Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

There’s plenty online videos of celebrities at Taylor Swift’s concert on the same evening that Meghan was “spotted” - but oddly nothing of Meghan. Charlize Theron (with her children), Cameron Diaz, Nicole Kidman were all there.

Strange that there were no photos or videos of Meghan. She’s usually easy enough to spot at a big event

You’re right about the algorithms. If you searched for “Taylor Swift and Meghan Markle” before the concert, you’d have got this as top response.

Page 6 wrote about her being at the concert with the slant that she is there without Prince Harry so they must be splitting up! As for Kraapi's opinion that it is PR to keep her in the media. It was very poor PR from them if they couldn't even manage a photo to go with the piece.

As for Meghan's contribution to Finding Freedom - it was basically on the advice of William's right hand man that she had anything to do with Finding Freedom. She did not speak to the author, but William's right hand man, Jason Knauf did.

Page Six were the originators of the story (and are being acknowledged by other publications as being the originators of the story).

Just in general, Meghan doesn't have to do publicity stunts - she has appeared in public about 3 or 4 times this year and still there are hundreds of articles written about her. Going to a movie (with no photos etc) gets hundreds of articles. She doesn't have to do anything to get publicity (good or bad).

There's been photos of loads of celebrities at the eras tour shows. Weird how she went but seemingly no one noticed her and snapped a pic. Do they not complain about not being able to go anywhere without paparazzi chasing them and that's why they need police protection? Page six is probably one of the biggest "legit" celeb gossip sources in the US after say, TMZ and people magazine. Her people absolutely would send press releases to them, regardless of the owner.

Sorry but you really need to take a good hard look at yourself - you’re taking up one off innocent childhood instances that were publicised so you’ve absolutely no wider context that a psychologist would have or access to consistency of behaviour to illustrate a point -

William and Harry are now well developed adults- there’s always been something unsettling about your relentless defence of Harry but this is just taking things to quite another level again

Are you for real? I need to take a look at myself? This is a message board. You can keep that bit of advice to yourself. Who do you think you are?

What I'm doing is repeating what the boys body guard (named) said that William was jealous of Harry. Just in case you missed what this former bodyguard said, here it is again:

Can you explain to me what the problem would have been with H&M living in the Commonwealth and being half in and half out (other than as Robert Lacey said that Harry & Meghan were far more popular?

It just shows that from such a young age, the pecking order was being established and a four year old understood that he was just the spare. Diana seems shocked that her four year old already knew this.

Harry was told from day 1 he was inferior to William. Thats bound to have an effect on him whereas William was told he was the greatest thing since the sliced pan and it turns out he needs to get his way all the time and has a filthy temper.

The problem with half in half out is akin to someone having to sign a social media usage policy at work i.e. you’re free to have such accounts and, simultaneously, a job with a company but any personal views expressed on such platforms must not be in anyway linked with those of the company itself e.g. someone going down a conspiracy rabbit hole and posting nonsense with “Works at Company XYZ” or the company logo prominent on their profile would violate such a policy. Leave the job and no policy is applicable. Go nuts. Go part-time though and it still applies. With H&M seeking financial independence then an obvious solution for a conservative and archaic monarchy was breaking the link as much as possible. Linked (“much loved members of the family” and able to use their profiles to land commercial gigs) but not ranked (a disconnect where they are no longer part of the hierarchy/working royal gig). That disconnect is an ongoing process e.g. Harry is still a counsellor of state but this may change in future.

Am I for real?

Yes, I’m Oscar Madison.

Who do I think I am?

Im Oscar Madison😀

Which Oscar Madison are you - Jack Klugman or Matthew Perry?

So what do you think M&H would do to embarass the RF. Take a suitcase of cash from some Saudi billionaire in exchange for a title? Are only HRHs working royals allowed to do that. Or the family of the future Queen going bankrupt with losses of 2.5m and stranding small businesses (including a refugee who is owed £20,000.

Interesting thing about that is Harry wouldn't have anything to do with that person even though he was offering bags of cash.

I'm not sure the present lots of royals can be claiming the high ground on integrity.

I guess when all your contracts are cancelled you gotta make money whatever way you can— one sleeve rolled up pushing some sort of stress voodoo patch - besides Columbo, who the hell wears a full length coat in summer time California? 😀

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12400943/Meghan-Markle-ANTI-STRESS-patch.html

A charity donation/business with Qataris. What is the problem? That it was given in bags? Once it is all accounted for then it's a non issue.

No one forgets the Dimbleby documentary. It came not long after the Morton book which Diana totally wasn't (but was) involved with. 👌

The Middletons trading on the RF's name? They were multi millionaires before any such connection.

Yes, Oprah, Spare et al wouldn't have happened if they got what they wanted. So those lauding them for their bravery and stance in speaking out about mental health and racial issues would actually have nothing to laud if they had managed to get themselves taken care of. Consequently those things happened precisely because they didn't get what they wanted and are really not the brave heroes they purport themselves to be in that case.

Still waiting for them to sue Valentine Low as well. 😉

This particular allegation has been bothering me, as I thought it was incorrect but needed to check. Valentine Low's book Courtiers covers this (pp 271/272). He writes about clashes between Meghan and her then personal assistant Melissa Touabti, about the complimentary designer items that some companies sent Meghan. “Clothes, jewellery, candles … It was absolutely non-stop.”

Low writes: “Touabti was apparently punctilious in following the household rule that members of the royal family cannot accept freebies from commercial organisations. Her approach did not go down well with Meghan.” (By the way, Melissa left after six months with Meghan - she was the second PA to leave after Meghan's arrival. There's a pattern, here)