Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
18978989009029031190

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    As a Leinster fan I would start Aki over Henshaw. As I’m sure many others would. But I can see past blue jerseys, so maybe that’s just me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,477 ✭✭✭This is it


    Same, Aki/Ringrose is our best partnership at 12/13 IMO.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It’s meant to put some perspective on what is a runaway hype train at the moment.

    The reality is the vast, vast majority of posters in the pro-Crowley camp are arguing for him to be ahead of Ross Byrne. They're not arguing for him to be ahead of prime-Dan Carter, here, or Sexton for that matter.

    In that context, imo your claims of a "runaway hype train" are more hyperbolic than the posts you're deigning to criticise.

    The argument for Crowley to be ahead of RB is a perfectly credible one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,507 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Form can be so illusive, Aki has been playing a blinder while Henshaw has not shown much of the elite stuff he’s been known for over the last 5 years.

    On Crowley, this discussion over the Frawley kick that opened the door for him is totally off putting. You say say the same thing about almost every single player who benefited from someone else’s injury or Lois of form. (Sexton/Contepomi…sexton was an old man to be getting his shot by then, in another team a younger player might have already pushed him aside, he’s just lucky…)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    There is a perfectly cogent argument for Crowley to be ahead of Byrne but ultimately its a bit of a toss-up. Crowley is far more likely to improve than Byrne at the things he is missing, but it's still a toss up for now.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Yep, there's a credible argument for RB too.

    My point is, favouring Crowley does not make it a "runaway hype train".



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    What kind of nonsense is this!? You made it provincial and yet you’re calling someone else out for doing so. Podge made a valid point about JGP without mentioning anyone else and you replied with something about Munster players.

    This is exactly the sort of behaviour that is turning this place into a dumpster fire. People arguing in bad faith, being incredibly parochial and then pointing the finger at others for doing (or in this case not doing) the same thing. Clsmooth very much didn’t turn this into provincial crap. You did.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,137 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    You note a 'pro-Crowley camp' as if there is a faction here that is anti-Crowley. That mindset is so telling regarding actions on this thread.

    No one has been anti-Crowley - a few posters have just raised a couple questions or potential areas he can improve.

    The 'pro-Crowley camp are arguing' against attacks that are exaggerated or totally imagined in their minds.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Not at all what I meant.

    I merely meant “pro-Crowley” to differentiate those who favour Crowley over Byrne for the 22 jersey, since only one of them is likely to be selected.

    For clarity, I’m not at all saying there’s an anti-Crowley faction here, any more than there’s an anti-RB faction.

    Happy to clarify that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,420 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I agree with all of those points tbh. I don't think Farrell is gonna drop JGP if he's fit and available. I think he values the cohesion of having the scrum half who is most familiar with Sexton and that's Park

    If Sexton gets injured, then Murray or Casey would be better if Crowley was the starting 10.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I think he values the cohesion of having the scrum half who is most familiar with Sexton and that's Park

    Right. Because Murray and Sexton don't have cohesion...

    The only reason a Leinster player can be selected is because of "cohesion". Not because the coaches just rate him higher or because the team functions better with him. I don't have the figures but I'd say there's a good chance Sexton has actually started more games of rugby with Murray than he has with JGP.

    Also, "cohesion". A good old TRK buzzword



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Well judging by the teams they put out in the respective competitions last season, I'd say Leinster, rightly or wrongly, value being in a Champions Cup final far higher than winning the URC.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    It’s as well that nobody said it did. And this kind of conflation has been rampant (not just by pro-Crowley supporters) and is a massive issue that is just not being dealt with. It’s almost impossible to come in here any more and just have a reasonable, rational discussion. And this post does clearly show that. Taking something saying one thing and turning it into something else entirely. And then people wonder why rows break out.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    These are 2 posts straight from you, molloy. What exactly did you mean then?

    And I don’t want this to sound like I’m running [Crowley] down. That’s not what I’m trying to do. But the hype machine is in serious overdrive here

    That’s not meant to demean [Crowley] in any way. It’s meant to put some perspective on what is a runaway hype train at the moment. 



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    What I said. That I have seen some crazy posts about Crowley and some mental gymnastics about his season that are hyping him up beyond where he should be hyped. That is not the same thing as saying that if you like Crowley you’re going overboard. It’s that some people who do are, not all. If that’s what I wanted to say I’d have just said it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Could you give examples then? Cos I'm not seeing them to the extent or volume that would justify calling it a "runaway hype train".



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,105 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    There is a post a few pages back, I don't have a photographic memory so this is probably paraphrasing, but it said something along the lines of "there is no more he can do to prove himself at club level".

    This about an outhalf who has never started a game at 10 in Europe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,316 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I did no such thing. Can a Munster fan not mention a Munster player without being accused of provincialism? There's some pearl clutching going on here the last few days.

    Podge was talking up JGP, is he now to be accused of the same thing?

    He made the point that player who brings high tempo to the game often has a few errors, something I agree with and I replied with two more players who brings tempo but are often accused of having errors.

    Things are getting ridiculous here at the moment and the selective outrage at provincialism from a few posters isn't helping.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,239 ✭✭✭sprucemoose




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And that's a fair enough point. But it's 1 poster. I'm not seeing the swell of posters that I think would justify calling it a "hype train in overdrive".

    The vast majority are calling for him to be ahead of RB, not Sexton.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I see where @phog is coming from tbh.

    The main concerns voiced around Crowley is that he is impulsive and risks turning over the ball (voiced by myself among others). But nowhere (that I can recall) did anyone offer the reward side of that argument, i.e., that it's a risk you take to play at a higher tempo.

    So if you're going to qualify any similar criticism of JGP (essentially weighing up risk and reward, and not just risk), it's only fair you do the same for Crowley.

    Which for me brings it back to the current state we're in at backup 10, i.e., that it's possibly a horses-for-courses decision, as opposed to one guy being ahead outright. If we can manage the risk, we seek the reward (Crowley). If we can't, we play it safe (Byrne).



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,105 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    Are you really trying to pretend you're not the most rabid and uber-sensitive Munster fan on the forum? Really?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,105 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    Ask for example

    Get example

    Dismiss example as just an example


    Shrug



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,507 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Well put. I can see the coaches favouring RB or Crowley depending on the opposition and the style of game they want to play or expect the opposition to play, it's pretty similar to the Murray/Casey scenario where marginally different skill sets are appropriate given different circumstances. Obviously once we get into the comp this might clarify into clear 2nd and 3rd choices, or (say it ain't so) Sexton goes down and they have to choose unambiguously.

    The provincial stuff and arguments about the provincial stuff is very tiresome and a drain on this place. Hopefully once the lead starts to fly on the field it will take a back seat.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10 electricrover88


    Rooks lack ngl



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think you'll find I asked for examples.

    Because one example does not a "hype-train in overdrive" make.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Honestly, I’ve no interest in going back and picking out things to go “look what this poster said, look what that poster said”. That’s hardly helping matters. I mentioned examples in the post you quoted (where you ignored them). It’s clear the standard of posting here has gone down the toilet, and been allowed to.

    Maybe I’m crankier about some of this stuff as a result but this used to be a worthwhile place for discussion. Now it’s a forum for hyperbole, provincialism and people taking the piss with their behaviour. And then posters who try to post in good faith end up on the receiving end of crap. It’s maddening, because almost all of us here are adults. We should be capable of more.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    You are great at searching posts. Maybe dig up the ones saying Crowley should be starting ahead of Sexton. That might be the hype Train being referred to?



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,122 ✭✭✭fitz


    I like Crowley, I think he'll overtake Byrne, but he's a young player with a much smaller sample set of starts at 10 than Byrne. Saying he's ahead of Byrne is to overemphasize the weight that should be given to much smaller number of performances and scenarios that he can be judged on. I don't necessarily disagree that his clear talent is worth the risk of that tradeoff, but his inexperience is blatantly a risk. The willingness to just ignore that though is absolutely hype-train-esque.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Are people simply misreading posts that said Crowley will probably take over Sexton at 10 after the RWC, as in, after Sexton retires.

    Is... all this one massive misunderstanding?



Advertisement