Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1185718581860186218632215

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Nothing shows the gap in age between the Millennials running Ukraine and the gerontocracy running Russia than their respective media campaigns.


    Russian MoD messaging always takes itself so seriously. There's never any fun or humour in it. It's all about conveying "Russia Strong". It's often just looped footage of Russian soldiers in suspiciously clean uniforms on maneuvers or even just this guy reeling off a bunch of made up figures each night



    In contrast, Ukrainian MoD messaging:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Poland are clearly not using their Article 5 guarantee as an excuse to ease off on defence spending





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭dePeatrick




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Maybe the good Lord Dannatt should figure a way of gaining air superiority so. Ukraine can't be fighting a very large Russian military force with it's hands tied by moral equivocating, particularly when the Russian are quite OK with using such munitions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 833 ✭✭✭blackwave


    So Turkey are returning the commanders of the defense of Mariupol to Ukraine which it includes Azoz commanders. They are also seem to be supporting ascension to NATO as well. This is a big slap in the face of Russia.

    Has erdogan decided that Putin is a busted flush and sees where the wind is blowing? So is trying to show his support now and get ahead.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,240 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Poland knows it cannot totally rely on Article 5 to guarantee its safety from Russian attack. I get the unshakeable feeling that if a Russian attack were ever to happen on Poland (most likely not imminently because Russia are so militarily depleted just with Ukraine) that you'd have this whole tedious conversation of "...do we want to risk nuclear war over Poland?". If that conversation in any way did happen, it would be a complete green light for the USA's rivals to start moving on territory they wanted to control.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    They are drogue chutes to ensure that the shaped charges are pointing down. They don't retard their fall or allow them to drift.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Quite possibly, he's some wily operator. Keeping options open. Hardly a trustworthy ally though,



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Erdogen has played both sides from the start, and by all accounts the Russians are not happy at all with this news. Supporting NATO membership is fairly significant. But Türkiye has its own problems and erdogen may have had quiet talks and had it pointed out that only one side of this war has the economic clout to do well by Türkiye. Russia can't even wield Bigger Army Diplomacy anymore: this war has been a huge geopolitical own goal for them, and then some.

    As to the prisoner trade, I had wondered if any of those commanders were Azov. That's a shame; as sad as it was to see Mariupol fall, it also meant the tedious refrain about Nazis in Ukraine disappeared from the Pavlovian contrarians' playbook. The return of these commanders will no doubt allow those bad faith actors to trot out that canard once more. I wonder if Zelensky might quickly and quietly shove them somewhere as far away from the public eye as possible.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Maybe so but during the NATO bombing of Serbia over Kosovo, NIS Airport was targeted and several drifted over and fell in the City itself, 3 klms away. 2nd bombing was more than 7 KLms away from the airport, also in the City 14 deaths, 28 injured plus one more death in 2000 from an unexploded Cluster bomb. After the war stopped, hundreds of unexploded Cluster bombs were found in the Serbian countryside. I've seen a few of them ( at least their parachutes } but always kept far away from them, much more so than unexploded shells or rockets half buried in the ground. I was specifically warned about their unpredictability, and how lethal they were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @pixelburp As to the prisoner trade, I had wondered if any of those commanders were Azov. That's a shame; as sad as it was to see Mariupol fall, it also meant the tedious refrain about Nazis in Ukraine disappeared from the Pavlovian contrarians' playbook. The return of these commanders will no doubt allow those bad faith actors to trot out that canard once more. I wonder if Zelensky might quickly and quietly shove them somewhere as far away from the public eye as possible.


    I'm not so sure that those involved in the defense of Mariupol were anything to do with Nazi's or the far right,the Azoz battlion of 2014s defense of Mariupol were a different kettle of fish, post 2014 the Nazi's were drilled out and the Azoz battlion became a full time unit of the new Ukrainian military,the defense of azoztal steel works were a mix of Ukrainan army , Ukrainian Marines and a few other units ,part of the agreement to release the commanders involved them being shipped to turkey for a period of time, wether them being returned from turkey today or this weekend is part of the deal with Russia is a different story, which could effect the hundreds of others still in detention in Russian occupied territory



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The way to look at that is, considering the fact that in any war zone anywhere in the world, the land is so badly contaminated with all manner of unexploded ordinance, singling out cluster bombs for special attention is a bit superfluous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Poland should just choose “ peace” and “give up thy foolish ways”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    There are several assumptions to that idea Danzy... the main one being that the soldier behind the 6 foot of concrete is in good shape and fighting fit, well supplied with arms, food clothing etc. Another one is the 6 ft concrete walls..you would not want to equate 6ft of Russian standard ( especially Military standard) with its European equivalent, and definitely not after its been through a winter in that part of the world....while they will remain an obstacle, they are not as formidable as they may seem at first sight. The mines of course will always be a problem. But fighting as Ukraine is fighting now destroying the Russian soldiers fitness to fight, is a very good plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I'd say that its a case of sufficient to the day the evil thereof....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,240 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Nazis in Ukraine should never have been a talking point for Russia, anyway. Not only would such people pose no threat whatsoever to Russian territory, but Russia had a powerful mercenary group called Wagner that was operating at Putin's pleasure. Basic concept, here, but if a country cannot or will not deal with its own Nazis, what cause has it got to be complaining about anyone else's?

    However, the Nazi thing was only ever really for domestic consumption, anyway. For the generation who remember the Great Patriotic War and have a general fetish for the hardship endured during it. Everyone else can see it as even more of a sham argument than WMDs in 2003.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,794 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett



    You've got it wrong.

    Valery Markus isn't with the 3rd assault brigade, he's with the 47th assault brigade

    The 47th was one of the brigades trained by NATO and equipped with NATO weapons.

    Markus's 47th are the ones who have been trying to assault Robotyne for the last month. His task has not been made easy at all. The Russians have anticipated this was a primary axis of attack and have deployed the 45th Spetsnaz (special forces) here, and there are other capable formations here too.

    Markus gives a 2% dead/missing, but neglects to give the wounded number. Assuming a 3:1 ratio of wounded to dead, the total loss is 8%. As of now, the 47th have gained no strategic objectives, and in about two-three months will be rendered combat ineffective if the current rate of attrition persists. The video is likely out of date, and he is sugar coating things, so the reality will be towards the lower end of estimates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,794 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Could you point out where the shells will come from?

    Germany, Britain, France, et al still seem to be trying to get the paperwork through to get production ramped up. None of whom have capacity to give anything anytime soon.

    The US has released cluster munitions, only because Biden has acknowledged that stocks are running low on their side. South Korean shells are back-filling the stocks that the US are releasing to Ukraine. Even the US are under strain with regard to supply

    In the meantime, I will make a gruesome, but likely very correct prediction. Whatever number of Russian shell production that people have in mind (I hear capacity of 1M shells a year), I bet they will beat it.

    I said at the end of 2022, everyone was sitting their laurels, patting themselves on the back for the imminent collapse of the Russian army.

    Here we are in 2023, everyone is doing the exact same thing, patting themselves on the back for the imminent collapse of the Russian army.

    No one seems to give a sh1t that the pledged deliveries (tanks and shells) have been completely missed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    The OP already stated the shells supplied will be cluster shells. The snails pace with the EU shell production is annoying, but if it gets on a war footing then I can't see Russia competing. The EU have already provided 220k shells over the past 2 months.

    So if it's not 1 million shells a year Russia can produce, what is it? Making a prediction that will be higher or lower than a quoted figure is just tossing a coin. 1 million is less than 3k a day and if Russia are expected to keep the land they have taken, 3k shells a day is not nearly enough.

    It's very easy to look at one side. Ukraine don't have X or are running out of Y, so they will fail, but completely ignore the other side, Russia, that are in a similar situation. Why do people assume Russia has unlimited supplies of everything?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Indeed. Despite potential logistics in getting supplies to Ukraine, they are being afforded the resources of the entire NATO alliance, none of which is under sanction and many of whom have strictly adhered quality standards for their equipment.

    Contrast this to Russia, who must lean upon an ultimately finite supply of weapons they inherited from the Soviet Union, which is increasingly looking like a very different beast to the modern Russian Federation. The supply chains the Soviets built are either long gone, decayed or ironically located in places like Ukraine. The Russians must rely upon the munitions the Soviets made back in the day, of which there are many, but unfortunately for them many of these stockpiles were poorly maintained, meaning that much of it might be little more than very dangerous rust piles.

    Their hope for new supplies come from Iran, a country that can’t hope to meet the rate or quality of munitions supplied by NATO, and can be very easily cut off if Isreal get cheeky again and strike their factories. Then there’s North Korea, actual experts at maintaining Soviet kit, who may not be willing to give up their supplies in case of fighting with South Korea. Finally there’s China, who are not above quietly selling shells to Russia for the right price. Problem is that the supply lines would take ages to restock via China and Chinese munitions would be piss-poor clones of Soviet weapons.

    If the Soviet Union of the 70s was suddenly time-traveled into the place of the current Russia, then maybe they’d have a shot. But today’s Russia, now removed from some of the more industrial elements of the Soviet empire, and without a Warsaw Pact to back them up, is now a decaying shadow of itself thar had little more than gas money to keep it going. Their defeat on the battlefield is a matter of time, but their defeat as a nation happened long ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭amacca


    That's exactly what's happening....expect to see more rats and fence sitting rats pick a team now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 765 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    A lot is the quick answer. They intend to open some up to use the submunitions in drones too.

    Russians claim to have a shell production capacity of 20,000 per month so 240,00 a year the 1 million is nonsense.

    "Compared to war demands, Ukraine’s current production capacities appear relatively small. On the other hand, it is significant compared to other states’ capabilities. For example, the US industry currently produces nearly 15,000 155-mm ammunition rounds monthly. According to various estimates, the Russian industry could be making, at best, 20,000 152-mm rounds per month, although the precise data is classified. The US plans to increase ammunition production to 20,000 per month by spring 2023 and 40,000 per month by 2025, given the Russo-Ukrainian war’s intensity and the ammunition consumption speed." reference below

    https://euromaidanpress.com/2023/01/10/ukraine-finally-launches-domestic-ammunition-production-how-will-this-impact-the-war/



  • Registered Users Posts: 765 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    700 shells a day is all they can produce and I even doubt they meet that.

    "Once the stockpile is gone, the only source will be new deliveries. According to Ukrainian estimates, Russia has capacity to produce around 20,000 rounds a month or less than 700 rounds a day. One 152mm gun fires 7-8 rounds a minute, so a single battery of 6 guns will expend that 700 rounds in one 15-minute bombardment – leaving nothing for any other Russian forces anywhere in Ukraine. No wonder competition for shells between different units is becoming intense and Wagner units claim they are not being given any."




  • Registered Users Posts: 765 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    It's very simple the Russians will be picking up the bill for the gargantuan clean up



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 253 ✭✭purplefields


    Even Mr Sunak believes cluster bombs are a bad idea. 123 countries have signed up to the Convention on Cluster Munitions (Interesting side fact that is convention was held in Dublin) Countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Ireland have banned them, but apparently they're okay to use in Ukraine because the place is already mined.

    Land mines are terrible weapons. I remember visiting Croatia long after their war, and there were still no-go areas where there might be land mines. Every now and again there might be a goat or something blown up. The problem is that once a country is mined, you can never be 100% sure that you've demined it afterwards. There are no maps to refer to.

    Cluster bombs are a whole new level of evil. Children get disproportionately killed and maimed by these. Having an area already mined isn't a reason to justify cluster bombs. Hundreds of these things are released into the environment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    They are terrible but they are already in use by Russia already. The Ukrainians have said they intend to use them outside built up areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,904 ✭✭✭Polar101


    And is Russia one of the countries who have signed up to the cluster munitions convention?

    It's always easy to ban weapons if you are a country who doesn't need to use them in the first place. But when you're fighting against someone who is using them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 253 ✭✭purplefields


    Neither side should be using them. They are totally unjustifiable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,589 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Yeah but cruise missiles and bombs and tanks are like totally justifiable!!!


    This is war, none of it is justified but it is what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,589 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Russia have shown no restraint or care for anyone since they illegally invaded a sovereign country.

    Fight fire with fire.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    If Ukraine want to use cluster munitions on the entrenched Frontlinse (fields, not towns or cities), I don't see an issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 253 ✭✭purplefields


    We might as well just crack open the nukes then🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,589 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    There is one country swinging it’s Mickey about nuking countries and it’s not Ukraine.


    If cluster bombs help Ukraine free their land from barbarian raping scumbags then bring them on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 253 ✭✭purplefields


    Why shouldn't the Ukrainians also use them in cities too? - after all the Russians did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Cluster munitions are vile horrible weapons, they should ever be needed.

    But you know what? The Russians could leave. They could go tomorrow, they could go this very minute and return to their actual country and put an end to this monstrous nonsense they they put upon Ukraine. They could stop shelling Ukrainian cities, they could stop murdering and raping citizens under their “care”. They could stop stealing children and go the f*ck HOME, and put an end to all of this.

    It is on the Russians and not the desperate nation defending themselves for the fact that these vile weapons are in play at all. They don’t need to be be used if Russia would just get a hint and do the right thing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,920 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Because it would potentially be a war crime first and foremost. Secondly, there a difference in danger from UXO in a city (where people will be living) and UXO in a field.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭wildefalcon


    Ukrainians can do what they want in Ukraine in defence of their sovereign nation, in my opinion. They are an independent nation, with the agency that confers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 765 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    tariff the russians until reparations are paid up and keep sanctions in place until they start acting civilized



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Probably because the targets Ukraine would be launching against would be their own cities and towns. The urge to resist invasion will quickly dry up if the army starts hitting its own population without due caution.

    They're an awful weapon but it's a bit weird, and rich, that having seen months of Russian use of these things met with silence - suddenly Ukraine should be ashamed to fight fire with fire, all to clear out some dug-in russian trench locations.

    Trenches that appear to exist as a bit of a last line of defence between the south of Ukraine, and Crimea.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭zv2


    I'm a Napalm kinda guy meself but sure we'll go with the clusters. They kill orcs and that's what matters.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,981 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Could cluster munitions be used to clear minefields

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,520 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    If Russia had shown some restraint and left their cluster munitions at home we might be having a very different conversation, but they didn't, so they're just going to have to accept that they're going to be on the receiving end now.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Estimates of Russia's artillery shell production capacity vary. British military think-tank RUSI put it at 1.7 million shells per year prior to the war and 2.5 million per year currently. That's 200,000 per month, which is way beyond anything the combined West can do in the short-term. USA is aiming for a mere 80,000 per month by 2028.

    Nobody knows the true size of their pre-existing stockpile. Even Russia probably don't know for sure. The Soviets were hoarders, they didn't throw things away, they had massive stockpiles dotted around the USSR in salt mines.

    It was widely reported in Dec 2022 that Russia was almost out of shells and were using 40 y/o ammo with high failure rates. That's 7 months ago. They've continued firing tens of thousands of shells per day in the 7 months since that article. They are down from their peak of 50,000 per day but they are still averaging over 10,000 per day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 765 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    They reckon russia produces shells 10 times more than what my source says. What is certain is that russia can't get the shells to the front in enough quantities ever and they're grossly inaccurate compared to the Ukrainians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,909 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It's not that, it's just the latest putinbot talking point whataboutery while ignoring their use by russia directly against civiiians (i.e. war crimes).

    It also makes it really easy to spot them now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭zv2


    Russians mistakenly(?) blasted the Kadyrovs


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement