President Biden closes gun control speech in USA with 'God save the Queen'

As I said:

'Man with speech impediment flubs 'volodymyr' with 'vladimir.' Story at 11. But first, is your air fryer spying on you for China? Don't go anywhere, we'll be right back'

/walks off set

Vlad, vlod. Another random whinge about counterfactuals thanks.

The last time you posted this slur, I posted expert commentary to the thread explaining how yes it can lead the wrong words coming out. It can lead to phrases being repeated.

You didn't engage with it.

It's a confidence building story Biden tells himself. That's not the same thing as a lie and you know it.

You wanna talk about lies and fitness for office? Let's start with Trump thinking he has presidential immunity to molest women. Or he can declassify documents by magic. Is he lying? Deranged? I don't know but he is clearly unfit for office.

https://truthout.org/articles/report-archives-has-proof-trump-knew-he-couldnt-declassify-docs-on-his-own/

It is so transparent.

Trump claims he has magical powers to declassify documents by waving his hand. But that's not a sign of anything wrong with his brain or fitness for office apparently.

He is found liable for sexual assault and defamation in a court of law. He continues to defame the woman in public. Words with actual consequences. Then tried to claim presidential immunity! But that's not a sign he is unfit for office. Apparently.

but but but Biden mixed up a word!!!

Desperate stuff.

I rarely agree with you but I've gotten into the habit of saying Vladimir Zelensky too, so I can't really blame Biden on that one. Vladimir rolls off the tongue easier.

They believe that Carroll was lying during the trial and trump was innocent because Carroll was smiling after the verdict was delivered.

QFT. 'He's not crazy, YOURE crazy, you have Trump Derangement Syndrome!'

Its possible but you never are as is proven by your post history. A textbook litany of binary partisanship.

Unprompted criticism of Trump - zero.

So if thats the standard you want to apply - apply it to yourself.

You were still defending Trumps innocence even after he was found liable for sexual assault in court.

The only reason you are posting these nothingburger attacks on Biden here is to distract from Trumps Achilles Heel. Or rather the endless stream of them.

Capitol Riots. Sexual assault. Defamation. Using campaign funds to cover up an affair. Breaches of care of confidential documents. Election interference across multiple states.

I might have missed some - maybe you could add them if so. Purely in the interests of non binary, non juvenile, serious consideration of what you consider 'fitness' for office.

Against that you are here posting ... but but but Biden mixed up a name.

Its not a proposition worthy of serious consideration by any objective analysis is it?

Utterly disingenuous answer.

You dont criticise Trump for those actions on the Trump thread. You defend him. Even when he was found liable in a court of law for sexual asssult you were still trying to maintain his innocence and cast aspersions about the victim who was vindicated by that court.

He opens his mouth to further defame the victim and you say nothing. But yet here we see 'faux concern' because Biden mixed up a name? Seriously? You dont think anyone paying attention doesnt see right through this pretence?

You dont defend Biden on the Biden presidency thread either.

So while it is entirely possible to criticise both you dont. And it is demonstrably false from your post history to misrepresent such a position as applying to you.

Given that there is already a Biden and Trump thread I see no reason why this thread shouldnt consider the fitness for office of the Presidential contenders eg RJK Jnr is a wingnut also.

Its entirely valid on this thread to point out the motivations and obvious partisan political agenda behind the scurrilous attacks on Biden here. For verbal gaffes that pale in consequence and comparison to Trumps actions.

Another reason why it is valid to mention Trumps conduct and your lack of criticisms for it is to establish your standard for fitness for office.

You are the one who made claims about 'binary' positions so your post history on Trump and Biden on this forum is entirely relevant.

So when you post here expressing concern over a Biden verbal gaffe it is entirely valid to point these things out to demonstrate its hollowness and obvious partisanship.

Have you dropped all pretence now and coming clean as a pro Trump poster then?

On this thread I have challenged both the substance and motivation of the criticisms. It is entirely valid in political debate to point out double standards.

It is entirely valid to point this out when those making them pretend to do so from a supposed 'neutral' stance in an attempt to sway readers to conceal the flimsy nature of the criticisms. That is not a legitimate position.

Only critics of Trump can make claims from such a stance - and you are demonstrably not one of them.

If someone thinks an 80 year old is too old and applies that standard regardless of party that is their opinion. I have seen zero evidence however of anything indicating that Biden is unfit for offence. Not a shred of real evidence.

So the accusations are without merit (when obviously partisan) and without foundation (no real evidence).

So it is entirely valid for me to post the view that there is an agenda on this thread to sling any mud at Biden however flimsy or scurrilous purely to deflect from Trumps far worse conduct.