Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

Options
1302303305307308315

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    The level of casualties and destruction. Hitler seemed to view the Russian's as inferior humans.

    Good account by Conor Gallagher on naked capitalistism comparing Hitler's campaign to present day.

    https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/07/underestimate-russia-at-your-own-risk-a-comparison-of-hubris-by-germany-during-wwii-and-todays-collective-west.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,970 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Hitler viewed a lot of people as inferior. The level of destruction and casualties was largely down to scorched earth tactics and the fact that they had lost most of their own generals to Stalin's paranoia.


    Russia has invaded places a lot of times in that time period and has heavily involved itself.


    However certainly over the last century and a bit they have tended to suffer much worse than outside observers would expect prior to the war (ww1, Japan, Finland, Ukraine...) generally because internal politics have prevented competent military leadership over that period.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    What was good about it...? (https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/07/underestimate-russia-at-your-own-risk-a-comparison-of-hubris-by-germany-during-wwii-and-todays-collective-west.html)

    Christ almighty, back on planet Earth Russia launched this war (Putin's "Barbarossa"?) and if anyone can be compared to arrogant deluded "Nazis" it is Putin & Russian govt. (who thought their war would be very easy and quick).

    There may be alot of materiel and other kinds of help going to Ukraine and Russia-US/EU/West relations are in the toilet + extremely hostile (as bad as relations with the Soviets during the Cold war now I would say) but NATO and the West is not in a war with Russia as yet.

    Let's hope we don't see that come to pass.

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    A new country? An invader decides that chunks of another country belongs to him and that is the signal that these regions should be hived off? There has never, repeat NEVER, been an indication of any overwhelming pro-Russian sentiment in Kherson or Zapororoyzhe provinces. But that's not what you meant at all, what you meant was "Give Russia what it wants".

    As for these "heinous acts", a UN investigation found that the majority of the deaths in the Donbass were those of combatants and responsibility for the deaths of non-combatants was equally divided between Ukrainians and Russians/separatists.

    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    It's very easy to understand. A defending army is fighting among its own people whom it is protecting. An invading army is usually occupying areas with a hostile population. Unless that invading army is extremely well disciplined and controlled the temptation always exists to victimize the local population out of fear, hatred or avarice. Historically the Russian army does not have a good reputation and considering the detestation shown by many of the inhabitants, the hard conditions the soldiers are experiencing, paranoia about saboteurs and the resistance and the poison being poured into their ears by social media and by Russian television about 'Nazis', "twisted Russians'', "kholkols" and "satanists" a level of atrocity was guaranteed.

    As for the so called ''SS patches'' (or rather far-right nationalist symbols), you can find many more of those among both Wagner fighters and and among the separatists and other assorted extremists and gangsters on the Russian side. What counts here are actions, not symbols and Russian crimes dwarf anything that has taken place on the Ukrainian side.

    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Further, this is the second time a user has tried to draw parallels with Northern Ireland with the intention being clear enough: to try and imply there's some "Both Sides" ethnic conflict behind the invasion, all to delegitimise the defence of Ukraine by its people. Easier to muddy the waters of the invasion if you can claim ethnic strife, internal divisions and some facade of concern that drove the Russian advance into Ukraine (again).



  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    It might be regarded as understandable-if not justifiable-that large numbers of German women would be raped considering that many of the Russian forces were brutalized, illiterate primitives and that many of them has fierce personal incentives for taking vengeance on their enemies and the families of their enemies but the Russian penchant for sexual assault went far beyond that. Russian female prisoners of the Germans and deportees of other nationalities were raped and Milovan Djilas, the Yugoslav aide to Tito, recorded that they had to remonstrate with Stalin about the amount of rapes taking place on Yugoslav soil, some accompanied by murder. Stalin, needless to say, was utterly blasé about this.

    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    There is an air of desperation coming from the US/EU/NATO side. Ukraine appears to be losing this war and, if that's the case, Biden will either have to resign or lose the 2024 presidential election (most likely to Trump). My guess is that if Ukraine lose he'll announce he won't stand for re-election in 2024 citing his age as the reason. The consequences across the EU are already being felt. Politicians in EU countries who have signed up lock, stock and barrel to US hegemony are losing power and are being replaced by those demanding policies not too dissimilar to what Orban is implementing in Hungary. Uncontrolled immigration (at the behest of the US) is putting the very existence of the EU at stake and we are four years away from Le Pen as president of France with the AfD making significant gains in the 2025 German election.

    NATO are even distancing themselves from Zelensky and Ukraine's wish to become immediate NATO members. No one even talks in terms of Ukraine becoming an EU member anymore.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Normally there's some veiled attempt at objectivity, but this one seems devoid of even that.

    A few weeks ago, Putin couldn't stop one of his own commanders reaching to within 200km of Moscow in less than 24 hours, now he's about to win the war in Ukraine, how so?



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I takes a special kind of moral and intellectual bankruptcy to read a report which says the vast majority of abuse is committed by Russian forces and try to spin it as both sides.

    Russia commits thousands daily yet somehow morally it is all balanced out by far fewer on the Ukrainian side. Russia commits them as a deliberate act of strategy and terrorism.

    Such a proposition gives succor and carte blanche for Russia to commit more war crimes. Abuse more children. Kill more children. Maim more innocents.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    200 km from Moscow? Was he even in Russia?

    Sure the nazis made it to 8km from Moscow and we all know know how that turned out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    In case you missed it, to make a point, the head of Putin's mercenary army went from Ukraine to within the outskirts of Moscow in less than 24 hours, casually shooting down a dozen pilots on the way. The Russians were digging the roads in an attempt to stop him, presidential planes and jets were flying out of Moscow to St Petersburg, like rats off a sinking ship.

    Russian conscripts, prisoners and soldiers are bribing their commanders for leave, making videos pleading for ammunition, commanders and even leadership stating they are having supply issues with, among many things, artillery and artillery shells - for an artillery based army. Russia's navy is afraid to sail against Ukraine, a country with virtually no navy. The much smaller Ukrainian air-force incredibly hasn't been destroyed yet, on the contrary, it's getting larger. It's now believed Ukraine has more functional main battle tanks than Russia, and is getting more. In fact, it's getting more of pretty much everything, including longer range missiles. From it's partners, aka the civilized world, which has fairly deep pockets. Conversely Russia, which has a GDP the size of Italy's, is receiving help from such economic powerhouses as.. North Korea and Iran

    It's no picnic for Ukraine and it's likely going to still be a long drawn out conflict (if the Russian military doesn't actually implode from it's own issues first) but according to your personal opinion, Russia is about to prevail in Ukraine, okay, how?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    "Uncontrolled immigration (at the behest of the US) is putting the very existence of the EU at stake"

    Utter histrionic waffle of the level you'd expect from the conspriacy forum, not politics. The rest is just generic talking points from the chronically obsessed with blaming "the west" for everything - except the actual country doing the invading.



  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    With Hitler's army turning around, saying "To hell with that, I've other things to be doing" and marching away? Right?



  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    "Bigger country beats smaller country!? Except in the cases of Sparta versus...well, everybody for a while, Greeks versus Persian Empire, Macedonia versus Persian Empire, Mongols versus..everybody for a while, Mamalukes versus Mongols 1260, Scotland versus England 1314, England versus France 1346, Hussites versus Crusaders-14th century, Netherlands versus Spain-early 17th century, Sweden versus Austria 1630s, Nascent United States versus Britain 1776, Robert. E. Lee in 1862, Japan versus Russia 1905, Israel versus nearly everyone it has ever fought...just a few out of doubtless many others.

    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    There wouldn't have been an invasion had the west and Ukraine lived up to the Minsk Agreements agreed with Russia in 2015. If the Ukrainians want to fight a US/NATO provoked war (started by Russia) then that's their choice as the west will fight until the last Ukrainian soldier.

    For the past twenty years countries in the Middle East, Northern Africa & Europe (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine...) have either had their countries attacked and/or democratically elected governments removed (happened in Ukraine). This has led to the displacement of literally millions of people from those countries seeking legitimate refuge in the EU. 1.1 million Syrians literally entered Germany overnight under Merkel. Given the fact that one major country has already left the EU using immigration at the heart of its reason it is not impossible to imagine another leaving in 5 or 10 years time. One year ago I would have thought it madness. Not anymore - as the leadership of EU countries is changing rapidly with the far right rising.

    This is not normal. The performance of the far right VOX party in Spain (the most Eurosceptic party in Spain & formed just ten years ago) in the general election will be one to watch next week. A recent poll in Germany has Alternative für Deutschland second with the general election two years away. In Sweden the Christian Democrats are in coalition government under a mandate to reduce the number of refugees allowed into Sweden by 70% with some calling for repatriation of existing refugees. Italy has a far right headed government and Le Pen looks in pole position to become the next president of France in 2027. . . and I haven't mentioned the governments of Hungary or Poland yet. Ironically brexit, being such an unmitigated economic disaster, has led to less calls from some of these parties to tone down their past desire to leave the EU.....but that could change.

    It is nearly the 100th anniversary of the Munich Beer Hall putsch which led to Hitler's imprisonment in 1924. Less than nine years later he was Chancellor of Germany. Sadly this is not conspiracy but fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You forgot to mention the Budapest Agreement and NATO Russia Founding Act.

    Russia violated the Budapast agreement in attempting to destabilise Ukraine and prevent it signing EU treaty.

    It violated it again by invading Crimea and stirring up trouble in Donbas, and sending weapons and forces in.

    Ukraine has the right under Budapest and NATO-Russia Founding act to join both the EU and NATO.

    So why are you only concerned about Minsk? And how many times did Russia violate Minsk? They did not withdraw their forces as agreed. Russia had no intention of honouring any agreement only as long as it suits them.

    So your pretence at respecting agreements is Pretty obvious pro-Russian propaganda.

    An utterly dishonest attempt at rewriting history with added whataboutery. Completely without merit or foundation. There is simply no basis to state that Minsk could have prevented war. Such a claim is thoroughly discredited by Russia's attempt in the war to seize Kyiv rather than protecting Donbas etc & Russia's past treaty violations. That Russia doesn't give a damn about ethnic Russians is proven beyond doubt by the number they killed directly or indirectly or conscripted as cannon fodder.

    The rest of your post is conspiracy theory nonsense not worth giving any airtime to by discrediting. It discredits itself.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @Peter Flynt

    There wouldn't have been an invasion had the west and Ukraine lived up to the Minsk Agreements agreed with Russia in 2015. If the Ukrainians want to fight a US/NATO provoked war (started by Russia) then that's their choice as the west will fight until the last Ukrainian soldier.

    What part of the Minsk 1 and Minsk 2 did the west not live up to, Russian forces repeatedly broke the cease Fires and kept trying to grab more land for themselves, including at Mariupol and donesk airport, there was no war in Ukraine until Russia invaded 9 years ago,

    Anything else is parroting Russian propaganda



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    Russian Propaganda?

    I'm sorry to inform you but ..... everyone lies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    I'm just not too sure how you decide who committed the most heinous acts. As my maths teacher used to say (and I'm sure yours too): show me your work.

    You do know that the areas taken over by Russia are inhabited by Russian's in the main? And that Ukraine has been shelling those seperatist areas since 2014.

    According to your argument, it would naturally be Ukraine who would be committing the most war crimes. Unless you think they are fighting on behalf of ethnic Russians against Russians?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Especially the Russians,

    Were not in Ukraine,they aren't our soldiers in our uniforms and they aren't our officers leading this .....

    Yeah 👍



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Easy there was a UN report post 2014 and guess what the absolutely majority of cases of war crimes and ceasefire breaches came from Russian forces



  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    It was Russia that never lived up to the Minsk agreements, refusing to aacknowledge that its own soldiers were involved in the Donbass. Russia negotiated in bad faith from DaOne. . There would have been no war if Russia had kept to the Budapest agreements that pre-dated the fighting in the Donbass.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    "Mr (Jake) Sullivan said Ukraine was running out of artillery and needed "a bridge of supplies (ie: send cluster munitions) " while the US ramps up domestic production." (source BBC)


    "The U.S. Army will boost production of 155mm artillery shells more than sixfold to 85,000 a month by fiscal 2028, according to the service’s undersecretary." (source: Defense News)


    "Russia is firing a staggering 20,000 artillery rounds per day, a senior U.S. defense official estimated, while Ukraine is firing from 4,000 to 7,000 rounds daily." (Source: NBC news)


    85,000 a month by 2028 when Russian is firing that much in 4 days? And you talk about a military being embarrassed?

    The Yanks literally hadn't a clue what they were biting off. Well, I think they do now. And so they are sending cluster munitions - a munition designed to obliterate large infantry armies moving through the jungles of Vietnam. At least they didn't call it a "gamechanger"



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The UN report cited on the thread recently proves that for the vast majority of abuses Russian forces are responsible.

    But no doubt you will try to dismiss this with a self serving bad faith excuse - just as earlier on the thread you asked for Guardian as a source, a Guardian source was provided and you then tried to lie your way out of it. You are a proven liar and the proof is on this thread.

    Your claims have no credibility.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    So these areas are occupied illegally by Russian forces and Russian forces are shooting at Ukraine and Ukrainians are returning fire ,

    That's not a war crime



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    I suppose it would be useful at this point to figure out what constitutes an agreed victory ... or even a significant checkpoint.

    Can we agree that Russia rolling the front up to the Dnieper and taking Odessa constitutes that?

    [Cluster munitions, the Scarlet Pimpernel Challenger tanks and ancient decommissioned air defence missiles just bought back from Taiwan (where the Americans first unloaded them) notwithstanding...]

    I think the signs are clear from Vilnius: Ukraine can go forth and multiply if it thinks its dragging white Westerners into this war.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Apparently in the worldview of the pro-Russian propagandists, illegally invading another country and killing its civilians isn't a war crime.

    But defending your own country against that invasion is.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    "white westerners"

    And there it is.

    So much said, implied, and to be judged by a single set of two words.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    Twenty years ago some posters on here would have supported the war in Iraq and telling everyone WMD are just about to be discovered.....Heck you could even go back to Vietnam.



Advertisement