Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
18688698718738741190

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭Shehal


    It is a must win game if Ireland have aspirations of going anywhere in this tournament. This loser attitude that some Irish fans seem to have isnt present in the Irish players or coaching staff otherwise would go nowhere at the world cup.


    SA are the ones who should worry about which game to prioritise their squad as they are the inferior side and have a squad with an average age of over 30, we dont have those concerns!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    I hadn't actually considered that it doesn't have to be a hooker that gets injured to bring in Sheehan (if he was left at home). Silly I know. Yeah now there's no justification for bringing him. If we have redundancy in places like the back row or an extra centre, someone will have picked up a knock by the time the QF rolls around.

    Given that Stewart or Barron (probably stewart) would be coming in out of the cold, I'd rather they have the chance to get up to speed with the squad. There's a scenario in which Kelleher re-injures himself (given he now has less opportunity to manage his hamstring), Sheehan hasn't recovered one time and we're suddenly drafting in an unccapped replacement who hasn't been with the squad for the Scotland game or a QF.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Technically they’ve only beaten us once in the last 10 years. The other time was in the 2013 6Ns which is now more than 10 years ago. I know there’s a level of pedantry there, but it probably reflects just how dominant we’ve been against them over the course of the last 2 coaching set-ups.

    I mean if they couldn’t beat us in Murrayfield this year…..

    To add to that, they’ve only beaten SA once in the last 20 years too. They’re in what is probably the worst pool they could be in.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 23,968 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    On any day any team can beat another, if anyone proves that is Ireland at World Cups..........



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    In the 33

    Kellher (if fit now) Sheehan (if likely available after 6 weeks) Herring

    Then call Stewart if (and only if) Kellher injury comes again or Sheehan recovery isn't fast enough



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,481 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Cian Healy becomes critical to that coverage.

    The fact that he can be named on a bench as "hooker" is what would allow Ireland to take a risk on carrying Sheehan for a few weeks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    See the risk there is that we have Sheehan in the squad, and kelleher gets a twinge that puts a question mark over him for a week or two. Now you've got two players and you don't know which will recover first or more effectively. You have to send one home to bring in an uncapped player who hasn't been with the squad.

    And once you send them home, then there's no way they can come back.

    Whereas if you leave Sheehan out (for now) he remains available to be brought in later if/when he recovers. And in the event that he doesn't, Stewart has had more time with the squad so it'll be less of a shock if he ends up in a big game



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,652 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    That goes against what you said earlier when you have Kelleher, Stewart and Herring all playing games.



    If Sheehan doesn't make the 33, and I don't think he will if its 6-8 weeks, It's risky to bring him in for a player in a different position because it might leave us very short there for example half back


    Coaches spoken in the past about optimum numbers in extended squads for 6n to have players to train against each other etc. I cannot see Sheehan travelling in the original 33 in that scenario


    Imagine if Healy ends up as Hooker v South Africa as a result with VDF throwing into the lineout. We got away with it v Scotland in 6n but this is a RWC.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    I get you final point but IMO doesn't mean too much for Stewart to train with or without the squad, hookers not involved that much in combinations bar lineout calls he can (and had) learn(t) anyway.

    But for the 1st part I've said Kelleher in (instead of Stewart) is conditioned by a fitness for day 1.

    Then as he's injury prone he may leave the squad but it has to be "unlikely"

    Whearas Sheehan is indeed injured and has to be taken as such, yes, that's different.

    A chance for Kelleher IF final recovery week is perfect, a chance for Sheehan anyway as he's an alien if injury is reasonnably more of a 6-week matter than 8



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    No Stewart plays (is called after) only in the case of Kelleher sadly gets injured again

    And yes I absolutely don't care about having 1 hooker only for South Africa (which again is unlikely as Kelleher has to be fit to be in the 33, and it would be really bad luck he got injured less than 72h of S-A so we can't call Stewart)



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,420 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I'm not being 'defeatist'. I'm only talking about a scenario where Kelleher is injured so we'll need cover for Tonga and Romania, and Sheehan won't be back until after the SA game. I think Ireland can beat SA with Stewart or Barron as hooker but we'll need Sheehan to have our best chance in the QF and later.

    Even if we lose to SA we would still be in the exact same position as long as we go on and beat Scotland



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,652 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    The other issue here is a red card or citing. A player banned for say 1/2 matches cannot be replaced


    So if Kelleher is picked and Herring gets banned (or vice versa) and Sheehan is the 3rd hooker, and it's SA up next in a few days time, what then.


    Sheehan won't be in the 33. It carries way too much risk in pool stages. We may feel we will beat Scotland but the coaches won't think like we do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    With Sheehan now having to see a specialist we can only assume bet case is QF. Too risky.

    Light the candles for his his recovery!

    Interestingly Ireland beat France in 6N with Porter ('69 Kilcoyne), Herring ('25 Kelleher), Bealham ('61 O'Toole).

    v Samoa 2.Herring 16.Stewart

    v Romania 2.Stewart 16.Kelleher

    v Tonga 2.Herring 16.Kelleher

    v SA 2.Herring 16.Kelleher


    I presume Herring speaks Africaans?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    I take your point about ban but it's hugely unlikely, again.

    Sheehan has to play QF anyway. Would be a huge mistake if he doesn't.

    I disagree with you it's worth the risk to have him in the 33, but at worse (not the best option IMO) we will have to call him back for another injured player whoever he is.

    And yes coach knows this RWC start in QF as 1) we'll beat Scotand 2) finishing 1st or 2nd doesnt matter (sadly)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    I'd actually consider using Stewart and Barron for the Samoa game. If the guy is in the squad we may as well take a look at him. Herring had a good run last week and is well used to being in the team.


    I think you're underestimating how involved hookers are. Ireland use sheehan as the first carrier off a lineout for lots of set plays. There's also the general attacking shape that they use to get a feel for. And lastly there's a psychological difference in being selected as part of the squad vs being parachuted into a WC at the last minute.


    Yeah in fairness you'd have to make a judgement call there on who he's replacing, but depending on the squad there are options.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,652 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Your thinking as a fan, not as a coaching team who do this for their livelihood and have a responsibility not only to themselves, but to the squad in General and to the IRFU.

    A ban is not highly unlikely. Any player can be guilty of a mis-timed tackle ar any stage. There's is hundreds of tackles in any game. Its very much will be part of the discussion when the 33 is picked. Sheehan won't be selected unless he will be guaranteed to be ready for SA which seems very unlikely given he is rumoured to be seeing a specialist.


    The coaches will prepare the exact same for every game. They will not be taking Scotland lightly Just because you do. Its a test match in a world Cup, each opponent will be given full respect. Otherwise we won't have a QF


    We don't know who may or may not be injured and when. There is far too many unknowns here and the coach will try to cover as many scenarios as possible in the 33. You may not agree with that but your not a coach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,652 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Yes but if a player has a minor issue which means he misses one game will he be sent home so we end up with 4 fit hookers but only one fit/available 9 or 10.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    you're not either, for the better.

    Sheehan 6-8 weeks is yet to be seen, with a specialist today. If it's 6 max, meaning ready for Scotland on the bench, the coaching staff may be wise enough to select him in the 33.

    And yes, red is highly unlikely, as hookers more so. Sheehan had none in his career for exemple. Herring has one yellow only each season (25 games), assuming one yellow out of 2 leads to a ban, Rob is hypotetically banned in 1 game out of 50. We're taling about 4 games with (potentially) an issue

    You don't select a team based on a less than 4% statistical occurence. It's not about fan or staff. It's about balencing benifits/risks. And we disagree



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,358 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Once the tournament reaches knock out time the needs of the squad will change, if a centre or back 3 got injured in the last group match I don’t see much issue in bringing in a hooker as the makeup of what’s needed narrows as the tournament progresses



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    As I said, there's a judgement to be made. It's less likely for a half back. Though if Frawley was in the squad as a centre/full back and we lose crowley or Byrne, then it might be worth thinking about rather than bringing in someone like Carberry out of the cold. I'd be more inclined to think it happens with a 2nd or back row.

    By the time we're looking at him being ready anyway we're probably in the knockouts so it's not that many more games to manage guys for.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,652 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Sheehan is seeing a specialist, its 6 to 8 weeks but that's potentially 6 to 8 weeks of no real on feet training as its a foot injury.

    sheehan could be told today he needs surgery for all we know.


    your taking the best case scenario and marrying it to the ideal player getting injured after game 3 and every other best case you can consider because ultimately your opinion doesn't matter in the real world.


    The coaches will not in a million years share the same thoughts as you. Sheehan will only make the 33 if he is guaranteed to be fit before the SA game because anything else adds huge risks to getting out of the pool.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,652 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Yeah it just comes down to who is fit and available if we reach a QF. The coaches won't be thinking that far ahead though. For them job one is to get into the Knock out stage. Some on here think a win v Scotland is a foregone conclusion but AF won't be thinking that way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    Thats a good point.

    Barron looks solid enough. I wonder is he considered a good technical player e.g. Scrummaging, throwing and does he have a good engine?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    Most except you and your consevative views as usual think he will be in the 33 if today diagnosis is reasonably confident for Scotland game, and certainly not South Africa as a deadline



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,652 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Conservative no, living in the real world, yes, and not in a world of delusions



  • Registered Users Posts: 42 Deramore


    Ireland's referees for RWC pool games:


    v Romania - Nika Amashukeli

    v Tonga - Wayne Barnes

    v South Africa - Ben O'Keeffe

    v Scotland - Nic Berry



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,137 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    It doesn't.

    You need to give the first choice SH and backup SH game time during the first two games and you only have 1 SH playing at any point in time. Rotating 2 players over those two games makes perfect sense.

    In contrast, you have two locks and three backrows plus two spots on the bench normally if you bring an extra forward option, given the versatility of the squad (similar for a utility back). An additional player here can do far more help in allowing for rotation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,137 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I've said repeatedly that my point on SHs doesn't cover for front row as their positions that take on far more attritional in nature.

    It isn't a gamble though. I'm talking about doing it for SHs for the first two matches, where we should be able to win either match with no specialist SH on the pitch from the start if both our SHs pull up during the captains run.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,137 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    This has been my overarching point whether folks agree or disagree with my point on the SH position.

    People are looking at the initial announced squad as something that is set in stone that we're stuck with and cant change over the tournament.

    If the Irish set up is seeing it this way they're missing out on a potential advantage that it very much looks like other teams are going to use.

    To me squad management is going to be an important aspect of the tournament and given our proximity to France we should be making the most of any marginal gains we can and not limit ourselves to historic approaches.



Advertisement