Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Wolfe Tones

1111214161721

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭TokTik


    No tears here. Just basic, well known facts that seem to have a) gone over your head or b) been ignored by you to push an agenda.



  • Registered Users Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Fuascailteoir


    Your constant attempts to try and portray Irish nationalism as some sort of common bedfellow to right wing extremism is infantile in the extreme and lacks even the most basic understanding of Irish politics, particularly north of the border



  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭rdwight


    Sweet Jesus. Please 1. google "women's rights in ireland" 2. click on the first result 3. read the article

    Here's a couple of spoilers for ye:

     "De Valera’s conservative government passed legislation that eliminated women's rights to serve on juries, work after marriage, and work in industry. In 1932, the marriage bar was introduced in Ireland; it prevented any married woman from working in the public sector"

    "Contraception in Ireland was made illegal in 1935 under the 1935 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act.[8] Divorce was banned in Ireland in 1937"

    "Also in 1973, the marriage bar was removed in Ireland.[16] It had been introduced in 1932, and had prevented any married woman from working in the public sector.[7]"

    "Prior to the Family Home Protection Act, 1976, a husband could sell or mortgage the family home, without the consent or even knowledge of his wife"

    "Prior to 1981, criminal conversation existed in Ireland, and meant a man could sue any person who had sexual relations with his wife, regardless of whether the wife consented, except that if the couple was already separated the husband could only sue if the separation was caused by the person he was suing"



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Rough estimates puts the Third Reich death toll at around 17m people. We are told, and it is very true, that these were horrible evil people. They were made pay for their atrocities.


    The British death toll for their “empire” is over 100m people, and we are told that the past is the past and we must forget it. The IRA were the nasty people in Ireland.


    Cognitive dissonance to the nth degree.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Cool story, negotiations were ongoing with several heads of the Nazi party long before the fall of the Third Reich.

    Alan Dulles, head of the CIA at the time, was negotiating for this long before the war ended. It may have become “official” after the war ended, but it was going on well before that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭TokTik


    You make it sound like the IRA were some army dropped into the middle of NI to fight the troubles.

    The IRA were the Catholics of NI at the time. They were peoples family, neighbours, friends colleagues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,732 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I wonder how many in here living in a Catholic working-class area in the 1960s would not of resorted to violence. Trying walking in my shoes....

    That old myth again.

    The fact is that the Provos and SF had minority support even within their own communities as one can see in terms of election outcomes. The SDLP outpolled SF constantly for 30 years up until after the GFA.

    Men like John Hume and Seamus Mallon came from these very communities and they didn't resort to planting bombs in pubs and shopping malls which killed innocent women and children.


    That statement above makes no sense, were the Irish security services as you refer to them based in Northern Ireland ?The British security services were based in Northern Ireland and worked hand in hand with loyalist terrorist groups and that is an indisputable fact. The best we could down here was the arms crisis and that was a **** up.

    It is a statement of fact that Loyalist paramilitaries are not and were not the British Security forces, no matter how hard people try to turn water into wine. Next, you will be telling us that because SF and IRA members were informers to the British they too belong to the British Security forces. Stakeknife anyone?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    Those defending the Wolfe Tones have behaved in the exact manner you'd expect of Trump supporters. No attempt to debate the issues, constant trolling, attempts to use lowest common denominator "humour" to mask ethnonationalist tendencies, dismissal of victims, pile ons against anybody who speaks out online - including that "Big House" woman who has become prominent online. Prominent Shinnerbots online have behaved in extremely threatening manner towards her, including calling for her house and all other "big houses" to be razed to the ground, and anti-Semitic abuse (she's Jewish).

    That's a Trump style cult.

    And still none of those defending the Up the Ra chant have addressed the protection of paedophiles and rapists by the PIRA.

    Sinn Fein and the violent Irish nationalist movement pretend to cry about victims while in reality pissing on them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭rdwight


    Thanks for confirming my point Tony. Sean Russell and the IRA in general were indeed happy to make a pact with the devil whether by collaborating with Nazis or indulging in multiple atrocities against non-combatants.

    Personally, I have never believed that their desired end (Brits Out/United Ireland) were worth the use of such means. The fact that their campaigns all ended in failure adds to their culpability. Here we are, still waiting for the Taigs to outbred the Prods one hundred years on from partition, fifty years on from the start of the PIRA campaign and twenty-five years after the GFA. Although I suspect that even if Russell and company had realised it would all come down to demographics in the end they would have still resorted to guns and bombs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,971 ✭✭✭randd1


    In all honesty, who care about a group of drunk young people singing songs at a festival?

    And so what if it's the Wolfe Tones they were singing to. Most people know they're relics from a time best left in the past, but that doesn't mean there's any harm in enjoying a few of their songs.

    Our police force is falling apart due to poor leadership turning the job into a nightmare, young families can't afford houses and likely never will unless there's a serious recession or some sort of serious revolution, our health service is a costly shambles held together barely by over-worked staff, our national TV/radio service is a complete money bleeding farce, out water systems are closer to third world standard and price gouging has effectively been made legal by a government who refuse to even attempt to tackle the problem.

    But no, it's the Wolfe Tones that are the problem.

    Priorities people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,790 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    I was a Catholic of NI at the time myself. They were Catholics of the time also, but most people wanted them to stop what they were doing. They only represented themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭rdwight


    "It's only those who support a party with a fascist past who try to tie Russell in the with the Nazis"

    No it's not. I don't support a party with a fascist past.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,889 ✭✭✭growleaves


    WWII itself could not be won without making a pact with another devil (Stalin) and Britain began by declaring war on Germany to liberate Poland and ended by ratifying Stalin's dominion over Poland to run it as a colony with a puppet government.

    The Allies also indulged in multiple atrocities against non-combatants - as deliberate policy.

    For Churchill and the Allies, all difficult choices and mixed-fortune outcomes are forgiven by history.

    From a moral standpoint though Sean Russell and other IRA men's collaboration with the Soviet Union is also pretty bad - except you aren't meant to say so because it might indirectly make the Allies look bad too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    Jasas the shinnerbots are really trying to use this a s a call to arms after having nothing to do all summer but duck and dive scandals


    wouldnt be like a gang of fat greedy old men to try to exploit young people for thier own reasons .



  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭RavenBea17b


    How about the Wolfe Tones start writing songs and singing them that highlight the absolute evil that was carried out to each other during the civil war.

    How Dev re-wrote history to suit his story, especially what he got up to with his campaign with the Irish Americans, - whose written records vary greatly with his story, especially with the US senate.

    How about some truths about the vile executions at Ballyseedy - and not the 'sanctioned' ones - but the outright murder of men, who were prisoners and had no 'trial' by blowing them up.

    Kerry never forgot what was done and the North never forgot how they were being treated - and I am not talking about the British, but by their 'own'.

    Terrible thing were done, by both sides, but some honesty please - the Irish have never truly been united in the history of time - always infighting of one sort or another, even during the Easter Rising itself. Was it to be called off, yes or no, power struggles.



  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭BaywatchHQ


    Wolfe Tones songs are in the same basket as something like the show 'Give my head peace', they aren't to be taken seriously. Most of the drunk people singing their songs at a concert aren't actual IRA supporters. Yes it is in poor taste just like how loyalists sing songs like the sash but people shouldn't read into it as much.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    He was trying to free us from a bunch of murderous thugs who killed millions. Not sure why you want to ignore that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    You are very uneducated on this topic! You need to read up on collusion. British security services worked side by side with loyalists to share intelligence, to go on killing sprees etc together.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    You're completely ignoring that the PIRA did not start the war. The IRA were finished. The war was started by loyalists bombing and murdering innocents, the local government denying equal rights and the local police force beating peaceful protesters and killing innocents including children.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    The blue shirts were far more embarrassing than a man trying to free us from a murderous nation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,732 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,732 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Was it a pincher movement?

    Did the British Army attack the left flank, while the UDA went after the right flank?


    Listen to yourself FFS.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    No, the British state. Even in the same time period as the Nazis, they killed millions in India. Do you have an issue with calling the British armed forces murderous thugs? Why is that?

    They were what the Nazis wish they could be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,732 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Ah, you are one of those. Let me guess you also voted against the GFA?

    We in Ireland lived in the Free State as it was called at that time. We were not under British occupation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    Time to educate you if you won't educate yourself. Here's a good place to start, have a good read of this page:

    https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/issues/collusion/chron.htm

    After reading that you'll need to re-evaluate your position on collusion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,732 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    You have no problem calling the Nazis murderous thugs but you can't bring yourself to calling the British military forces murderous thugs despite having a much larger list of murder and destruction in their wake. Why is that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,732 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Ill use the words I want to use.

    But the fact is, Ireland aka The Free State was not under occupation. This is a clear objective fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    If you don't want to educate yourself then that's alright but it means you can't be taken seriously. Go on, have a read of the link, it's good to learn new things.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Musicrules


    The British security forces were murderous thugs, that's a clear, objective fact.



Advertisement