Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gov Plans to reduce speed limits

13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 421 ✭✭redunited


    Nothing more than Revenue Collection and giving the Useless Greens more power to feck us over.

    Surely this means vehicles will be on the road longer thus pumping out fumes longer?

    Speed does not kill, idiots behind the wheel kill.

    We have people from all over Europe and the world driving here, with different rules and standards do they consider this at all, not to mention the state of the roads is appalling. I know at least 2 people who still drive without having a full license.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,868 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    It won't work for 1% of the time in say Dublin where connectivity is good, but in the mountainous treacherous roads of Tipperary that might be as low as 50%. My own car, for example, often loses GPS signals at many spots between Clonmel and Lismore for up to 10km at a time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,406 ✭✭✭stooge


    Speed is a factor in almost every collision.... what I mean by this is that if those involved in every fatal collision had slowed to 1kmh then it's likely they would not have been killed. The real question that the investigators and powers that be need to ask is.... what caused someone to speed?

    Has an analysis been done on the days and times of fatal RTCs? Do most happen at weekends?, During school runs? in the morning/at night etc etc

    Having this info made freely available would give more confidence in any measures taken. A blanket speed limit reduction seems crazy and counter productive. It will likely involve more people taking risks to make up time lost travelling at new speed limits. And for those saying to leave earlier.... people have never been so busy...it isnt always possible.

    My 2c...Use the data to determine a pattern in the days/times of fatal RTCs (weekend?, evening? etc etc) and target resources to these days and times.

    Reducing speed limits universally is a lazy approach....



  • Registered Users Posts: 421 ✭✭redunited


    Making Dash Cams mandatory for all cars would be a better option, I bet it would be a real eye-opener to the authorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,170 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    GPS speeding tracker solution would not work. There are far too many variables and ways it could fail - trying to enforce it on speeders would be impossible. GPS needs to be always correct everywhere, speed limits on database need to always be correct everywhere, no way to deal with temporary speed limits etc

    Very easy to cast doubt on the integrity of it so not practical to prosecute based on it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i think Red Silurian has a strange idea of how GPS works - connectivity good in dublin, but not in the country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,868 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Yeah I get that in theory GPS is 100% reliable anywhere in the world but in reality it leaves a lot to be desired



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the main issue with GPS connectivity basically boils down to how much of the sky you can see. going under lots of tree cover can mess with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭Jakey Rolling


    RSA road traffic collision data can be found here.

    The 5 year trend analysis report has a coarse breakdown of time of day.

    100412.2526@compuserve.com



  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭Jakey Rolling


    To be fair, there is a stretch of 3km directly north of Lismore that is in a canyon with dense tree cover, I've seen my GPS track go wonky when cycling through there. The bigger danger on that road are the tight bends and slippy surface at times due to detritus from the trees, and surface staying damp due to the shade and proximity to the river.

    100412.2526@compuserve.com



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭Norteño


    You must be joking. It'll be barcodes on our wrists, next.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,592 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    Ryan was out of the blocks well before Chambers on this, and essentially admits to cynically using recent deaths as a means to further his climate agenda. He's been harping on for ages about reducing speed limits to make a very slight reduction in the 0.089% of global CO2 emissions produced by Ireland and by God he wasn't going to miss the opportunity to exploit recent road deaths!

    "Minister for Transport Eamon Ryan has said that “one of the key responses” to address the increase in road fatalities was to look at speeding. He told RTÉ Radio One that this was part of the programme for government commitment to “review and reduce speed limits, where appropriate, to address both road safety issues and carbon emissions, and ensure greater compliance”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,868 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Of course building better roads and improving the ones we already have would be good way to bring road deaths and carbon emissions down as well.

    But the green party are all about the investment in public transport and cycling so that doesn't suit their agenda



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭Ardent


    This move is politically motivated - designed to save face and be seen to be doing something - and the laziest approach the Government could have taken to tackle the issue of road deaths. But what more would you expect from these morons currently in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    if you work on an average speed over 1km or two it doesn’t matter if a signal fails for a few 100 yards.

    As I said in original post I don’t see it happening because of privacy but it is possible and would work on 99% of the road network.

    Even if it was adopted and data only used in the Event of accidents it could change driving behaviour just knowing that this would happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,296 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    See 1,2,4 everytime I cycle on a country road and see 3 every day going to work. I would add another to that on the country roads.

    5. Idiots who overtake on a blind bend or blind incline.

    The only bit of the new legislation that will make a difference to me is 30kph city streets because at least there people have some fear of being caught.

    The country roads are and will remain a free for all and from what I can see (could be wrong) it's the country drivers involved in most of these deaths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,406 ✭✭✭stooge


    Yes, very coarse, I'm sure they could go deeper. My main question though is whether the measures they are proposing to take now (blanket speed reduction) have taken this data into account. It does not seem like it



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    It's worth pointing out that even if speed is not the primary cause of an 'accident', that this means reducing speeds is of no benefit. Speed may not be the primary cause, but lower speeds could result in the collision being avoided entirely in the first place, and failing that, the severity of the collision being reduced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,868 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    To play devils advocate here, was speeding the result of recent crashes in Clonmel and Cahir?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    result? or cause? you're asking the wrong person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If people stick within the speed limits…. But people don’t because they know that outside of urban areas, motorways and main roads it is practically impossible to enforce as roads are to narrow for a speed van or Garda to stand on side of the road.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    my point had nothing to do with speed *limits*.

    a rather obvious illustration. i am driving along an N road at 100km/h, at the limit. someone pulls out of a side road, without looking, in front of me, and i crash into them; say i'd dropped to 50km/h after emergency braking.

    it's a simple no-brainer that if i'd been doing 80km/h instead, the chances of me avoding the collision entirely would have been improved, but even with the collision taking place, it would have been notably less severe. my point is that even though my speed had nothing to do with the cause of the collision, it has a significant effect on the outcome.



  • Registered Users Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver


    What carnage? Road deaths are massively down compared to 20 years ago.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    a deeper dive into the stats than the bare number of fatalities would be interesting. have pedestrian deaths dropped at the same rate as car occupancy deaths? have pedestrian deaths dropped possibly because people are less likely to be out walking?

    we know two large factors in the reduction of car occupancy deaths anyway - a massive falloff in drink driving, and safer cars (though that benefit is mainly for the occupants).

    if, for example, people will prefer to drive rather than walk because it's safer to drive; yes, road deaths may be down. but that could be a reflection of roads being more dangerous for pedestrians now; so the figures could be counter-intuitive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,087 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    As part of this initative, we should also seriously raise the fines for speeding.

    At the moment the fine for speeding is a paltry €160.


    In Australia, you have the following.


    If you challenge a fine and go to court, but get a conviction that is a blanket $2200 fine.



    That would soften people's cough a bit in relation to going over the speed limit.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,868 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Yeah cause is what I obviously meant

    I'll answer the question, they were killed by bad roads so that's 9 of the 127 deaths or 7% of the road deaths not caused by speeding and that's without anybody looking deeper into the other deaths

    In fact lets make it easy, using google, can you find just 20 deaths caused by speeding this year?



  • Registered Users Posts: 44 topal


    Speed limit reduction without enforcement is pointless.

    It seems the only way people will slow down is if there is the possibility of a fine or damage to their vehicles (speed bumps, traffic calming etc.)



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There is a experiments test of average speed enforcement on a strip of the M7 near Nenagh that must have reported by now.

    Why do they not erect gantries along all the motorways at regular intervals and have them check speed, motor tax, NCT, and insurance? Now if my speed is above the maximum allowed then a fine in the post. The same applies to any other offence detected.

    Currently, the test strip keeps speed down between the two gantries. But if gantries further up are detecting average speed measured between any two gantries, there is no way to exceed the limit in any big way.

    The same could apply to traffic lights, so driving through a red light becomes a little less likely. However, lights need to be sequenced correctly. Giving 30 seconds green followed by three minutes of red is just daft.

    Widespread use of autodetection using cameras would make a huge difference to behaviour.

    It might also increase the attraction of public transport.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    no, because the inquests likely haven't happened yet. i'm not going to pretend to possess knowledge of fatalities which you seem confident in doing.

    but also; you seem to be responding to a different point, one i was not making. the post of mine you quoted stated that regardless of primary cause, slower speeds make it easier to avoid collisions or result in less severe collisions EVEN IF excess speed was not a cause.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    What makes a road bad? Isn't it a pity that there is no way to navigate these bad roads when driving?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i prefer my idea. within one week of being notified of an offence which results in penalty points, you must surrender your car for a number of days matching the number of points now accrued on your licence. so if you're caught speeding and that brings the number of points up to ten, you lose the use of your car for ten days.

    many people can shrug off a €160 fine, many can't; so that's not a equitable way of levying a punishment. temporarily taking their car off them is more equitable.



  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The day fine approach is a better option imho. Its based on your income and assigns X number of days of income to an offense.




  • Registered Users Posts: 44 topal


    automatic number plate detection (APNR)  is in loads of places in the UK and the fines are timely and pointless to dispute.

    Wishlist for APNR:

    Bus lane abuse

    Parking on footpaths



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    There are enough bridges to mount them on…but will this reduce accidents or deaths probably not because they are generally not happening on the motorway and when they do occur it’s a driver driving the wrong way, falling asleep at the wheel, stopping on the side of the motorway, driving to close to car in front etc.

    now try and put average speed cameras down a country road that has multiple turn offs and on… you would need 10,000’s of cameras and as a result not an option. And it is on these roads the fatalities are generally happening on the motorway



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭the.red.baron




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,087 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    That would be difficult to police.

    We do what they do in Scandinavia, link speeding fines to one's Salary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,087 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I see a lot of commentary about enforcement options, but surely enforcement comes with a deployment of better tech like they have done in other countries.


    An issue though, is how to police rural roads which is very hard given we have so much of them. But this is where one could deploy ad-hoc speed cameras randomly and through the book at offenders.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    possibly. i was thinking that instead of them having to bring it to a yard somewhere, there could be a team who visit your house and clamp it in your driveway with an extra fancy secure clamp.



  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭Jakey Rolling


    Given that many newer cars have multiple built in cameras and accelerometers, I'd be wholly in favour of all data from these being available to Garda in case of a collision. So if you're diving like a muppet and cause a collison your are going to be found out. Would also lessen the instances where joint blame is apportioned by the insurance companies, where clearly one party is at fault. Would be cheap as chips to mandate that a all new vehicles have built in cameras.

    100412.2526@compuserve.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,503 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    A motobike cop could easily enforce from a gate entrance or the commonly available trailer mounted APNR camera or from fixed cameras (as mentioned before - the cameras can be moved between fixed "boxes").

    The only reason they aren't enforced is lack of gardai, and lack of political will/ pressure to use the camera technology that has been in use in most countries for decades.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,250 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    How would that work if the car has multiple users? Or if the offending driver is not the primary (named) user of the car? You're are penalising the good driver for the crimes of the bad driver. It's not something that could work because of this.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    so be it. it might make the person who owns the car more circumspect about who they allow to use it/lend it to.

    i would not lend my car to someone who i didn't think was a responsible driver. this would be an extension of that.

    to partly address your concern, it could be structured so that the impounding happens only after a second offence, say.

    it's certainly not a perfect solution, but if you want a means of punishment which will make people behave, i think this is as good as i can think of.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    what is the impact on me if i accrue nine points? or 11? essentially it's just financial. higher insurance premiums. unless you hit 12 points, the only impact is financial so until that point (pun unintended) it's still not equitable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    There are only something like 120 motorbikes in Ireland and most will be based in urban locations or used escorting wide loads and politicians etc…

    Plus I would like to see them try and park a heavy bike like that off the Road in some boggy gateway.. would make for great viewing.

    As for parking a trailer with APNR cameras the roads not wide enough…it would be a hazard because there wouldn’t be enough room for 2 cars on the road. Remember these are country roads not main roads in the country.

    yes fixed cameras may be a possibility until harvest season comes and you have two tractors and trailer meet on the road and fixed camera is flattened.

    I agree there aren’t enough Gardai or resources…would you be happy to pay an extra grand or two in taxes to address it and even then do you want them enforcing speed limits or addressing crime…



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,250 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Best of luck getting that into law. It would be shot down straight away.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    no, never any points. i did once have to show my licence at a garda station after running a red. and the funny thing was the light went amber just as i was approaching it, i glanced in my rearview mirror and there was a car stupidly close behind me - maybe half a car length - so i made a quick decision not to stop (in case he rear ended me), so i reckon it went red just as i went through. turns out it was a cop car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Mods, Any chance of moving this thread to Motoring? Speed enforcement policies aren't really about road infrastructure, and they degenerate quickly into shite...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,569 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Typical shur tis grand response.

    Do you think the recent high profile road deaths are acceptable in your opinion? That there was no way they could have been avoided?



  • Registered Users Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver


    People should take personal responsibility for their actions. I have no idea what caused the recent road deaths.

    Once again road deaths are way way down on that of 20 years ago.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,487 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    How many extra cars are on the road as well? Knee jerk from the Government and yep, Eamon Ryan will not hesitate to use a pandemic or recent trend of road deaths to shape what he ultimately wants.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement