Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How to insure a second car without breaking the bank?

Options
  • 13-07-2023 10:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 5,291 ✭✭✭


    I have a second car - a 17 year old BMW - that I want to be able to drive on the odd weekend. My current insurer won't let me add it as a second car to my policy, despite having been with them claim-free for many years. Rang a broker that specialises in multiple car insurance and their quote for a brand new policy is north of €800.

    It just seems bizarre to me that insurance policies in this country apply to individual cars and not to the driver.

    Has anyone here had additional cars insured in a cost effective way and, if so, how did you do it?

    Post edited by LIGHTNING on


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 69,006 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I don't believe there's anyone doing NCB mirroring currently, which was the way around this before. Try the usual set of brokers - there's a list in a sticky in the Insurance forum I believe - and see what comes up; that's the only way really.

    There aren't that many countries where the driver is the sole insured entity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    There aren't that many countries where the driver is the sole insured entity.

    That's true, but also there's probably very few countries, where insurers who give you discount for years of claims free driving, suddenly tell you that if you want to have second car, then you are considered as someone with no driving experience and 0 no claims bonus. That makes totally no logical sense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    Do what everyone else does, put in someone else's name and drive it on you driving other cars extension 🫣



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭creedp


    Absolutely agree, it total hypocrisy by the insurance industry. How the hell can they legitimately claim that you are an experienced driver with full ncb on one car but a novice with no ncb on a second car. It's just a p1ss take, otherwise you'd be offered the same ncb on the second car.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,250 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    With the car being 17 years old your stuck between a rock and a hard place. It's deemed too old for a lot of insurance companies to offer regular cover and it's deemed too young to qualify for a classic insurance. Normally to put it on a classic policy with limited annual mileage, the car needs to be at least 20 years old and you already need to have a normal policy on another regular car.

    Maybe keep ringing around the various brokers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,368 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Ya classic policy is the only sensible option. For the right type of car, they will do that from 20 years old.

    I've a 2000 Audi TT and it cost 240 quid per year. Must have a main car on a standard policy also.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭User1998




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,753 ✭✭✭standardg60


    If you get, or are, named on someone else's policy you can use this named driver experience to start a new policy. You'd need at least a year though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,291 ✭✭✭Ardent


    Yeah, that's how I got the €800 broker quote



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    It's utterly illogical for motor insurance companies here not to cover additional cars in the same name. Subject to a reasonable limit, say 3 vehicles to avoid abuse. The OPs situation is perfectly reasonable and normal and their risk level is known to the insurer. You'd almost think that the insurance companies actually want to encourage uninsured driving.

    A case for the government to get them in before the appropriate committee and look into this practice in detail.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,545 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I have 2 cars insured under my own name, and now both are with the same broker (123.ie)

    1st car is a 2006 BMW which I've owned since 2011, and it had a claim on the policy in 2017, so I had to start my NCB again from scratch..

    In 2020 we bought a Tesla and had to start a completely new policy with XS Direct as we wanted to keep the BMW on the road, and decided to leave it as it was in it's own policy with the 3yrs NCB built back up on it... at the time XS direct were the only show in town for a brand new policy on a fairly powerful Tesla with 0 NCB... Can't remember what we paid but it was steep enough, and we renewed with XS again for the 2nd year... by the time year 3 rolled around XS had left the market so we had to shop around and went to 123.ie (for €885). Into year 4 now in the Tesla and paying €998 fully comp which is still fairly steep but it is what it is... was too busy to shop around so just renewed at their price....

    about a year ago we moved the BMW also to 123.ie who quoted us about €600 3rd party which we were happy enough to pay at the time..... I guess with the BMW its easy to get cover as we've had it insured since 2011, but starting a completely new policy on a 17yr old car might be difficult..



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,719 ✭✭✭honda boi




  • Registered Users Posts: 25,455 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    If you're with Aviva, Liberty or Zurich, somebody needs to have a policy in place for the car in order for your policy's 'driving other cars' to cover you. This applies regardless of whether the car's policy covers you to drive it or not.

    For example, Liberty has this in the terms and conditions for driving other cars ...

    • there is a current insurance policy in place in another person’s name that covers the other car;

    This started off as an urban myth and it did the rounds for years, even though it was a false rumour. Trouble is, the insurance companies heard about it and thought it was a great idea. Because it's precise purpose is to prevent the practice decribed above. Sooner or later, every insurance company will have this condition in the 'driving other cars' section of their policies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    I'm with Zurich and any car I drive has to have its own insurance policy, it can't be more than 15 years old either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,455 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    So, if the OP is in the same situation and you expect him to follow your advice ...

    Do what everyone else does, put in someone else's name and drive it on you driving other cars extension

    He still has to take out a policy on his second car. Or give your hypothetical 'someone else' the money to buy a policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    No Mr angry person, obviously he needs to check his policy carefully. The only cars I'd drive using the extension would be my childrens and they fit they required criteria laid down by my insurer. It might happen one a year I'd need to use either of their cars.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    If a claim is made the insurance companies will check to see who drives the car most. Then you'll have a claim and cancelled insurance which is a bigger issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    Wha? What are you on about? This site is getting back to normal again, posters spouting complete nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Better than advising people to commit insurance fraud.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    It isn't fraud, this always gets trotted out on boards every time. Me hopping into my son's car to get the paper because he's parked behind me isn't committing insurance fraud. On better policies where the other car doesn't require an insurance policy of its own, driving that car on the weekend is not committing insurance fraud as the policy you carry clearly states you're insured to drive said vehicles. I have not told anyone here to drive uninsured, the onus is on them to make absolutely certain the vehicle they're driving meets the criteria laid down on their policy. Don't accuse me of it again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭creedp


    Agree I confirmed at last renewal that I'm covered to drive other cars fully comprehensive even if cars are not covered by another policy so long as car is not owned by spouse/partner



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    I think it must have a valid NCT if required as well. My daughter's partner has that on his policy, mine is very restrictive but suits me for the rare occasion I drive a different car.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    You are driving your SON's car not YOUR car. You are advising someone to register THEIR car in someone else's name so they can drive it using the "driving other cars" extension, that's the insurance fraud.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    AHH stop now, you're making yourself look ridiculous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭User1998


    To be fair, he’s not wrong. Just because a car is registered in someone else’s name doesn’t mean its not owned by you.

    If I buy a car with my own money, purposely register the car in my fathers name, so that I can drive it on the weekends, that is insurance fraud.

    Now do I give a bollox that its insurance fraud? No, I done it anyway.

    Heck I even drove cars that don’t have an active insurance policy on them because I knew if I was stopped I’d still get away with it. All you need to show is your insurance certificate. Garda aren’t interested in the terms and conditions of your policy.

    Am I condoning it? No. But thats what I done before I got motor trade insurance



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    I have never ever heard of an insurance company asking anyone for a receipt as proof of ownership of any vehicle ever, they use the document issued by Shannon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭User1998


    Let me put it to you in another way then.

    You purchase a car for yourself, with your own money, and you put the car in somebody else’s name.

    You drive the car, and you crash. You call your insurance company and explain what happened, and when they ask about the car you were driving, you tell them the above.

    Do you think they would cover you in that scenario? Of course they wouldn’t, because it’s insurance fraud.

    Just because they don’t regularly ask for receipts doesn’t mean it isn’t fraud. But like I said, I really don’t care what it is. I’ve done it myself in the past, and would still do it if I didn’t have motor trade insurance.

    Maybe your just trying to make yourself feel better by convincing yourself that what you do is all above board?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,137 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    Where did I say I'm driving a car like that? You're wrong, the insurance company will cover the accident as the driver, policy and vehicle conform to the stipulations laid out in the policy. I bought a car for my daughter last year which is obviously in her name, is she wrong to be driving it? No, I can't drive it on my extension because it's 07 which makes it too old.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,753 ✭✭✭standardg60


    I did clarify this specific thing with my insurance company a few years ago as I was doing the same thing as you and wanted to be absolutely sure I was covered.

    The lad at first said as long as it wasn't in my name I was grand but he actually rang back a few minutes later after he'd checked with someone and said no if the car was 'owned' by me, which was the specific wording on the policy and in my possession then it was mine and wouldn't be covered.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,865 ✭✭✭mulbot


    It's certainly not insurance fraud to do this.



Advertisement