Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cross-border review of rail network officially launched

17810121344

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,731 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The map is wild. Trains from Belfast to Galway via Clones

    I mean could we not have started realistic in the coverage aspect.

    Then you have the main lines limited to 200kmh surely we should aiming for 250kmh to Cork and Belfast at least



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Cost estimate in of all proposals is 2021 prices €32 Billion, €600 million extra per year extra operating cost. Costs don't include current projects Dart+ upgrades, Metrolink, etc.

    25 years to deliver at a cost of over 1.27bn per year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,099 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If the review’s recommendations are implemented in full across the coming decades, the capital cost is estimated to be €36.8bn/£30.7bn in 2023 prices.

    Of this, the estimated capital cost that would apply to Ireland would total approximately €27.6bn/£23.0bn. If this investment was split evenly across 25 years in 2023 prices, then it would amount to annual capital investment in the rail system of €1.00bn/£0.92bn per annum over and above existing plans. This is roughly equivalent to peak annual investment in the motorway network in the late 2000s.

    Similarly, for Northern Ireland the total capital cost estimate in 2023 prices is €9.2bn/£7.7bn, which is approximately €0.37bn/£0.31bn per annum over a 25-year period.

    Timelines

    The Review’s implementation timelines involve three periods: short-term interventions to be delivered by 2030, medium-term interventions to be delivered between 2030 and 2040, and long-term interventions to be delivered between 2040 and 2050.

    The review also considers whether developing a new, fully segregated 300km/h (186mph) high-speed rail network could be a viable option on the island. Analysis undertaken for the review finds that the benefits of delivering this would be significantly outweighed by the costs.

    –------------------------

    CBA quote tagging all this, vanilla is a pain



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,380 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Mad stuff in here.

    This is their "Final Scenario", which seems to be the plan going forward.

    • Electrifying lines to 25kV between Belfast and Bangor, Belfast and Drogheda, Dublin and Cork, Portarlington and Galway, Limerick Junction and Limerick, and Kildare and Waterford. Speed upgrades to maximum of 160km/h on these lines.

    • One train per hour (tph) on intercity routes between Dublin and Galway, Limerick, Cork, and Waterford.

    • One train per two hours on regional routes including Galway-Limerick, Limerick-Cork, Limerick Ballybrophy, Dublin-Sligo, Dublin-Westport/Ballina, and Greystones-Rosslare Harbour.

    • Through services between Cork and Galway via Limerick with modifications to track and platforms at Limerick Junction to allow more through movements Cork-Limerick and Limerick-Waterford.

    • Increasing direct services between Belfast and Portrush.

    • Adding passenger services to the Limerick-Foynes line together with a new line to Shannon Airport to expand commuter rail in Limerick.

    • Restoring services to the Lisburn-Antrim line along with a new station at Belfast International Station. 


    • From the Intercity Packages:

    − A new 200km/h line from Belfast to Newry via Sprucefield, Dromore, and Banbridge, primarily for intercity services to Dublin and beyond. Through connections from Sprucefield to the Lisburn Antrim line and towards Portadown.

    − A modified line linking Heuston and Drogheda. This consists of a new tunnel connecting Heuston and Spencer Dock via Temple Bar and Tara Street, four-tracking the northern line between Spencer Dock and Clongriffin, and a new line inland from Clongriffin to Drogheda. A spur to Dublin Airport from Clongriffin is included.

    − A link between Maynooth and Adamstown to separate longer-distance trains from the DART network and allow trains from the Sligo line to run to Heuston and Dublin Airport.

    − A new 200km/h double-tracked electrified alignment between Hazelhatch and Portarlington to speed up services between Dublin and Cork and Limerick. Includes links to the existing line at Kildare to allow through services to and from Waterford and Galway.

    − Double-tracking from Dublin as far as Mullingar, Athlone, and Kilkenny, as well as between Galway and Athenry.


    • From the Regional and Rural Packages:

    − A new 160km/h double-tracked electrified line between Portadown and Derry~Londonderry.

    − A new unelectrified single-track line between Derry~Londonderry and Letterkenny.

    − New surburban stations between Derry~Londonderry and Coleraine, including City of Derry Airport and a spur to Limavady.

    − A new unelectrified single-track line between Portadown and Mullingar via Armagh, Monaghan, and Cavan.

    − A new unelectrified single-track line between Claremorris and Athenry via Tuam.

    − A reopened single-track line between Waterford and south of Wexford via Wellingtonbridge, including electrification between Waterford and Rosslare Harbour.

    − Modifications to Limerick Junction station to facilitate through services between Cork and Limerick and Cork and Waterford.

    − Enhancements to capacity and alignment along the Limerick Junction-Waterford line. 

    Some of this is really good, but other stuff is fictional.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,380 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Also, it's got a Benefit Cost Ratio of 1. Not much wiggle room there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,321 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Most of this won't happen. It's a dream/fantasy document to a large degree.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    "Most of this won't happen. It's a dream/fantasy document to a large degree."

    Unfortunately I have to agree, it feels like an Irish Rail wish list, rather then a realistic plan forward. It is pretty much everything they might want, with 300km/h HSR being the only thing dropped!

    The worst thing about it is that they want to try and force 200km/h intercity trains and long distance commuters trains into the DART Underground tunnel!

    Absolute madness, basically repeating the mistakes of the existing DART line creating a poor service that mixes different types of services and thus does nothing well!

    I no real info on how they plan to quad track north of Connelly!

    I fell like this report will basically completely kill off DART Underground, at least in our lifetimes.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    BTW interesting tidbit about Leap cards:

    "2022 was the busiest year ever for sales of Leap Cards, with over 950,000 cards issued across Ireland."

    LOL, basically everyone lost their leap cards during Covid lock down and had to go and buy a new one!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,731 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    When it comes to the fantasy sections I can't follow how they've dismissed some vaguely plausible fantasies and accepted really wild ones. For example, new railway serving large towns in west Cork where there is high demand already for trips to Cork City is dismissed out of hand. But a new train line from Portadown to Mullingar is considered perfectly fine??? The analysis isn't consistent.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    They estimate 1 billion (2021 prices) to quad track to Clongriffin, right....

    5.3 Billion for an East - West Tunnel and another 1.1 billion for the spur to the airport, ouch!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    1.6 Billion to electrify Dublin to Cork and another 800 million for speed improvements, ouch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,321 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    The cost benefit ratio is very poor on most of the proposals. That'll be a reason enough not to proceed with most of this alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,005 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I doubt it's even an Irish Rail wish list, I'd say they are far more realistic and would rather get basic improvements done instead of fantasising about new lines serving small towns through extremely difficult terrain.

    It looks like absolutely everything made it into the report. Nothing was considered a bit too farfetched.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,005 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I would consider that as one of the more realistic elements of the report. The first step is to double track Galway-Athenry and Athlone to Portarlington as that is where the capacity is needed on that line. Although when also indulging with a new line serving Cavan and Monaghan, it does seem a bit stupid not to have just continued the thicker line between to double track Athenry and Portarlington on that map.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,099 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Claremorris to collooney was (rightly) considered too farfetched. As was various proposals for an Atlantic rail spine from cork to donegal.

    The Mullingar to Portadown line is a strange one alright, the rest have some reasoning behind them.

    also if the review came out and just said electrification, double & quad tracking, fixing a few junctions - people would be complaining that it wasnt ambitious enough!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,731 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Except ironically a new line to serve large towns in West Cork, somehow that's too far fetched but clones rail isn't



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,731 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    People are already complaining because there's no Atlantic north south corridor, no direct Cork to Limerick line etc. And even a lack of a line to the Ards Peninsula.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,731 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    If they can just revise the report to omit the wierd portadown to mullingar line I could actually get behind the rest of it, accepting that that athenry to claremorris can just be a political sop to shut up the whinging

    In the more immediate future we need double and quadruple tracking where appropriate, line speeds of 200kmh on the main routes and sub one hour frequency on main routes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,321 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Direct Cork to Limerick was pretty much ruled out in the M20 route selection debate. However seeing as how Mullingar to Portadown made it in, then the 35km or so from Charleville to Limerick should have definitely made it in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,099 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Mullingar to Portadown is a big political sop - although I imagine someone involved wanted some redundancy in the network and tried to leverage that as justification. That or Heather Humphries is pulling some strings for cavan-monaghan



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,921 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Is that from the report.

    Shocked to see Shannon raise its head again.

    Personally as a frequent leisure rail user I don't think the Intercity lines from Limerick need more frequently but desperately need later services. I think it's around 6pm last train from Waterford/Galway and 7:30 for Cork (unless you want to spend an hour in the Bit & Bridle). The Castleconnell/Nenagh train has similar problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,758 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    People are criticising the Cavan line as connecting to Mullingar and not Dublin, but if you look at the Cavan line as a suburban feeder for Belfast instead of a service to Dublin, it suddenly starts to make more sense. Realistically, most of those towns are Belfast satellite towns rather than Dublin satellite towns.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah its from the report.

    The maps are bit all over the place though. One even shows a link from Claremorris to Sligo a la WRC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,233 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I understand that they disregarded commuter rail, but it makes the whole thing look weird to me. I'm struggling to make sense of the document. It was apparently considered important to link some far-flung small towns into the national network for "reasons" but not important to link in other small towns. There's no clarity behind the decisions that were made in that regard.

    That big-headline statistic of 90% of airport passengers being connected by rail realistically just means "Dublin Airport connected by rail". A strange mix of high ambitions and zero ambitions in one document.



  • Registered Users Posts: 141 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    I think I need to lie down after reading all this. I am literally in shock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,321 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    As usual in Ireland the timelines are extremely long. Most of the transformative stuff like electrification and dual tracking etc are long fingered out to the next decade at the earliest / 2040-2050 timeframe. Relatively little is proposed in the next 7 or so years besides some frequency increases on certain routes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Cracking out the crayons but that Mullingar-Portadown line doesn't make sense south of Monaghan, and it would be better to link Omagh -> Monaghan -> Navan as a direct line to Dublin, preserving Armagh and Dungannon connections.



  • Registered Users Posts: 209 ✭✭Bsharp


    For me the best approach is to separate out what's proposed for existing lines and new lines when thinking about the strategy.

    Proposals for existing lines add up to a logical and deliverable strategy in the timeframe involved.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,936 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    "Proposals for existing lines add up to a logical and deliverable strategy in the timeframe involved."

    Sort of, the Crossrail Dublin tunnel, quad tracking north of Connolly and spur to the Airport is all a bit out there too IMO.

    Also Dublin Port freight is laughable.

    The general intercity improvements, 200km/h, clock face running, some quad/double tracking and maybe electrification (though Hydrogen is an option worth watching) are likely.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭VeryOwl


    I would like to see a rolling programme of improvements as the report suggests, but overall the report isn't a serious piece of work. Just railway fanfiction.

    The development of such a solution will obviously need to be aligned with the development of the rail network within the Greater Dublin Area generally. The Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area 2022 to 2042 proposes to protect and preserve an alignment for a cross-Dublin tunnel for delivery post 2042 (subject to periodic review) and it is recommended that any such proposal considers fully the implications of this Review for the tunnel’s alignment, functionality, and delivery. Considering this context, this Review encourages policymakers to consider whether this intervention could support longer distance services such as direct services between the island’s largest cities (e.g., Belfast – Cork) and Dublin Airport (e.g., Cork – Dublin Airport), as well as longer distance commuter services (serving stations as far out as Athlone, Portlaoise, Kilkenny and Drogheda). A future east-west tunnel would almost certainly include interchange stations with the planned MetroLink underground line and DART network

    Why would you ruin the DART+ Tunnel with these suggestions??



Advertisement