Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The government is hoovering up too much housing - the private working taxpayer is hurting

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Yeah, the childcare one is really quite outrageous. If you're not working, the childcare should be specific to the job interview - for example if they can show evidence of a job interview you might get 5 hours free care that day. That's reasonable. Not full time care everyday!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver


    Unbelievable isn't it. Most people in social housing are on low wages and barely have enough week to week to get by. Of course if you called for a wage increase for these same folk so they could put some away to save for a deposit im guessing the same people who punch down would be saying not a chance.

    Like i said, the one constant in society is when things get hard for people they inevitability blame the poor and immigrants for the issues and keep voting for the same creeps that have created the situation.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭Fox Tail


    Why would someone not working need childcare anyway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭Fox Tail


    Who would you vote for to change things, though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,951 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Is there? It's all very much true. I'm not sure how you think I'm a snob. It's just facts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,951 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I didn't post anything about social housing?

    I don't have an issue with social housing. I.don't have an issue with immigrants.

    care to explain your post?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,396 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    More snobbery.

    “You should just have enough money to buy in this one town in Ireland”

    It’s oh so simple, isn’t it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,951 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I have no idea how you think that snobby!

    Someone paying less then 100 euro a month in rent for years, should have enough money saved that they can buy in that small rural town



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,396 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    And if they don’t want to stay in that small rural town? And you’ve literally no clue or information on some expenses they might have.

    Saying they had cheap rent so therefor they should be able to buy, how naïve can you be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,951 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    They were living there for years, why would they want to suddenly go elsewhere? And even if they did, they should still have plenty of money saved.

    There are a lot of people and families suffering because of our housing crisis, really suffering, this Garda and family paying little to no rent for years in templemore, is not one of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Can we move on from commenting about Templemore and Garda accommodation





  • There should simply be no housing list.

    Scrap the list and scrap the idea of social housing.

    Create an emergency list that has rigorous checks with short term emergency housing.

    The goal is no longer to integrate social housing into communities as proven by tuath housing.

    They used to buy single houses within estates. Then they started buying whole streets of new builds. . By they are buying whole estates.

    They are adding to the homelessness of the employed.

    I would also add to this that there should be 1 housing charity is its needed not multiple being bankrolled by the government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,123 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    We just are too easy going as a country.

    I rented and saved for 7 years without a foreign holiday to get a house which I overpaid for due to demand.

    I am saving and doing up the house and can hopefully go abroad next summer.

    I will pay a mortgage for the next 35 years.

    I went to school with a fella who never worked a day in his life and they got a brand new house.

    They pay probably a 10th of what I pay a month and go abroad at least once a year based on Facebook pics.

    If my boiler blows up I need to find thousands while they don't need to worry.

    Imagine a country where you work hard paying taxes which are used to outbid you for houses and give them to people who contribute nothing.

    I don't know if we are unique but it's ridiculous when you think about it.





  • Tuath housing bought 35 houses in our estate directly from the developer. That's on top of the Government's 10% allocation. These are full streets.

    They have now bought 2 apartment blocks down the road.

    You can't even compete with the charities. They get the heads up and use taxes to screw the working people wanting to buy houses even at market price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    That's however a good thing though if you are one of the people waiting on the housing list such as childcare workers, road sweepers, catering staff and so fourth who have no chance of buying or renting anywhere decent on the money they are on. Where would these people live if it were not for local authorities and housing trusts buying or building social homes?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • It's a great thing for the career unemployed too and there teens who are encouraged to follow is the family tradition no?

    You never seem to include them....why?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    I have mentioned the unemployed in previous posts and obviously it is annoying hearing about people gaming the system. However the fact remains that there are large numbers of low paid workers doing often essential work. Where should they live in your opinion?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,218 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Here we go… divide and conquer, them and us, have and have nots, with me or against me… the type of polarisation that never does anyone any good.





  • In short term emergency housing while government focuses on a plan for affordable homes people can purchase.. Ive mentioned that already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Well, in the case of social housing, these are often made available to their occupants to purchase for a discount. Would this be the kind of thing you are talking about? In this sense they are temporary as, when they are purchased, they are no longer state owned housing for rent.

    There's also the established affordable homes schemes, where are proportion of houses built are sold at a discount. But even with these in place, there will be many who cannot afford the reduced price of these schemes, generous though they are.

    Ultimately there needs to be more building of new units in all sectors to bring prices down for everyone but this, unfortunately, can't happen overnight. I have suggested ways things might be sped up in a previous post.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,405 ✭✭✭Airyfairy12


    I think part of it is that immigrants arent coming here by choice because its a country full of opportunities, allot are coming here through asylum & refugee status & we should be helping them but its adding to amount of vulnerable people who cant afford homes & require social welfare & council housing. Some immigrants are willing to work for less money than indigenous Irish people & this lowers the amount of living waged jobs available, further increasing the need for social supports. I dont feel like immigrants or refugees are at fault but government policies are to blame for allot of our societal issues, immigration is a very small percentage of contributing factors but it shouldnt be a contributing factor at all, we should be able to handle increased immigration but our government are a complete failure who cant handle so much as a snow day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    It is insane. People are financially better off not working than working!

    For cultural reasons, and perhaps a belief that it can't continue, there hasn't been a mass exodus of lower paid people from the workforce. But not for financial reasons. If you get a house for free or token rent and a medical card plus a few quid for walking around money, you'll be better off than many people who are bursting their proverbial bollocks. Crazy situation, but has been the way for quite a long time now.


    When the Troika were in Ireland they did urge social welfare reform, but because Ireland performed well on the other reforms sought it was never followed through. They wanted a situation where the supports would drop if you stayed long term unemployed. Which makes sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭LongfordMB


    Our unemployment rate of 5% is a percentage of those looking for a job, not the working age population. I've seen studies that show 12-15% of households of working age have no-one working in them. That's twice the EU average. Simply because they are better off that way, we have incentivized not working. Completely insane and destructive to society.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    Yes, we have had a serious issue with jobless households.

    This is not the same as unemployment.

    Even where there were loads of jobs, we still have loads of jobless households.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭LongfordMB


    Is there any up to date version of that graph. I'd say we're still around 12%, at the upper end of the range. Even with a booming economy and businesses crying out for workers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    People are copping onto the situation too. While SF are going to go well in the next election, a large share of the population is going to vote for them as a protest. There is also a large demand for the private sector worker to have a government that will act in its favour.

    Ye all saw how well that idiot from Donegal did when he started making racist anti-traveller statements. If some party came out with sensible statements like the Government will have to start giving some priority to people who try to make a living for themselves rather than relying on handouts, they'd take off like a rocket.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Is that not contradictory there. If working parents can't afford a house themselves due to the government bidding against them. Does that not equate to them not being able to house themselves anyways same as the rest



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭hymenelectra


    It's as simple as this, the government have known for a decade nigh of the ever increasing housing crisis and they've done the only sensible thing and have allowed hundreds of thousands of extra people into the country to alleviate it at precisely the same time. Every year more than the last.

    It's genius. Here me out.

    Now faced with the problem of their solution, they have to compete in buying homes from the ever shrinking resource to accommodate the extra people they invited to solve the housing crisis leaving more and more people desperate for housing as exemplified by the month-by-month record breaking homeless figures.

    Not bold enough, more than 1 in 5, approaching 1 in 4, social homes are given over to other EU and non EU citizens. Perfectly sane.

    Still with me? Well, it doesnt matter if you are or aren't.

    Needless to say, it's very sensible, and I pity the poor fools who cannot keep up with this Nobel prize winning strategy.


    Now shut up and keep bidding against your own well being.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,951 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Homelessness has been an issue for decades.

    Government were warned long before immigration started to this country, but they failed to do anything about it.

    They continued to sell off social housing stock and failed to build new stock.

    They then allowed private companies to be the provider of social housing, paying private landlords rent for social housing tenants, and buying properties in private estates.

    All of which meant taking away existing private housing stock from the open market, meaning less and less houses for people to buy.

    This is not new and has been going on for decades, government has ignored it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭hymenelectra


    Even if you take what you say at face value, what effect would the arrival of several hundred thousand extra people have on those issues, do you think?

    Or to extend the inferred, if there was less and less to go around, and even more and more people, what kind of scenario would that result in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You earns your money, you pay your taxes and save what you can towards housing.

    Then the state, using your taxes, competes against you in the housing market. To house those they have a legal obligation to.

    No, I don't call that fair.





  • The Government and Charities no longer compete with you.

    The learned from the vultures funds to go directly to the developers to buy estates.

    The plan was to publicly condemn the vultures funds and replace them with the same model using tax money.

    They have done this using the guise of "housing charities"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,417 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The problem there is planning and politics.

    As for the state "silverware"...you mean all those inefficient companies where the worker came first and not the customer? Those companies where there was no competition and we paid through the eye and there would be strikes every year? The ones that needed bailouts every few years? They were just protectionist rackets overstaffed and delivering poor service.

    My only issue is the job isn't finished yet.

    The government has no business running any company imo.

    It is telling that the only people guaranteed a no questions asked "bonus" every year are welfare recipients. For the forever unemployed able bodied it's an award and in many cases a top up payment on their "other" income.

    It shouldn't be tolerated. There should be no such thing as lifetime welfare. Far from helping anyone it's damaging to society.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,951 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Your point is basically, ' it's perfectly ok that government created a housing crisis and forced homelessness into thousands of people, we just shouldn't let other people into the country ' 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    We need an actual socialist party, one that's not pandering to the fringes of society but providing services to actual tax paying workers.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,799 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Eir/telecom eireann/eircom are just as much of a basketcase as they were when they were privatised, if anything they've gotten worse. If it wasn't for the NBP, Most of Ireland Ireland would still be using dial-up....

    National Infrastructure doesn't get built by the private sector (unless it's nonsense like Star Link that over promises, under delivers, ruins the sky and then crashes back to earth every few years)

    Talking about people on permanent welfare. What's your solution to the unemployable. The people who do not work, never have worked, and most employers would not want working for them?

    Just leave them homeless? I don't want to live in a society where i have to step over homeless people every time I leave my house.

    Social housing isn't perfect, but the alternative 'cut off welfare and force them to get work' also doesn't work, especially when there are generational problems. What do you do with the children of unemployed people? It's hard enough to get them help when they're settled in social housing and can have social workers attending to them. Cut off their housing, and what happens then? They grow up without any formal education and become the next generation of unemployed and unemployable people.

    Ireland should be spending a lot more on social services. way more on early interventions. Is it expensive? yes. Does it cause some perverse incentives? yes, and these need to be addressed, but the black and white alternative of labelling people as lazy and abandoning them does not work, and god knows it's been tried plenty of times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    Really.

    2200 houses allocated from housing list in Limerick last year. Of those 2200 over 1450 were to unemployed occupants.

    So those 1400 tenants do not work and get a house

    Please explain how that is not a free house. Oh and please don't point out that they have to pay rent so its not free housing.

    That nominal rent is paid from money that they get each week for sitting on their fat asses , which is funded by irish tax payers. So yes free housing plus all the other add ons.

    I can easily see where my tax deductions of over 700 euro per week is going.

    Free housing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    It's called self esteem and a bit of ambition in life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    Prepare for the backlash my friend despite the facts you are 100% telling the truth



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    My parents did not qualify for a mortgage because, although my father out earned "professionals", his work was classed casual.

    Their "free" social house cost more than the mortgage payments on similar houses. They've paid the council several times the construction/mortgage cost of that house in 1987 (as have about 18 of the 22 houses there)


    You try to throw a "shocker" around the houses distribution. We have a social housing shortage because of FF and FG so, yeah, the dregs get first dibs as they are classed the most in need (particularly with kids)


    As opposed to the 1980s where workers got social housing, because the governments were actually building them in sufficient numbers. We are one of the richest countries in the world with a housing issue we've not seen since we were one of the poorest.

    By not building social housing this era of FF/FG has driven up property prices to stupid levels, hell they are even partakin in the bidding wars now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    In your own words your father worked , and that is my point.

    You cannot compare your situation with families who make a lifestyle choice of not working , yet hand out for everything going.

    Can I also point out if you scratch beneath the GDP and GNP stats we most definitely are not one of the richest countries. We are up to our oxos in debt that will need to be repaid at some stage ,and completely over reliant on fdi Corp tax.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,815 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,123 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Some people want to set an example for there kids and better themselves.

    Thankfully these people exist because they pay for layabouts who do nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver


    None of the current crowd. Unfortunately there is no alternative in Ireland.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭hymenelectra


    Speaking of debt, I read something fairly eye opening the other day, that 90% of new car sales are pcp in UK, and over 70% in Ireland.

    Sounds very healthy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Perhaps but that's tantamount to the same thing, since the supply on the open market is constrained thus.

    Taxes being used to compete against and undermine the housing aspirations of people trying to get on the ladder.

    It's a rotten system.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,582 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    the flaw in the plan there is that SF are the biggest supporters of the no work brigade.

    Anyone working on an above basic salary is going to get no help from SF.

    Working people voting SF is like Turkeys voting for xmas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,582 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Exactly.

    If the unemployed are in a house paid for by the state and all they have to do is make a nominal contribution to rent payment from their dole money, its a free house.

    The state is giving them money so they can give it back to the state. (if the state is lucky and the doley decides to pay them back their own money - 30% of social housing tenancies in Dublin are in arrears)

    Put the unemployed in house shares to free up homes for those contributing to society.

    If house shares are good enough for the professional classes, they are good enough for the doleys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    That’s the case, but people are so desperate they will vote SF as a protest anyway. The real change could be in the election afterwards, when there will be an opportunity for a right wing party.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement