Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Air Corps SAR

1568101115

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    as much as fanboys want the IAC to do SAR again, the capability simply isn't there. It has also been covered via civil contract successfully and the last gasp they were looking at, of the top cover role, they failed to provide consistently, and with the availability of the P-8's from Lossiemouth for Rescue taskings, there isn't a need for the Casa on long range missions (which CHC were usually sending double Helo's to anyway, due to Casa unavailability).


    Either way, the capability won't be anywhere near to challenge for even partial contract for 5-7 years, even if they started yesterday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Slight thread drift with this question. Countrys like are selfs that have big SAR regions that go far out into the ocean has a Tiltrotor ever being offered by a contractor as a SAR aircraft or is it not viable with a winch?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Given the limited pool of tiltrotor designs in service and the costs currently I doubt it would be viable, and the downblast from the rotor wash would be an issue I would think.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If the Court does agree with CHC that there is an issue where does that leave everything. Do CHC just continue on an agreed rate untill the issue is resolved if it drags out past there contract end date as Bristow have said they need the full 2 years to work up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,527 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yes, the current contract may be continued until the legal challenge of the award of the new contract is resolved.

    CHC may make claims for additional costs as the contract goes into overtime, but they would have to be arbitrated.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Aer Corps been out on this ?

    Search for Suffolk sailor Duncan Lougee missing in solo challenge - BBC News

    Say ICG is working on it too.... Rescue51 been up yesterday and today



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    Vessel was located by R117 from Waterford, vessel uncrewed & adrift.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747




  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    all that bluster about blocking :-D

    yes, they found the boat, so there is some sort of closure ... a result



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    I never said you couldn't, never said you couldn't respond either... you're the one who make the big issue over it :-D

    Or am I supposed to be hurt by it or something?

    "Oh please Dohvolle, please don't block me, please oh please oh Aer Corps gatekeeper"



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,533 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    [Mod]Sigh. Why do I keep encountering these issues after midnight? I’ll look at this thread tomorrow… Temp Locking…[/Mod]



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,533 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    [MOD]OK, do me a favour, here, AerLingus747. This sub-forum seems to attract enough "honest held belief" s**t-stirrers and trolls as it is that a number of regulars are on something of a hair-trigger for that sort of thing (See the Russia thread on CA for a similar effect).

    Either you are one yourself (and looking at your posting history, I don't think that's true), in which case this is your warning to stop, or you just have an inappropriate sense of fun by winding people up which isn't working out well in this context, in which case this is your warning to keep it under control.

    As others have recently observed, I do follow through after the initial direct warning.

    Re-opening thread [/MOD]



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    I think the winding up has gone very well seen as they've gone crying to you about it...

    At the end of the day, they don't have to respond, in fact, Dohville said I was blocked but continues to respond to me, which is technology defying and should get some sort of technological medal for being able to do so...

    If they didn't think their opinion was holier than though, it wouldn't be so easy to get their backs up.... their precious IAC is a lllooooonnggg way from anything functional other than maritime patrol and maybe some surveillance/ISR activities with the PC-12's.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,533 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    [MOD]Regardless of past success. It stops now[/MOD]



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    It's stops when Dohville and co start coping with anything negative said about the IAC... even if they put together sarcastic essay responses, it still doesn't enhance the IAC's capabilities any time in the next decade

    the first step to change, is acceptance....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,125 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    It's in the nature of legal proceedings that claims are made that may not have a lot of weight behind them. Posting a media report doesn't add anything other than drawing attention to the proceedings. On the face of it, there's no clear issue here that casts doubt on the outcome of the tender process. But let's see how this progresses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Thats true but in court on Tuesday the below was said

    CHC had made a "really extraordinary submission" claiming the public interest favoured it because, it claimed, Bristow will not be able to deliver and that their (CHC's) aircraft are self-evidently better, which Bristow disputes, he said.

    That reads as if its not going to be the S92. If rumours going round that it will be the AW189 that could be bad news for the Air Corps as Bristow might go after the Older Air Corps AW139 pilots who might be tempted to jump ship for a big pay day. Leonardo claim you can get rated on the 189 if you have flowm the 139 very quickley.

    The one thing out of all of this that is very shi@y is that the current CHC staff dont know if they have jobs going forward. I dont know how the unions have not got an amswer for them yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Maybe the CHC S-92's are better than the Bristow ones... bit like my Da is better than your Da.

    It's a strange assertion, as Bristow are about 70/30 split S-92's to AW189's in their UK fleet at the moment, and I don't see them getting brand new helo's for the Irish contract in the timeframe, unless they have recently lost a contract in the Mexican or Middle eastern gulfs?

    Or it may not be a single type? With some AW139's or 169's replacing an S-92... but that leads to a redundancy nightmare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Based on they said Bristows helicopters are not up to the job. If Bristow where going to use the S92 why would CHC say that when they use them. Would that in effect not be saying there S92s are not up to the job?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Did you read the Article? In the High Court on Tuesday it was claimed that CHC said Bristows Aircraft are not up to the job



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭sparky42


    CHC want the awarding revoked, I imagine they are going to claim everything under the sun to try and make that happen, whether it’s the entire truth or not is a different matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,527 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    That's the daftest angle to contest a procurement award I ever heard.

    I wonder do Bristow's S92s fly into big rocks in the middle of the ocean at night?

    I do hope the High Court sees through this My Cousin Vinnie stuff quickly and dismisses the petition.

    The Coastguard SAR service needs certainty and forward progress and it needs it soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,451 ✭✭✭davetherave


    >Johathan Newman SC, for Bristow, urged the court not to grant an injunction which would prevent the contract being awarded to his client.

    CHC had made a "really extraordinary submission" claiming the public interest favoured it because, it claimed, Bristow will not be able to deliver and that their (CHC's) aircraft are self-evidently better, which Bristow disputes, he said.

    CHC are also using the fact that good old Gerry Craughwell stuck his oar in during the few minutes they (the Seanad) get at the start of business to go on about whatever they feel like, as part of their case.

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2023-05-31/speech/49/

    The Department of Transport has set out its preferred tenderer for the search and rescue contract and that is Bristow Ireland, which I congratulate on the job. I am not one bit sorry to see that CHC has not gotten over the line. 

    From our point of view, this House and committee did much work that influenced the way this contract went. It was a good day for Ireland that we did what we did.


    And this fine piece.

    I want to find out, as regards the fixed-wing element, whether that aircraft will be stationed in Ireland. It should be stationed here. I suggest that Waterford Airport would be an ideal place for it. It could cover both the south and west coasts, but also the east coast. I do not want to hear we have a fixed-wing element somewhere in the UK because those fixed-wing aircraft carry specialised equipment and we do not want a foreign aircraft scanning Irish coasts.

    I could be wrong, but I reckon that the crew of a vessel in need of assistance 60 miles off the south west coast of Cork wouldn't really care if it was EI-ICW or G-ICAW that was searching for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Can the good senator be dragged in to this court case or is he protected by parliamentary privilege?



  • Registered Users Posts: 302 ✭✭tippilot


    The tender specs were written for the AW189, be in no doubt about that.

    Unfortunate, as the winter SAR environment here is one of the harshest worldwide and the east coast has high frequency large ferry traffic. Anything with a smaller capacity and shorter range than the S92 is a downgrade. No two ways about it.

    The AW189 might have sufficient capability for the majority of takings, but it brings a reduction in overall capability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,527 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The same noble Senator will be only too delighted with the attention



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Id say there might be an article about this covered in one of the papers on Sunday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If you look at the JP Morgan presentation it shows an AW189 in IRCG colours. Is that hint it will be a AW189 Fleet?





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Go to the 1st one June 20th 2023 J.P. Morgan Energy, Power & Renewables Conference scroll down 3/4 ways you will see the slide on the IRCG contract



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,527 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    A photoshop rendering in a tender glossy is irrelevant. It just means they took one of their existing 189s and doctored the image.

    Long way to go, if ever, before Bristow aircraft take up the role.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    Thats the image mentioned. Looks crap either way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Surley this report from sligo that the Bristow Paramedics will not be up to the same standard is scaremongering and total BS




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,451 ✭✭✭davetherave


    It is the 3rd of July meeting here - https://www.sligococo.ie/YourCouncil/CountyCouncil/Recordings/

    That motion starts about 08:15.

    It is pretty much what the article says.


    "People have raised concerns me that those who have been award the contract, Bristow Ltd, would not have the same facilities which mean that our current service would be downgraded, in that those who provide the paramedical service would not be in a position to offer the level of care that they are currently providing"

    "My understanding is that those who have been awarded the contract may not be in a position to have that same level of care that would result in the loss of life, possibly, along the western seaboard.

    Like, it's Bristow Helicopters, they know what they are doing. They've been doing it for years in the UK and the North Sea. It's not Honest Dave's Helicopter Rescue.

    Interestingly enough, what the article doesn't mention (or chooses not to) is when the councillor who seconded the motion starts, he says "I'm also a member like Cllr Maguire (the proposer), and Cllr Gilroy (the only other speaker on the motion), of the board of Sligo Airport." There could be a bit of loyalty to CHC there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,527 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It is total BS. Usual gombeen shite talk from Irish rural Councillors who would do or say ANYTHING for a bit of press coverage.

    You'd never guess the local elections are in 10 months



  • Registered Users Posts: 256 ✭✭mupper2


    Question for any lads who know, has there been any missions/how frequently have they occurred where the S92 was used but the AW189 would be unable to do similar?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,592 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    If anyone wants to register to see full spec. comparison https://air.one/compare/leonardo-aw189,sikorsky-s-92 From what can be seen without an account, they seem to have similar capabilities, with the AW189 having greater range.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,494 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    I'm surprised the seating capacity is the same, the S92 looks much bigger visually.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    I was talking to an EX IRCG S92 Pilot, he said "S92 can officially lift 20 casualties (but if situation warranted it could cram more in) & with the reserve fuel tank it had the endurance to give some margin when operating out at 200NM. What is said on paper as capability versus what actually happens when the mission changes, updates." Also was talking to a Crew person on one of the duty S92's "Space inside a helicopter when operating in Ireland is everything especially as we are a combined HEMS & SAR Operation, A full medical team of 3 & associated gear plus a child on an ICU trolley can easily fit & be wheeled up the ramp of the S92, this wont happen with an AW189 where you will be on your knees pulling it across the floor.

    Great photos doing the rounds on twitter lately, AW189 just cant do what the S92 can its that easy.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    As Good as the S92 is there is drawbacks with it so maybe its a mixed fleet the IRCG need. There has being issues with the S92 on cliff rescues due to the washdown from the rotors making rescues diffcult.

    The other issue is and i know some here dont agree with this but we have only Two Trauma centers in the country CUH and the bussier Mater. At the start of the process the medical community were asked on there views and they told the state that in serious cases of trauma the pateint needs to be dropped at the door and not dublin airport.

    An here is the problem the S92 cant get in to the mater but a smaller aircraft can hence when 112 did it in a training excercise. Ironically i think the area they used for landing now has sisk cabins on it. So maybe thats why they are happy going with AW189 if thats what Bristow are using. Also remember in this contract there is a greater amount of inland HEMS expected



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,155 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I see the AC are attending the RIAT at Fairford this weekend and are taking along an AW139 and an EC135 for static display.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Looks like Bristow seam Confident they will be successfull in the Commerical Court




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    That has nothing to do with Air Corps SAR, they are celebrating Heli60 which is 60 years of IAC Heli Operations, also there has been plenty of years where they have been invited to RIAT & were unable to attend as they simply didnt have the capability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I see on the Aircraft fourm that the state have being given the go ahead to award bristow the sar contract. If bristow keep the current crews and change to the AW189 how do the logistcs of that work. How will the existing crews be trained up while still working for CHC for the next 18 months?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement