Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Liverpool FC Team Talk, Gossip, Rumours 2024/25

1103610371039104110421604

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,592 ✭✭✭brevity


    I am quite disappointed so far.

    Imo we don't have the strength in depth to make any significant challenge where it is required. It's very hard to win with a skeleton staff. Especially considering the improvements other teams are making.

    The club are letting down the players again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,501 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Oh yeah I’m not saying they’re making the best signings by any means, just referring to your point about how even a good signing won’t work out there.

    Hojlund is massively overpriced for what he’s shown so far, he’ll be compared to Nunez because of the fee but at least Darwin had a massive season to warrant such a high transfer fee. Still, Hojlund could well look like a bargain in two or three years, it’s almost impossible to predict unless you have access to the kind of data the big clubs have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,480 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Mbappe to Liverpool, all day everyday fiction the internet click bait engineers spin.

    It's incredible the way PSG is treating Mbappe, a player that has done nothing wrong, he wants to play, and yet was kicked out of preseason for wanting to honour his contract with PSG, and see it out, he wasn't looking to leave this summer, and now it looks like he'll sit our a season of football, and still walk for free, PSG is totally in the wrong, is there no Professional Footballers Association in France to sort it out, PSG are the ones breaching his contract



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,118 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    After last season and with with a completely new midfield I don't think it is realistic to expect a title challenge.

    Champions League qualification for sure, but a challenge is a step too far imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭antimatterx




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,392 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    FSG are sending a signal out to future players that they're no longer an ambitious club. They hunt for bargains but when none are available they'll happily leave big gaping holes in our squad to the detriment of the club, players and management. They're not prepared to take risks to get the team back to the top.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,510 ✭✭✭tinpib


    Community Shield day today, last year was prob as good as our season got. It was a good game, fairly spicy. We played very well and beat City 3:1. Haaland missed a sitter, which of course the media and rival fans seized on, and Darwin scored in injury time.

    All kinda hard to believe now looking back. I was full of optimism after narrowly missing out on the quad a few months before. But it all started going to sh!te from league game 1, blessed to get a draw at Fulham.

    Anyway, hopefully it's spicy again today and that we start well next weekend.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,255 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    That's a very dramatic way of putting things. They went and bought two brilliant quality additions to midfield early on - and then got hit by two players pushing to leave that weren't expected. Maybe before we complain about holes left we actually wait and see if they bring in one of the two DMs they're currently closely linked with.

    Also, FSG always feels like a very easy 'outsider' place to apportion blame. They own the club, but the club spends its own money - would be much more looking at the actual club staff, including Jurgen, for how that money is spent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭jones


    Such a funny window and I accept there is a lot of time still left so this is just on how's things stand now. I can't shake the feeling Liverpool are trying to do it "on the cheap".

    They started off great with 2 quality signings to strengthen midfield but then we lose experienced players we probably hadn't planned to lose and this seems to have stopped all progress.

    One thing is for sure we need a good defensive midfielder (which are rare). I think Lavia will be a great player but he's mostly potential at this point but considering the dearth of players in that position it would have been beneficial to just pay Southampton the money and get him in for pre season. We missed this boat and are still arguing over the penny's (in relative terms). I don't even know if he's worth the money right now but pretty confident he will be in a year or two. This dilly dallying doesn't make sense to me unless there was another real target in the background which is becoming apparent there isn't.

    Look at arsenal they had a midfield weakness and spent over 100mil to sign their top target no faffing around in the bargain basement etc. I know I'm exaggerating here but it's starting to feel like that. Arsenal aren't a nation state backed club with unlimited resources they are a direct competitor for us financially and are out spending us year after year.

    This is exactly what we previously did with VVD and Alison but it seems without a truck load of money from sales (coutinho) we won't spend big money on big players. How can we ever expect to get back to the top if we won't spend what the other top 6 are? We're unlikely to strike gold again to the same extent with sales or with Salah, Mane etc and how good they turned out for the money spent.

    We need to put our money where our mouth is in relation to targeted spending. We clearly can't spend like City, United, Newcastle but we can spend more than we are. It's a frustrating one as in general I think FSG have been great owners but their frugality has cost us in the last year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    True enough - but I think they DID do what Arsenal did to an extent... identified the ideal replacements, and got them done early. By all accounts they were about to move onto CB, before we then lost Fab and Hendo unexpectedly and then had to completely scrap all the transfer plans and prioritize DM.

    I'd also be placing the blame much more heavily on Klopp and the transfer lads - even last season, we went into the season woefully short in midfield... but we spent a lot of money on forwards between Darwin in the summer and Gakpo a few months later. I really like both guys - but maybe we should've spent 35m on a striker, and the rest on midfielders? I doubt it's FSG who pick the players after all, or pick the specific areas to spend the transfer funds on, it's the specialists who are employed to make those decisions. So I think we can look at the money spent last summer and say that the people actually spending the available money made poor choices for where to spend it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭jones


    Fair point and I do agree I think there's a lot of blame for Klopp and transfer committee moreso than FSG directly but it could be a symptom of restricted spending. I suppose what can Klopp say if FSG won't spend money although he was a little too eager saying we didn't need strengthening last summer. Plenty of blame for the **** show last season to go around.

    I just hope we make some more good signings and give the team a real shot in the arm



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,509 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    If Hendo and Fab are replaced then fair enough.

    I was quietly confident before they left.

    Otherwise we've a Thiago, Mac, Sobo midfield 3 and no backup imo bar Jones. I think that's being generous too as I never considered Jones a viable option for a while now. Elliott and Bajetic either aren't midfielders or are too young to expect the required impact.

    We really, really need two, even before we need a CB.



  • Registered Users Posts: 548 ✭✭✭BillyHasMates


    Stat from transfermarkt today that we currently have the smallest squad in the league at 22. Utd listed has having 36. Doesn't bode well considering our injury record.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    I think nearly everyone agrees we need 2 midfielders and a centre half. Whether that happens is another thing. The Lavia deal is really dragging on. Rumours on twitter(not reliable of course), is that we are renewing our interest in Gravenberch. If true it would be a bit underwhelming but I suppose at least it would be another pair of legs in midfield.

    Can see us getting two midfielders but running out of time for a centrehalf and the excuse coming out then that the right type of centrehalf was not available



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I like the idea of Gravenberch as a signing - but not as our sole DM. He's just not experienced or specialised enough in that role. He's still more of an all-rounder midfield option. So if he comes, it really has to be along with another DM like Lavia or Amrabat or Palhinha etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    If we were to get Lavia then he might the 2nd more "experienced" midfielder. Amrabat off to Utd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,388 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    I've said it for weeks now but I think the focus is Lavia and then a LCB. They'll then try for another CM but I bet that won't be done until January.

    It's fair enough that the club are haggling over the £50m Southampton want. No way is Lavia worth that sort of money. City have a buy back for £40m (possibly less depending on the with the sell on clause) for him next summer when he'll have another years experience under his belt so to me £40m this summer is probably over paying but I think the deal will be done at £40/42.5m with add ons bringing it up to £45m.

    No clue who they'll try for as LCB. Apparently they didn't want/like Inacio so not sure who else is available other than the guy Leipzig are trying to sign but he's possibly a little raw?

    Andre would be excellent as the second MF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    If we get Andre he probably won't come in until January



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,592 ✭✭✭brevity


    What ever the transfer committee are at it comes across as quite disjointed.

    Need to back to the way it was when Klopp first joined. It's the only way this approach will work.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,501 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    I know the wages involved would be insane, but if Bayern do end up getting the Kane deal over the line, I’d love to see a bid go in for Kimmich just to see if they might want to recoup a big chunk of that fee instantly.

    It’s pure fantasy stuff really, but given his injury resistance and availability over the last few seasons along with being an undisputed world class number 6, one Kimmich would easily be worth two lesser midfield signings.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭dmigsy



    FSG are competent business people but not great owners. They appointed some good commercial people to bring the club up to where it should be in terms of income. While they're not taking money out, they've put fcuk all money in (about £110M in 10 years). The club is paying for the stadium redevelopment and all of its player purchases while FSG have likely at least 10x'd their initial investment (bought at £300M, valued at £4.3B now). Their goals are not the fans goals.

    They are caretakers sitting back and watching the club's value increase until the optimal time to sell. For comparison, the owners of Leeds, Wolves, Arsenal, Brighton, Leicester, Everton, Fulham, Aston Villa, Chelsea and of course Man City have put in more, in most cases multiples more, than what FSG have put into Liverpool over the past 10 years.

    They care about what happens on the pitch only as far as it influences the balance sheet. They've had an easy ride from the fans thanks to the brilliance of Klopp. They'll walk away with nearly £4B off the back of the club if they can find a buyer. Standard venture capitalists but not 'good' or desirable owners imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,501 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Suddenly I fear that might happen and it’ll be our only midfield signing by the close of this window.

    You have to admit, it’d be textbook Liverpool/FSG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,501 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    By the way, is there any case to be made for Alexis as a number 6? I can’t honestly say I’ve seen enough of him to know whether he’s that good defensively. His positioning and awareness is clearly a strength of his though, so you’d imagine he’d be capable of doing a job there in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,144 ✭✭✭Augme



    Why would Kimmich want to take a step down like that? Especially if they signed Kane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,501 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    The same reason Casemiro took a step down from Real Madrid, and the fact that there a few rumours of Tuchel being open to the sale.

    As I said though, it’s not the most realistic idea (to put it mildly) but there have been far stranger transfers over the years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    Since winning the league, Liverpool have been poor, almost neglectful in the transfer market, obvious weaknesses in the squad have been let go unheeded for at least 2/3 transfer windows, signing unproven youngsters like Elliott, Carvalho & Ramsey and claiming them as first team squad members when in reality they weren't ready, only Elliott has made any contribution and Klopp seemed to have lost faith in him towards the end of last season, they really should have been considered fringe players, same with Bajcetic this season. You can't really expect to compete when relying on teenagers to fill gaps in the squad that should be filled by more experienced players.

    Had we added to the squad in a more planned way since winning the league, it would have cost less (as fees have gone through the roof in the last year or so) and we wouldn't have this massive transitional season coming up and very unlikely to have had the shitshow we had last season, we'd likely have finished top 4 at least. I think the club is also finding it more difficult to sign players when not in the CL, this won't be admitted, but, it just tipps the balance in favour of CL clubs if we are after the same player. We were in an excellent position after winning the league, that was the time to strengthen, it would have cost far less in the long run. The club blew that excellent position, plus with all our main rivals outspending us it's difficult to see how we can get back seriously challenging for the major honours ( league & CL).

    I'd be very happy with top 4 and winning the EL this season, I can't see a title challenge materialising unless all the other top teams have poor seasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,388 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,692 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    They're missing a 0 at the end.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The club should be laughing at an offer like that - but nice that Mo went the extra mile of rejecting it himself too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,880 ✭✭✭passatman86


    It annoys me im posting this - but Roy Keane was right when he said every year United won a title they went out and bought 2 world class players to keep the team on their toes - we didnt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭Zak Flaps


    You've hit the nail on the head.

    They could afford to throw a bit more money towards transfers, but they won't. To be honest, i'd like them gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭McFly85


    FSG have been brilliant owners.

    Theyve taken a club that was a financial and organisational shítshow and turned it into one of the best teams in the world, rebuilding the infrastructure and making sure the club can run under its own steam, winning every trophy they could while having to compete against a club that has been charged with massive overspending by the PL.

    The main issue people seem to have is they don’t spend enough money. we did spend 60m+ on a forward last year and we’ve brought in 2 midfielders and as far as I’m aware they’re still trying to get deals done.

    They won’t spend a few million more than they think a player is worth, which can be frustrating, but I’d prefer that then for them to load the club with debt.

    So weighing up everything good they’ve done against everything bad, I don’t think anyone could have done any better.

    Anyone who wants them out, who would you like to see us owned by?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭dmigsy



    A better owner would be one who puts more money in and who has goals more closely aligned with those of the fanbase. Running a business more competently than the Hicks & Gillette muppet show does not make FSG brilliant owners.

    Brilliant owners would be putting in as much money as they could up to the legal limits so that the team has the best opportunity to compete. Trying to compete with only the income generated by the club is great - if it was a level playing field where every team was trying to do the same. It's not. So it's the equivalent of deciding to fight with one arm tied behind your back.

    FSG are simply competent business people who want to maximise their return on investment. They don't care about what the fans want. They only want to get paid. Not what I want to see in an owner. Is that what you want?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Does that exist? I don’t think it does… essentially you want a benevolent multi-billionaire scouser/fan to appear.

    More likely is either a hedge fund like Chelsea got, who will also only be interested in financial return (and may do mad things like leveraging future spending in an attempt to boost share values in the shorter term, as Clearlake seem to have taken a gamble on), or else it’s a despotic nation state.

    For me it’s very much a case of ‘better the devil you know’ on this front anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I don’t think that’s true at all.

    Theyve invested heavily in the club at all levels. Gotten the best coach possible, transformed the scouting and recruitment, in the process of transforming the stadium.

    We have won major trophies and have had multiple 90+ point seasons.

    I think FSG do want to increase value through success but to a point. They will not attempt to compete with state owned clubs on a financial level.

    Putting the maximum legal limit at all times is huge risk. It increases the clubs debt and getting a few transfers wrong hampers future transfers.

    I don’t think the owner you describe exists outside of state owned clubs and that’s something I’d like to see the club avoid at all costs.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's not many better owners out there.

    They are not perfect, but there's no others in the league I'd swap them for i reckon.

    They are trying to run the club on its own revenue. Nothing wrong with that. Will it mean we can't compete with financial cheats every season? Yes, but such is life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,404 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Some people here seem to forget about the malaise under Hicks and Gillet and it shows. FSG haven’t always made the best decisions but it’s 1000% better than before



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭dmigsy



    A benevolent multi-billionaire scouser/fan - bang on. That would be a brilliant owner. Maybe they don't exist.

    But all this 'FSG are brilliant' talk is like a collective Stockholm Syndrome on here. They could easily pump a few hundred million into the clubs based on the killing they've made. But no, they have the club in a position where their penny-pinching approach leads to mad stuff like Arthur being signed as a solution for midfield last season. And a week from the start of the season and one of the biggest clubs in the world has no CDM.

    Yet, people on here are banging on about how great they are. They're brilliant at lining their pockets is what they are brilliant at. Their behaviour in every scenario supports this idea. Super League, Covid layoffs, ticket prices, level of investment, etc etc.

    As I said above, many clubs with non-State owners have put far, far more money than FSG has into their clubs without jeopardising their clubs.

    6 days until Chelsea. 0 CDMs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Who are these clubs and how many trophies have they won since their owners took over?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,580 ✭✭✭✭Riesen_Meal


    I think the best scenario we can hope for is Lavia getting done this week and Andre on a pre buy for December...


    We are paper thin though, it's not looking good...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,580 ✭✭✭✭Riesen_Meal




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭dmigsy


    This is from March - https://khelnow.com/football/2023-03-world-football-premier-league-owners-funding-last-10-years

    Feel free to tot up trophy counts if you like but I don't think that money invested in a club always equals trophies. Some clubs would have been at a lower base level to start with, some much lower (Brighton/Fulham/Leicester) with less revenue generation capacity than Liverpool have. You can spend money badly too - look at Everton! We're also in the Man City era. Outside of City, there are few clubs who have won any trophies at the top-level of English football.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,096 ✭✭✭hawaii501


    Lavia in and Andre in January is a gamble as he will take longer to settle than Lavia would.

    Would probably get away with it if he was ready to go as could play younger players in the Europa but it's looking like it'll be another season of excuses even though I'm delighted with the 2 signings. If they just signed Lavia with a bid of 45m plus add-ons he'd already have 3 weeks training under his belt. Amateurish that he wasn't signed as soon as signs of both Henderson/Fabinho showed signs of leaving for the sake of peanuts in football terms. Feels like Utd strategy under Glaziers, spending all summer for a target.

    Desperately need a cb as well as Konate is too injury prone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭McFly85


    All that shows me is that heavy investment doesn’t guarantee anything.

    FSG have made Liverpool arguably the most successful non state owned club in the league over the last 10 years. Surely that’s considered a success?

    I do wish they’d loosen the purse strings a little, especially now when we don’t have a DM.

    But they don’t run the club badly, and I don’t think there’s many owners out there that would do better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭dmigsy


    Who said that it guarantees anything? You don't think Liverpool could do with a bigger transfer budget or that Klopp would spend that wisely? Or are you happy that they're scratching around for a key position a few days before the season starts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,692 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    How exactly are they brilliant at lining their own pockets? They haven't taken a penny out of the club yet. There's no obscene dividends or one-off payments. Until the club is sold, there's no return on their investment. They might make a fortune, they might make nothing. The future is unwritten.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭dmigsy


    Ah, come on man. You don't understand the benefits of buying a distressed asset for ~£300M and it growing to a valuation of £4.3B? You don't think you can leverage that type of paper valuation increase without a full sale? From 2021 - "FSG confirmed that they had sold a £533 million stake in their company to RedBird Capital". What do you think these stake valuations are based on? They're based on the value of the assets in the FSG portfolio, including Liverpool.

    They've taken multiple rounds of investments on and Liverpool's valuation would be a key contributor to the value of those stake sales.

    "they might make nothing". Jesus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,294 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    FSG not spending money but just ignore they built a new training ground and upgraded two stands along the way.

    ******



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭dmigsy


    They've written off the loans for the stands redevelopment and training ground purchase, have they? Hadn't seen that myself. Got a source? Are they going to give the club back the £37 million for the Main Stand loan that the club has already repaid?

    "Between 2017 and 2021, £37 million was in fact extracted from the club to help repay a loan sanctioned to build the new Main Stand."

    Link: https://www.thisisanfield.com/2023/03/fsgs-low-investment-into-liverpool-fc-revealed-but-it-may-not-be-a-bad-thing/



  • Advertisement
Advertisement