Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Athlone thread

15355575859

Comments

  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Thats the problem with building a road that is specifically designed to take agri traffic out of the town, you can't do that with a 120k motorway.

    To be fair to the residents who live along the road, there is a horrific racket from it all day every day. I don't know if I could live by it myself



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    The bypass wasn't "specifically designed to take agri traffic out of the town". It was built to take traffic out of town who had no need to be in town going from A to B. No investment such as that bypass is sanctioned to take a few tractors away. The reason it remains at 100km/h despite the motorway being built is due to the many junctions, some of which are on bends (Garrycastle, Monksland) when heading west. The right thing to do when the motorway was being built is build again around Athlone and maintain 120km/h. The cost was prohibitive



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Sorry, bad phrasing on my part. It would be better to say it was never classed as a Motorway to ensure agri traffic could use it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Once your going 50km/h, which a huge amount of agri stuff are well capable of, you can use the motorway. The reason was primarily safety at the junctions and vehicles motoring at 120km/h. The road itself, due to the safety could never be designated as a motorway and remains a grade-separated dual carriageway, which has a maximum speed of 100km/h designated to such road types. The only way to get the bypass up to motorway standard and speed is huge investment on it. May be cheaper to build a southern bypass of the town and link into the M6 both sides of Athlone.

    Nevertheless, reducing speed to 80km/h on it seems mental



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    I'm pretty sure the folks living beside it would disagree

    Besides, the difference is a grand total of about 1 min 10 seconds of additional time if dropping from 100 to 80k over the roughly 8km length (4 mins 50 seconds to 6 mins)

    Not a big deal considering the improvement in quality of life for the residents close by



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Personally don't have much sympathy for the residents. Better insulated windows would help. Sow some trees and plants in their gardens to "block" the noise plus the barriers along the residential parts of the road would also help. Even going by the article these reduce noise by ~9 decibels vs. 1.7 for reducing the speed and discommoding the ~35k daily users of the road



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Not sure your opinion (or my own) matters too much. The survey showed the sound limits exceeded the tolerances so it has to be addressed. Only decisions to be made are what options are chosen with the speed limit reduction being one. Whatever is chosen will have to be assessed afterwards and further actions may or may not still be required to get the noise levels down further



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,259 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    The noise should come down as more and more of the cars using the bypass turn electric. I have to say as a young learner, it was a great help to get some legal experience as to how to drive on a motorway properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Speed limits on the bypass should be reduced to 80 kph. This would help reduce noise and would also reduce fuel consumption.

    Motorway limits should be reduced to 110kph which would save considerably on fuel consumption in a country that must import all its petroleum based products.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Road/wind noise as distinct from engine noise will always exist with EVs. Indeed, because of their greater weight due to the heavy battery, they chew up tyres and make more road noise than an equivalently sized ICE vehicle.

    Reducing speed makes huge sense for EVs, which mostly hate high speeds anyway, as it kills range.

    Greater attention will need to be paid to road surfaces as EV numbers rise, both to quieten road noise and deal with heavier vehicles.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,459 ✭✭✭Sunny Dayz


    As someone who travels the motorway stretch and the by pass a couple of times a week I can see that many drivers don’t reduce their speed from 120 to 100 as it is when they get to the by-pass, not a fear of them reducing further down to 80.



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Easily fixed by a handful of avg speed cameras. These are coming to our roads though I think not until 2025/2026



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    A speed limit is just that! Whether its on this stretch of road or elsewhere, once its properly monitored and accompanied by speed cameras (fixed or roaming) speed limits will be adhered to. Your comment that speeds are not reduced to 100 from 120 as we speak is proof that cameras are needed, now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Avg speed cameras were placed on the M7 earlier in the year.



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Really? I thought they were still years away, nice to see them in place already



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Yeah... Around 15 months in operation on a small section so far.

    I was struck by the TII analysis finding 40% of drivers exceeding 120 kph during the asessment period. As far as Im concerned, they should be everywhere, subject to sensible limits being in place.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/speed-over-distance-cameras-go-live-on-the-m7-in-co-tipperary-1.4860723



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 732 ✭✭✭murphthesmurf


    I agree, and I'm one of those residents. I live right beside it as it becomes a motorway again. Noise not a problem at all. We have a grass bank between us and the road, makes a huge difference.

    It's like people who buy houses besides airports.

    Sick to death of every time I look at my phone or listen to the radio there's some new law/tax/crackdown. Why must busy bodies intrude on every aspect of life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 732 ✭✭✭murphthesmurf


    Do you even drive?

    I lived in the UK most my life, these cameras are absolutely everywhere. It's hell! Constantly watching speedo. Cameras pointing at you everywhere you go. Take your eye off the speedo for a minute to look at the scenery and boom you got a fine and points.

    Speed really isn't the bogey man some people make it out to be. I've driven well over a million miles in 31yrs, cars, vans, motorbikes, small trucks, HGV trucks the length and breadth of UK and Ireland. The problem is the standard of driving, and more recently mobile phones.

    No amount of cameras solve either.

    I see people do unbelievable things every week that are insane. Cameras won't detect any of it.

    They're a cash cow, that's all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Yep! I've been driving for 50+ years.

    Rationalisation of general speed limits is long past due in Ireland. We have excellent stretches of road limited to 80 with similar limits often applying to boreens.

    Sadly, many drivers forgot basic driving rules once the test has been passed, with speed limits generally used more as a target than as an absolute maximum.

    Its clear that local authorities will be required to make significant changes between here and 2025. 100s in many places will be reduced to 80, and many 80s will be dropped to 60. These changes will be accompanied by increased enforcement measures, including ANPR based averaging. These changes are happening in other places also, with countries like France having dropped their 90 kph single carriageway limit to 80 on their Routes Nationales, in the interests of fuel saving. It's been implemented there since 2020 and it's been accepted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Why don't they start with enforcing the existing rules and see how that goes?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    I agree that enforcement is indeed poor in many respects, while inappropriate limits can lead to shooting fish in a barrel, which undermines the whole system.

    I suspect that average speed monitoring will be implemented far more widely once the current review is completed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    But they aren't going to put average speed cameras on rural roads. Maybe more motorway and national primary routes alright but the speeds on those aren't mentioned for changing



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    That's where road engineering comes in by making it physically difficult to go above the limit through the use of lane narrowing, chicanes, bumps etc etc

    That, coupled with the incoming speed limit alerts in vehicles, would do a lot.

    That being said you would be looking at a few hundred billion to do it for every rural road.

    Crazy that it would have to come to that to stop dumbasses killing people



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Enforcement of the existing rules should be priority #1 before billions get spent on nonsense. One of the problems with a successful economy is clowns try their hardest to spend the excess on shite.

    What are the speed limit alerts you mention? Hadn't heard of those. Heard of limiters alright but unless they are geo-fenced then they are useless too. Alerts can be ignored.

    We've been on a great trajectory in terms of road deaths over the past decade or so, despite more cars on the roads at the existing speed levels. Mass reductions due to one bad year is a kneejerk reaction IMO.



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    What are the speed limit alerts you mention?

    It's coming from the EU, all manufacturers have to have a system where the driver gets an alert if they exceed the speed limit.

    What that alert consists of can vary (audible, vibration, acceleration pedal push back etc) and the alert can be ignored but it will not cease.

    Maybe we're thinking of the same thing by different names?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Maybe. Most cars already have a limiter fitted to 155km/h. There was talk of making that more stringent down to 120km/h, and then geo-fencing it based on traffic signs. A lot of cars can read the speed signs and display on the dash (in way too many cases, this is an optional extra) so it would be easy to tie the limiter to that. Perhaps the alert then is if you exceed the limiter or something.



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Afaik the alerts would be triggered based on the prevailing speed limit which would be detected based on cameras seeing signs and/or the GPS location

    On a side note, I think we're well outside anything Athlone at this point



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    Revenue collectors to have a field day



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Quite a bit of additional information from the recent council meeting on the topic of the noise levels from the N6 bypass




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭FlicFlak


    Any word yet on when the bus stop outside the barracks will move back down the road to the gallery? I seen the temporary zebra crossing is gone but the stop is still there and the bus still stops at the barracks.



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    The next section of the Galway-Dublin greenway looks to have ground to a halt....again. The main consultants are walking away from the project




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    Wouldnt blame them. Daft route. The Eurovelo project is to link cities. Doing it in such a zigzag route is mental. If it was about the scenery of the route, do you really think theyd have done Mullingar to Athlone.


    Of course thats not the main reason theyre pulling out but I dont think many will care given the pointless route it is now taking. At least the section near Athlone links alot of bike commuters



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Speaking to Shannonside Northern Sound News today, Councillor O'Rourke says it is unlikely the delay will result in changes to the preferred route:

    Thats unfortunate, given how utterly shite it is



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭rn


    In fairness the brits did the hard work in land acquisition for the mullingar to athlone greenway. And most greenways in the country. Took us a hundred years to attempt similar scale infrastructure projects.

    Landowners were even happy to see likes of old mullingar line disused and decaying. Anecdotally many would have half an eye on incorporating parts of it into their holding. I've seen this happen a good few times and it seems relatively easy to get your local council to extinguish rights of way and routes if nobody objects.

    That said, I agree, the new route is daft. A simpler solution would have been follow the motorway. There are new access roads along most of the motorway each side. Although I know there's the odd new house built on them now - which is very poor planning by roscommon Co council (but that's not surprising given their atrocious record in monksland)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 628 ✭✭✭jimmyendless


    The "F**K Greenways" ... I mean the "East Galway Greenway Action Group".

    My understanding is that it is meandering so that it uses the maximum amount of public land to minimise dealing with landowners. It's backfired anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    It's going to end up being a case study on how not to design a greenway

    Seriously, I gave up counting the 90 degree turns when I got past 100.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,259 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    The case study will be Offaly. The Grand Canal is paved from Edenderry all the way to Pollagh with a link to the Lough Boora Park, the branch from Ballycommon to Kilbeggan is also cycleable with signage for local roads to connect to Streamstown to get onto the Rail Trail (very impressive work around the Streamstown station, coffee shop, children's play area, bike service tools, looks well)

    With the industrial level peat production all but wound down by Bord na Móna, the state owned bog lands are the easiest places to put these things in. Only problem is those bogs don't stretch to Galway. Historically transport infrastructure west of the Shannon wasn't even built, never mind abandoned and adapted for local leisure facilities, there aren't any old canals, railways etc that aren't still in use today. Once you get to Shannon harbour the ESB have control of the west bank of the river where tow paths for canal boats to get to Portumna used to be, once you get down there the communities along the foothills of the Slieve Aughtys are much more accomodating. Portumna has just recently put in a path from their lake swimming amenity over to the castle and dock which leads into the Coillte forest park. You used to have to go into town and back out. The village of Woodford to the south west of Portumna has bicycle ornaments decorating the streets. There's always going to be "action groups" against getting nice things. They'll either succeed or fail in the short term but long-term things will work out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 626 ✭✭✭batman75


    Was in Jysk and homestore on Monday. Can't see Jysk surviving. Homestore was nice and bright. Dear I thought outside of their half price offers. The Mr Price in Athlone is colossal. It made the Eurogiant in Monksland looks small.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭rn


    Mr price is excellent... even if it violates planning law. Did they ever get that rectified?

    Although the cheapest of those discounts stores in Athlone continues to be supersavers in Monksland

    Homestoreandmore is fairly premium alright, apart from their special sales. Jysk should probably survive with all the new houses in the town.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,050 ✭✭✭✭cena


    Has coppers closed down?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,156 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,050 ✭✭✭✭cena




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    There was a minor fire above Peddlers (that name you're looking for). Not sure how serious or even genuine. Theyre not losing much this time of year. Maybe using the time to finish renovations too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    The Lidl plan to move beside the Springs is interesting. Monksland crying out for them or Aldi to setup and finally give a rival to the cartel (who have been using their influence to block them before).


    Anyone think it will see fruition? It is planned to go in the field beside the Ford Garage.



  • Posts: 15,362 [Deleted User]


    Athenry saw the same with them both blocked for nearly a decade so it's anyone's guess. If this is the first application, I don't hold out much hope



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭rn


    They have a better chance this time. The last few times, the sites were far from ideal. Was surprised the omeara one was turned down though. I thought that made a lot of sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    Devils advocate, the junction beside that garage is mental. If you are pulling out of the garage, you get stuck if there is a queue for the lights. Add a LIDL to that with tonnes more traffic lights and the Tuam Road becomes Ballymahon Road mark 2.

    Saying all that, id love to see Monksland slowed to town levels. Revvers need to be silenced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,739 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    They'd need a roundabout or lights (probably lights - Athlone has a sick fascination with traffic lights) ad maybe reorganise the main road along to sequence things better



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭FlicFlak


    I did (briefly) see plans for the site, and this was taken into account. That entire section was being bought, including all those houses along the Roscommon road, across from the old butchers. There would have been a new entrance/exit onto the Roscommon road and the junction with the lights was being redone.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement