Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Spain - Women World Cup Champions - 1 week later. (How not to manage a crises)

1141517192028

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal



    You are proving my point for me. You are using hyper emotive language in a case you clearly know very little about.

    So it impossible to have a rational discussion based on reality and facts with someone who clearly doesn't want to.

    broken irony meter.

    “So you took what was a thoughtful and honest post and boiled it down to basically you 'daft naïve lass'.

    That is militant feminism in a nutshell.”

    “Epic cowardice”

    etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Lacks context. Dishonest and low grade posting.

    👎️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    The context is hyperlinked to; what are you trying to pull

    people in glass houses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Original posts not included, no context.

    Again dishonest.

    Please stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,768 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    The findings of the Greenwood case were fraught with having a bad reaction from the squad and manu supporters as all that is still publicly available is that leaked audio and the photo of his partner looking beat up. Manu have some further evidence as did the prosecution services but we don't get to see that so there is nothing in the public sphere that is powerful enough to repair Greenwood's tarnished image.

    I wonder why Vilda didn't quit already when all his staff quit and every available player said they would refuse to play under Rubiales. I would presume the staff will be rehired when Rubiales is eventually sacked.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,809 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Hermoso joining the prosecution is a strawman piece. The issue isn't whether the unwanted kiss amounted to sexual assault or not. The bigger issues are what happened afterwards, the attempts to coerce a joint statement, the declaration that she consented when she said she did not, the threats to sue and more, the attempts to portray her immediate reactions as implied consent etc. etc. Those things are symptomatic of a misogynist culture pervading the Spanish FA. Firing the President and the coach should only be the start of what happens.

    Going back to the kiss, at the very least it was sexual harrassment, which is an employment matter (hence the FIFA intervention) not necessarily a criminal one. A decision not to proceed with a criminal case is not an absolution for Rubiales. In fact, if Hermoso declines to join the prosecution because of the mental strain imposed on her by the way that he has responded, that would be another black mark against him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The issue isn't whether the unwanted kiss amounted to sexual assault or not.

    I imagine it is an issue for Rubiales to be fair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The book club the next chapter?

    You really do need to stop now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Why would Vilda quit?

    That would be a monumentally stupid thing to do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I don’t need to stop, if you want context click the link to the quotes? You said these things so you already know the context, it’s from recently in this thread.

    I would however suggest you stop throwing stones from a glass house at people regarding your own “hyper emotive language”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,809 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is probably an issue for him insofar as him wanting to stay out of jail, but insofar as him wanting to stay in his job, he has an awful lot of bigger issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    He hasn't a hope in staying in his job whatever facts emerge in the coming days, weeks, months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,768 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    When his whole staff quit from under him he had to make a decision. Continue to stay on and thus support Rubiales or quit in solidarity with his staff. By not quitting and then publicly going against Rubiales he tried to play both sides but that doesn't seem to be working out well for him.

    On the question of stupidity, do you think Rubiales has acted monumentally stupid this week?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,614 ✭✭✭Augme



    Can you show me where in employment law that it is an employer job to investigate and make a criminal determination?

    Post edited by Augme on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    When his whole staff quit from under him he had to make a decision. Continue to stay on and thus support Rubiales or quit in solidarity with his staff. By not quitting and then publicly going against Rubiales he tried to play both sides but that doesn't seem to be working out well for him.

    Hang on, I thought peoples perception of events were allowed change or evolve on reflection?

    I can show you a video of a whole bus full of people who did just that.

    Vilda doesn't get that benefit? Interesting.

    No actual player has quit, they are on strike. Maybe if Vilda says he will go on strike too?

    On the question of stupidity, do you think Rubiales has acted monumentally stupid this week?

    Once the Spanish Government Ministers started calling for criminal proceedings the whole even firmly entered clown town and has not returned.

    Interestingly UEFA have been the only measured authority through out all this, asking for due process.

    I wonder what they know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,809 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Most employment contracts provide for disciplinary action in situations whereby there has been gross misconduct. Situations of gross misconduct include bringing the reputation of the organisation into serious disrepute. Rubiales and Greenwood can both certainly be accused of that and employers have a duty and responsibility to investigate the facts and make a determination.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Huh?

    What employee made a criminal determination?

    Criminal liability are made by the courts (and online mobs), the decision to prosecute in England is made by the Crown Prosecution Service.

    The CPS in this case dropped all charges. Therefore no criminal liability exists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,614 ✭✭✭Augme



    I know that. But the question they need to investigate is whether the employer committed gross misconduct or brought the organisation into serious disrepute. An employer isn't responsible, nor needs to, make a determination of a criminal nature. Employees who have been found not guilty can still be sacked for gross misconduct.


    The fact is, it is not a employers job to make a criminal determination on a case. United decided to do so in this case that involved a very talented football player who they really wanted to keep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,614 ✭✭✭Augme



    Sorry, that should read employer. United made the determination that Greenwood didn't commit that acts, which is ludicrous, given they are not at all impartial.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,768 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    If his view evolved,he should have quit. He looks stupid now presiding over a team with no staff and no players.

    You make sure never to criticise Rubiales, even when nearly everyone of his supporters has deserted him for his stupid antics this week. I will stop asking you for an honest assessment of his actions as I can see now there is no occasion where you think he has done anything wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    There is no criminal liability. Repeating it won't make it so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭crusd


    Once there was no conviction they were always going to be left with obligation to pay the remainder of the contract. If the statement could have been interpreted as judging there was a case case for Greenwood to answer, it could have been interpreted as impacting potential future earning. Would be pretty sure there is an agreement in place between United and Greenwoods over the wording of Uniteds statement designed to enable a path to employment at a future club.

    There were lots of reports than United should be encouraged to donate any fee to women's charities. United have not said they would though. It looks more likely any transfer will be a loan, which of course would involve the club taking him paying much if not all of is wages, saving United money



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    You can see even from this thread alone why he wants it to go to a proper court instead of the kangaroo court that is the internet.

    At this point if he resigns the rest of his life he is going to presumed guilty of all sorts of shenanigans. At least if he gets it into the court room proper evidence of his misdeeds and accurate reports of what he said she said etc have to come out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,614 ✭✭✭Augme



    No one said there is criminal liability. We are discussing why United made a determination that based on their investigation Greenwood did not commit the criminal acts he had been accused of. That isn't the role of an employer and has never been the role of an employer in employment law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,809 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    How many times does it have to be said that the issue that Rubiales faces is not one of a criminal nature.

    Sexual harrassment is not necessarily a crime, threatening to sue an accuser is not necessarily a crime, claiming that a woman consented when she said she did not is not necessarily a crime (if it is was, rape convictions would be at 100% rather than 1%), clutching your crotch in public is not necessarily a crime, etc.

    If this gets as far as a courtroom, Rubiales is doomed, but he is doomed regardless because his actions are those of a clownish, misogynistic, bullying buffoon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    If you want him out of his job your are going to have to go the legal route. He is making sure of that. Actually, he is doomed if it doesnt go the legal route. Going the legal route will expose the total overblown drama stirrers around this once and for all. Its a typical internet mob situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles



    Would be pretty sure there is an agreement in place between United and Greenwoods over the wording of Uniteds statement designed to enable a path to employment at a future club.

    Well yeah, they said it in their statement that will actively help him find a new club and keep supporting his family.

    So far no one has came in with a concrete offer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Court was aways the best place for this case. Especially when seen by tens of millions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,221 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Again, United don't make "criminal determinations".

    That's a courts remit.

    United as a employer had to determine if he committed gross misconduct. Or whatever the equivalent wording would be contained in his contract.

    They determined he didn't.

    How do you suppose they determine that unless they investigate it?

    Or do you think there should have been no club enquiry and he should just been reinstated immediately after the CPS dropped the charges?



Advertisement