Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

High Irish GDP is an illusion, Ireland is not that rich

123578

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,338 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    No you did not. You wrote "Any country that has achieved huge economic growth has been on the back of population growth."

    Stop trying to back track now and write something different. You were caught out on half a dozen different points, all corrected for you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,338 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I wonder does the taxpayer in other countries pay for / give up half their tourism accommodation in many areas to refugees?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Read your first sentence and what rubbish. The economy of China has grown massively since the 1980s when it introduced their one-child Per couple policy. It has had something like 8% per year growth on average since 1980 !

    China's population is almost 50% larger now than it was in the 80s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    This is a good metric intuitively.

    I always see us as a bit wealthier than the Mediterranean countries like Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece. Also wealthier than the Eastern Block countries.

    But at the lower end of the northern European and Scandinavian countries. So maybe just inside the top 10 in Europe.

    We're "Nouveau Riche" so our institutions and infrastructure is gradually catching up. Demographically we're much better off than most European countries also. Spain, Italy, Portugal are approaching a timebomb.

    So this metric seems to capture this. Our GDP is obviously bullshit.

    Actual Individual Consumption AIC doesn't seem accurate either.

    I think if our economy remains somewhat stable and we go hard on offshore wind, we could be towards the top in Europe regarding quality of living and real wealth.

    The housing crisis will hit a turning point next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    *missing quote

    Post edited by Bluefoam on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Sadly our weather is much closer to the Northern European countries than the Mediterranean ones. 🤨



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    This is the last of the charts I will post (promise!).

    Real consumption per person adjusted for PPP. EU27 = 100.

    Ireland is the thick line descending through the middle of the chart.

    In this chart, EU expenditure per capita is fixed at 100 allowing the relative movement of other countries to be seen. As far as I can see, Ireland is the worst performing of the EU 27 over the period with countries like Slovenia, Romania, Lithuania overtaking us since 2010. Currently on a par with Poland and other countries set to overtake us in the next few years like Latvia and Croatia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,338 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I know that. China's population only grew by 50% from 1980 to 2023.

    Yet its economy grew by about 8% PER YEAR on average from 1980 to 2023. It went from only 191 billion per year tin 1980 to 17.73 TRILLION in 2021.

    Zimbabwe and much of Africa's population increased much more than China but their economy, so increasing population does not necessarily increase prosperity! Look at the people in Bangladesh, or the close on 1 billion people in Indonesia.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Fair enough.

    "Any country that has achieved huge economic growth has been on the back of population growth" is not an if and only if statement though. It doesn't mean that any country that experiences population growth by default will experience economic growth. Just that economic growth is, to some degree, predicated on the increasing population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,735 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The relationship between population and prosperity is basically this: output in the economy is a function of (a) how many workers you have, multiplied by (b) labour productivity. You can grow total output by increasing (a), or increasing (b), or (very often) increasing both. Obviously, increasing both will tend to give you the greatest growth in output.

    Ireland has been increasing both. Population growth we already know about. Labour productivity has been increased in a number of ways, including:

    1. Massive long-term investment in education and training.
    2. Attracting inward investment. It may not be immediately obvious that capital investment increases labour productivity, but it does. A worker in a pharmaceutical plant may not work any harder than a worker in, say, a ball-bearing factory, but what he produces can be sold for much more; his labour is therefore more productive. And what enables this is the huge capital investment that is required to establish a pharmaceutical plant.

    Britain's industrial revolution, already mentioned in this discussion, was powered both by a growth in population and by a rise in productivity. The rise in productivity was, again, the result of several factors, including:

    1. Technological innovation (steam engines, railways, etc)
    2. Massive capital investment, initially funded by the slave trade and later on by the rape of India and other colonies

    China's more recent boom was also driven to some extent by population growth, but only to a limited extent — as already noted, the Chinese government was actively trying to limit population growth for much of the period. Economic liberalisation, enabling the more efficient allocation of resources, was I think the main driver.

    One other point should not be lost sight of. To the extent that growth in output is fuelled by growth in population/labour force, that may make the country richer, but it doesn't necessarily make people richer — 20% more wealth, divided among 20% more people leaves people with, on average, exactly the same wealth that they had before. Plus, regardless of whether wealth is increased by population growth or other factors, the increased wealth won't necessarily be evenly shared — rising wealth can be accompanied by rising inequality, leaving most people worse off. Exactly this happened in the early part of the British industrial revolution. And, in our own time, it is notoriously the case that rising wealth in the US over the past 30 years has accrued almost entirely to the top 10% of the population in the form of increased profits, dividends, asset values, etc. Real wages, by contrast, have stagnated for most of that time, while the minimum wage (and, therefore, the income of people in minimum-wage and low-wage jobs) has fallen steeply.

    So that's another way in which GDP — even a more robust GDP than Ireland's — is not necessarily a very reliable indicator of the wealth or well-being of individuals or families.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,309 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Such shite. So why do people want to immigrate to a country for a better way of life. You guessed it because the country was doing well before hand. Im not going to immigrate to some African countries if they've a high population thinking there doing great and there living standards are high.

    Does a country need proper vetted migration with hard working people with skills and education yes it does. Wtf are you on about. You think migrants come to a country and all a sudden the economy takes off. 🙄 I'd say investment is more to do with it more than anything else.

    As stated countries heavily populated round the world and their not exactly too healthy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    Again you failed to understand what I said. I didn't say that economic growth is because of population growth, but that massive economic growth is often accompanied by population growth. If you can't understand the nuance that's okay, but stop getting so agitated by stuff you fail to comprehend.

    You're off on a tangent now talking about getting immigrants vetted... that's a whole other conversation. Not one I'd want to engage in with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,032 ✭✭✭3DataModem


    The "old ways" of living near where you grew up and starting a family are always tenuous where there has been a massive shift in relative wealth and income. Without wishing to trot out the same old thing as always, the 70s and 80s were a very different time economically in Dublin.

    • Even a long-tenured civil servant had to beg their bank manager for the right to apply for their first mortgage. It was not a given. Mortgage decisions were made locally in the bank, so the manager was judged on who they approved. This was centralised to credit teams in the late 80s / early 90s so bank managers didn't (and still don't) care who applied.
    • Interest rates were double-digit. I know houses were cheaper, but high rates affected everything like cars, personal loans, business loans, etc. It was brutal. I remember the joking celebrations when mortgage rates dropped to single digits for the first time in more or less living memory. Mid 1993.

    Now houses are expensive, because a lot more people want to live here. The reality is, Irish youth should be looking at the benefits of the anglophone world and the EU bring, so their "home country" is really some of the best parts of the world. I know it's harder to get the Sunday roast from mammy each week when you live in Seville or Sofia or whatever... but limiting yourself to your parents postcode is inexcusable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,148 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Its not true at all - most countries huge economic growth comes from widespread access to education.

    Converting workforce from uneducated to highly educated of the #1 predictor of economic growth.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,444 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    I would not agree at all with this.....

    This idea of home ownership and having a housing policy that requires people to take on huge amounts of debt or relying on social housing to put a roof over your head is a very Anglo sphere thing. My kids grew up in Switzerland and are now young professional and they like all their friends have not plans for home ownership on the horizon, because it is not a thing for most young people. They see rental like booking a holiday for what it is - you pay and you get a service. And they are more concerned sticking to the traditional rule of thumb of not paying more than 20% of your salary for accommodation. And their cousins in Germany and Italy seem to be of a similar view on this. So I don't thinking sending young Irish people off to other part of the EU is then answer. Starting a talk about a more realistic housing policy would be a start.

    As for Dublin in the 80s/90s I was there and I put in may loan applications for clients. And while knowing the manager might make the difference in a credit squeeze to get the loan through, the reality was the rules 2.5 times salary for a single person and 3.5 for a married couple with both partners working was very strictly applied. It was not until David Solo came up with the idea of securitising bank debt that mortgages really left the ground and bank management no longer cared.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    There's a construction crisis looming in Germany.

    I wonder would that benefit us.

    It could provide us with construction workers and also cost of materials might drop. Germany's huge so even a small crisis could benefit us.

    I'd be interested in anyone's opinion on this.

    Also China might be in crisis. This might result in drop in price of commodities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,776 ✭✭✭eire4


    I would say it all depends on how you view rich. Ireland by world standards is a rich country. But if viewed against our peers in just the developed world things look less rosy. Housing costs which are ridiculous, the health system and renewable energy are the issues we need to get our act together the most IMHO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,928 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The Economist reckons we will do OK, in a rather light hearted assessment. Housing output can only grow slowly, but it is growing year and year and the decline in office demand will free up some construction resources. If a few people come from Germany, then so much the better. We can catch up on green energy.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,735 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The problems with our health system aren't the result of not being a rich country. In terms of health outcomes, the health system performs well in international comparisons, but it's massively expensive — costs are out of control. Ironically, we can afford (at least in the short term) a massively expensive health system only because we are a relatively rich country. What we need to do is learn to make our health system more efficient, but the barriers to doing that, whatever they are, do not include a lack of wealth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    There's also large scale immigration ramping up our population at the fastest pace in , what 150 or 200 years . It's not birth rates which have plummeted. Just look around Dublin or any town. It's a major factor and pretty obvious factor in terms of driving up demand for housing and therefore scarcity . I'm not saying that we have not done a piss poor effort in building housing !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    I don't know how folks can tell bald faced lies that our health system stacks up well internationally. On what metric exactly?You can't even see a doc or a dentist in large parts of the country!

    Developing countries offer much better options even , with relatively low cost private providers and very rapid access . In many Asian countries you can see a consultant/ specialist THE NEXT DAY. Not two bloody years later.

    Ireland's has failed, often with little to no access for many (ridiculous GP referral system that barely works..years waiting lists...no national digital records system...no GPs available in many locations) but eye wateringly expensive in terms of tax revenues required and also areas like dental work being a rip off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    It's not a fair comparison if the only metric you're using is wait times.

    Our health services are fantastic, so long as you get to use them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    If you get to use them lol, delusional stuff, much of it is broken right now. It exists as vaporware for many of us. it's also quite expensive even though we pay high taxes e.g. GPs charging 70 Euro a visit not including meds (that is if you could find one in much of the country they are refusing to take on new patients and have two week times to see their current list of patients. And how do you get a consultant appointment if you can't see a GP to get the stupid referral letters. You could be dead by then).


    Why do you ignore wait times of years for specialist appointments? That's a KEY metric for a health service.

    How is the lack of a digital health records system 'fantastic' in 2023?

    Also what is the definition of fantastic that you are using exactly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭DataDude


    We have one of (if not the?) highest life expectancies in the EU and the highest self reported health status for both males and females in the EU.

    So we live longer and consider ourselves healthier than any other country in the EU. Surely our health system has to take some credit for that?

    https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Self-perceived_health_statistics#:~:text=More%20than%20two%2Dthirds%20(69.0,good%20or%20good%20in%202021.&text=Self%2Dperceived%20gender%20health%20gap,their%20health%20better%20than%20females.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yes, it is a key metric that we perform poorly on.

    We perform very well on many others. Someone is welcome to go to Turkey to get quicker access to dentistry, but I doubt it's a good idea to do it for oncology care.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    We are also amongst the most obese, gonna the healthcare system with that as well? :).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    Which metrics are we performing very well on? I'm very curious. For instance beds per head of population is another key one. How do we stack up?


    Well colour me surprised, we are woeful, amongst the worst in Europe.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/health/2023/01/04/how-many-hospital-beds-does-state-need-to-fix-the-overcrowding-crisis/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭techman1


    Because by gdp statistics ireland is one of the richest countries in the world, many international experts have been pouring over the Irish data to see what is really going on. Alot of the big tech companies moved their IP to ireland in 2015 from tax havens like the Bahamas and cayman Islands Because ireland changed its incorpotion laws to facilitate this.

    On the surface that would suggest that the iPhone is designed and made in ireland based on Irish gdp figures, but on the back of the iPhone it says " designed in California, assembled in China "

    When these experts travel to ireland it doesn't strike them as a particularly wealthy country, no high speed rail or metros , no dubai style sky scrapers. Ireland has nothing in common with the other high gdp wealthy countries like Switzerland, Luxembourg or Norway.

    The fianna fail government of the celtic tiger is rightly blamed for crashing the economy, however they did alot of stuff like building lots of houses, motorways, the port tunnel and the luas ,our only quasi european infrastructure.

    This government has built nothing all it has done is give loads of cash handouts to welfare recipients but has built no infrastructure except the delayed and seriously over budget children hospital



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Wealth can be measured in lots of ways, and crude statistics can often rely on metrics that are chosen to show a particular result.

    Health is a difficult metric because it is a demand led service. The healthy do not need it so for them it does not matter. We have a strange dual system of private and public that is mixed in a strange way. I can see a consultant privately in short order, or I can be referred to the public system and be seen sometime - whenever - often by the same consultant. Sometime the public system is quick, and others - sometime, never.

    However, when measured by outcomes, we do well, and most who do get attention from the service speak very highly of it - the vast majority. Now there are some bad outcomes, and most are unfortunate rare occurrences, but some are systemic and inexcusable. On the whole, we are doing well, but the increase in population is affecting the system. We have 95,000 Ukrainians and another 75,000 in direct provision - that is outside our normal provisions.

    Wealth is determined by long term investment - most wealthy people do not become wealthy overnight, and if they do, they become poor in similar order.

    We overprovision for social welfare, and under tax the super wealthy. That is a political choice.

    We have fallen down on infrastructure because - reasons. We stopped building public social housing since the 1980s - again political.

    However, we have gone from needing significant funding from the EU to being a net contributor. That is a massive sign we are wealthy as a country.

    Surely, whether we are wealthy or not is just a political question asked by the opposition parties as a stick to stir the pot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 843 ✭✭✭m2_browning


    To be fair I would be interested in seeing a developed (and for that matter developing) country where housing is not a problem

    Having seen the world extensively Ireland is a nice place to live and work especially if have a young family, the only downside is the miserable weather. But oh well at least the grass is green 😃



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,444 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Oh come on now, that will not suit the usual whiners!

    Yes housing is a problem in almost every advanced society without exception. It is just that in the Anglo sphere, the only solutions the voters are willing to any solution that does not involve them getting own a house. And makes it all the worse because it can't be achieved, exposes them to an unacceptable level of financial risk and less mobile during a down turn in the economy. But of course it is easier to blame the banks, the government, the bond holders and so on, than to face reality.

    Ireland is not better or no worse than any other advanced economy and of course those that claim the the GDP figures are rubbish, conveniently ignore the fact that the cash does flow into the government coffers and that reduce the tax burden on them and pays for many of the services they benefit from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,928 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    You are 100% correct about the digital health records, that is a complete disgrace, and that contributes to inefficiency which affects the other measures. However, the other issues should not be overstated, in a prosperous country with a higher cost of living it is inevitable that dentists etc get paid more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭techman1


    Ireland is not better or no worse than any other advanced economy and of course those that claim the the GDP figures are rubbish, conveniently ignore the fact that the cash does flow into the government coffers and that reduce the tax burden on them and pays for many of the services they benefit from.

    Cash does flow to the government as a result of corporation tax but in no way is it related to Irish gdp because that is grossly distorted by multinationals moving revenue through ireland as a result of IP being located here but the californian research facility or the Chinese manufacturing facility is not in Ireland but the Irish gdp figures suggest that. Therefore Irish gdp is a rubbish statistic and is not related to Irish wealth. Actual Irish wealth and productivity is half that figure. We are not talking rubbish



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    "Many international experts" have most definitely not been pouring over the Irish data, because every man and his dog knows the reason for Ireland's inflated GDP. It's the very reason the GNI* is published.

    Also, for the record, Switzerland has no Dubai style sky scrapers, no high speed rail and only one pseudo-metro in Lausanne.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,944 ✭✭✭growleaves


    GDP per capita and the standard of living for ordinary Irish people is not necessarily going to be raised by anything/everything that leads to "economic growth".

    You would swear half the posters on this site were CEOs of big conglomerates hearing people fret about alleged "labour shortages".

    "Economic growth" can benefit capital without benefiting ordinary wage earners. This growth may even come at the expense of ordinary wage earners, and often does.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭techman1


    Yes they have Paul krugman for one and many more since. It is the scepticism of these international experts about the true nature of irish gdp that prompted the cso hastily to invent GNI * statistic. But that only happened after gdp statistics were rubbished by krugman embarrassing the Irish authorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,776 ✭✭✭eire4


    I absolutely agree. I was not suggesting our health system issues are the result of not being rich simply that it IMHO is one of the biggest issues which negatively impact the overall quality of life in Ireland currently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,776 ✭✭✭eire4


    Certainly I agree Ireland is far from being the only country among its peers in terms of developed countries where housing is a major issue. I also have and do travel extensively so while there are worse in that regard in my experience also I would say Ireland is pretty bad in that regard. Nonetheless as with health care I brought it up as the problem is IMHO one of the major issues which negatively impacts overall quality of life in Ireland currently.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Most people are not ill, and do not have ongoing health issues that are not being correctly treated.

    There are edge cases that get significant exposure in the media (and often rightly so) but for most the health service is brilliant. If the Gov could tame the private health side of the issue, then we could be on the way to Slainte Care, where needed treatment is free at the point of issue.

    We need hospitals and other health centres to work seven days, and 16 hour days (or so) for at least 5 of those days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    We all know the large disparities between GNI and GDP.

    I think it's more useful to look at certain metrics such as wages and government tax revenues though

    1. On wages we seem to rate relatively highly compared to most of Europe and indeed the world. And yet we are definitely second rate compared to American wages. Take any mid level to senior job in Ireland in a US multinational and I bet the American coworker in the same position will be on 1.5 to 3.0 times the wage. And that's before higher income taxes. I always find that curious. it could just be Americas exceptional capitalism at work. Or it could be Europe is losing it's competitive advantages vis a vis the rest of the world over time (lack of resources on a small land mass, aging population, increased competition). Anyway Ireland stacks up well enough in Europe in terms of salaries. But beyond compared to resource rich countries or US, not so sure.


    2. Government revenues are off the charts for the last few years due to high taxes on pretty much everything along with full employment and multinational sector washing their European incomes thru us. No matter what you think about it, the Irish government is CASH RICH (yes I know the national debt etc etc). So the Irish state is rich. But are they rich at the expense of...


    Us?


    It's no wonder you won't feel rich if your pocket is getting dipped by well over 50 per cent (income taxes , VAT, excise duties and carbon taxes ) while allowing costs to rocket (insurance, housing, fuel).


    it's no wonder you don't feel rich when that money is flowing away from you after you worked hard for it.


    It's no wonder you don't feel rich when you get **** all back for it from the state although they constantly give it away on extremely generous social welfare (billions on very generous COVID schemes , provisioned a billion just for Ukranian refugees this year , I believe somebody can correct me if I'm wrong, I guess hoteliers are feeling rich right now though basking in the state's cash bonanza).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Any metric can be selected to prove or disprove that Ireland is rich or wealthy.

    Salaries of top jobs is is irrelevant wrt to USA as many many workers need two or three jobs to survive. Top pay only gets to the top few per cent.

    No single metric proves the issue discussed in this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    I am not talking about top jobs in the US. What I'm saying is that middle managers and professionals tend to get paid much better in the US. Why that is, scale or some other reason, I'm not sure. Go on to Glassdoor to see for yourself.

    Everybody knows no single metric proves or disproves things.

    Give us your preferred metrics and stats and YOUR opinion instead of chunks of waffle and nuggets of gold such as most people don't get sick etc. EVERYBODY gets sick, it's only a matter of time.


    One thing is for sure , at the moment the Irish government is cash rich but they are also throwing billions here and there at their favorite voters and causes. They are forecast to have a 6% growth in revenue this year on top of 7% growth last year. Did you readers see your wages go up by similar amounts the last two years?

    Another point is who owns most of the assets on Ireland. Over 80% of people over 40 own their own homes but under 40 the number who own one drops dramatically, turning them into the tenant class with little assets and who don't benefit from rising housing prices.

    Post edited by maninasia on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,735 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    1. On wages we seem to rate relatively highly compared to most of Europe and indeed the world. And yet we are definitely second rate compared to American wages. Take any mid level to senior job in Ireland in a US multinational and I bet the American coworker in the same position will be on 1.5 to 3.0 times the wage. And that's before higher income taxes. I always find that curious. it could just be Americas exceptional capitalism at work. Or it could be Europe is losing it's competitive advantages vis a vis the rest of the world over time (lack of resources on a small land mass, aging population, increased competition). Anyway Ireland stacks up well enough in Europe in terms of salaries. But beyond compared to resource rich countries or US, not so sure.

    You're stating, and yet missing, an obvious point — Ireland isn't the outlier here; the US is. You find it "curious" that Ireland is like most comparable countries, rather than being like the outlier, the US. But why would that be curious? Surely Ireland being like most comparable countries is what we would expect? At the end of your paragraph you compare Ireland with "resource rich countries or US". But why would Ireland be like a resource-rich country? We're not a resource-rich country. So we're back to a straight comparison with the US when there's no obvious reason why we should be like the US rather than like other countries.

    And you almost recognise at least part of the reason why other countries are not like the US. You compare wages for "mid-level to senior jobs", without recognising two important factors. First, in any economy people holding mid-level to senior jobs are a minority of the workforce; what's true for them is not necessarily a general characteristic of the labour market. (This is especially true in the US where the middle class, as a proportion of the workforce, is smaller than in Europe.) Secondly, the US is characterised by much greater wage inequality than is considered normal (or desirable) in Europe. The high level of earnings for those in mid-level to senior jobs in the US is sustained partly by relatively low earnings for those in operational positions.

    It is true, though, that on average US wages are higher than European wages, and this has been true for a long time. Because this is an all-economy average, wage inequality does not explain it. Accounts of why this is so vary, but usually focus on the fact that Americans have higher overall productivity because they work longer hours and take less holidays. Their hourly productivity is not greater than in Western Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭maninasia


    I asked a question I didn't answer the question because I want to see what other peoples ideas are.

    Ireland is definitely NOT like most countries, we have a pretty unique economic model in Europe still and by far the most successful in attracting foreign investment in the world except for Singapore. Interestingly salaries in multinationals in Singapore for locals are pretty high too , usually 120, 000 USD for any kind of professional role (they strongly favour local hires in Singapore).

    But I think it is interesting that a similar job in an American multinational in Ireland would often pay significantly less than that job in the US. And there are a LOT of employees of those US Multinationals in Ireland. But the firms here are ALSO pulling in huge amounts of revenue from all over EU and beyond . They are often well paid in Ireland and compared to local companies so I guess it is all about the local base of comparison (indigenous companies) being lower in Ireland and of course huge numbers of European and foreign workers who will also happily accept these wage levels.

    You claim operational workers are paid a lot less in the US but from what I understand they are actually paid reasonably well and often more than operational workers here e g. Autoworkers . I also know many working in other technical industries and they have done very well over many decades. There is higher income inequality but that doesn't mean that is a bad thing if more people are earning more money and starting from a high base. It's a fairly meaningless stat taken on its own .


    I mentioned resource rich countries to give some balance. They are also very diverse e.g. Canada, Australia, UAE, Russia etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,735 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Income inequality is hugely important to this conversation. For one thing, it's generating most of the examples you're offering of where wages are higher than for comparable positions in Ireland. It's interesting that you now bring up Singapore — SG has even higher income inequality than the US so, yeah, salaries for senior executives in competitive sectors in SG are very high. Average earnings across the economy, however, are lower than in Ireland

    In short, you're taking instances of income inequality and using them to argue that other countries have generally higher wages in Ireland. I know that's not your intention, but it's what you're doing.

    As for whether higher income inequality is "a bad thing", you argue that it's not necessarily because it means that "more people are earning more money and starting from a high base". But it also means that more people are earning less money and starting from a low base, and that second group may be larger than the first group. Plus, on a societal level, it's associated with higher degrees of dissatisfaction, alienation and self-reported unhappiness. Even if it's economically advantageous — and you haven't demonstrated this, merely suggested that it might be — there's general consensus that income inequality is socially disadvantageous. We can't ignore that.

    If you want this conversation not to be about income inequality, you have to stop buttressing your case with selective examples that refer only to higher-paid workers. We need to look at wage levels across the entire economy, find countries that have higher wage levels than Ireland does on this basis (which includes the US but not Singapore) and hopefully don't have higher inequality (that knocks out the US), and then look at what they are doing to see if we can learn from it.

    On that basis, you're looking at the wrong countries. Countries with higher earnings and similar or better income distribution than Ireland has include France, Denmark, Austria and the Netherlands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    Over 80% of people over 40 own their own homes but under 40 the number who own one drops dramatically, turning them into the tenant class

    Care to furnish us with the actual statistics?



  • Registered Users Posts: 843 ✭✭✭m2_browning


    There definitely are politicians and their representatives who want to paint Ireland as a basket case, and yes there undoubtedly are multiple issues discussed to death on this forum.

    But having seen the world it’s hard not feel like our issues are very much first world problems and a far cry from the glory days of the Great Recession which scared my generation



  • Registered Users Posts: 843 ✭✭✭m2_browning


    Anecdotally recently rang my GP got an appointment next day, my UK colleagues were in shock as they have to wait and wait. But that’s an anecdote, health is one of those things where amount of money spent doesn’t seem to translate into better services, just look at US (tho possibly the opioid phentanyl epidemic which is yet to hit us is stewing their results)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭techman1


    You are not comparing like with like ,in the UK a GP appointment is free so that is why there are waiting lists there for GPs, here it is at least 60euros to see a GP , only the medical card holders can get it free. Therefore in the UK the people paying the taxes are getting back the benefits in free health care. Here by and large health care is not free and the government has pushed those middle income workers into private health insurance. That's a very big difference. Ireland is a great place to be on benefits



  • Advertisement
Advertisement