Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

Options
1304305307309310315

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,443 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Because these so called ' Protector's" were actually Putin's military, unbadged, and they were shelling and killing ethnic as well as Ukrainian citizens. Putin on several occasions denied that they were his troop's claiming that they were local inhabitant's forming defense forces to protect ethnic Russians. More Russian lies to cover up illegal action's. Igor Strelkov AKA Girkin explains it very well, that is if you bothered to look at his VID.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,415 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So, let's consider your lying. It is demonstrably proven in the post linked below.

    You asked for evidence. You cited the Guardian as an accepted source. Evidence from the Guardian was provided. Then you denied saying the Guardian was an acceptable source! So now, you change tactics. After having been proved wrong by a Guardian article, now the Guardian is off the list. An entirely self serving argument.

    If you think the Russian version of events is accurate, that the Western press version is completely wrong, well it is no wonder you think you have a bridge in Crimea to sell.

    You never reveal what would be an acceptable source to you because then information from that source could be used to challenge your pro-Russian prejudged position. It is an entirely bad faith argument.

    You will always find some excuse to deny the evidence that is presented to you.

    This is proof positive your posts here just an exercise in deliberate muddying of the waters, it is an assault on truth itself. With constant whataboutery.

    And you seem utterly incapable of doing perfunctory research yourself into Russian lies. You never give any reason for that. But the reason is obvious. You are just here to spread pro-Russian both sides propaganda.

    Because Russia's actions in Ukraine cannot be defended truthfully in open debate, pro-Russian posters resort to these transparent tactics.

    Here's the post again with the proof of your lies.

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120849464/#Comment_120849464

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie



    Woman sleeps with another man and husband finds out.

    Husband forgives wife

    Husband finds flirtatious texts on wife's phone a year later and confronts her about it.

    Wife says whataboutery.


    Its not an ex administration. It's the US system of World Policeman / (our) Rule Based Order.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    I'll start with "Russia are occupying ethnically Russian areas" That's a fact.

    You are saying that Russians are more likely to commit war crimes against ethnic Russians than are ethnic Ukrainians?



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,415 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,443 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Lies? Lets start with the beginning of Putin's lying career lie, shall we? His "Election" was based on a blood stained lie...300 people dead in the Moscow,, Buynaksk and Volgodonsk apartment bombings with the bombers caught red handed placing another bomb in an apartment block. They were the FSB and the GRU. Putin blamed the Chechens, and triggered the second Chechen war to solve the Chechen problem. His 23 odd years in power has been a continuous lie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,970 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Are we really going back to the Sudetenland argument again?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They are occupying Ukrainian territory the majority of the population centres which are Ukrainian,your trying to use the argument Russian speakers vs Russian citizens



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    For the 2nd time. Countries aren't people.

    Scholz, the leader of Germany, is not hypocritical for condemning the invasion of Ukraine, because 'Germany' once invaded the country in the past. He is perfectly entitled to support the defence of Ukraine and criticise the invasion of that country by Putin's Russia.

    Reaching decades into the past to cherry-pick the actions of one administration in order to criticise one now is reductionism and whataboutery.



  • Registered Users Posts: 195 ✭✭Repo101


    To be fair before 2022, many but not even a majority in Donbass and Luhansk would have identified as ethnically Russian, however it would appear as if the pro-Russian politicans in Ukraine have been slowly rowing back on their stances since the illegal invasion, including the head of OPZZh, Yuriy Boyko, who is now pro-European. I would say that the majority of people were pro-Russian in those regions before the invasion. It's likely different now but obviously difficult to tell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    This is a distortion.

    Ukraine is an independent nation. In Donbas, polls in 2014 showed that the majority of population didn't want to join with Russia. They were never given a choice. When Russian tanks rolled across the border in Feb 2022, they weren't greeted with flowers and crowds. In currently occupied areas, Kherson, Melitopol, Berdyansk and Lunhansk oblast there were protests, many violently dispersed by the Russians.

    Even Crimea, with it's ethnic Russian majority, showed from Russian leaks "referendum" Russia held there that only 30% of people voted and they were split 50/50.

    Don't confuse Russian-speaking with "wanting to join Russia."



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Not true , explain why the majority of people living in donesk and Luhansk refused free Russian passports for the previous 10 years and the previous 10 years before that



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    I asked. You said the Russians are there to rape and plunder. Rape and plunder ethnic Russians.


    I think you're trying to make a generalisation about invading armies stretch a bit too far.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The persistent logic that the language you speak dictates your nationality is a particularly odd fallacy what with the presumed Irish people posting. Emphasis on the "presumed".

    I do think there was/is an issue of Russian language rights in Ukraine, but the manner this has been exploded into full blown separatist instinct is reaching at best. Easily contradicted by talking to actual Ukrainians for a start, or reading their testimony, but then if one is dismissing ALL media outlets as liers - therein lies the pointlessness of debate with a bad faith user.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    The American Empire began sometime after the 2nd word war and continues up to the present day. If you want to suppose the Yankee Empire of today as substantially different to the Yankee Empire of WMD times then by all means stick your head in the sand.

    It is no exaggeration to say that the US government is the absolute best that money can buy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    I'm saying they are Russians. A line drawn on a map doesn't alter that.


    The notion that the Russian army are raping an pillaging ethnic Russian areas is about as nonsensical as it gets.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But that makes you wrong,

    The majority of people here speak English does that make us British



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Ah there it is. Whenever someone is reproducing Kremlin talking points, it's always because this Putin world view is close behind it.

    Clare Daly uses it in her speeches, typically around the time she votes in favour of Putin and against Europe for the umpteenth time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,415 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The Russians are there to rape and plunder. Zero evidence they are fussy about who.

    They sent their own troops through Chernobyl contaminated zone. They have continually shown zero regard for value of civilian lives and even their own forces.

    And lets not forget you are a proven liar on this thread who has provided zero evidence to support any of your claims. Multiple posters have discredited your fallacy that ethnic Russian = pro Russian invasion.

    The rape and sexual violence including that of children is documented by multiple agencies including the UN and cited on the thread.

    There is no generalisation. It is an established fact.

    As for plunder Prigozhin simply confirmed what anyone paying attention knew - Russia is there to plunder the resources of Ukraine.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Prove it.

    Are you English then, if you conflate language with nationality?

    Mind you, if you crib about "white Europeans" your grasp on ethnicity and nationality is obviously fairly suspect.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭Economics101


    THat's quite a giveaway. Your obvious detestation of America has warped everyting you say about Russia/Ukraine. A bit like Daly and Wallace, and some more I could mention.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    I detest them for a reason: they bring death and destruction whereever they go. And boy do they travel - bringing "democracy and freedom" to countries on the far side of the globe.

    One mans Beneficent Global Policeman is another mans terrorist.



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    Tell you what: lets agree to meet here in 6 months time. That should be about enough time for Russia to mop things up (whether peace deal when they reach the Dnieper or if the US not willing, then the Russian army on the Polish Border.


    We can agree then that Western media was reporting a pile of lies then



  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    Lines drawn on a map brought Russians into Ukraine. They are Russians by virtue of language, culture, long history and not least, self identification. If you want to suppose a piece of paper changes that and makes them something else, then knock yourself out



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'm asking for proof, and evidence of a separatist movement that shows Russia speaking Ukrainians wish to join Russia. You make bold claims about what the Russo-Ukranian community thinks, so back it up. It's not a big ask, and a basic tenet of the forum that claims are backed up with evidence. Otherwise it's just talk, talk that conveniently justifies the occupation by a Russian force ... that doesn't even control all the areas it claims to have absorbed into Russia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    If you just won't believe "Western" media about Russian govt.'s track record, or indeed anything it reports about what is happening in Ukraine, I suppose you can hand-wave it away and all is going excellently for Russia (in your view) and to plan. Maybe that is what Putin himself does!

    Russia and "the West" are not in a war (as you've claimed a few times) yet unless of a "Cold" variety. For someone so well informed and wise, not falling for the (non) wartime tricks of the Western MSM like us poor plebs mostly reliant on it, how did you get that fact wrong?

    Where do you get all the contrarian facts that support Russia is Goliath about to wake + defeat Ukraine (in next 6 months)?

    Unusual to see someone still getting excited about military potential of Russia and believing, any day now, they can reverse things in Ukraine and make Putin's wet dreams come true.

    If Russia is a giant, imo it is not a strong goliath figure, it looks more like a big loud sack of lard reeking of drink and piss with its best days well behind it. Large, angry and dangerous for sure when picking on their nearby smaller victims. They have overreached this time though, and got a right belt on the nose back.

    Without outside help (the Chinese riding in to the rescue?) the only "Goliath" move they have left now in Ukraine IMO is a sucker punch. Pulling some of their WMD out of the cupboard. No doubt you'd find some very good justifications for that action though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭Economics101


    So you do detest the Americans. I'm glad to see that you agree with my opinion of your beliefs 😊



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Relevant (again)

    Noun[edit]

    campist (plural campists)

    1. Synonym of third-campist
    2. (derogatorypoliticssocialismslang) A leftist who supports any country/organization simply for being opposed to the United States or the West, including authoritarian governments who would otherwise not follow leftist beliefs.




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭Auntie


    Not so much Americans as their system of Government / their military industrial complex / their sociopathic corporations / etc. Truly detestable indeed.


    I'm not so sure why you're so delighted. Hatred of what America is to so much of the world is hardly a rare thing. Sure, we do well acting as a tax haven for them, but that's hardly an excuse.



Advertisement