Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

Options
1301302304306307343

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,401 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It's a talking shop where people who already wrote submissions can read them aloud in a room with ABP, Irish Rail and the design consultants. The purpose is to make the people who made a submission feel like they've been listened to.

    If they still feel they have a grievance they can pay for a judicial review. It seems like there's only really one objector who has the funds and inclination to do so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,313 ✭✭✭pigtown


    Who's that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,401 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    A large land owner near Maynooth where the depot is to be located.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Will Dart+ do anything to increase train throughput via the central section of track, specifically the loop line bridge? There's nothing rapid about trains crawling between Clontarf Road and GCD. How does Irish Rail manage to slow down traffic so drastically along a stretch that, by the end of this project, will have had multiple signaling/infrastructure upgrades in the preceding years while other cities across the continent manage to get trains through much busier sections of track at much greater speeds?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,889 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    the Dart in general is slow as hell even on sections that aren't particularly congested. Goes between stations slowly and then dawdles at platforms for way longer than necessary. massive variation between different drivers as well in my experience. Time has no meaning for Irish Rail.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 378 ✭✭Ireland trains


    Sure didn’t the introduction of the 10min DART add nearly 10 minuets to the journey from Connolly to Greytones, essentially cancelling out time savings from a shorter waiting time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,690 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well I think that it’s probably more accurate to say that the running times being used previously were just wrong, and were updated to reality.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,831 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    As far as I'm aware (and I'm open to correction here), the improvements to through-put over the LLB happened under the City Centre Resignaling project. DART+ may help further but I think this will be more through addressing issues at other locations, "greasing the wheels" on approach.

    The other cities across the continent you refer to have likely separated different types of services and don't have long distance diesel trains running across a two track bridge in the city centre which is also trying to accommodate high frequency, electric trains. DART+ obviously doesn't address this issue either. Another connection between the various lines is required, a tunnelled solution will be required eventually (and no the PPT is not an alternative).



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    It should be addressed to a large degree ...so only time will tell if it means faster through-services. Most of what's currently running across LLB that isn't dart are diesel services that will become dart. There'll actually be no intercity services left crossing LLB apart from Rosslare services, of which there's what... 4 of those a day?

    Post edited by AngryLips on


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,680 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Could we not terminate those Rosslare services at GCD? After all, if passengers from Maynooth have to use Spencer Dock.....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,690 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The trains have to be serviced / swapped at Connolly.

    Why should Intercity passengers who are paying higher fares lose out?

    One path an hour in either direction isn’t going to cause that big an issue (assuming frequency increases).



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,804 ✭✭✭thomasj


    They won't have to use Spencer dock ...

    From what I was reading half of Maynooth services will go to Spencer dock , half will go to Bray.

    Similar to the Docklands when m3 parkway line opened , Irish rail had to keep saying connolly services would remain



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Lose out how? GCD is easier / quicker to get to from city centre than Heuston. Not sure what difference it would make to most passengers.

    Most European cities have intercity trains departing from different terminus, which can work fine if there are quick/easy connections with the city rail network (which there is to GCD).

    Also no reason why trains can't be cleaned / serviced between GCD and Pearse? Are there not some facilities there already? Maybe not...



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Does anyone know a realistic timeline on Ballyfermot Dart+ SW station?

    Will it happen in parallel to Dart+SW or after?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,680 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That could work.

    I don't understand why the tens of people travelling from Rosslare should be prioritised over the thousands commuting from Maynooth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Grand Canal Dock cannot be used to terminate trains from the southside, it only works for trains approaching from the northside

    There are no facilities to clean or fuel trains at Pearse or Grand Canal Dock and if you get that far there is no capacity problem continuing to Connolly

    Changes are a pain, you are looking at losing 25% of potential passengers with each change, changes add time and make the service look less attractive



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,627 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Only six train a day to Wexford, Even assuming it doubled in the coming years. the extra blockage on the line to get it from GCD to Connolly is minimal.

    As others mentioned, the platform/track setup only currently supports south bound train terminations. There is no "facilities" to fuel/clear the trains. and no sidings for them to wait, and no room for same.

    If we had to terminate the Wexford trains before the LLB, then they should not have filled in the extra platforms in Pearse.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    At least the first service could terminate at Bray, with across platform change to a waiting Dart. If it then returned to Rosslare or Wexford, the first train arriving at Wexford would arrive in the morning - at about 10 am instead of 12:15.

    The Northbound Dart connection could also have limited stopping since the IC train does that anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    So effectively, what we're saying is that diesel services is not what's causing the delays along loop-line bridge? So what's the implication? That it's not possible to achieve faster speeds through the city centre under any circumstances? I find that hard to believe. The best way to maintain a reliable service is with excessive padding in the timetable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭Consonata


    That the LLB has speed restrictions and it being only double track does make this believable to be honest.

    We want the the LLB to be all things to all people, a reasonable frequent (>10min) metro tier service for folk coming from Maynooth and Malahide to Bray/Greystones, whilst also squishing in intercity services. Its the same issue with the arguments surrounding DU, where folk want it to be a Metro and a heavy rail inter city connection. It is very hard for it to be both on a dual track line.

    If we want to retain and make competitive commuting from Wick/Wex to Dublin, there needs to be more capacity than a dual track can probably offer. (Honestly a further argument that Metrolink should've been designed with the ability to extend to Bray)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 378 ✭✭Ireland trains


    But a semi-fast DART wouldn’t be any faster than other services, so it would be as well of serving all stations.

    separately is there any word on when dart costal south will go to consultation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,319 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I've always felt as part of an integrated Dart and rail network, Metrolink should eventually join the Dart line around Shankill. It would open up a new corrider of passengers, east of n11 through Ballybrack, Loughlinstown, Cabinteely and onto towards Foxrock and Sandyford.

    Essentially linking the whole system together. Because really through Dart+ its a stepping stone in the right direction.

    Ps. Still keeping Sandyford to Fassaroe/Bray as Luas line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    But dart plus means that the LLB won't be used for intercity services so much anymore apart from a small handful of services to Wexford.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Metrolink will never be able to seamlessly integrate with the existing DART network as it is a fully automated system that will likely be on a different track gauge.

    The best they could do in terms of linking to the dart at Shankill/Bray would be a station interchange.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    “If we want to retain and make competitive commuting from Wick/Wex to Dublin, there needs to be more capacity than a dual track can probably offer.”

    We absolutely do NOT want people commuting into Dublin from Wexford! It is too far for commuting, sure some mad people might do it, but it certainly isn’t something we would want to encourage.

    Wicklow, sure, it is roughly just on the edge of commuting distance. Battery DART+ trains might be able to serve as far as Wicklow, which would then allow those to cross the LLB.

    Ideally if they can fit both the 10 minute darts and the Rosslare service across the LLB, then great, but if it turns out it is too much for it, then we absolutely need to be prioritising the DART+ service (including potentially to Wicklow) over the Rosslare train.

    Make the changes to GCD to be able to terminate Rosslare trains there. It really wouldn’t be a big deal, specially if Wicklow gets DART+, then you are only talking about true intercity passengers and GCD is still much more central then Heuston.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    If the IC Wexford trains or Commuter diesels are no quicker than Darts that stop at all stations, why do these trains not stop at Blackrock, Sydney Parade, Lansdowne, and GCD?

    I am only suggesting that the first Wexford train returns from Bray to give Wexford a train that arrives in the morning. There are few enough trains serving Wexford - nearly as good as none at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Reopening the short section between Rosslare and Waterford could provide an alternative to Rosslare-Connolly. Trains could still run from Rosslare to Bray.

    The intention with the AIRR is to improve speed along the mainlines, which could make Wexford-Dublin via Waterford a realistic alternative.



  • Registered Users Posts: 378 ✭✭Ireland trains


    I’m guessing as their diesel traction with slower acceleration would clog up dart services, although some call at extra stations at peak times.



  • Registered Users Posts: 378 ✭✭Ireland trains


    Greystones or Bray would probably be better than GCD for Rosslare trains at off peak hours. But you can’t just say Wexford, Gorey, Arklow etc shouldn’t have commuter services because they’re too far when the likes of Thurles and Athlone have many people commuting to Dublin. Yes it’s bad planning, but we just have to live with it



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    No we don’t, we shouldn’t be prioritising investments in infrastructure for that sort of commuting. It is simply bad planning.



Advertisement