Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Time to admit defeat, scrap the navy?

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    No, time to treat defence as a serious matter and fund it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭satguy


    We need, schools, new hospitals,, a really big new prison,, we need to fix our potholed roads,, we do not need navy boats, or fighter jets.

    But we do need one really big plane,, maybe a second hand C-17 or similar type craft ,, or even a civilian aircraft that was refit / repurposed for use as a military troop carrier plane.

    We should never need to beg other air forces to bring home Irish Citizens from conflict zones when things go tits up.. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭Firblog


    I'll admit I don't know alot about the navy, from a very little bit of searching online (Irish Naval Service - Wikipedia) some of the numbers make no sense to me.

    Number of personnel in the Navy: 899

    Crew size of Samuel Beckett class ship: 44

    Question when the 88 crew are at sea on the 2 active boats (if both will ever be at sea at the same time) what will the other 800 people be doing?

    I really hope the figures I've posted will turn out to be badly wrong, but have me doubts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Its really strange that we as a nation are alone in not being able to manage to do multiple things at the same time. How do so many others manage? Maybe they have no schools, or hospitals?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Because you have personnel on leave, you have people that have just come back off a patrol and deserve not to be sent out again, you have people fulfilling shore roles, you have people on career development pathways, you have people out sick, or family leave, you have people on deployment with other sections of the DF or UN/EU, you have specialist sections like the divers...

    Any military/Navy is much more than just how many people need to be on the ship/plane/vehicle etc. Even if we were at full establishment we would actually still be short personnel, as is when high skilled/high demand areas like Engineering for example are all but shattered from the Private sector headhunting, it doesn't matter if you have enough crews for 4 ships if you only have engineer watches for 2.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭satguy


    Some countries need or must have a navy,, they have large overseas territories to look after, in some cases its the leftover remnants of long gone empires.

    We Irish have no overseas territories to look after,, and No, I do not think it is our job to make sure Spanish fishing boats have the right size nets.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Not even close to reality for navies across the world (or militaries for that matter), nor the tasks that most navies conduct. But either you knew that and are trolling, or you just couldn't be bothered to educate yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭satguy


    This is a discussion forum, we are discussing the Irish Navy,, just because my views differ from yours, you bring out the "Trolling" word.

    I should flag your post,, are you really trying to shut down discussion ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I don't consider clearly inaccurate nonsense as discussion, there are over 150 navies around the world, do they all have large overseas areas? Are they all legacies over Empires? Do they all float around counting fish? So either a) you are one of the people that complain about the limitations of the NS while at the same time point blank refuse to understand how many things are left unsecured because of those limitations (due to politics), b) don't understand the roles navies across the world do, or c) have no interest in having a discussion on factual grounds, or d) elements of all of the above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭satguy


    I would be in favour of an EU defense force, where every member of the EU chips in,, and if that was to mean we give up our neutrality, I would be ok with this.

    And as part of this EU defense force, we where asked to beef up our army and navy and even air force, this is fine by me.

    But if Ireland stays Neutral,, we have no need for gun boats or fighter jets. And joining NATO should never be considered.

    Post edited by satguy on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭Firblog


    I would seriously doubt that any other navy in the world only has 10% of their personnel on active duty at sea at any one time, it is just bonkers



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,355 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    it's worth pointing out that the navy is (well, the intention is) scaled to operate 8 vessels; it's stated in the article that the shortfall seems to be in one particular critical skillset. so they very possibly have 8 nearly full crews, but minus a few people per boat who are required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,058 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    But what do we buy with this increased funding? The war in Ukraine and Nagorno-Karabakh are showing that most traditional military hardware is obsolete or going to be fast. Cheap drones and missiles can take out multi million Euro systems with ease.

    So do we spend billions on big ships, fighters and tanks to be taken out by cheap weapons or spend millions on drones and missiles to take out expensive attacking equipment?

    We aren't going to be attacking anyone so batteries of A2/D2 missiles and SAMs will be a better investment than capital ships and fighters, if the enemy can't land we don't need tanks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 256 ✭✭mupper2


    Well for one, we live on an island so ships/boats might be handy....whether loitering munitions exist or not



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Other navies tend not to let their sections get depleted to the scale we are at. If most sections are at full complement, but there’s only 33% of engineers, or electricians or chiefs (to name some noted areas the NS is short on), then the fleet isn’t going anywhere. This has been highlighted for over 5 years now as critical areas have lost personnel leaving what’s left to be burnt out trying to cover the gaps.



  • Registered Users Posts: 231 ✭✭patmahe


    I think what we need to do is look at how other small island nations with a relatively low population density protect their seas. Out of those nations who is doing it best (not necessarily most ships) and would they be willing to share their knowledge with us. Can technology play more of a role, what exactly is the purpose of our Navy? Protect in the event of war, keep drug smugglers off our coastline, all of the above?

    I mean if the US decided to invade Ireland tomorrow it won't really matter whether we have 2 ships or 22 ships, we need to decide what the Irish Navy should be and then fund it, which will take proper leadership and political will.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Maybe we should have some sort of Commission to discuss the issues, produce a series of recommendations and then enacted them…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,058 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    I'm not saying don't buy boats. But we don't need destroyers or frigates etc. Missiles on shore can protect us from invasion, then patrol boats for fishery protect. Nothing will keep drugs out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    you know what can take out drones?

    Sticks

    we have plenty of sticks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,723 ✭✭✭Feisar


    LOL the Swiss have a bigger Navy than us!

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    We've got Naval threads on here, at least two that could have covered this trolling.

    Manic please pull down the shutters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭Firblog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭Firblog


    There are many more threads on electric cars, and yet we're allowed to start new threads to discuss new events relating to them. Just because you don't like what is being asked/suggested doesn't actually mean that you're being trolled.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Apart from that, I love the basic premise of the post, the Navy is in dire straits because we as a nation won’t invest in it, let’s instead spend more on some sort of private body to do it instead…

    Cause that makes sense?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭Firblog


    Bristow signs Irish SAR contract | AirMed&Rescue (airmedandrescue.com)

    It makes sense to contract out services which the state has proven it is unsuited to incapable of delivering.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    And the point is? Oh yeah the state is spending much more on a private service than it would have “in house”. When you consider the difference between engineering officer pay in private sector or other semi state bodies for example your suggestion is going to cost several times what the NS costs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,727 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    As an island the sea is our biggest natural asset. Guarding it should be our first military priority even if that means cutting the army down.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭Firblog


    Why was the SAR put out for tender? Why do we get the private sector to carry out so many functions that the could be carried out "in house"? Because the "in house" solution has turned out to be massively expensive and sh*t so many times - and no one is ever held responsible.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭RavenP


    There are other reasons for privatisation. For a start neo-liberal governments like to transfer tax money from the tax payer to business. A good way to do that is to under fund the service you want to privatise, make reforms that make it worse and then throw up the hands and say “privatise”! The problem is, though, for certain core services,the things that are hard to put a monetary value on like saving lives or providing core infrastructure, it tends not to work out long term. Look at the U.K. to see how bad it has gone for them with everything from transport to energy. Some things should not be in the public sector, some things should not be in the private, but done by the state. The problem in Ireland is a belief that neutrality means we do not need defence, which is untrue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,903 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    It will be interesting to see what the new head of Army Design does they could recommed less managment with only a handfull bases throughout the island for the Army



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,454 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    And your solution for say preventing drug trafficking, or illegal fishing etc... would be what exactly and keep in mind that the Irish territorial waters dwarf our land mass....





  • The sooner an EU defence force is setup the better.

    The Irish Defence Forces couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery let alone workout how to defend the country no matter how much money you would throw at it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭RavenP


    The problem is not the DF, it is with the government and Department of Defence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Not going to happen. NATO is the supreme military alliance in Europe, now more than ever. The PfP is the methodology to include non NATO EU members in activities.

    The EU is all very well as a bureaucratic platform to share the economies of scale of bulk research and procurement, but it is not a military body and in the wake of the Ukraine war - and it has to be said the strong presence of the UK in the material support of Ukraine - I daresay an operational EU military command is further away than ever.

    Fisheries and piracy are one thing, warfighting is a whole different ballgame.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • I think it will happen with the EU pulling its funds and resources together. No country in the EU can fund there own equipment so will want to use EU budgets to spread the cost.

    Ireland will have ships and jets stationed here which will be directed from Brussels.

    NATO is a flip flop organisation as it depends who's in the white house.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    ? No country? So who pays for Frances nuclear force and all its costs? Oh yeah the French taxpayer. Nations do joint projects (with varying degrees of success) but that’s not even close to being a centralised EU force. I’m sure next you are going to be telling us the Germans are all going to conscript us?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • Stop crying.

    I believe at dome stage that there will be an EU Defence force funded and governed by the EU.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,454 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    All that tells us is that you don’t understand very much about the nature of the EU and more importantly the mind set of the average mainland EU citizen! Not surprising since you don’t live among the fallout of two world wars! You’ll get coordination in purchasing and administration, join missions and even possibly some joint units, but that is it. The average EU citizen will not be willing to go beyond that.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭RavenP


    i was in England a couple of years ago, I was in Bristol and my friend lived in Oxford. I wanted to get the train to visit him. It would have cost about £200 return, to do a journey not much more than Dublin to Belfast. I hope we change course soon. I don’t think FG are quite as corrupt as the British Tories, who know exactly what they are doing and know it is destroying their countries infrastructure, but do not care as long as their pals make money.I do think, however, that FG are blinded by ideology on the one hand, and like to think they are high rollers as well . Alas FF do not seem to have a strong enough counter narrative and I have little faith in SF, they are inexperienced in government, too populist and have not put enough blue water between themselves and the provos campaign .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭Firblog


    So the state cannot compete with the private sector in what they pay engineers?

    Q: Why don't they increase the pay of engineers to compete?

    A: Because every other rank will want a pay increase too - to maintain parity, couldn't have an engineer getting paid more than the captain or first officer of the ship.

    The navy isn't exactly preventing much of anything the way it is at the minute now is it? You want to spend 100's of millions on ships which will be stuck in port most of their life? There is no need for ships to patrol our waters, it's a waste of time and manpower; drones could patrol our seas much more efficiently and be used to direct fishery protection vessels to suspected illegal fishing, or direct the Gardai to where drug trafficker's are going to land.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,486 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Ukraine and Nagorno-Karabach show no such thing, as any of the professionals in the sector will tell you. Drones have merely become an additional component in all-arms warfare, both a factor in offense and for defensive consideration. They have not yet become the dominant form of combat.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,486 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    [MOD] I am not a moderator over on the EV subforum. I neither know nor care what their policies are. However, let's take this at face value, that there are a few interested, well-meaning parties taking a particular viewpoint on matters. Sparky42's position above on inaccurate premises not being discussion holds. It is quite possible that the many folks starting multiple electric car threads actually know what they're talking about in the subject matter. That does not apply given a number of the statements on this thread. Be they honestly held mistaken beliefs, or beliefs put forward for the sake of trolling, the end result is the same. If you don't like being corrected by people who know more on the subject matter than you do, then that's your concern. When it comes to the political questions of the role of the Navy, I would refer you to both the political guidance given to the defence forces, and the recent independent commission on the defence forces which have stated the framework in which the State is to best operate.

    That's not to say that there are no legitimate alternate viewpoints on how to do things. I note, for example, Iceland has a coast guard to perform the roles the Irish Naval Service tends to spend most of its time at, but it's also worth noting that as members of NATO, anything which requires a little more capability is provided by treaty. Such arguments need to be substantiated on something better than misunderstanding the tooth-to-tail ratio of a modern navy.

    I'm not going to shut down this thread (for now), but am going to insist that all parties continue in future within the political framework set out. The government has said Ireland needs a navy. The Commission on Defence Forces has said Ireland needs a navy. If posters disagree with these political decisions, or the relative allocations of funds per department from the Minister of Finance and Minister for Public Expenditure & Reform's budget, then I suggest they take it to the Politics forum. The military is an executive branch. This forum primarily exists for discussion on how best to execute political guidance.[/MOD]

    You really need to tag me so that I get the notification.







  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Just to highlight that such issues aren't unique to our Navy, one of the sites that follows the RN is pointing out that currently none of their SSNs are out on patrol and some of which (any of which costs more than the entire NS combined) haven't sailed in over a year... And yes crewing is one of the issues they face. It's not a unique problem for Western militaries at the moment, our issue is given how small the NS has always been we lack the depth that others have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭mikeym


    Nobody talking about improving pay & morale. Thats whats killing the place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Fix pay!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Pay.

    Respect for a work life balance.

    Pensions appropriate to the nature of the career.

    Opportunities to develop and progress with hard work.

    Adequate staffing appropriate to the task.

    = good morale and no problem recruiting and retaining.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement