Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

RTÉ admits paying Tubridy €345,000 more than declared

Options
1742743745747748848

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    Glad sumner is over so we can get back to these committees hearings.

    Are the sick MIAs still “sick”?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Nervous laughter following Cannon's suggestion that RTE relocates out of Dublin en masse to Galway!!



  • Administrators Posts: 53,830 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Good grief.

    Again, as has been explained at least 4 or 5 times in this thread, the reason that employers do this is they can increase salaries without having to pay increased pension contributions or bonuses.

    It saves employers money.

    The employee has no benefit whatsoever, in fact the opposite is true and the employee would be financially better off with a higher salary and no car allowance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,010 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    Leitrim would be cheaper and give the local economy a great boost



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Ian Kehoe making sure he's in good standing with the new director!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Sigma101


    There are questions, however, about how the car allowance might have been used by RTE to make salaries appear lower than they actually were. Where salary scales are fixed car allowance can be used to differentiate between colleagues who should otherwise have been on the same salary.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Well it's not cost neutral, there is a benefit to the employer and they can reduce their staff remuneration costs this way. As observed above, there is a logic for such allowances where they are applied carefully e.g. to compensate someone on the same pay scale as another, but where the former has some additional role or costs. Like the barter accounts have some logic too when used appropriately. But it appears in RTE anyway and likely elsewhere that these sort of practices are open to misuse & abuse. The logic of practices like bartering and payments of allowances rather than salary is that all employers could reduce their labour costs using these and similar mechanisms which would have several knock on affects on how the state and society manages finances. Like bogus self employment where staff are made contractors, Revenue needs to be keeping a closer eye on cost reduction strategies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Whatever about Galway, I'd say the delights of Leitrim would have RTE staffers penning emails furiously.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    Mr Bakhurst said there has been legal correspondence regarding the ending of Ryan Tubridy's contract but that he does not want to go into any further detail about that.

    He said that - as far as RTÉ is concerned - there is no outstanding money due to the former presenter.

    He said that RTÉ does not have a legal mechanism to get €150,000 back from Mr Tubridy.

    But assessed that there is a moral case to pay it back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Dept Social Protection investigated/ ing 500 cases of bogus self employment in RTE!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,337 ✭✭✭CH3OH


    The Head of HR should be for the chop.

    Marie Sherlock eating her!



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    In other words, they've kissed that €150K goodbye.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Round the table wringing of hands now...



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,095 ✭✭✭Trigger Happy


    He made the comment earlier that they could not afford a round of voluntary redundancies.

    Surely eliminating those personal allowances would drive a fair few people to just resign? The place needs all the chaff cut out. Mind you - there may be very little left if they did that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,589 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Nobody has yet mentioned what happened to the unsold Toy Show The Musical merch 🤣



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Fight, handbags at dawn between Griffin and Shortt!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,436 ✭✭✭Tow


    This is a big issue. The committee members should have asked for costs on this. Not just on Scope's back taxes, penalties and interest, but on pension costs for RTE.

    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,337 ✭✭✭CH3OH


    Everyone on the board kissing Kevin's ass



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Stand by your (Wo)Man from the board members as regards Moya. All were in the dark.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Sigma101


    Clearly Robert Shortt can't read the room - warning us that not paying the TV license is a serious matter. Who the fock does he think he is? 

    They're looking for €50 million of our money and offering absolutely nothing in return: no cutbacks, no compulsary or voluntary redundancies, no cuts in pay or allowances, no selling off of assets, nothing. 

    They should be sent packing and told not to come back until they have real proposals.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,545 ✭✭✭Topgear on Dave


    Direct exchequer funding (ie access to the bottomless pit of paye taxpayers cash) is regarded as a much more progressive method of funding by them.

    Like a child getting both hands into the sweetie jar.



  • Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭72sheep


    Just tuned in... The meeting Chair has clearly been told to give time to these Board members to give their pre-prepared RTE rehabilitation speeches. Gov need this to justify start taxing us at source for their RTE mouthpiece.

    I'm assuming that nobody asked about: Moya getting 800k / the CFO getting huge redundancy / when is Dee going to answer questions? Of course not, we'll let those people sail off into the sunset. We all know it's going to be the low and medium paid RTE workers who are going to be the one's to suffer. Watch how diligently they police these shft allowances for the little people!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,337 ✭✭✭CH3OH


    The senator asking questions that have already been asked.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,337 ✭✭✭CH3OH


    Richard (CFO) is currently standing on the end of a plank.



  • Registered Users Posts: 553 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    whats the gist of this today...? is it more "aye we know we've made a bollix of it but give us a metric shite ton more money and we promise we'll only make a small bollix of it this time"


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    ps wheres my free,fancy rte flip-flops...?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    No chance they could ask Tubs back for an update on his progress on the 150k payback? He did promise didn't he?!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,436 ✭✭✭Tow


    He said he would pay it back, if asked to.

    Kevin, did not ask for it back after negotiations broke down.

    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 7,029 Mod ✭✭✭✭HildaOgdenx


    Clearly Robert Shortt can't read the room - warning us that not paying the TV license is a serious matter. Who the fock does he think he is? 

    Wasn't watching but that's some neck! Cheek of him. Seriously.

    He must have been hoping the politicians would back him up, so he chose to say it there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    RTE is paying a photographer €80k a year to take 16 still photos a week from the set of Fair City



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    FFS!!!! Bakhurst notes that the current leadership team is an ‘interim’ one - though points out that his own new recruitment ban may make it difficult to find permanent appointees.

    How convenient.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement