Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1650651653655656804

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭Blut2


    There were 90,000 households on the social housing list in 2013. The crisis was already brewing.

    In 2013 there were TDs in the dail literally asking about plans to build more social housing to address this: "Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the extent to which in the course of a review of the full extent of the local authority housing need arising from failure of his predecessors to make adequate provision in this regard, any plans have been put in place, to reintroduce a capital housing programme with particular reference to addressing the housing crisis"

    Or: "Deputy Michael P. Kitt asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the proposals in place for increased provision of social housing; and if he will make a statement on the matter"

    etc

    Those two TDs above are from FG & FF, nevermind the left wing parties who have always consistently called for it.

    The National Economic and Social Council in 2014 were already releasing papers calling out the dangers of leasing social housing instead of building it: http://files.nesc.ie/nesc_secretariat_papers/No_10_Review_of_Irish_Social_and_Affordable_Housing_Provision.pdf

    The idea that nobody saw this coming is completely untrue. There were plenty of people calling for the state to build social housing instead of lease it throughout the last decade - it was a deliberate, conscious, decision to ignore them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,754 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    No, I got the selling-up spiel. Did keep an eye on Daft for a while but no idea what happened to it in the end.

    Pretty rotten fate that I handed back the keys not that long before the Covid eviction ban came in. Hindsight is painfully 20/20..



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,553 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I wonder what planet people are on when they say it would have been cheaper and better if the government had built the necessary housing rather than providing state support payments to help house the recipients. What is it that makes them think that that volume of housing could be built on time and at projected costs? Nothing in our history has supported such thinking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Nothing in our history... apart from the state building literally hundreds of thousands of social housing units in the 20th century?

    Including in the 1970s, at a time when Ireland was one of the poorest countries in Europe, riddled with corruption and inefficiency, and we still built the per capita equivalent of what about 15,000 social housing units a year would be in 2023?

    On what planet is leasing social housing from the private sector for decades, at sky high costs that rise with inflation, with no asset to show for it after 20 years, a better deal for tax payers? Especially for tax payers looking for private sector housing, who are now being outbid by the state with their own tax euros on properties?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,586 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    HAP is the cheapest way of housing social tenants for the government and LA's. It limits there liability and forces LA's to carry out management of tenants for them.

    HAP or a firm of it was in place since the early noughties. There was no way the IMF was allowing the government to spend money on house building. It's incorrect to say the giveaways doing nothing. There is as inner city regeneration going on during this period but funds were limited.

    Labour is the limiting factor in house provision nowadays. During the mid 1900's we had a cheap sour e of skilled building labour( 50-70%) immigrated and build the US and UK infrastructure.

    We cannot access the same cheap labour now. Factories in Limerick, Galway and Cork are full of former construction workers. They can earn 50k+ every year and not get wet or have to travel longer distances to work

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,618 ✭✭✭Villa05


    HAP is cheaper only outside the main population centres

    Labour freed up from the slowdown/stalling in many commercial sectors. Labour can be sourced internationally were the will to do so present.

    Cost of construction labour in Ireland is around the median in the EU. Cost of Labour is not the reason for higher prices



  • Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭danfrancisco83


    I'm not saying HAP is not cheap for the gov, I'm saying it's not fair on private renters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 208 ✭✭Bakharwaldog


    New RPI data is out. 8th consecutive monthly drop in RPI for Dublin. 5th consecutive drop for whole of Ireland.

    Dublin YoY RPI is now negative.

    Looking forward to seeing the Irish Times and Independent talk about property prices continuing to rise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 667 ✭✭✭shawki


    A nice one month drop for where I’m looking at.

    Houses in the South-West: -1.7%

    On the other side of things houses in the West saw a 1.4% increase for the month.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 53,843 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    That article literally quotes the CSO as saying prices are rising.

    CSO statistician Viacheslav Voronovich said: “Residential property prices rose by 2.4pc in the 12 months to May 2023, down from 3.4pc in the year to April 2023.

    Though maybe the CSO are in on the great big conspiracy as well.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,843 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Big more digging:

    Nationally, house prices are at roughly July 2022 levels, if current trends continue then the next month the national YoY will probably be negative.

    Nationally, excluding Dublin, house prices are at about November 2022 levels. Compared to all other segment, this segment seems to be holding fairly steady, however that is mostly caused by the significant price rises we saw in the April 2023 data.

    In Dublin, prices are slightly below May 2022 levels, so Dublin has hit negative YoY. The actual reduction for May is -0.2%, which is the least amount of change in about 6 months, which may be completely anomalous or could point to a slowing of drops.

    In terms of sale volumes, May represented an increase in sales. Nationally, there were 5247 properties sold, which is an increase of about 33% compared to April. In Dublin there were 1548 sales, which is a 34% increase in transactions compared to April. This sounds like a lot, but a similar bump was seen in March.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    There are 13512 properties available nationally on my home.ie whereas last year July 15th, it was 14597

    Doesn't seem like a stampede for the exit yet....



  • Registered Users Posts: 544 ✭✭✭theboringfox


    This is good to see. Stable prices. Fundamentally can't see a major correction whilst economy remains so strong. Would need to see significantly higher rates too on mortgages. Anecdotally from being in market looking this year the cork city market for family size home in a good area has been red hot.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    The first line of the article says: "Property prices rose in May..."

    That's just not the case, and not the same thing as saying prices are higher than they were 12 months ago.



  • Registered Users Posts: 861 ✭✭✭Zenify


    I don't know how they get away with that ****.

    Absolutely no denying they are spinning the data here.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,843 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yea that's a fair point actually, bad writing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 661 ✭✭✭FernandoTorres


    I don't think it's a "conspiracy theory" to suggest that the major media outlets in Ireland deliberately underplay house price falls. They have repeatedly used the yoy rate to suggest that prices are increasing mom when they're actually falling. Today the Irish Times have run with "Dublin house prices increase by 80% since 2010"!



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson



    The report is based on Eurostat data from 2019

    Seems a bit mad to use data from 2019. A bit like using data from 3 years before the Great Famine to say there's no food shortage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,553 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Also easy to see why government policies which affect the value of those mortgage free properties will not appeal to those voters, nor to those who have taken out mortgages on pricey properties over the last decade. There is a significant percentage of the population who do not see lower property prices as benefitting them.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,618 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,618 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Irish people, in general, don't throw there children under the bus to save there own skin.

    You might have an argument for people that own multiple properties, but in general high housing costs means higher cost of living for everyone



  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭lordleitrim


    But that statistic probably hasn't changed at all since 2019(and home ownership rates probably have deteriorated further since) so comparing to the onset of the famine when the situation radically from changed is apples and oranges.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,553 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    A little bit of hyperbole there.

    Protecting the value of your most valuable asset isn’t throwing your kids under a bus, certainly younger people who have taken out mortgages in the last few years will not want their house value to fall below their loan. I’m also not sure rising house values will be seen as a cost of living concern with those who have no mortgage on their home.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,057 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If im mortgage free there is no risk of negative equity should the value of my home fall.

    If I wish to trade up or down, a fall in prices at all brackets will mean little change to the mover upper, a bit of a loss for a downsizer as lower end of market tends not to fall as much in absolute terms. However we see ireland has very low levels of homeowners downsizing in general so this is largely moot. Irish homeowners tend to stay in their home until death or nursing home. The value of their asset is never realised until after they're gone and their children inherit it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,618 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Not really, that report showed that Ireland had the fastest growing population of 24 to 35 year old living with there parents

    Mortgage free homeowners in general will be close to retirement, half the population have no pension, so low fixed income. High house price have the same effect as high energy prices in that they drive up the cost of everything else. That not good for low fixed income elderly folk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,553 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Do you know the proportion of people who are finance free home owners, who also have private pensions? Significant falling house prices are also associated with recessions, what is the correlation between recessions, unemployment, falling wages and living standards?

    Again, a sizeable proportion of the electorate will not welcome a decline in the value of their homes, especially 30-somethings who have recently gotten on the property ladder.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    True but worth remembering that this is probably less due to the inherent attachment of the Irish to their home than it is to the absolutely piss-poor availability of decent smaller-volume housing stock to downsize into.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,618 ✭✭✭Villa05


    No, but know far more people that just have the state pension

    There's a high correlation between unsustainable prices and rents and the deepness of recessions. Often better to take a slap in the head now rather than a hammer in a few years time



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,229 ✭✭✭combat14


    depends on quality of house number of rooms, bathrooms, location etc. maybe sell for a little less 225k approx. however as interest rates rise buyers will come under increasing pressure with continued rate rises so may want to sell fast



Advertisement