You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the Left - read OP

You've been the victim of more than one gotcha: concerns about trans issues in the curriculum, for a start.

Now, how about you answer the previous question about how exactly Baker gets a "free pass"?

Sorry if this feels like you're being hounded, but it's only fair considering the amount of posts you make that deliberately try and mix left, far left and trans.

You say that but when I have presented you with detailed information in the past I've been accused by you and others of scaremongering.

On evidence, the notion that you are happy to accept and debate things hasn't been borne out, at least on this topic.

Eventually you're going to run out of road when you're defending the indefensible, so why not just forego the entire exercise?

The idea that sharing qualifying information on a subject is scaremongering is anathema to rational discussion.

Feel free to bring up issues?

I've done that and it's always the same response.

I've been set upon for presenting well thought out arguments on this thread, it would seem that the better thought out your argument the greater the amount of vitriol you can get expect in return.

The positions are entrenched and the battle lines drawn at all times. It's no wonder there's so little room for compromise.

All save the children nonsense too. Apropos to that a 14 year old committed suicide this week because they were denied access to healthcare. I await the performances and virtue signaling condemning the inhumanity Noah was subject to.

Ahh here, where are you going with your merely expressing science backed beliefs? Whether or not your beliefs are backed by science isn’t relevant, it’s the expression of them in the workplace is what’s likely to see you ostracised, for inappropriate behaviour.

Who do you think would want to be around that sort of lunatic? And I’m not referring to the specific beliefs, I’m referring to the idea that anyone would think they’re appropriate. Smallest bit of cop-on would tell you that much before you have yourself convinced you’re a pre-victim because everyone thinks you’re a lunatic.

No, it’s not brushing aside the science or anything like that. Look again at the examples you gave, in both cases -

For example if said at work in the canteen last month during pride month that I've had enough of lgbqt and think trans are going too far, biological men have no place in women's sports, we need to protect kids from abortions, trans strip shows and permanent hormone replacement, I would be called transphobic misogynistic and many other buzzwords, when my only concern is that of wonderful defenseless children. I would be called to HR and be an outcast if even had a job to return to.

If I said to hell with God and Jesus because the Catholic church should rot and I hope Trump and republicans die because abortions are healthcare, white people suck and black people can't be racist, I would prob find people agree with me and no visit to HR would ensue.

In either case you’d be likely to be ostracised, if not shown the door and don’t come back, because of your behaviour, not because of your beliefs which, I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest most people would rather you kept to yourself as they don’t want to listen to that crap.

For what it’s worth, I’m a practicing Catholic and the people I work with are a mix of various religions, faiths and none, cultures and beliefs. We’re all working in the ‘fintech’ sector, all educated with degrees up the wazoo, all with backgrounds in science and engineering.

They found it odd at first when they started (I hired them) that I wear a plain white shirt, black trousers and tie to work every day. The dress code is casual attire, but that’s what I’m comfortable in, and nobody bats an eyelid once they’re used to it, no different than nobody bats an eyelid at my work colleagues who wear the hijab. We all talk all sorts of shìt, latest on Netflix, sports, religion, education, culture, arts, travel (I don’t travel, don’t like going abroad, but I’m interested in where they’ve been or are coming from).

I can guarantee you that if you came out with that shìt you’re using as examples above - the first time people might look at you a bit odd, second time I’d take you aside for a quiet word. If you persisted in your behaviour, you’d leave me with no choice but to expedite your dismissal from our employer, because there’s a code of behaviour which you will have signed as part of your employment agreement, which you’d be in violation of should you choose to persist in the sort of behaviour you’re describing. Everyone has the right to a safe working environment, including you, but if you make it an unsafe working environment for other people, then that’s entirely on you.

It’s nothing to do with your employer’s values. Employers will generally regard anyone engaging in the sort of behaviour you’re describing as a liability, and when it gets to the point where you’re more of a liability than you are an asset to the employer, they’ll be looking to manage you out of the organisation.

You’re still not a victim, unless an employer has not followed due process and you’ve been unfairly dismissed. Employers are much more careful about that sort of thing though than they used to be, because they don’t want to be paying out compensation when they failed to follow their own disciplinary procedures or failed to act in accordance with employment law.

I'm.not saying they arent valid issues, but what do they have to do with ypur pre emptive responce to nullzero's post?

I'm not expecting you to debate anything.

Reflection would be more appropriate.

Reflection on what?!

I can't debate or reflect on anything unless you specify something!!

Does this actually happen?!

Conjecture. Provide evidence. Are you prosecuting the parents of kill g their child? Wow. That’s sick. I hope you have evidence for it.