Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1675676678680681808

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    The UK is a country with relatively low wages for people who work with their hands , tradesmen in America , Canada and especially Australia would be on more than in Ireland, the UK is an outlier



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    They could easily buy in the modular parts and construct them but the majority of the profit will be in the fabrication of the materials as the construction of these parts are relatively easy to do as I have said there are lots of examples of these modular homes being built in the factory and lifted to the site ergo no need for any specialist construction expert the only bit part would be pouring a concreate base for them to sit on and attaching utilities and no need to pay out for building walls, floors, ceilings etc- They could make hay in that space but lets be honest it will come no where near the profits on what they are currently getting for their bricks and mortar builds. You need to famiiarise yourself with modular homes pal.

    If modular homes were the desired solution for our current lack of supply issue with regards to housing those on welfare, those not being able to afford the current price point and refugees coming into the country it would take a lot the current construction companies pipeline away and it would allow for supply to tick back up and actually take the heat out of our property market so while I agree that they create different things, the things that both create would be competing for people who currently have no roof over their head.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    A developer only makes profit on the sale of a property. What has profit of making/supplying materials got to do with it?

    And how would they make more money selling brick & mortar homes compared to modular, if modular is cheaper to actually build (according to you)?

    If they reduce their build cost, but keep their sale price the same, they make more profit not less. This is really basic stuff here, that you struggle with it speaks volumes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Your cracking on about them buying in the individual pieces of modular homes and constructing them as a business model and in your opinion that they would make more profit on doing this than continuing with their current bricks and mortars offerings. Which is ludicrous as the construction implementation for these modular homes needs no where near the expertise/expense needed for building a traditional house/dwelling. Your negating the fact that most of the construction is already done in the factory so not much construction needed (if any) So their room to make profits on construction of modular homes via the model you outlined is not really there they could create their own factories and start making modular homes themselves but this would be a move away from what they traditionally do sure if they are doing that why not go into making pizzas or an other sector that could be more profitable as if they are just selling modular homes that have been premade they are just glorified estate agents selling a property? What is an EAs profit margin 1%?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    What is appropriate? If11% was fine in 21 why does it need to double in 2023

    Not only has it doubled on percentage terms if all the inputs have increased substantially the doubling of margin is far greater in monetary terms.

    Add in the fact that you have one dominant buyer, should this not lead to a discount of some kind.

    Taxpayer is being fleeced and in the process there own housing costs are being increased substantially



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Increased profit doesn’t mean they have increased their margins it could just mean an increase in turnover which based on your previous post would make sense. (I.e. they are building more for the same margins)



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Then why are they paying corporation tax on it and more to the point why are they paying 15.3% more corpo tax on it than the year prviously? One thing we do know is companies have several ways of limiting their exposure on paying tax. So I am sorry but it does point to an increase in profits there is no other explanation, I couldnt give a crap about their margins, they are taking 15.3% more home in their back pockets than last year and then lobby our government saying they are all in the poor house



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Increase in profits yes due to doing more business but it doesn’t point to an increase in profit margins like you previously claimed is happening



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    I said profits I never said anything about their profit margins. Having said that look at it this way ask the question has construction activity increased significantly in the last year according to constructions PMIs and Outputs they have not its the opposite we are in a contraction for construction so margins be damned they would need to be building a hell of a lot more dwellings for the numbers to match and for your argument to hold true and according to both the construction outputs and PMIs this is not happening construction for 10 of the last 12 months is contracting and construction outputs form Q1 of 2023 is down over 2% from Q1 2022 and yet they are making more profit the numbers don't correlate

    https://tradingeconomics.com/ireland/construction-pmi

    https://tradingeconomics.com/ireland/construction-output



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The developers "room to make profits" is by bringing finished houses to market and selling them for more than the cost to build and finance.

    It doesn't matter how easy or difficult or skilled the builders must be, that only affects build cost, it does not affect sale price.

    Sale prices are determined by market forces of supply and demand - right now demand way outstrips supply so even an easier built modular home would sell for same as "bricks and mortar" if they were of similar spec. If modular homes were cheaper to build and could be supplied then they would be far more profitable for a developer. If you cant comprehend this well then ill leave it with you because I've wasted enough time explaining the basics of what a developer actually does for you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The 11% in 2021 was based on apartments

    The 22% is likely based more on houses sold. In our current supply constrained environment there is always more money to be made selling houses than apartments, as houses are

    1) cheaper to build and

    2) sell for more than apartments.

    Item 2 will always be the case, but #1 is a sign if serious dysfunction in this country that apartment building costs so much more per unit even after land costs are considered. Apartment building should scale such that price per unit reduces as you build up (to a certain height), that scale doesn't appear to exist in ireland like it does everywhere else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Your argument keeps changing Corporation tax that is assessed on prior years profits and not on what is happening now.

    Your previous comments about price gouging by developers indicates that you believe they have increased profit margins and are now price gouging the public. Building more for the same profit margins would not be what I consider price gouging.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Which is why I am arguing that the government should be all over this and ramping up and where there is demand using a model "build not for profit" for people who cannot afford a house, who are on welfare and who are coming in from war torn countries etc. Why should we pay X + the current greedy developers margin when we don't have too and what's to stop these companies creating the modular homes from finishing it off themselves and going directly to the EA what value add is the developer actually bringing in to the equation for their slice of the pie?

    I have agreed that they could start their own modular home business and make a profit but its completely different to what they have been doing and my argument holds why not just go do something else that is more profitable if you going to completely change the way your working and trying to make it look like I don't understand what your talking about is just a side show for your own lack of understanding



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    These apartment blocks in castletroy also going to the council via cluid.

    Lots of employees in national technology park (adjacent to apartments) struggling to find accomodation and commuting long distances.

    I hope those people are considered/prioritised for these apartments




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If its Cluid then none of those employees have a hope.

    To be honest from experience dealing with cluid and their antisocial tenants are a nightmare, cant imagine many of those working adjacent would want to live there too much now if its a cluid owned building.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The article is from April of this year 2023 construction outputs and PMIs have not been good over 2% decrease in construction activity. I mean the PMIs fell off a cliff back during the first 2 quarters of 2021 it rallied to a high point in August of 2021 and since then it has seen a gradual bumpy decline with 10 of the last 12 months seeing it construction declining. According to Construction Network Ireland we seen a 4.7% contraction in construction in 2021 ( so thats 4.7% in 2021 and then in 2022 just over 2% contraction) so once again we are seeing less construction activity year on year for the last 2 years and in 2022 we see a 15.3% profit. So the numbers still do not add up. Pick a year 2020 > 2021 > 2022 > 2023 with regards to construction outputs and PMIs. So they are not building more they are building less and taking home more profit which for me is gouging


    https://www.constructionnetworkireland.com/ireland-construction-market-size-trends-and-forecasts-2022-2026/



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    That is my motto now :)

    ANd then you have people wondering why i decided to retire 2 decades before im supposed to. Better being a tax taker at this point in my life than a tax payer. Pretty sure im not the only one. Ive taken it to the extreme and gone on the scratch, but I know lots and lots of people who just arent bothered doing overtime when asked anymore.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,856 ✭✭✭growleaves


    If you make the market more attractive for developers they will pocket the difference and then claim they still are barely in profit.

    They will never not view the State and the buying public as counterparties to be out-negotiated.

    I agree with poster above that the figures can't be taken at face value. 500k to build an apartment? Those are scam numbers.

    However I don't think you're necessarily wrong about reducing some costs and regulations. Its just that developers will never turn around and say "We have enough concessions now, we don't need any more" so someone else will have to a draw a line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,438 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Apts are for sale in Belfast for 125 - 150k GBP.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Is the decline in total construction or just housing? Because I suspect it’s agricultural and office space where construction has decreased with housing increasing.

    it doesn’t mean an increase in margins (or gouging as you put it. It just means that there is a different mix of construction that have different profit margins.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,438 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Thats my point also.

    The bottom 30% of earners are given social housing by the state and the top 30% can afford it themselves.

    But the middle 40% get stuck living at home with parents into their 40s or house sharing. And they are contributing more in tax than the bottom 30% whom have been housed by the state.

    The middle group are not on any housing list, so the govt doesnt care about them.

    Social housing should include house share tenancies also. If its good enough for working folks, its good enough for everyone.

    It would also reduce the waiting lists, faster.



  • Registered Users Posts: 893 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    "Cost-based" rental may be of help for this middle group. This is where a housing association buys a property but calculates rent on the basis of cost rather than either subsidy, in the case of social housing, or profit, in the case of private rentals. Although more expensive than traditional social housing, the accommodation is at least secure because it is not owned by a private landlord and, as previously mentioned, it is cheaper than inflated private rents.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    its in all construction activity it really does not matter these boyos in this sector are screaming like they are being raped and yet they made 15.3% more of a profit in 2022 over 2021 and that with construction outputs being less in that time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,438 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If the govt were really serious about solving the housing crisis, it could change planning legislation to develop modular homes at scale, and quickly.

    Then invest in companies with skill and experience to build the homes and fund the build entirely with govt money.

    Bring the homes to market as mixed developments.

    Some homes for sale, some social to rent, some part ownership etc. So we dont create another Ballymun and we continue to encourage mixed developments.

    The rest of the construction industry could then refocus on building private developments only, with part 5 included, and then watch the house prices come down as the Govt is no longer suspending the floor of the market through excessive social housing provision.

    Its the prices coming down part that makes me think the above approach will never happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 893 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Modular homes in Cork.

    Seem quite nice inside.

    At the moment only for Ukrainians but possibly could be extended to Irish in future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    What is the "cost" in cost rental?

    The term is everywhere but never with an explanation of which cost its based on. Is it the capital cost? Maintenance cost? Finance cost? Etc

    All would lead to wildly different levels of rent.

    If its capital cost of the house then you are basically paying a mortgage but getting 0, same as in private sector.

    If its cost of maintenance then its arguably worse than social housing which is means tested % of your income as rent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Was it 4k per month for a specific development in Dublin posted here



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,490 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The only modular home I have ever seen arrive and only need connection to utilities is a mobile home.

    Any modular houses will come in sections and need wiring, plumbing and general second fixing. There was a no way you will bring you average semi D's in one piece onto a site. Go down to any Steeltech sales location and they have modular homes there. Have a look at them.

    It's a bit more complicated that laying a slab. You will need roadways, footpaths, gardens etc. You can get a Steeltech house 90 sq M build for sub 40k however you have to wire plumb, slab, second fix and fit it out. You need a site and utilities.


    The Key word you are missing is ''Modular'' the houses come in panels that are bolted together similar to Timber frame but a water proof slab is put on the outside. You cannot do anything structural to these houses or modify them in any way and any extensions will have to be a completely separate unit with a hall to integrate them.

    Now these houses are 45 sqM and are considered suitable for four people????? That is 500 sq feet. It's about half the size of your average semi-D. There is a lot of debate about apartment size in Ireland and 45 sqM are about the smallest of them and they are one bedroom. Most two bedroom are 60-65sqM minimum and a lot are 70+.

    Read through the article. 2 bed rooms one with Bunk beds. Common living dining area.....no hallway as an entrance. One bathroom, I say no storage.....at least with a mobile home you could shove stuff underneath it.

    Now I believe the Ukrainians will mind and look after them. Put the great unwashed in them and the housing agency will be out replacing windows and wall panels every week.

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats how it works in other places like Singapore or Vienna with far more functional housing markets than Ireland. In Vienna over 60% of the population lives in social housing. When it reaches a high % like that it does great things

    • Ensures theres no social stigma about social housing
    • Means reasonably priced social housing of a good quality is an option for everyone, not just long term dole people
    • Lets the government ensure good income balances in the social housing, so again its not just long term dole people which can result in ghettoisation
    • Creates much more political support for social housing because its now actually of benefit to most of society, not just the poorest 5-10%

    etc

    Its both much fairer for society (everyone, including tax payers, have the option of social housing within a year or two if they want it) and obviously works much better as a system. Anyone who wants nicer, fancier, private housing is still free to rent/buy it, too - its not mandatory.



Advertisement