Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Flash

12345679»

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's mad the multiverse has become so prominent in pop culture in the first place; a relatively niche trope of Sci-Fi for a long while, now it's (everything) everywhere (all at once).

    Beyond the MCU and DC universe you got the Spider-Verse and the aforementioned Daniels movie. I'm sure I've forgotten other instances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,969 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The Chris Pine Star Trek movies are multiverse.

    The Happy Death Day movies did that trope as well.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 7,415 Mod ✭✭✭✭pleasant Co.


    Sure, but so is catwoman, that’s not much of a boast though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I'd say with Morbius, everyone had low expectations and knew what to expect, so it just ticked along at that level. With The Flash, there was a lot of buzz in the last few months about how great the film was, and it ended up being a disappointment, which then puts people off seeing it altogether. Not to mention the issues with Ezra Miller, the fact they're striking when the iron is stone f*cking cold given how long the film has been in production and the death of the DCEU, and they gave away far too much of the film in trailers.

    Morbius had the advantage of being so cheesey and laughably bad that some people went for fun.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Cat woman, ah let’s not get silly now that’s a different league of sh*t and didn’t make anything!


    I didn’t have any expectations for flash, maybe that’s why I enjoyed it.

    Its also getting much stronger audience scores then morbius but people just aren’t taking to it. I wonder if it’s anything to do with the whole thing being rebooted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,257 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    Gunn’s Suicide Squad and Peacemaker series are going to be part of the DCU and apparently Jason Momoa is going to remain as Aquaman so this universe will not be going anywhere.

    To be honest, the fact that Cavill and Gadot are gone but the DCU won’t be a complete fresh franchise annoys me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,257 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    How many people know about that though?

    So how bad at the box office is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I just use IMBD for most things movie or tv related. Quite handy for that stuff.

    Morbius - critic score 35% , viewers 5.3/10 (139k votes) - worldwide gross 167mil

    Catwoman: critic score 27% , viewers 3.4/10 (122k votes) - worldwide gross 82mil

    The flash: critic score 56% , viewers 7.3/10 (63k votes) - worldwide gross 176mil

    Granted the flash will make more and get more votes as it’s just out , but I find these sort of comparisons mad.

    I mean if you look at Eternals critic score 52% , viewers 6/3/10 (361k votes) - worldwide gross 400mil

    Thats considered by all concerned a poorer movie and still double the return.

    I know these things happen , I just don’t think the flash deserves the lack of return for what it was. I think DC are a bit unfortunate because they have several movies that viewers seem to enjoy that just can’t build up steam. Marvel have solid relative success regardless of what sort of movie they throw out.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    This film has been cursed from the outset. 9 years in the making, a tonne of directors and restarts; meanwhile the entire universe gets junked cos it became broadly hated. The star turning out to be a toxic mess. The tethering of this film's marketing so heavily to Michael Keaton stank of desperate Nostalgist trawling; there's an audience for a Flash for sure, but like Black Adam there has been this sense of redundancy to the whole thing. I'm entirely unsurprised audiences have shrugged their shoulders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    It’s not morbius bad , that was my initial point and yet it may not make an awful lot more then that steaming turd.

    It’s not like there’s not examples of movies that critics got badly wrong (Venom) and audiences missed at first (Shawshank).

    I guess most people don’t really pay attention to movies outside of when they are released. It’s just funny how sometimes it’s about being the right movie at the right time, rather than the box office takings having a Lot to do with the movie itself.

    This could have been an epic 9/10 surprise and it still would have had its disappointing opening and even word of mouth wouldn’t have pushed it to a billion. I suppose DC have really made a mess as you said and people just don’t trust they will make anything (in the pg realm) that’s really worth a cinema visit. While marvel can make up whatever they want and they just seem to be able to live off their Avengers phase 1-3 movies.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Of course there has also been the whole Zaslov Warner's take over that has itself been a shítshow.

    Honestly I think the DC universe is a busted flush, and the best thing Gunn could do is return to Batman, Superman and never the twain shall meet. Ignore the bench for now. Build up the good will again, start slow with single movies dedicated to their titular hero before even talking justice leagues or multiverse. Stop trying to ape the MCU structure of interconnectivity; not sure where that might leave Matt Reeves Batman or the Joker films.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,798 ✭✭✭speedboatchase


    You're not factoring in their respective budgets, or that generally movies need to make 2.5x that budget (accounting for marketing spend and cinemas taking around 50% of ticket sales). Morbius cost $70m. Catwoman cost $100m. Flash cost $200m. Eternals cost $236m. Technically Morbius actually came closest to making a profit and maybe has done from VOD sales.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    It is more the theory of DCEU vs everyone else. I can't remember any show or movie even coming close to the DCEU strained logic.

    The whole concept that there is an infinite multiverse means every possibility is out there so the universe they spent most of the time during the movie would have been just fine if they left it at that rather than their spaghetti nonsense.

    To try to shoehorn the Flash story they made an absolutely insane leap that

    saving the life of a random woman impacts what happened decades before that with people who she never had contact with afterwards, including a man being born before he would have been and one alien capturing a baby alien in space.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Agree with most of this.

    Feel there was a huge overestimation of the draw of Keaton's Batman in this scenario.

    He isn't the 'Batman' of the vast majority of the general public - there have been several iterations since then. Even then, I'm skeptical how many who have ties to Keaton in the role would have interest in the rest of the marketing for the Flash as it is such a different type of movie from Keaton's. It is a bit of an oddity where for most I'd argue that the sum is less than their separate parts. Spider-man NWH worked so well because of the overlap between those who are still interested in the MCU and the previous iterations.

    Another thing that is being a bit overplayed is the impact of the decision to get rid of the DCEU in the performance of the movie. Most of the viewing public has any idea that has happened so few skipped this movie because of it. Gunn is going to run into the same issue if he thinks he gets a blank slate with his Superman - people don't know things are changing, which makes all the more sense why they're changing the actors to at least make it seem like a break



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,281 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    A quite disappointing movie, but better then last few superhero movies I have seen like Antman, Black Adam and Dr Strange. The over the top nostalgia in the movie really dragged it down. Some of the jokes even relied on audiences being aware of plots/catch phrases from over 30 years ago. Supergirl and Zod were totally wasted in the film , both got so little screen time and little development. Thought the Russia segment was one of the best action sequences I have seen in a long while just involved some good interaction between all the characters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Because the reputation of this film hasn't been tarnished enough...

    They can't get people to pay for the movie with actual money. Now they're trying to sell special digital versions as NFTs which are, pretty much as we speak, falling through the floor in price as a whole.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The journey of this film is just so deflating. The Flash should, and could, have been a romping old school superhero adventure. And we've had similar speedstere with Quicksilver form X-Men or the kid from The Invincibles, so the concept was primed.

    $262 million and I see it has just crashed out of the US box office. A very sad end to a film I had quietly kept some hope for through all the years of constant director changes etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,969 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Warners dropped it on VOD today.

    I guess they want to try and make some money from it while it is somewhat still current.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Aye it's on digital now: watched the first 20 minutes out of curiosity; absolutely abysmal FX. I had heard much snark about it but ye god's it was genuinely dreadful stuff. A useful strawman for anyone wanting to bash modern blockbusters as incoherent CGI noise - but it wasn't even convincing CGI noise.

    Plus once more I got distracted by the fact Gotham was clearly Glasgow. Every time, lol, dunno why Glasgow stands out so much for me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    At 20 minutes in I'm not even sure you've gotten to the worst of the CGI



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,155 ✭✭✭✭Snake Plisken


    Really enjoyed it there ans will buy on 4K Disc when released VFX are shite but still enjoyed it Ezra Miller was very good in as both Barry's, great to see Michael Keaton back as Batman some of the gags where great. So a solid 8 out of 10 for me. Shame it's Box Office numbers are so poor. Apparently they would have made more money if they had released it on Max.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    I watched it on HBOmax last nigh and I liked it. Some real laugh out loud moments. Story was great. Close enough to the original comic.

    Keaton was class, the multiverse additions were a nice surprise, as I had aboided the spoilers. Supergirl was beautifful and nailed the role. Surprised to see she has only been in The Young and the restless for a billion episodes.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    You weren't kidding: absolutely atrocious stuff, bordering on a disgrace. Nearly 9 years since the first post, a decade of production - and that was the best they could do? I wonder once the DCEU burn-off kicked in, if the FX phase got a reduced budget or oversight; I kinda feel sorry for Andy Muschietti, feeling like he had to defend the FX in public, even if his rationale was a little iffy.



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,871 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Found it a very frustrating watch, there was great and very, very poor moments. It felt like if they'd just had Keaton's Batman mentoring Supergirl so she can beat a world ending threat that on its own would have been far better. The weakest parts were the bits with the Flash, amusingly!



  • Registered Users Posts: 898 ✭✭✭El Duda


    This was atrocious and everyone involved should be thoroughly ashamed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭Homelander


    So watched this last night not expecting much and as much as I wanted to dislike it I didn't - it's actually a decent watch, for the most part.

    Whatever about his train wreck of a personal life Ezra Miller was fairly good in the dual role and Michael Keaton really elevated the whole thing a few notches. Supergirl was pretty OK as well I thought, liked the actress and it didn't come off as hammy as I expected.

    The biggest problems for me were the god-awful FX in many spots and honestly, the whole opening 10 minute sequence was a massive cringe fest and absolutely did not have to be there, and the movie would've been incomparably better for it.

    I thought the bad CGI in the opening scene might be due to its inclusion later in the production cycle, it has a powerful whiff of that with it's early 2000's level CGI.

    But it continues at random points throughout the movie, one minute it looks like a $200m movie, the next it looks worse than the low-budget Flash TV show on CW.

    There's one scene where they phase through the door and I am not exaggerating when I say the digital overlaid face on one of them actually looks like a soul-less PS2 cut-scene render, we all burst out laughing.

    Usually I wouldn't let weaker FX get in the way of my opinion for most movies, especially not if it's consistent at least, but there was absolutely no excuse for this one.

    Overall I'd still say it's a solid 6/10 for me, despite it all I genuinely enjoyed it, far more so than most of the other recent DC movies which are almost universally awful in my personal opinion like WW84, Black Adam, Shazam 2, etc.

    I really think they were on the right track with the original Zynderverse, Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, Justice League Znyder cut, etc. DC really fell down when they decided to poorly emulate the Marvel movies rather than doing their own thing.

    I still think Man of Steel, BvS and JS Zynder cut are head and shoulders the best of the DC movies, first Wonder Woman is OK as well.

    Though it can be done well in that format too, as James Gunn has proven very well with the likes of The Suicide Squad and Peacemaker, both of which are excellent.

    Birds of Prey doesn't get mentioned much but I found that one also surprisingly decent.

    So, overall, The Flash - I'd agree with people saying it deserved to do better than it did, because despite it's massive flaws, it's nowhere near as bad as a lot of the DC content that came before it and honestly better than some of the recent Marvel efforts as well.

    The problem at this point is that people are fatigued enough with Marvel, they just don't want to invest the time in Marvel's poor relation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    This is my feeling on it also. At this point Snyder is 3 or even 4 times removed from the utter disaster the DCEU became. Geoff Johns, Walter Hamada, Bob Greenblatt, Ann Sarnoff and David Zaslav have all been either calling the shots or exerting significant influence since Snyder left, yet it's Snyder to this day who gets all the ****. His 3 films are nowhere near the worst that has come along in the franchise and for all their faults, seeing that vision completed would have been the much preferable route than what we got.

    I completed my watch of The Flash last night and there's a good film in there but unfortunately it doesn't include the main character. I think they could have made a fantastic film without young Barry, such a strange decision that I'm sure they were hanging their heads against the wall. They could have easily had Keaton guide Barry throughout the film and reach the same end result.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's getting into the realm of splitting hairs, but Synder's films were bad IMO, but they never lacked direction or a distinct and singular style. It's just a style that's the single aesthetic speed of Synder's and one I've grown very tired of. Superheroism as a terrible burden works in small doses - but it's not something to hang a whole universe off of. Still curious what Synder brings with Rebel Moon so I'm not completely divorced from the guy.

    But what replaced it when the DC executive tier panicked was worse in being rudderless and reactionary. Synder's Justice League was overcranked, self-serious and as baggy as parachute pants ... ... but Joss Whedon's version was worse for being utterly anaemic, unfunny and bereft of panache. And the crazy thing is, until Gunn took over, they were still reacting - which included, unfortunately, The Flash; a movie that had such great potential.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,470 ✭✭✭Acosta


    Unexpectedly really enjoyed it. There was a bit of ropey special effects, that to be honest didn't bother me at all, because it had a decent story. Some of the recent Marvel movies look great, but I can't even remember the plot of a couple of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    good review, the ropey special effects didn't bother me either.

    good movie, lots of fun. supergirl was hot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,053 ✭✭✭✭cena


    The flash voice got really annoying the more the movie went on. Loved the Batman scenes. Not sure if I would watch it again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Watched it again with the family, it’s really great fun.

    Prob the best post Snyder DC movie in the sort of marvel mould but better then most marvel stuff since endgame and not the same kind of marvel copy/paste that WW and Aquaman was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,459 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    I can see why Tom Cruise, Stephen King and the likes praised this so much prior to its release. It’s a great film, and the best superhero film ever made. Nah I’m joking of course. I don’t know what WB were thinking with that ridiculous marketing campaign.

    My genuine thoughts on this is that it’s a very entertaining film. It’s funny, it’s sad, great action, great acting, a good story and just an overall fun watch. if your a Flash fan, I think you’d have to be content that you got a good flash movie and try to ignore that the films performance was a colossal failure. Same with Muschietti and all those involved, they set out to make an entertaining film and that’s exactly what they delivered. It’s a shame that it tanked so hard.

    I think the film is too good to get swept under the rug and will gain an audience over time. I hope so anyways. It’s not nice when you see a good movie fail this bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Yeah, I’d echo a lot of people here, I’m surprised how much I enjoyed it - the director is to be applauded for making an entertaining film out of the trainwreck of a production.

    The CGI is indeed ropey as hell, distractingly bad in the opening sequence, but I sort of got used to it as I was watching, probably helped by being generally entertained by it.

    Keaton stole the show, he is still brilliant as Batman and could easily carry a Dark Knight returns type film, a shame he won’t get the chance.

    The film was a massive bomb, and that’s likely what it will be remembered for, but that was moreso just disinterest from the audience about a soon to be rebooted series and the antics of its lead of recent times. As a comic book film, it was solid entertainment. Far better than a lot of recent MCU entries(GOTG3 aside of course).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,153 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Yup, same, was pleasantly surprised - now, that's largely because my expectations were very low. It wasn't amazing by any stretch, but reasonably decent entertainment. Unlike some of the other major turkeys like Morbius, I think this is one that most people interested in any sort of superhero/adventure movie will end up seeing sooner or later.

    Though I do hate these story-reset concepts, where everything we watched may as well have been a dream. It's just a bad foundation to build anything upon.

    Hope they find a way to use Supergirl in some way going forward in whatever universe they create. Was a very interesting version of the character, and the actor had a real gravitas to her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,814 ✭✭✭✭silverharp



    lol that is some loss, their budgets were out of of control


    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



Advertisement