You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the Left - read OP

Another $8 tweet dump no thanks. The waffle on Twitter is debunked by the fact a 14 year old committed suicide. It’s happening. Their denials based on “studies” do not apply, there is dead bodies now period.

“Do you approve” of the 14 year old committing suicide? /s

Sorry you simply cannot casually dismiss a 14 year old committing suicide with a shrug of the shoulder and sarcastic reference to tweetdumps. Just because those tweetdumps disagree with the SUICIDES you would rather blithely ignore instead.

You asked other users if they approve of things are we not allowed to?

Finnish $8/mo psychiatric waffle (appeal to authority fallacy) doesn’t obviate the suicide of a 14 year old over denied access to healthcare. It’s disgusting to downplay their death. Children are actively being harmed and you’re trying to say “nuh uh”

does trans kids killing themselves from denied care get a free pass on this thread?

It's clear YOU have no interest in evidence:

They aren't a **** statistic in Finnish academia.

Speaking of bad faith and academia, are you gonna stand behind your school curriculum accusations? No. You're not. Nor will you simply admit you erred and your "concerns" were vapid nonsense. You have no interest in engaging in good faith.

Pithy isn't it. Can you be specific, ie. in Good Faith with your claim.

Tweets are not evidence of anything except a tweet.

Twitter is unverifiable. Users can pay $8/mo to functionally pretend to be anyone. You can even edit tweets ex post facto, so they are not a matter of dependable record. It has many of the same (and some additional different) credibility issues to Wikipedia. It is a dead platform, sorry, and if you're going to link to it I encourage screenshots for static recordkeeping (and Twitter would really appreciate the lessened strain on their server, the company is deeply in the red).

Tablet Magazine is not a reliable or objective source:

Per the article in the Tweet:

"A previous version of this article gave the wrong percentage, 75%, of Finnish pediatric patients presenting for gender identity services who had a history of severe psychopathology prior to the emergence of their gender-related distress. The correct figure is 68%."

It didn't even get written based on correct information, and any neutral observer can determine the piece is opinionated and slanted: "Unlike American doctors who dare question “gender affirmative” orthodoxies, Kaltiala has the backing of professional medical groups in her country. " etc.

You say I don't care about evidence and engage in bad faith. I say I have not seen any of your supposed evidence, and are waiting for you to provide any. Are you going to say anything about Noah O'Brien, under your "Free Pass on thread" sentiment? Are you going to concede your "concern" about the school curriculum under the "good faith" standard?

Bullshit and more scarmongering.

Poster - when the people who claim to support them keep telling them it's this, or suicide, no other options.

You - here's a doctor who made a diganosis: he's told the kid NOTHING before he started (and if he did, he should be struck off).

---

You don't know the difference between an activist who said "either you're trans or you're suicidal!" and a doctor who made a disagnosis.

So more scaremongering bullshit. Note to @nullzero - no, this is not representative of left-wig criticism and yes it is possible to criticism left-wing pjilosophy without scaremongering, this is just in relation to the poster I quoted. He clerly is not capable of it and this is the latest item of evidence in a long line of anti-left bigoted transphobic posts which, I accept, are viewpoints of said poster ALONE.

Nobody here is arguing that there aren't young people who identify as trans who have killed themselves, with the reason given that they were denied gender affirming care.

What we are arguing is that there'd be less of them, if the narrative of gender affirming care or death, wasn't pushed so hard.

But feel free to go on a bizarre tirade, dismissing everything that doesn't support your position.

The term "scaremongering" does get used a lot on this thread. You have as you said, had occasion to use it yourself, and without scouring the thread for all instances of you using it, I have had occasion to feel it was used unfairly.

Just to note, you're not the only person using that phrase and I'm not attempting to single you out here.

I'm not citing specific examples here, rather just making an observation about something that has been a constant element of the thread and should perhaps be curtailed.

No, I was asking if there was any evidence to the claim that non-suicidal kids were given the idea that it was most likely going to be suicide or trans, and if so, what kind of scale are we talking?

Depends when you check

unclear how long platform can operate without paying its ISP and overhead bills. Nevermind the central issue, the problem of credibility when even the CEO is provably operating sock puppet accounts. There is no meaningful standard of reliability anymore regarding information on Twitter or who is who.