Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why don't we buy tanks for Ukraine to help them win the war?

Options
  • 15-07-2023 10:47pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 127 ✭✭


    Bear with me here.

    Estimates are that the state will spend about 5.5 billion on Ukraine related expenses this year and next..accommodation, 200 euro a week, medical card and so on.

    A leopard 2 tank costs 10 million. So instead why don't we use that money to buy 550 tanks for Ukraine, win the war, send the refugees home and end this nonsense.

    To heck with neutrality...we have enough cash to literally defeat the Russian army and still have a budget surplus!

    Post edited by Beasty on


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    Diversity is our strength, obviously we are going to out diversitise Russian into submission.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,766 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The war may well be over before the expected constitutional court case is settled.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,312 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    When you have figured out where to buy the tanks get back to us and we’ll explain the 50 problems with your thinking.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,640 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    is that the secondhand cost of one? this suggests a new one costs €30m.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-aims-buy-18-leopard-2-tanks-545-mln-euros-source-2023-05-12/



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 478 ✭✭Run Forest Run


    They don't need more tanks. They need more bodies!

    Go and offer your blood for this pointless war, if you believe in it so much.

    This is all about sacrificing Ukrainian bodies, in a futile attempt to weaken Russia. It will all be for nothing in the end.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,312 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Might have better luck a mainland European museum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Everlong1


    I've met two Ukrainians so far who have no intention of ever going back because they prefer Ireland. I doubt they're the only ones.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,312 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    So your home, your family and your freedoms are not worth anything then? And that includes writing on this board!



  • Registered Users Posts: 478 ✭✭Run Forest Run


    Ukraine is being used and sacrificed. This is a pointless war, that will only result in the destruction of Ukraine.

    The sooner Ukrainians wake up to this reality, the sooner they can save their nation.

    Continuing this futile war will NOT save them!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    So, just letting Russia advance would save their country? But we digress into existing threads.

    As for buying them tanks....the OP hasn't thought this through at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,508 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    It might not be so nice when all the help they get now is cut back.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,645 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Someone needs to do some homework in why spending a euro in Ireland is so much better for the Irish economy than spending a euro outside of Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,515 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Okay, let's skip past the implications for Ireland's neutrality

    First off, if Ukraine won the war tomorrow it wouldn't mean all the Ukrainian refugees suddenly get sent home. Their country has been devastated by war and in many cases they don't have a home to go back to

    Ukraine is going to need significant investment the get back on its feet after the war. I just hope Ireland and other EU states are ready to roll out the chequebook to help

    Then there's the problem of "ending the war". To some extent, wars almost always end with mutual consent. Ukraine's stated goals are to retake all territory back to the pre 2014 borders (including Crimea and Donetsk/Luhansk), cease Russian aggression, seek war reparations and prosecution of Russian war criminals (including Vladimir Putin)

    Even if Ukraine accomplishes the first goal, Russia is unlikely to agree to any of their other war goals. And Russia can still fire into Ukraine from their side of the border with long range artillery and missiles

    Ukraine's Western allies have already said one of the conditions of their military support is that it isn't used against Russian territory. So Ukraine will need home grown ability to retaliate against Russian bases where their bomber fleets are based

    We've already seen they've developed drones which can attack Russia, but let's be honest, they're a bit **** and their success is probably more due to Russian air defences being spread pretty thin at the moment

    My point is that the war can end up in a frozen state and never really end


    To go to your point about buying Leopard tanks for Ukraine, there's a lot of problems there. For starters, military procurement is pretty difficult with a lot of legal barriers to get past, both domestically and internationally. As other users implied, you can't simply go onto DoneDeal and buy one

    There's also a lot of aspects to "buying" a tank beyond the tank itself. One of the major reasons the price seems to vary between €10 million and €30 million is the extra costs associated

    As well as the tank, you need to train personnel, who also would like to be paid something more than minimum wages. They also need fuel, quite a lot of fuel actually, definitely more than a Prius. And then there's the maintenance costs, spare parts, upgrades, life extension programs. And ammo, unless you're only planning to use the tanks for parades

    This might come as a surprise but it's generally not a good idea to skip the maintenance on heavy military equipment. Best case scenario the tank runs a bit poorly, worst case scenario the gun explodes when fired and destroys the tank while turning the crew into paste

    Oh, you'll also need a base to house all of this stuff, with associated land and construction costs

    Believe it or not, most military procurement does factor this stuff in and doesn't just buy things without considering the lifetime costs.

    Ireland doesn't really have a huge amount of experience with large military procurement and would likely get caught in multiple legal issues, especially since it's known that we'd be exporting them to Ukraine immediately after purchase.

    Little quirk of arms exports, if you own a piece of equipment you can't just sell it to whoever, you need the permission of the country that originally manufactured it. This is why Poland had to wait for the okay from Germany before they could send their Leopard tanks to Ukraine


    Okay, no worries, much simpler plan. Just give the Ukrainians the money and let them sort out the details. They know much more about what they need and have the negotiation teams already in place so could probably do a better job

    This is actually a good idea and several countries have already done this. They basically underwrote Ukrainian purchases from their domestic arms industry and bypassed their own procurement process

    However, you then run into the problems of production timelines.

    See, if you order a Leopard tank on Monday, you won't have it by Friday. It'll be more like 2-3 years depending on what exactly you ordered, because there's a whole heap of orders in front of yours

    You could try convincing Rheinmetall to give you priority or increase production capacity, but be prepared to bring your chequebook. This isn't command and conquer where you can build 20 tank factories and have them sitting idle 90% of the time, they cost money to run in real life and need to be filled with orders to remain in business

    This is partly why the US keeps building Abrams tanks even though the US army doesn't really need or want more. It keeps a lot of people employed, but also keeps a lot of trade knowledge still in the business that might be lost if the factory shut down and then tried to open up again


    A lot of the equipment being sent to Ukraine isn't new, it's being pulled from stockpiles that the donor countries already have.

    This is generally to circumvent the production backlog, it's generally quicker to refurbish and upgrade existing equipment then wait for new stuff to be built

    The donor country then orders new equipment to replace the donated stuff

    This has actually created some interesting accounting glitches, because the cost of replacement is often what's used for reporting the size of the arms package being sent

    However, what happens to equipment that's old and not planned for replacement? For example, the US sent a load of M113 armoured personnel carriers to Ukraine. They were manufactured initially during the Korean war and have been retired from service decades ago

    The cost on the package was essentially the cost of a new M113, but the US will never manufacture them again and doesn't plan to replace them

    Similarly, a lot of AMRAPs have been sent to Ukraine. Those vehicles were designed to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq against irregular soldiers. I don't think the US is planning to get into another Afghanistan if they can avoid it, so again they aren't going to replace them

    It isn't just equipment, a lot of the munitions being sent are slated for disposal in the near future

    This is why recently the Pentagon was told by the US GAO that they had actually underspent on the arms packages sent to Ukraine and they had more money available to send more stuff


    There's also a slightly twisted logic going on with several European countries that are sending support. With the exception of probably the UK and French militaries, most European armies are designed to fight off a Russian invasion (or a Turkish invasion in the case of the Greek army, or a Greek invasion in the case of the Turkish army)

    So if a tank is sent to Ukraine to blow up Russian tanks, then overall that means the donor country needs fewer tanks since Russia has fewer tanks to invade with

    This kind of logic is what underpinned things like Poland donating half their tank fleet to Ukraine, or Latvia donating all of their artillery

    The more Russian resources they can tie up in Ukraine, the less likely they are to be invaded in the near future. Remember around the start of the Ukrainian war, there were multiple commentators on Russian news saying Poland was next in line and the Baltic States had always really been part of Russia

    Those states can probably handle a temporary decrease in their arsenals if it means the vast majority of the modern Russian tank fleet gets sent for an early and terminal retirement


    So, in conclusion, I don't think Ireland can really go and act as a buying agent for Ukraine. There's a lot of other ways we can help, and housing Ukrainian refugees is one of those. It relieves pressure on the Ukrainian economy to support people while they're fighting a war, and I'm sure there's a few Ukrainian men who are happier knowing their families are safe from drone and missile attacks and can focus more on evicting Russian occupiers from their territory

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    What happens when we figure out most of the people who have come into Ireland are not from Ukraine. Plus when the people have come in stay and we are still left with our huge bill and a load of Irish tanks sitting in Ukraine?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,515 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Well it didn't take long for this thread to devolve into xenophobia and trolling

    Although I suspect it started out as trolling 🙄

    Anyway, I'm done here, enjoy the cesspit the rest of ye!

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 694 ✭✭✭creeper1


    Useless idea because most of them aren't going anywhere regardless of what happens in the battlefield.

    That has already been accepted at government level.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,956 ✭✭✭mikemac2


    edited out



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,506 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    We have a thread dedicated to this conflict.

    Closed



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement