Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"Influencers"

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,719 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    I've little or no experience with influencers. I've just never seen where the attraction lies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    If anyone identifies themselves as an influencer, it’s just a red flag to ignore, block, delete.… Any I’ve encountered I’ve found to be self absorbed full time narcissistic residents of twatsville…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,741 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I don't get the hate towards influencers.

    All they are are modern day marketing people.

    It's no different to the old days when a well know personality endorsed a product, now it's done by people who have big online followings.

    And they don't get those big online followings easy, it's difficult to firstly get noticed and secondly keep producing content to stay noticed.

    They can be great for small local businesses, local influencers can be very good at getting their product out there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 IstvaanV


    Greasy parasites, living off the corpse of so called civilized society. Bill Hicks was right about people in marketing.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's just another form of advertising. But people who follow them religiously are hilarious.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭pat_sconce


    Especially those that think using menstrual blood as a facemask is a great anti ageing process.

    Yep, thousands of really really really stupid women believe this because an influencer said so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,412 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Influencers? The first of the contemporary four horsemen. I’d take the old ones over them any day….



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,549 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I don't hate them but I've no interest in them either. They don't seem to contribute anything of value. They just preen for likes on social media and some of them make bank off that. I just find the whole thing very vain, shallow and materialistic. There's more to life than influencers, their lifestyle and social media as a whole.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,120 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I don't worry too much about influencers, they don't influence me.

    However I find your "exiting the womb" bit pretty mind numbingly stupid.

    The miracle of birth requires no intellectual capacity on the part of the born.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Grifters, the new leaders of the easily influenced, numbingly stupid millennials.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 13,105 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    So-called “influencers” on social media are, from what I can see, just chancers and grifters with very inflated egos who are usually very opinionated on things they know little or nothing about and are vain, shallow and narcissistic - it’s all about making money off the internet by preying on the gullible.

    They are lapped up by the stupid and gullible who often pay for their supposed “advice.” It’s the modern online equivalent of the snake oil salesmen of days of yore. They really contribute nothing of value to the world.

    Some of them, including that misogynistic Andrew Tate asshole, are actually dangerous in spreading lies and hatred.

    Post edited by JupiterKid on


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,647 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I submit there are three types of influencers. Those who are in effect a marketing agent, who use their position with the primary intent of encouraging business a certain direction, and basically 'sell' their time. Those who primarily are on it to obtain the revenue from their own activities (eg an Instagram post with a circulation of X million will obtain Y thousand in revenue) and influence is pretty unintended. And the third group are those who are online for a non marketing purpose, but whose opinions will knowingly influence others without any particular agreement with the industries in question. Think professional film or car reviewers for example.

    I think it's a bit unfair to place all three types in the same category. And yes, creating a sustainable online presence is not something done with little work, effort, intelligence and, frankly, luck. I may not like some of the big influencers, but I'll respect what they did to get there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,542 ✭✭✭Hangdogroad


    Those well known personalites of old were generally well known for a reason at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭Purple Mountain


    And not forgetting those that are no more than glorified QVC selling channels now.

    It's like a form if sales brain washing.

    To thine own self be true



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭Fox Tail


    vacuous entities is what i think of when someone mentions the word influencer.

    Both the influencer, and especially the influencee.

    Although there is a space for genuine positive influencers to ride the social media wave and make a positive impact to young people.

    The principle will eventually give rise to some positivity.

    But not the crop of preeners we have today, obviously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    Since TV was around there have been celebs promoting products now there are 1000s of influencers promoting products .I see no harm in it as long as people know they are getting paid to promote products .I think it's good theres influencers of all races and minority's . I don't like influencers who use thier children in videos , when you are under 15 can you give informed consent to be in videos made by your parents



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    It's always funny watching their bubble burst, they live in a vacuum for so long they almost always overstep the line.

    I'm not in any of the demographics for them and mostly ignore them anyway bit they should always be stopped from misleading practices (and also not paying taxes).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭Sunny Dayz


    Many of them buy fake followers and likes. Have supposedly a high following but get low interaction on their posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭bartkingcole


    Marty Morrissey - Renault are a smart company getting him on board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    Ah, going for the anti-marketing dollar I see.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,062 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    There seems to be a push back against people getting free stuff. It’s long overdue.

    Anyone following “Cakegate” at the minute?

    A small bakery in UK was approached by a PR company on behalf of an ex coronation street actress for a rake of free stuff in return for social media exposure. The bakery owner published the request with a response like “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”. The actress then made a video pretending she knew nothing about the request and slated the bakery. She’s getting some kicking over it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,542 ✭✭✭Hangdogroad


    Just looked it up there. Never heard of this actress which reminds me that I probably last looked at Coronation St circa 2000.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,062 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    She’s gone from it a few years I think. I don’t watch it either.

    The bakery response was epic and shredded her.

    what was shocking though were the amount of small businesses coming forward and saying they felt almost bullied into giving free stuff by those who can most afford it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,815 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Chancers looking for free stuff and insta-fame. Absolute knob ends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,029 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    The Kardashians are probably the biggest, they'd promote $hit and it sell

    I don't see them "influencers" as good or bad, take or leave



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,880 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    "hey guys"...

    Naw not for me painful the lot of them.

    But it clearly works or people wouldn't be paying them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,426 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    I find them distasteful, the amount of “freebies” some of them get is ridiculous, from hotel stays to thousands of Euros worth of baby stuff.

    I’m not on Instagram but when the missus often shows me a #ad from one these Insta huns, I make a mental note to never spend money on that business!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,075 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    To me they are just the 21st century version of those telemarketing channels, or even further back the people who wore billboards who walked along the street to advertise things.

    But for some reason there is a cohort who attach 'celebrity' to them them now. I watched a programme last night (that I would not normally watch) it was all about the 'lifestyle' in Monaco.

    Lots of people who want to be seen, and be seen by other people who want to be seen. Types that have more money than sense, and a large dollop of narcism.

    Anyway, Monaco wanted to diversify to get more money out of really rich eejits who crave attention. So what did they do? They invited 'influencers' over in a big do. Now if you saw the cut of them you would really question how anyone could be 'influenced' by them.

    They just all seemed so vacuous and wrapped up in themselves, with no real depth to them. All show no substance.

    Post edited by gormdubhgorm on

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Years ago people that entered the consciousness of the general public, they often did so because they were

    A : Talented…… be it as an actor, musician / songwriter, artist, sportsperson…. Etc

    B : Notorious... be it as a criminal, politician or whatever other brand of scallywag.

    C : Entertaining…comedian..whatever…..maybe not the most talented but still a discernible reason people like them.

    now the absolute bland have taken over, these influencers. Or social media attention whores.

    They are lauded by their young followers and peers, not often for what actually gets them their fame and notoriety, not for discernible talent not for what they do but because they simply achieve notoriety, fame and attention…. Which let’s face it IS the goal, the holy grail of currencies for many young people nowadays. The little weirdos obsessed with….. ‘ look at how many followers, look at what I posted, look at me, listen to me…..’ constantly. 🥱 attentionattentionattention….

    growing up I looked up to footballers / sportspeople , musicians, actors. Talented people who entertained you.

    now instead of “ great, United / Liverpool / Celtic are on the box…. Or “ are you getting the new X album “. It’s “ohhh, quick what did X say, look at the car Y has”… “ did you like *****’s post quick, like it ! “ All a bit psycho.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,877 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    According to the Pope, Mary the Blessed Virgin, Mother of God was the first influencer. So I will go with her. Although I wouldn't be surprised to find out that they were around in BC times as well. Shakespeare had a bit to say about them too, mostly not complinentary. Nothing new under the sun.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ye and I hate the way they go on about 'content'. It's like a grab all anything to say/do rather than actually have something to say/do. It can seem so forced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,575 ✭✭✭Glencarraig


    "Influencers!................get a proper job FFS !!!!!!!!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 364 ✭✭RockOrBog


    My 10 year old niece has 8 girls in her class, she reckons the other 7 want to be youtube influencers when they grow up.

    There's Irish kids going around with American accents now from YouTube





  • It's about time influencers get their comeuppance. They are some of the most dangerous people out there in my opinion doing untold damage to the minds of youth.

    However - I will say it's brands that are at fault. Some influencers have absolutely 0 morals but maybe 100s thousands of followers thus the brand will throw them a freebie to advertise without doing any semblance of due diligence.

    You have to be a certain type of vulture in my opinion to be an influencer and spread the lies and misinformation some of them do. The lives a lot of them show are pure BS.

    In my opinion the tide is turning on them and it's about time.





  • I was having this conversation with my partner the other day. Her niece is the same and her internet use time is not controlled/monitored. Her niece wants to be an influencer but has very clear communication problems in social settings my o/h believes is from spending too much online. She will however show her something and speak like an influencer doing a demo same phrases etc. Her parents (my oh brother) chooses to ignore

    Parents need to wise up to this nonsense fairly lively.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    how disingenuous some of them are. There is one who is famous going by one name on tiktok, I won’t use the real tiktok name here but it’s in the format ‘IrishTracy’ and she just appeared earlier on my FB under ‘people you might know’ as someone completely different like Sarah Kelly….. looks like we actually have a genuine friend / acquaintance in common on FB and that’s how it appeared. I had a sneak peak at her FB profile and it’s the normally dressed, normal family, boyfriend, socialising etc average say I dunno 32-38 year old…. On tiktok a mad yoke dressing in all the colours of the rainbow and wacky hair and personality….

    so the whole influencer thing gets turned on at the flick of a switch….an act, basically. 💶💶💶



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,880 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    There is definitely a bit of a shift.

    A good example would be those "influencers" SheIn had over to help to promote them, they all got absolutely ripped to shreds.


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    The whole influencing world needs to be regulated. I think its australi where they are banned from advertising supplements and giving health advice.

    I love the wat none of them seem to know how to use google like the rest of is or use family and friend recommendations. Hi guy can anyo e recommend xyz and sit back a wait for the freebies to roll in


    Id also love to know how tax compliant they all are



  • Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 2,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Nigel Fairservice


    A lot of them seem to describe their day jobs as make up artists, personal trainers or 'models'.





  • There are the practicalities of a nobody (to begin with) becoming one of these vacuous “influencers”. To become an “influencer” requires investment in both money and time. To set up your exponentially increasing exposure on Instagram and other platforms you need to spend a lot of money in the first place, before you catch-on and gather followers. This may be several €k, and you need to spend a lot of time and money on grooming yourself to get the “appearance” right. Then find your vacuous “content” and poses in suitable locations and demonstrate your ability to promote whatever it is you are talking about. Then with your “CV” you can approach entities who want their wares promoted, and then you can start earning.

    Personally I’d rather be doing a real job 😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,977 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Lots of hate here aimed at the influencer but instead it should be aimed at the eejits who follow bad influencers.

    If people on Instagram are dumb enough to fall for this form of advertising then that's on them not the influencer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    @Fr Tod Umptious I don't get the hate towards influencers. All they are are modern day marketing people.

    You do realise that you just showed your own contempt for influencers, and possibly explained why it is people hate them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Beefcake82


    Influencers, also known as professional attention seekers. Only reason they exist is a lot of gullible people giving them attention. Remove that attention and they are nothing.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 12,526 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    Laughing at the variety of descriptions and hate towards 'influencers' here. Describing all of them as 'vacuous' or 'greedy' or whatever else is like saying all boardsies are X. They are a mix of good and bad, entertaining and bland just like boardsies.

    Suggesting they 'need to get a real job' only exposes the fact that some people understand very little about how difficult it is to get and maintain a following on Instagram or TikTok and just how much time it takes. You need to produce regular content, it needs to be new, relevant to your audiences interests and needs, sometimes it is paid, and sometimes it is not. Social media is so cut throat, if you do a deal with or recommend the 'wrong' thing, you are done.

    I have zero interest in celebrity influencers and don't follow very many, if any. Anyone I follow that falls into the 'influencer' category are women my own age who might recommend clothes or make up or holidays, breaks that I might be interested in and that would suit me (a woman in her 40s). There is no harm in it, it's not in your face because you can choose to not follow or to unfollow at any time. I know how much work goes into it properly and I personally couldn't do it on top of my full-time job as a lot of them do (the ones I follow).

    The likes of Andrew Tate trying to poison vulnerable young people can get in the bin obviously. I see them as something different even though they probably do fall into an 'influencer' category of some sort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,222 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Well as a guy I've no interest in woman talking about make-up tips of dresses.

    Also not much interest in guys talking going to the gym and counting calories.

    I like comedy sketches and maybe one's talking about true crime if that counts.

    Apart from sweets and a kitchen cleaner I haven't bought stuff recommended by people online from what I remember.

    I do fin it funny when there all green and eco conscious one minute and they they've a big haul of clothes that they'll probably never wear more than once or twice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,741 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I don't have contempt for marketing people.

    Marketing people help people chose things they need/like/want all the time.

    But then again @Brid Hegarty, you are the one who started a thread a while back claiming that you are immune to advertising, which is in fact BS, because no one, no matter how smart they think they are are no immune to advertising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    My attitude to them really depends on the kind of "influencer" we're talking about. The likes of Peter Sellers or Stumpy Nubs in the realm of woodworking, or Mike Greenfield from Pro Home Cooks who make a fortune creating Youtube videos that have an educational value or even the likes of Mr Beast, Jack Septic Eye or Mark Rober that just make entertaining content I have a certain respect for. I think they'd consider (and present themselves) more as "content creators" than influencers though... I'm sure there are plenty in the fashion/makeup space etc. who could be considered the same but as a forty something Dad they don't really pop up in my feeds so don't attract my notice.

    The nauseating "influencers" are those that could most kindly be referred to as "lifestyle vloggers". There's nothing educational or entertaining in what they do, simply preening for - usually heavily edited - pictures or footage of them showing off their "aspirational" lifestyle (or at least a flimsy, vacuous portrayal of such). A less charitable description might be "professional show off" or in the case of those who go begging for free stuff in exchange for "exposure" on their socials "professional beggar".

    While both categories can undoubtedly leverage their position through paid partnerships, advertising, selling other products under their brand (e.g. Beast Burgers / Feastables / over-priced rebranded make-up) etc. I'd argue that the former category have much more real-world influence on their viewers than those who refer to themselves as "influencers" and, actually having expertise in something, will usually have a much longer shelf-life.

    We're already seeing the evolution of many of the early Travel or Beauty influencers into "Wedding Influencers" and "Parenting Influencers". Where do they go from there? As their looks fade and they become less photogenic, they'll fade into obscurity imo.

    The worrying aspect of all of this is that when kids hear about the fortunes made on social media by the lucky few, they see it as a viable career. With over 100 million Youtube channels actively creating content, reaistically it's a pipe dream. Your average child in Ireland has a better chance of making a fortune as a professional footballer or actress than they do as an influencer or gaming streamer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    @Fr Tod Umptious I don't have contempt for marketing people.

    I thought the mere fact that you don't consider them to be influencers, and instead to be marketers, kinda showed contempt towards them. The question is, were the marketers of old disguising themselves as not being so? For e.g, someone who is inspired by Cristiano Ronaldo to better their fitness doesn't view him as a marketer. If Ronaldo were doing fitness videos on twitter and made brief references to creams that he uses for skin-care, then people might think he's just being genuine.... it mightn't click with them when watching it that he's just being paid. But if George Clooney is in a coffee advertisement then the viewer knows straight away what the deal is.

    @Fr Tod Umptious But then again @Brid Hegarty, you are the one who started a thread a while back claiming that you are immune to advertising, which is in fact BS, because no one, no matter how smart they think they are are no immune to advertising.

    That's an unusual use of the phrase "but then again" and a desperate attempt to relate this thread to mine in order to wind me up.

    Post edited by Brid Hegarty on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,449 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    The worrying aspect of all of this is that when kids hear about the fortunes made on social media by the lucky few, they see it as a viable career. With over 100 million Youtube channels actively creating content, reaistically it's a pipe dream. Your average child in Ireland has a better chance of making a fortune as a professional footballer or actress than they do as an influencer or gaming streamer.


    You’re after reminding me of the time I appeared on an Irish children’s show in the 90’s and we had to do a piece to camera about what we wanted to be when we grew up. The other children were like “I want to be a famous footballer”, “I want to be a famous singer”, etc, and then there was me - “I want to be a maths teacher”. Andy Ruane was like “Can you not think of something more exciting than a maths teacher?” I stood with a blank stare for about a minute before he said “Ok NEXT!” 😂

    The point is - they’re children! There’s really nothing to be concerned or worried about in them having dreams and aspirations at that age, some will make it happen, some won’t, I didn’t become a maths teacher but I still ended up working in fintech, not really a role I envisioned myself in as a child, I was more interested in entrepreneurship and engineering.

    As for influencers and the idea that it isn’t a real job? It’s a real job, which most people just either aren’t interested in, and of those people who are interested in it, most aren’t very good at it, because essentially it’s about marketing yourself and your brand, before sponsors ever begin to show any interest in associating you with their products. Only a small handful of influencers are making any real money in the industry and that’s no different than any other industry or sport or business. I follow a few of the more well-known tech reviewers who as well as doing paid advertising and marketing videos, also do tons more unpaid videos to promote their brand and keep their channels active and create a community around their brand.

    It’s tough but rewarding work and very few people are interested in doing that kind of work, and even less are actually dedicated enough to keep doing it day in and day out. I’ve seen plenty of influencers and content creators suffer burnout and suffer ill mental health from the amount of work it takes to be successful in that industry, so I wouldn’t put them all in the same boat at all to be derided and regarded as someone not to be aspired to. It’s not as sad as Bill Gates, Michael Dell or Richard Branson being your childhood heroes 😬



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    What makes me dislike influnencers is 1. Dishonesty- the photoshopping the shite out of themselves.

    2. My big annoyance is the ones using their kids. Yes kids are used in traditional advertising but you dont know their DOB, pets names, where they go to school etc. Its open season on the poor mites and they are too young to understand.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement