Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish rail fleet and infrastructure plans

1111214161724

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    All this talk of trying to squeeze more capacity out of the line along the coast...............

    Call me crazy, but I suggest leaving it as a 100% DART line.

    Build a new intercity line from north of Swords, through Swords, (station), through the airport (station), another regional staion somewhere in north Dublin, into the centre of Dublin, (maybe docklands) to join the DU tunnel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The signalling will be addressed by DART+, as I just said, yes they are looking at bi-mode.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,610 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    I have seen some photographs of the new footbridge at Dalkey Dart Station via a message from someone on Youtube.

    It looks very nice with a lot of good lighting built into it.

    Does anyone here know how long has the new bridge opened at Dalkey?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 oscyk


    It's been open less than a week, the other footbridge up at Gormanston has been open for a few weeks now. It's fantastic seeing all this new infrastructure around the network.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,202 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Hah! I'd like to see a LOT more new infrastructure around the network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    One of the premier sets is back to 6 coaches and in service. Only saw from a distance at Heuston so could be mistaking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,577 ✭✭✭lord lucan


    Set 40 is a 6pc set and been out the last few weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    If you look at Google maps, there definitely space for three tracks. and four tracks in many places.

    The problem is upgrading itself, and I suppose the "Where do you stop"/"how much is to much"?

    If you wanted to convert to three tracks the whole way, that would mean moving all the OHL's and moving the track and rebuilding every train station, and widening every bridge. The line would be out of action for months and that is just not feasible.

    The Japanese discovered many moons ago that it was cheaper to build new lines than to try an upgrade old ones. They can add more signals for sure but I think they've reached (or are very close to) the limit of what's possible. You have to bare in mind too that not all the trains have the same acceleration/braking capability.

    Allegedly, the Enterprise takes at least 1 mile to stop from 70mph. That's quite a distance for a passenger train and a lot more than a DART for example. This means that two amber signal would need to be shown more than 2 miles for an enterprise to safely slow down for a DART that's in front of if (assuming the Enterprise was at full speed)

    This just ends up being a pain in the hole to manage and its just cheaper and easier to build a new line at the edge of the catchment area of the existing line to take some of the passenger load.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I suggest a new line from Dublin city centre, via the airport and Swords, to join the existing line north of Swords.

    Leave the coastal line as DART only.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,202 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    That would shadow Metrolink too closely.

    Connolly-Clongriffin all underground for long distance, surface line for commuter.

    Or blue skying it here - a new city centre terminus, and start the tunnel there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,781 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Or 4 track the MetroLink route, two Metro tracks, and two for Heavy rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Terminating Belfast trains at the airport would reduce conflict with Dart services. It's not unusual for intercity trains to terminate outside of city centre on the continent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I genuinely believe Metro (or what ever it's being called these days) is dead in the water at this stage.

    The project has been marred by so many people "wanting their say" / "want it their way" that I don't think it will ever happen.

    Planning permission has still not been submitted for key areas of the project, such as where exactly in the Airport the station will be. My understanding is that DAA don't want to risk anything that could impact the construction of T3 which will be needed in the next 10/20 years. And hence they want to station well away from the Terminals. Which is pointless if you've a 15 walk to the train having left the Airport Terminal itself (Luas Red and Green not linking up issue again). Maybe a sky train is the answer here similar to Düsseldorf.

    I don't know where they're coming up with the figures for the cost of the tunnel network, yes they're expensive, but not that expensive.

    The Hanover–Würzburg high-speed railway is 327km long of which 120km are tunnels and supports trains running at 280km/h, has a max incline of ONLY 1.25% it took just 18 years to build at a cost of €6.5 billion (probably €15 billion in todays money)

    So where the hell is this price of 9.5 Billion (but could be €12.5 billion) coming from on a project that less than 5% the size of the Hanover–Würzburg high-speed railway?

    It makes no sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,781 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Another idea might be extending a line from Hueston (via Airport) to Rush, and then we could have a Cork/Dublin/Belfast hourly express service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,363 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I wouldn't want to be the one telling someone travelling on the Rosslare line to change at Greystones or Bray for a DART. Or telling a first class passenger from Belfast to change at Malahide. I'd imagine you'd see an increase in car and bus usage; it could end up killing off intercity travel altogether.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Have you seen the number of people on the buses from Belfast getting off at Dublin Airport? And with Metro it would only be, what, 20 mins into from there? Also, not every Belfast service needs to terminate at the airport - some could continue to service Dublin city centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    My preference would be for a third track to be installed / if not 4 tracking from Fairview to Portmarnock.

    The centre roads would be kept clear for all express trains North of Malahide, with a double track line turning left at Clongriffin and dropping into a tunnel for the airport.

    Yes there would be serious disruption and it would be a big job, but it would be doable. North County Dublin has the biggest potential for population growth and the Fingal County plans have huge growth forecast. This infrastructure will be needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    but it would be doable

    I really don't think it would, they originally wanted to run more lines from Fairview to Connolly, you can see from the bridge:

    It involved building a big wall on Stony Road and West Road, but it was opposed by residents. Gas thing was the place was a kip at the time, and they could have CPO'd the effected residency's cheaply enough

    From Fairview to Killester, 4 tracks is definitely doable, there is loads of space. but once you get there, there is a steep embankment, that would need to be dug out further back and start CPO'ing land from very expensive houses. You'd probably have to knock down houses at Venetian hall along with the Bridge. There is serious flaw with that bridge in that its the only way in and out of Venetian hall/The Pines. (How the hell did that even get built?)

    Now as you proceed East you need to make the cut in the earth and hence you need to CPO the back gardens of all the houses in Harmonstown and Raheny.

    As you get past Harmonstown you need to CPO all the industrial /Commercial buildings on the north of the line and knock them.

    At Raheny station things start to level out a bit so you don't need to cut in so far to the earth, but you need to rebuild the station and the bridge over the Raheny road which is a main road that's extremely busy and the bridge is raised. so you need to start the hill for the bridge further back which means CPOing a heap of houses including the protected cottages and trying to raise the road earlier some how to go over the 4 tracks. (I've no idea how you'd do this, maybe move the train station 200M west?)

    As you get from Raheny to Kilbarrack you nee to CPO and entire house and not just a piece of the back garden as the expansion would leave no back garden for these house.

    From Kilbarrack you need to build a new bridge and knock 2 blocks of apartments, then more CPOing houses in Donaghmede. The land is flatter between Howth Junction and Clongriffin and you might fit 4 tracks in without having to cut into earth.

    From there on, 4 tracks is relatively easy.

    Factor in the hassle and planning and CPOing and digging... It works out WAY chepaer to just buy a tunnelling machine, learn how to build tunnel's and then start building tunnels. Starting with Donnycarney, Artane, Coolock on toward Malahide and link up there.

    Hypothetical question: If you were to build a new line to Belfast would you stay 5 ft 3 in or go Standard Gauge?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,484 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Any *completely* new lines should be standard gauge to simplify kit purchasing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Let’s wait and see what the feasibility study into this very topic (quad tracking the Northern line) that IE have just got several million of EU funds for comes up with is probably the best strategy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,736 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Eeek , going standard gauge couldnt really be a stand alone thing ,

    So if you did dublin - Belfast in standard well you'd need to get all the way to central Belfast in standard ,

    I think the idea of having a cork belfast - ( via heuston) highish speed train would be great , that'd be out if you went standard

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,170 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The only way I'd see of connecting the northern line to Heuston, while also serving the airport, would be to use the PPT line. Buy the Batchelors factory to create a tunnel portal and then tunnel north under the canal. Its a straight shot to the airport, then join the northern line. Could be up to 20km depending where you connect but obviously not all tunnelled. All services coming from north of the tie-in would go this new route, with an interchange station allowing people to switch to the coastal route. It would solve a lot of problems.

    I don't think switching to standard gauge would be realistic there. Funnily enough, it might be worth switching the part of the northern line south of the above mentioned tie-in to standard gauge. You could create another Metro from, for example Malahide south, then through the DART+ Tunnel (which should be easier to do as standard Metro) and out to Hazelhatch. That could be completely separate from the remaining heavy rail network and would mean only trains coming from Drumcondra go to Connolly (thus removing the conflict north of Connolly). It could also be built as driverless so could have a train every couple of minutes.

    Would be great but not realistic now and not for an extremely long time, if ever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I think the bespoke nature of our track gauge is contributing factor to reason why rail works here are excessively expensive and slow.

    No one makes "in bulk" what we need. It's all bespoke orders. Trying to match a track loading for the UK or Germany or France could be very beneficial in the long rung.

    Start of with the HSR from Cork to Belfast via Dublin a standard gauge, and then take it from there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,170 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I don't think this is true. Our track gauge may add somewhat to the cost of buying new trains, and limit the possibilities for buying second-hand stock, but isn't a deal breaker. All orders are bespoke in some way and stock made on order, they don't build "standard" trains and have them sitting there for people to buy. We are in the process of buying a lot of new rolling stock so we will be in a good place in terms of rolling stock for decades.

    The gauge has little or no effect on general works to rail lines. The cost and disruption caused by changing gauge on the network would be enormous, far more than the extra over cost of buying special gauge rolling stock every couple of decades. It would be a disaster for stock management too given the existing stock is at different stages of their usable lifes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    All good points, but the issue is you cannot just buy rolling stock, you need to wait a long time for it (years). many EU companies rent rolling stock out to Railways, that's just not possible here because of the gauges and also we're an island. There is also no roll on roll off railway (only Road vehicles) this severely limits what's possible with regard to freight services (Means container ports is the only option). Freight = Money, it's very lucrative. That money can then be used to fund development of passengers services and offset the costs.

    When you cannot buy "off the shelf" items, things always become more expensive, so for example if you needed to replace 100 sleepers, where do we get them? we don't make them here (I don't think), we've to ask someone to make them, and there is probably only one person we can ask so there is no competition so the price is higher and delivery is slower.

    Ironically they probably arrive here on a RoRo truck ferry on the back of a truck.

    RoRo train ferries are a thing, but we cannot use them cause of the gauge.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭Economics101


    The discussion on track gauge is a bit strange. As far as leasing or buying rolling stock from Continental Europe is concerned, there is also the much bigger problem of Loading Gauge. Continental trains will not fit under our bridges and will foul our platforms. No problem with the UK insofar as their loading gauge is even more restrictive then the Irish one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,363 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    There's a sleeper depot at Portlaoise. I don't know if they actually make them there or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    It's a strange one isn't it? The gauge is wider but loading is more restrictive... One wonders how did that happen. Platforms aren't to much of an issue unless they're curved (Oh wait... they're nearly all curved). For Bridges/Tunnels... goosed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭highdef


    Yeah, it's funny alright. I'm open to correction on the following (and I'm sticking to imperial measurements as they're used commonly with regards to Irish rail) but I think the widest rolling stock I've seen in the UK is 9' 3" on 4' 8 1/2" track yet there are trains in Sweden that are almost 11' 4" wide with the same carriages being as long (or longer) than anything in the UK or Ireland. The widest carriages in Ireland were 10' 2" and I think the widest at the moment are the DARTs at 9' 6", on our 5' 3" gauge.

    The new DARTs on order are less than 53 feet long per carriage so I have wondered if the full loading gauge will be utilised as 10' 2" width should easily be achieved with such a short carriage, if not even wider. This would boost capacity a fair bit.

    Before I saw the photos of the new DARTs, I had wondered if if we get something similar/the same as the new suburban trains in Melbourne. They are just under 10 foot wide and run on 1500v DC and would you believe it, are 5' 3" gauge........so many similarities! Victoria and South Australia states run on 5' 3" gauge. I think Brazil also uses the same gauge, not sure if it's the whole country or just parts. So it's less of a bespoke gauge than you would think.






  • The gauges just came about in the 19th century because there was no reason to maintain compatibility internationally. Ireland and Britain both are islands and both adopted railways very early, driven by private investors developing lines. Narrower was cheaper, and avoided needing to purchase land.

    Long distance, huge scale bulk freight is more important on continental railways covering vast distances in Europe or North America. We have short distances on islands. So you’d have had lower capacity and more frequent freight. That’s probably why the loading gauges here and in Britain didn’t ever get very wide and why they’re huge in places with big empty plains like the US and Canada or Russia etc. Land was available easily, cheaply or may have been just taken back in the day without any significant cost.

    You also can’t and couldn’t just take lands by decree here, as is possible in authoritarian states like China and possible Russia etc, was possible in the USSR and many formerly authoritarian states and was possible in states with odd landownership arrangements. Private land ownership here (even if in the early 1800s was still largely an oligarchy of huge landlords) would have required a lot of negotiation and compensation.

    Trains also weren’t bulk manufactured and were very much bespoke and never left their railways. Compatibility between rail operators was all that mattered and they ultimately picked compromise standards.

    I can’t see gauge changes here making much sense. Metro and tramways obviously should be built to a European standard, but you’re not going to get much cost benefit from shifting to international standards on an isolated rail network running on very long established routes with a collection of ornate 19th century stations…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭kc56


    Sleepers are made at Portlaoise for normal demand. For large jobs,such as relaying a long line or the 4-tracking project, they are imported.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,610 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    A draft plan for the All Ireland Rail Review is due to be published by Transport Minister Eamon Ryan at the end of the month.

    2 of the proposals sound interesting as below from the Nuacht RTÉ article above.

    A new railway line to be built between Ballina in Co. Mayo & Rosslare Europort in Co.Wexford.

    New railway line to be built for Donegal.

    What do people here think of West on Track's concerns that Ballina to Rosslare Europort would only be used for freight services only and not for passengers? Do you think that is a sensible one to call by them? I would personally love to see that line used for passenger services as well as freight. I think it would be a big boost for people who live there would want to use rail services between the regions of Munster and South Leinster.

    I think Donegal have personally hit the jackpot when they get news of a proposed rail line in over 100 years. I think people living there could be very pleased to hear about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,484 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Ballina to Rosslare is not a new line. It is reopening two former lines, one still mostly extant and the other in ruins. Most of it already exists and has passenger services. The proposed reinstatements would be freight only initially as there is limited demand for passengers

    Donegal had trains less than 70 years ago.





  • If they’re building new lines they need to build them to run at 200km/h. Even having a 160km/h service would be very useful. There’s little point in building a brand new line into Donegal if it is going to crawl along at low speed, as is the case for almost all of the lines.

    It doesn’t need to be TGV quality but it needs to be able to get the maximum out of normal trains and be faster than driving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Just to clarify here, the two lines are?

    Claremorris to Athenry - in ruins

    Waterford city to the Rosslare line



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    If the Claremorris to Athenry line is rebuilt, I presume there isn't a hope in hell it will be capable of 200kph?

    If it uses the original trackbed / alignment, I presume this means max speeds much lower than 200kph?

    I'd say you'd be lucky to have max speed of 160kph?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,736 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Well considering that there are buildings , gardens and fences on the current alignment, as well as it being winding and poor ballast I can't imagine the speed being much , i wouldnt worry rail freight rarely needs to be high speed

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦





  • It’s just a pity to keep doing these things without making them vaguely competitive with driving. They need a bit of speed or they’ll just be much less attractive than they could be.

    Nobody’s going to go as far as a high speed line but we should be capable of getting the most out of the existing 160km/h trains. Other the Cork line, they all seem to be built to very low spec.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Dublin airport is such a significant trip generator, it should be on the national rail network.

    Not as a stub terminal.

    I suggest as a through station on Dublin to Belfast line.



  • Advertisement


  • Dublin Airport could easily be a big rail hub for national and local rail.

    Lyon–Saint Exupéry, which is significantly further out of the city, manages quite nicely as a long distance rail hub with a fast high capacity tram (Rhône Express) to the city centre.

    There’s a big non city centre intercity demand in Dublin that’s never looked at. There’s also huge road infrastructure, bus station potential and large scale park and ride possibilities, if it had a high capacity metro link.

    There probably should be the development of a significant intercity station on the Cork line on the outskirts of Dublin too.

    Funnelling absolutely everything into the very middle of the city centre doesn’t always make sense and changing trains isn’t the end of the world either, if it’s convenient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Didn’t they model the design of Pelletstown on Lyon–Saint Exupéry?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • Looks very like Pelletstown alright lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,484 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    You can only tell the difference now since they took the roof off the bike shed.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Did the Mark IIIA have the same clearance as MarkIII when in operation. I remember they made it to Cork, Tralee, Galway, Westport. Did they ever make it to Limerick, Ennis, Waterford or over to Connolly?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,320 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    they went to connolly and traveled as far as dundalk on a trial run if i remember correctly, and recently a set departed from connolly for a rail tour to tralee.

    i would assume they did a trial to limerick but couldn't be sure.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Sorry, what do you mean by Mk IIIA? Do you mean Mk IV? The latter have been cleared for Dublin-Cosk and the Kerry road. They have been trialled to Belfast as far as I am awars.

    When the MkIVs were ordered there were plans to operate them to Galway, but the new hourly services to Cork used all the available MkIV capacity, so that put an end to any services on other routes. I would imagine that they were specified to fit Irish Rail loading gauge generally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    No he means Mk IIIA as he typed.

    The Mk IIIA set was the former BREL Mk3 International set that was purchased by IE, and then branded "Cú na Mara", and normally used on the Dublin-Galway route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,789 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9



    It would be great to have a IV tour to Galway or Waterford. Cannot see IE clearing them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,320 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement