Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

RTÉ admits paying Tubridy €345,000 more than declared

Options
1590591593595596848

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Commercial broadcasters now stepping up calls for such a revamp

    They've been banging this drum for years but I guess they feel now the powers might be might actually listen...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    RTÉ a bad version of the BBC

    VMTV a worse version of ITV.

    VMTV would need to up their game if they want all that advertising, otherwise when RTÉ stop showing ads they'll be giving out that it goes over to the opt-outs.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    And VMTV spend the same to show coro st at the same time as ITV, and The Chase a year later and to repeat WWTBAM every weekend!


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users Posts: 819 ✭✭✭alzer100


    Don't know if this has been brought up before on this thread, but if the government where to commit to something like the overhaul of RTE and in so doing replace the TV licence with taxation. Could there be a negative reaction from the public? Could it be viewed in the same way and responded to similarly as to the introduction of water charges?

    I'm focusing on the bit where the government reform RTE AND introduce direct taxation, but what if they don't reform RTE and just introduce direct taxation?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 736 ✭✭✭techman1


    McSavage savaged all the sacred cows of modern Ireland he didn't leave much out. Usually a comedian will have a target to make fun of but also will try and appeal to a section of audience but McSavage savaged both the old conservative targets like the Catholic church but also the new liberal sacred cows so you might be laughing at one sketch but then be a bit uncomfortable at another sketch necause it was a bit close to the bone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    As more women than men support Tubs getting back on the airwaves an interesting take on this is below.




  • Registered Users Posts: 17,510 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    You know that poll is rubbish when there's 16-24 year olds listening to him at 9am - either they're in school or in bed

    Interesting no actual breakdown of the numbers for each age group


    64 per cent said they trusted RTE on news and current affairs reporting, 27 per cent did not, and 9 per cent did not know or had no opinion.


    Not a great figure TBH



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,494 ✭✭✭Damien360


    I hate polls. Size of data set, location of data set collection, even if it's online poll from their subscribers it's tainted as it hits a very specific demographic. And the question asked is important. Stats can be spun in any direction based on the specific question.

    I'll still say that Tubs is just the tip of a very big iceberg. He really is not the story, it's the board and RTE staff, board and contractor levels of entitlement to easy cash from an unlimited source.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭skimpydoo




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭skimpydoo




  • Registered Users Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    On McSavage, I saw him perform recently and he hadn’t a nice word to say about The Toyman so I’m shocked others are saying he’s supporting Tubs vocally elsewhere.

    On his departure from RTÉ or rather the decommissions of The Savage Eye, one Joseph Duffy of the NKM stable took grave offence at his portrayal on the show. He even called the show “blasphemous” and questioned the hiring of an English person of restricted growth for one of the recurring sketches in the show as that PORG was taking the job of an Irish PORG. This being the same Joseph Duffy who allows even more offensive and racist “jokes” on his Funny Friday show, and has his death books printed in Germany. 🙄

    The John Duffy sketches started as parody. Regular listeners to Liveline will attest to them being almost documentary-like in their portrayal of the “enjoyment” the host seems to get from misery and death.

    One would wonder how much of an impact Joseph Duffy’s (and possibly his agent’s) complaints would have had in the decision to end this series? And why for example it’s not on the player?




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    A great take on Richie Kavanagh.




  • Registered Users Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Do you get much giving out about TG4, which is funded directly by the exchequer and AFAIK is only watched any way regularly by a tiny fraction of the population? I think there is a broad acceptance that a lot of what RTE does would never emerge from a purely market-based broadcasting environment and therefore needs to be subsidised by joe public in one form or another....



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,510 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    Reading the below link and then you think about RTE


    TG4 is acknowledged as one of the most efficient and cost effective television stations in Europe.


    TG4 | Background | Corporate | Irish Television Channel, Súil Eile



  • Registered Users Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    Always liked that sketch. The “he fixed the road” sketch is an excellent summation of Irish politics in 14 seconds.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    I agree but I think RTÉ have ended up doing a lot of damage with the cuts that they have made and the spending decision that they made over the last 14 years.

    TG4's decision to partner with the CnaM and Screen Ireland to produce Cine4 which gave us An Cailín Ciúin, V RTÉ's decision to produce Toy Show The Musical, no reason why RTÉ couldn't have supported a similar scheme with CnaM or SI.

    RTÉ are obsessed with trying to make something out of Storyland over the last 15 or more years, yet almost all productions lead no where.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    The poster was asking about water charge-style protests though. Is someone who would be that fecked off about the mooted move to direct exchequer funding of RTE likely to have been appeased by different strategic decisions over the last 15 years or the introduction of salary caps or whatever? Surely if they are going to be sufficiently motovated to go on marches etc. they would need to be against the move in principle under any circumstances, and which demoraphic is that likely to be in Ireland? Most 'direct action', as in the case of the water charges, comes from the radical left, but AFAICS, the Irish left seems to be broadly supportive of direct exchequer funding of broadcasting...





  • As a woman I definitely spotted his bullsh1t a long long time ago. But I see a lot of women on social media fawning over a lot of fakery from both other women as well as men.



  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    In broader terms, of course, Tubridy, the corrupt barter accounts, the excessive junkets and so forth are merely symptoms of the fact that the monolithic national public broadcaster is coming to an end as a useful concept. It is no longer relevant in today's world and people are (correctly, imo) voting with their feet. It made a certain amount of sense from a governmental perspective that if Ireland did not set up a national broadcaster a vacuum would be created that would eventually be filled by British and commercial channels despite legal efforts to prevent this. Not desirable from the perspective of the governments of the day. Also due to Ireland's small size, some form of subsidy would be needed in order to compete. Back then this meant the setting up of a national TV broadcaster subsidized by a license.

    But now with the technology to deliver hundreds of channels, streaming movie platforms, thousands of international radio stations and so forth, is the setting up of a traditional TV service how you would now go about encouraging Irish and public service content? If RTE never existed and you wanted to encourage more local content would you create it. I think you would not. I think you would instead be making use of the platforms that are already there not setting up a traditional broadcaster.

    One reason you probably would not set up a traditional broadcaster with heavy investments in transmission networks and so forth is that it will tend to cling to these technologies even as viewers move away from them as they are doing. To make up for this lack of viewers, the traditional broadcaster then rather than innovating, seeks more and more direct public funding.

    This is what we're seeing with RTE. As people move away from them, they seek means in which they get paid regardless. In some ways, the current scandal suits them as it accelerates the move to a mandatory broadcasting charge of which they will be the main beneficiary, and with no legal means of avoidance for the public; something they have wanted all along.

    There may still be a need for some small body overseeing public money into Irish created content but it should be a traditional broadcaster as they are on the way out as the primary means of delivering content. Particularly not a heavily unionized broadcaster that is resistant to change. It needs to be something that is reflective of the changing technological landscape.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,601 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    The thing that annoys me about the TV license is its a tax on your already taxed income.

    Ive done some rough numbers on what the current model costs. These are very conservative figures. 26 counties, to make the math easier lets amalgamate Carlow and Laois, and say there are 25. One TV License inspector per county, earning 40k a year. Thats 1 Million a year. Which means 6250 people need to pay their TV license to cover that aspect of the enforcement. Plus the muleage allowance. Bringing people to court for non payment is an additional and expensive cost associated with enforcement.

    Thats a very conservative estimate and could well be a fraction of the real number.

    So how about get rid of the inspectors, the radio and TV ads reminding you that you have to have a TV license, the legal bills associated with bringing someone to court, and instead put 7 or 8 quid onto the PAYE tax bill. Along side your PAYE, PRSI and USC, no-one would notice 8 quid extra.



  • Registered Users Posts: 621 ✭✭✭bureau2009


    Perhaps.

    But only if RTE transforms itself, caps presenters' pay and is efficient and transparent.





  • i do believe there’s going to be imminent change but I do wish the core operational staff to be in situ. I’m quite sure they wouldn’t be wanting in flexibility once there was an overall fair working environment, which there isn’t at the moment. Current affairs content can be excellent. Before we switch over entirely to streaming we must remember there are a lot of people with old fashioned non-smart televisions which may see them out for next 10-20 years.

    Some years ago when I bought a smart TV I had no further use of a HD widescreen non-smart TV and asked around family if anybody wanted it for free. My cousin’s daughter & partner were delighted to get it, they have had enough expenses setting up home & trying to pay rent, so for that young couple they are content to have a perfectly nice non-smart telly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Plus the muleage allowance. 

    Well I think everyone accepts the licence fee system is a bit behind the times but I didn't realise that extended to how the inspectors got about...




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,601 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption




  • Registered Users Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    Indeed, when I change TV (usually about every 3 years as I’m into tech) I recycle my previous model to my father or mother (they’re divorced). Both inevitably gives the previous version to a charity shop, all fine by me as long as they’re being used. He did give one old Philips block of a machine to a neighbour. I bought this TV before the 2002 World Cup in Japan….it was on offer, I’d no interest in the football. At the time it was state of the art and over a grand and the early days of what we know as “widescreen” TVs. Everytime I visit my dad the neighbour tells me it’s still going strong 21 years later!

    TV costs have come down dramatically in recent years while tech and value has gone up, you’d get a good tv for €400-500 now and very good tv now for €800. I know I’m a bit of an outlier on these kind of purchases but you’re into specialist stuff in the €1000 and above price points. I’m also aware most people couldn’t tell the difference between a €500 tv and a €2000 tv, apart from size.

    Anyway, if say you bought a €500 tv and you used it for 5 years (not a long time by any means), it’s going to cost you an additional €800 in tv licence frees……which is insane, esp. if you don’t watch RTÉ content.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users Posts: 464 ✭✭northknife




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    TV ads are part of RTÉ set of promo minutes, neither An Post nor The Government of Ireland pay for these adverts and RTÉ don't as they are not considered part of their ad minutes on either Radio or TV. (Ads on other broadcasters would be paid for but paid for by RTÉ).

    I think one of the good things about the TV license is that it forces you to remember to that you pay for this service that it is yours, and if your not happy you should complain. But we also see bad decision continually across all public services in this country.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    The above info on Govt of Ireland and An Post ads is incorrect, they do pay for these. not sure where you got that information from?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,922 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    I was coming out of the shop this morning and Newstalk was on. Pat Kenny had just stated. The first item was the report on RTE that was coming out (or meant to be). He went straight to I think its Fionann Sheehan to report about it.

    From the start I got the impression he might not be a big fan of Pat Kenny given the way he said hello. He was saying Grant Thorton was saying the report was out but nothing from RTE or rather RTE had said they had not seen it. What striked me was he was saying that they released a part of the Report last week that said they looked into everyone elses wages.

    Fionann was saying it had not been a question that was not asked, I would have thought it would have been the first question asked. The bit that made me laugh and another reason I feel there is no love between them is he said and Pat you are fine all your pay was correct when you were there. Pat Kenny stayed very quiet but I saay he was not happy with that remark. So Tubs and no other client of Noels was getting a top up. Bet they are happy



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement