seems to be to leak the most radical form of a plan (total breakup of RTE) to a news outlet which is somewhat removed from the government's political direction (i.e. anything other than The Irish Times) and then see how the public reacts

    If the response is good then they say that's the plan. If there's a negative reaction they either deny the whole things or walk back the more controversial parts of it and say that was never the plan in the first place

    Articles like that would also sharpen the minds of and RTE senior managers who are being called into hearing with the PAC. They might be a bit more helpful if they know their jobs are on the line

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭NorthDown2


    As a Nordie, I enjoy a lot of content on RTE.

    2FM- yes it was a cash cow for RTE in decades gone by, but not now. It has little unique - could it be reformed like Matthew Bannister's BBC Radio 1 (he introduced comedy, focus on new music etc) - give it a USP. Is replacing with RTE Gold a possibility? At least it would then be more different to the alternatives on offer. It would allow for spillover sport (where R1 has already sport on) somewhere to broadcast - I don't see RnaG and Lyric being easy bed fellows for any extra sport to broadcast. Had DAB still been on air, I'd have said spillover sport could have gone there, but that's dead and there's no LW or MW either!

    Lyric FM - enjoy listening to this - it's not too high brow, the sound of it is not over processed like Classic FM / Scala. The squeeze of finances was seen in it - witness the specialist shows getting the axe about 5 years ago. It's now just presenter led shows.

    Radio1 - In years gone by, I felt that this had a good mix of trying to be a bit of BBC Radio 2 and Radio 4. I feel it errs more towards BBC Radio 5 phone in type material to fill air space in recent years. A lot of the Radio 4 type material - drama, feedback, book reading, Thomas Davis lectures have either gone or is minimal. I don't mind sport being here, or that RTE has a good number of rights for audio commentary (esp for Rugby :-) - make sure Against the Head on tv remains! )

    RnaG - keep. I know it has competition from Raidio RiRa who are seeking a national license but it seems to serve its purpose with a varied mix of programming being developed and produced well away from Montrose. I only have a cupla focal.

    Television - I get the RTE2 criticism out there. Again, where does spillover sport go if sport does move to RTE One? With digital, at least there's RTE One +1 - would the government allow it to be used to broadcast live spillover sport when needed, or let it remain on RTE News when needed (in which case what happens when there's a major news event and sport at the same time). RTE2 in years gone by brought american drama months before UK broadcast, so lucrative for advertising and keeping RTE afloat, but outside of sport, Home Rescue, Against the Head I struggle to say I watch anything on it. Children's programmes have a home on RTE Jr, it would be good to see the odd live programme appear for children, if RTE2 is sold off, I'd ask that wherever sport and children's shows go - those channels' resolution on Saorview be improved to near HD. RTE 2 used to have night time news - I'd like to see this back, or at least the broom cupboard news bulletin on RTE One that used to follow the Late Late.

    RTE One - some good programmes. I like the documentaries that are often post nine news on a Monday, enjoying the RIAM three parter at the moment that's on after 10 another night. Nationwide good, enjoy some of the half hour programmes - Animal SOS, Scannal, SuperGarden, Keys to My Life, How Long Will You Live etc. Whilst it is maybe starting to get tired, Ireland Fittest Family was that rare thing of an entertainment format created in Ireland that worked.

    I can't see the government giving RTE much more money from the license fee - maybe an extra one off to get structural reform in place in the organisation. I am sorry for the workers left there in this mess trying to produce programming whilst the executive sit at the committees and paper chase. There is a need for a national broadcaster - I hope people still support it financially.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    RTE employ orchestras which are pretty redundant in modern Ireland and a niche interest. Tough on the musicians but they need to go elsewhere for work or find a new patron/ sponsor.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    They have handed some of that remit over to the National Concert Hall already, just the RTE Concert Orchestra left. And your “pretty redundant” is another person’s art, otherwise the NCH would have itself closed down, as would Lyric FM which plays mainly orchestral music.





  • With regards to spillover sport, RTE will have to use it’s Player similar to the BBCs iPlayer. Wimbledon started today and there’s only one extra BBC red button channel for it on Freeview and satellite. All the rest of it’s coverage is via multiple streams on the iPlayer.

    Should RTE want to show more coverage of, say, the GAA’s expanded football championship where sometimes you have games at the same time, it will have to use the Player to do this IMO.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    That worked out very well for the BBC yesterday, didn’t it?!?!? And iPlayer has a much better rep than RTE Player, which means expectations are probably a lot higher, of course, and a failure like the one yesterday (even though it happened in the middle of the day on a weekday) attracts more attention.

    The RTE Player just really needs some love. It doesn’t work as well as it should and some of the issues sometimes appear to be deliberate (like, why is there never issues with the hated pre-roll adverts?).

    I’m not saying it’s not the way things should be going. TG4’s Player has none of these issues and works much better. But the RTE Player is clearly not capable of doing what is already asked of it, and thats an issue for those who are arguing that we should be asking more of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,655 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    The problems at RTE are due to financial issues.

    The organization and its content is something that everyone has an opinion on and nobody is completely happy about.

    If you like sport they dont show enough of it, if you dont like sport they show too much of it.

    The same goes for most other genres of program, music, history, current affairs.

    Its easy find a stick to beat RTE with when they are trying to be all things to all people and thats just not possible, its time to give up on that pipe dream and bring it back to basics.

    One choice that I would not be opposed to is to significantly reduce the license fee (by 50% at least) and keep one dedicated News / Weather / current affairs / prime time investigation TV channel and one Radio channel alongside TG4 and one Irish radio channel all under one organization. Significantly improve the online digital offering and sell the rights for the late late show to virgin. Lyric FM and 2fm can become online only. It would not have any commercial income and would not need to sell advertising revenue or care about viewership figures.

    That would leave it up to the individual to source their own Sport like a GAA now subscription, skysports for soccer, or the URC have their own online platform also.

    Its high time RTE went back to basics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,841 ✭✭✭lertsnim


    Sell the rights to the late late show? Why would Virgin Media buy that when all they'd have to do is put on any kind of talk show on a Friday evening. They'd have no competition on the Irish airwaves as RTÉ will surely have closed down for the day by 9pm with your cuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,655 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Yea they can put one on, they cant use the same name however and they wont automatically get the viewers, if its promoted as moving from RTE to Virgin with the same name then people might be more inclined to buy into it.





  • I’d agree the RTE player needs to be built into a robust product before it can be used more widely. I think the future will move to be inevitably online though. The niece and the other half moved into their new house at Xmas. They bought a big tv but never thought about getting an aerial and/or dish installed. They watch everything online.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 sheehan6023


    There's a lot to be said in favour of this.

    You'd start off by making cuts to RTE TV. There's no need for RTE2, there's no evidence that people watch more than one channel at a time so RTE1 is enough. RTE1 HD costs too much to run, so axe that and just keep RTE1 +1, cheaper to broadcast. Get rid of RTE News Now and replace it with RTE News On Demand, which will show classic stories from Aertel.

    On the radio side, same story, get rid of 2FM. The music they play is too niche and there isn't the evidence for the demand. Lyric FM would be replaced by RTE Country & Western, and sold to Virgin Media 4.

    To save on transmission costs, the broadcast network would be shut down except for LW 252 where no expense will be spared and the mast will be plated in gold. It'll broadcast RTE Radio 1 during the day and at night the air time will be sold off to advertisers seeking to reach people in old cars.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Now three barter accounts.

    The problem is not so much these are off balance sheet and outside financial control, but they are hidden for oversight.

    Is there any check on value of the two sides of the exchange?

    If an advert slot is bartered for a ham sandwich - is that good value? Is the value of an advert slot that expires in fifteen minutes of any value? Is the ham sandwich of any value once it is eaten? Who gets to eat the ham sandwich?

    The amount of barter at RTE appears to be 0.1% of turnover - not accounted for at all. Is that serious - or is it at the level of paperclips or the cost of disposable coffee cups or water for the water coolers?

    We need to know more - well - we might like to know more, but would it cost more than its worth to know more? Remember, we are paying the bill for Grant Thornton.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭Arthur Pants
    Overlord


    On the face of it, a fee of just over EUR 80k for a EUR 150K transaction doesn't seem to be good value.

    I think the question is why was the barter account used for any specific transaction - was it required, did it make sense e.g. financially, or in the case of the Tubridy payment, was it purely used to obfuscate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭spuddy


    The issue is the funding model for RTE. Their commercial arm ruled the roost, resulting in the lavish pay deals, the barter accounts, the subterfuge, and with scant regard for the licence payer along the way. This is the core of the problem, it's time to choose one model going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    I've suggested this in a different thread already but I think the fundamental split should be:

    1. Irish content funding (public).
    2. Streaming and broadcasting platforms (privately owned and funded).

    The basic idea of this split is to keep the public side very small and focussed so that the current problems don't build up again over time.

    The Irish content funding body would be a bit like an arts council. I would not produce anything itself but would accept submissions and provide subsidy for independent producers making their productions competitive with imported programmes. This subsidised content would be sold on the open market.

    Every thing else becomes a commercial entities subject to market discipline competing with Virgin Media and the like. Content subsidised by the funding body would be purchased by this entity along with imported content.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Sounds very like the situation in New Zealand - where TVNZ is, although state owned, essentially a fully commercial broadcaster, and must bid for public funding from the local equivalent of the Sound and Vision Scheme on the same basis as anyone else.

    Although it’s not an outcome I favour, I could fully see how we could arrive there in the current climate. The more the controversy rolls on and on the more I fear there won’t be an RTE in the form we know it by the end of it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, RTE should remember they are a broadcaster that aims to 'Inform, Educate, and Entertain' their licence payers.

    To do that they need to concentrate in making programmes that actually do that. If they have achieved those objects, and the viewers approve by watching the output, then the funding follows.

    To have to wine and dine the agents at RTE's expense, look for sponsors for unrelated programmes, show the organisation is open to discounts - all of these things debases the organisation.

    Now, the Gov could guarantee a certain level of Gov information advertising, and look to commission a number of tutorial type of public information programmes - and for that guarantee a level of funding to provide that.

    At the moment RTE News is a channel paid for by RTE but has no income because it is not allowed to carry adverts. How can it provide proper news content with no money? Children's programming suffers the same thing - lack of funds.

    RTE commissions programmes from independent production companies. Now what oversight is there for value for money there?

    RTE has served us well over the last 60 years - we must not throw the baby out with the bath water.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    I would go further and sell off "TVNZ" or the the commercial arm of RTE here so that the playing field is level. Only subsidy would be through a commissioning or funding body that does not itself broadcast or stream. Funding body would have a very well defined remit making oversight easier.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think a wholly commercial TV station already exists - TV3 or Virgin Media - which shows ITV programmes here - wall to wall, plus low budget US programmes and repeats of very old editions of programmes - time and time again. No thank you.

    RTE have gone through these troubled times before, but have had some fantastic successes as well. The news output is good, and less biased than the BBC. Up there with Ch4 output - produced by ITN.

    Their drama has had flops and success - given the reduced finance available to them.

    Light entertainment - not so good. The LLS has fallen relentlessly with Tubs waving his arms about, fiddling with the button that does not close on his jacket, and giving 'one for everyone in the audience!'. The fall in audience numbers should have been enough to show him the door, not give him under the table payments. He should have been moved to children's programmes which I feel is where his talent shines.

    Comedy has not been funny for RTE - ever.

    The whole of RTE needs a fundamental reset. They have many excellent people working there but there is a rotten smell coming from somewhere.

    We need a national broadcaster and RTE should be it, but fund it better, and not just by upping the licence fee. They need to create content that the public want to watch, and advertisers need to get their adverts seen. No sponsors of programmes, no presenter names on programmes, and no side deals.

    No-one negotiates with Tesco on price - you pay what it says. That is the style RTE should have with its advertisers and staff - tempered by the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    However there's a very limited price range the likes of Tesco can charge for something. Charge too high for an own-brand loaf of bread and shoppers go elsewhere. Charge too little and there's no profit: they are already squeezing suppliers to the maximum. Tesco know pretty quickly if they've got the price wrong on some item.

    Although I have absolutely no experience in TV advertising (or retail sales for that matter), I would imagine that selling TV advertising is very different, a bit more like selling houses with bidding and negotiation being more common.

    That said, I'm sure RTE could have been a lot more frugal with their corporate hospitality and junkets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭spuddy




  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    It wasn’t meant to be! 97 years of heritage thrown away seems like a horrible prospect.

    But the more this runs on and on the more i fear that will be exactly the outcome.

    I don’t think the politicians will let it happen though. They have more to lose than anyone else from the loss of a PSB - if News and coverage of parliamentary affairs is gone altogether or exiled to late night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Yep all our political parties are ideologically committed to PSB and would never contemplate letting it die, even if they are no longer necessarily committed to RTE as an institution. We don't have the kind of right-libertarian parties whowould be willing to stand up and say " To hell with PSB, let the market decide what people watch/listen to...



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    It’s not even about ideology. Politics survives on media coverage. Otherwise how does anyone know what they are doing.

    But commercial broadcasters are not interested in it, or at best don’t want it in prime time.

    Politicians need media coverage. They need a PSB that is willing to show a Six One, a Nine OClock News, a Prime Time. Not a late night show that airs when most people are asleep.

    And that’s why something will survive. Maybe not RTE as we know it, though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭SPDUB


    I see that Leo has now said that he wants reform of the licence fee to happen during the life of this government

    That's a big change from the long fingering they were doing before

    Change needed at top of RTÉ, Taoiseach says (rte.ie)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 916 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth Randomer


    We'll here Leo on 'This Week' at 1pm today on Radio 1 if he wants to put his money where his mouth is. (Lately on 'This Week' they have a commercial break about 5 minutes before the end. And then back for a one - liner.


    And then all you can eat GAA sports commentary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭SPDUB


    Further to Leo talking about reforming the licence fee , this appears to be what is driving his comments


     the Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal.

    Cabinet sources said last night there is a fear in the Government that public attitudes to the broadcaster have descended to such levels that, in the words of one minister, ‘there will be a mass boycott of the RTÉ licence fee. It will be a water charges mark II



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭decor58


    I see where the BBC has suggested the tv licence should be connected to a premises property tax, the higher your property tax the more licence fee you pay, the BBC had a turnover of 5.4 billion pounds in 2022.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 96 ✭✭Windowsnut


    If I see one more comparison between BBC and RTe, I'll scream!

    In my opinion, they are two completely different entities, one is a thriving platform that generates income on both a national and an international, (from it's global commercial operations) scale, the other is a lame duck.

    Networks globally are buying BBC content, either the individual programmes, Graham Norton Show, Line of Duty, Call the midwife, Peaky blinders, Eastenders, etc, etc or buying access to whole channels, BBC America, BBC Entertainment, BBC News, BBC Prime, BBC Earth, BBC UKTV, etc.

    I have always believed that, RTE is a repulsive organisation that fails to draw an audience and is happy to sit back on a protectionist autocratic model and "piggy-back" on the overspill of UK television networks.

    Despite the now, near global access to broadband services worldwide, RTE has failed to enshrine itself amongst the Irish Dispora, you know, the estimated 50 to 80 million people around the world that believe they have Irish forebears, making the Irish diaspora one of the largest of any nation in the world, if even 10% of this audience paid €5 a month to access a "player" type platform RTe would have an additional revenue stream of €300,000,000 but alas.....

    If I was DG of RTE, I would be targeting the dispora market, to either sell programs to major networks in Australia, America, Canada, UK, Europe or to have dedicated premium IPTV services targeting these markets, but no one wants to buy inward tunnel vision, we have a new era of dispora from 2008 - 2012 and RTE has done nothing to engage with them.

    2RN (the network of television and radio transmitters) desperately needs to be separated and a commercial focus, its job should be to sell airtime on the transmitter network and generate revenue based on the actual number of viewers and listeners not the current Nielson TAM sampling methodology.

    The control RTE has exerted on Irish media needs to be challenged and brought to an end.

    Please, please, RTE, have shred of dignity and ride off into the sunset like TCM or even Tara. TCM Movies is closing | July 6th - YouTube

    Tara TV startup sequence.mpg - YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    The trouble is that they conflate RTE with public service broadcasting. They can't see it being done in a way that doesn't involve a national broadcaster (like RTE).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Is there another way though? Even if RTE was dismantled tomorrow TG4 would still exist. I can’t think of any country in the western world that doesn’t have a national, public, or state broadcaster of some sort, even the US has PBS/NPR, as underfunded as they are. Even in New Zealand TVNZ and RNZ still exist in the public sector.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 96 ✭✭Windowsnut


    There was a place for Public Service Broadcasting, but it should never have been allowed to become the behemoth it is today.

    Everything is half-assed, TG4 for instance should broadcast both dual language and dual subtitles, could you imagine the tool it would be to younger generations learning Irish if they could watch their favourite shows in either Irish with English subtitles or in English with Irish subtitles.

    If TG4/ RTE is so hell bent on promoting the Irish language, how come all advertising on both networks is entirely in English??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    RTÉ has come in various form since 1926, starting as 2RN and renamed Athlone Radio followed by Radio Éireann.

    Teilifse Éireann did not merge with Radio Éireann until 1966. No real need to keep Radio and TV together anymore IMO.

    I support the following: -

    TG4, RnaG, Cula4 and RTÉjr (TV and Radio) to merge together

    RTÉ ONE, 2 and their +1 services, and RTÉ player and rte.ie to go to Screen Ireland

    Lyric and the CO to move to the NCH

    Radio 1, 2fm, digital radio stations and podcasting to come under the management of RTÉ Networks AKA 2RN, it would take control of the montrose site as a national media hub

    RTÉ News and Current Affairs to be spun off, providing news for the services above and continuing to provide live coverage of news programmes on the RTÉ News channel.

    Dissolution of the RTÉ Board and the RTÉ Leadership Team.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    To be clear, Telefis Eireann was operated by Radio Eireann from day one, as per the provisions of the Broadcasting Authority Act 1960. The only thing that happened in 1966 is that the name of the organisation was changed, from Radio Eireann to Radio Telefis Eireann.

    Your set of proposals smacks of the dismantling by the French of ORTF in the 1970s, something they’ve regretted since.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    I think you could argue that we regretted setting up RTÉ ever since, it hasn't really provided a significant service. There are times when it hits above its weight but often it is not much use.

    Why not bring TG4 under RTÉ, after all it is only a few 15 years since they got full independence from RTÉ. I don't see how RnaG fits with RTÉ, and their treatment of children's content has been abysmal, let others run the show.

    The proposal makes sense since there are all ready organizations ready to manage the diverse operations of RTÉ. They would be funded by the government and clear governance guideline would be required.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    One report in a newspaper today (I won't link as its a tabloid and I don't like the number of ads and pop ups on their sites) suggesting that the Government RTÉ wants RTÉ to sell of it assets before agreeing to help them.

    IMHO splitting the company up (a company that has largely regrettably not serviced the Irish public since its establishment IMHO) would be a far better proposal than selling assets, assets that are worth very little even the assets that they did sell such as CableLink and the land at Mentors lead to very little.

    Time for massive change and I think this would the the appropriate time.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    The problem I see here is that almost all involved in Media and the Production sector believe whole heartly that the issues surrounds the funding model.

    They seem to be unwilling to admit that if there was full reform of RTÉ that many of these funding issues would/could be resolved tomorrow.

    Regardless of how you go about that reform, but reform of RTÉ is require, to change the method of funding does nothing to address the monolith that is RTÉ nor its use of funding nor its governance structures.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    The other option is to have these companies come under one large organization, keeping commercial aspect at arms length.

    I think this would involved bring TG4 under the umbrella or moving RnaG under TG4's umbrella

    If you like : -

    TG4, RnaG, Cula4, RTÉ Radio JR and RTÉjr

    UMBRELLA COMPANY

    1. 2RN and Studios
    2. NEWS & CURRENT AFFAIRS
    3. Acquisitions for Sport and International programming
    4. Independent productions Unit
    5. Commercial Media services: RTÉ2, 2FM, RTÉ GOLD, RTÉ PULSE
    6. Public Media services: RTÉ ONE, Radio 1, Lyric FM, RTÉ 2XM, RTÉ NEWS CHANNEL

    Either way it looks like RTÉ will be a largely different organisation to what we currently have, and that can only be for the better.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    We are going to find that RTÉ will look to cut almost every service they have by the looks of things.

    Their Radio Centre wasn't maintained according to them yesterday at the Oireachtas. I honestly don't know how you could accept a company not maintaining their buildings, I think the same was said about their Cork studio, I am not sure if they own that out right.

    I can't see them being able to sell RTÉ 2FM or RTÉ2, neither have very much value at this point.

    You can prob say good by to the Digital Radio Stations.

    They really messed up badly.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,573 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    they'll cut everything apart from high paid management. so costs won't go down (like ever other state/semi-state)they'll be out with the begging bowl soon enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭AJB39


    I can’t speak for the building overall but RTE have upgraded several radio studios in the past year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    They did say this but they also said the other studio need a refrub and maintenance. 2FM studio were updated about 7 years ago with the new logo.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,023 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If RTE relocated there TV & Radio studios to one of the many empty office blocks in the city center would that be possabile with modern technology?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    What would the long term effect of that be, could they buy an office block?


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,023 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Easily or long term lease, but the only thing is if you sold montrose would it acheive much of saving by the time you move staff and fit out studios.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement