Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sinn Fein and how do they form a government dilemma

Options
11314161819216

Comments

  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    TBF your using a government that was formed mid-term and not off back of an election


    Not the greatest example of democratic principles now is it??



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,039 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    SF's inability to enter government was down to 2 reasons

    1. Their failure to run enough candidates, considering they'd have had 2 seats in some constituencies and their transferability
    2. FGs and FFs unwillingness to enter government with them due to historical reasons, without either the numbers weren't their

    The first point doesn't take into account what the government would have looked like had they run enough candidates. Which parties would have lost seats to SF and which of the 2 larger parties would have been willing to support an SF government IMO I think a second general election would have been run in 2020 as the numbers just wouldn't have added up, I don't think SF could have formed a gov with 45 seats in 2020, even if the 8 had been taken from FF and FG

    FF/FG - 62

    SF - 45

    GP - 12

    LP - 6

    SD - 6

    SPBP/LEFT - 7

    Aon - 1

    In - 19

    FF/FG/LP/GP - 80 with help from indos IMO would have been the outcome.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,949 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think there is anything undemocratic or against democratic principles about it, but you are correct that it is indeed an outlier and an unusual scenario.

    FF also had spent a long time in govt at that stage. I do not think it is comparable to a large SF delegation in the Dáil.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,704 ✭✭✭zimmermania


    The "left" means different things to different people (by the way i have never heard SF call themselves the "left" or socialist ) and those who call themselves socialists may not wish to support SF.

    There is bad blood between some on the left and SF and they do not trust SF who have no problem lying on a regular basis,the average industrial wage,IRA membership,robbing banks,supporting criminials (slab Murphy) and failing more recently to give a reasonable explanation for the funding of Lady Lou's Mansion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,904 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    SF claim to be a democratic socialist party

    Their actions in Government in NI are not left wing, though.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Deos parity of esteem,not severely limit their potential to implent their policies though?



  • Registered Users Posts: 473 ✭✭Ramasun


    Do political parties normally give loans to members in elected positions?

    In some places you can just give the money.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,904 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They don't even try - they just aren't a left wing party in NI.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,109 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2



    MM going nowhere it seems.

    Its possible we get an election next year and bookies and polls have projected SF to get the most seats.

    If I had to bet money its SF/FF forming the next government as I don't see how SF does it otherwise, anyone else disagree?



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Well, the polls can move further, one way or the other, between now and the next election. We won't really know the lie of the land until the election happens and we see what the vote-shares actually are, and we see how that translates into seats. We have to identify the coalitions that are mathematically possible before we identify the coalitions that are politically feasible.

    Still, lets play the game of speculation. The good people at Irishelectionprojections.com have modelled what would happen if the latest opinion poll results were applied to the revised constituencies, and the projection is:

    SF: 64

    FF: 43

    FG: 34

    Greens:2

    Lab:3

    Soc Dems: 6

    PBPS+: 6

    Ind/Other: 16

    With a 174-seat Dail, a majority government needs a minimum of 88 votes: SF will be 24 votes short. Even if they could corral the splintered parties of the left into a stable coalition arrangement, that would only give them 17 seats; they'd need at least another 7 independents to commit to supporting the government. Frankly, I don't see it.

    So, yeah, SF's only options will be FF or FG. With either of those, they don't need anyone else. And, of the two, FF looks much more viable, in political terms.

    What about FF/FG? With just the two of them, they'd be 11 votes short of a majority. They could find that eleven if they could get the Greens and Lab and the Soc Dems to back them. Or, they could replace one of those parties with a clutch of independents. But these numbers don't really add up in a politically plausible way; they'd have to get too many different groups to join, and to remain committed, for this to be easily managed.

    But the picture doesn't have to change too much for FF/FG to start to become viable. For one thing, the polls just ask people about voting intentions in party terms, not about candidates, and they just look for your first preference. I think SF does have a candidate problem which will mean a greater propensity for their voters to vote-split (i.e. give their first preference to an SF candidate and their second preference to a candidate of another party, ignoring other SF candidates) and this will mean that their vote share will not translate into seats as efficiently as other parties' vote-shares do. If I'm right, even on the current polls SF will have fewer than 64 seats, and other parties correspondingly more. It doesn't take too much of this, and of some modest movement in the polls, for the FF/FG seat share to rise to a point where they can govern with, say, one other party, or even no other party.

    On this view, the shoe-in for government is not SF; it's FF. They'll be in government either with SF, or with FG and probably others. An SF/FG coalition is the only thing that could keep them out, but in political terms that's wildly unlikely.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,315 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    I'd disagree with them being the smaller party in opposition; the reason is quite simple that I don't see SF being able to form a government without either FF or FG as a partner in some form. Hence by definition if FG is joining SF then FF is the biggest opposition party; if FF join SF then FG is the biggest opposition party. If neither joins SF I don't see a viable government getting through the initial vote and if SF somehow gets the majority (or with independents etc.) then they would not have FF join them in government making the question moot.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,667 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    this is going to be the big question. IF SF joins up as a junior minister to anyone, SF voters wont be happy as SF's influence will be limited. If its SF with either FG or FF as junior, then again, it wont be a clear SF controlled government and FFG will do their best to **** things up even more. They dont care about people either FF or FG so you wouldnt want them in government at all. I'll be disappointed if SF have to go into government with either of them .

    We just have to see how many they SF field this time and how the voters feel on the day - but Im not a fan of SF going into power with either ff or fg. they would undermine everything - though to be fair at least they arent the DUP.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    To be honest I can see the current govt parties all being returned



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,360 ✭✭✭✭mickdw




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,360 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Will the greens have any significant number of seats



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,711 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    This is why it won't work. The first scandal or indescretion involving anyone from FF will require SF to either publicly back them up and be seen as hypocrites, or else hold them to account and potentially bring down the coalition. Lose-lose for sinn fein.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    On the current polls, it's as close to certain as it can be that SF will not be the junior partner in any coalition; if they're in a coalition government after the next election they will be the senior partner.

    If SF voters are disappointed to see SF in coalition with either FF or FG as the junior partner, they need to cop themselves on. SF are only ever going to be in government as part of a coalition, and other left parties don't get enough votes to be able to form a majority with SF. The only way other parties of the left can increase their vote is as SF's expense, and that's a zero-sum game.

    The bottom line is that there isn't a left-of-centre majority among voters in Ireland; there never has been. And, given our voting system which is pretty good at attaching equal weight to all votes, this means it's very unlikely that left-of-centre parties can secure a majority. So the choice for SF supporters is (a) SF in government in coalition with centrist or right-of-centre parties, or (b) SF not in government. If they find (a) the more disappointing, they're living in fantasy-land.

    We can of course dream of the day when there is a left majority among Irish voters. But how do we get to that? Almost certainly travel in that direction must involve a period of successful government by a left-led coalition, to build credibility and experience. Right now, a left-led coalition (under SF) looks very attainable; SF supporters should not be disappointed by that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What are you talking about?

    All major irish parties are centre left, or left.

    FG have moved centre left, FF already there. SF and Soc Dems are traditional left also, so to the Greens.

    Labour even, if they still exist?

    There is no Tory party in Ireland.

    No centre right whatsoever.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    This...I have said it for 12 months now.

    Current govt will return, with the exception of the Greens.

    FG/FF, essentially.

    Plus some small groups to make up the numbers. But FG/FF will be the govt.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Left and right are inherently relative terms.

    Within the spectrum of the party political system in Ireland, SF, Lab, the Soc Dems, PBP/Solidarity and probably the Greens are to varying degrees to the left; FF and FG to the right (FG probably more so).

    The UK political spectrum is well to the right of where it is in Ireland. No (non-fringe) Irish party is as far to the right as the Tories, but so what? It is meaningless to locate Irish parties to the left or to the right on the UK's political spectrum; what would be the point of that?

    In terms of broader European politics, where placement of Irish parties does make sense, both FF and FG are centre-right parties. This is reflected both in their broad policy positions and in their formal alliances and relationships. FF is a member of Liberal International (that's "Liberal" in the European sense, not in the American sense) and of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (and is regarded within that group as being on its right wing). FG is a Christian democratic party, a member of Centrist Democracy International and of the European People's Party, all of which put it firmly on the centre-right.

    Tl;dr: in European terms, the Irish political spectrum is not anomalous and does not skew to the left — a bit to the right, if anything, given the left parties' singular lack of success. It is the UK political spectrum which is anomalous, skewing markedly to the right. The UK spectrum is artificially compressed because of their bizarre electoral system, and voters are basically offered a choice between a centrist party and a party that is well to the right.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,039 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    I don't think SF will be that short. I think you have to factor in some more transferable-ity to SF. I think this transferable-ity will cause problems for the smaller left wing parties, including SD and LP.

    SF will garner transfers across the board save for the hard line FG supporter who will never transfer to them.

    I imagine that SF will come to about 10 seats of a majority, to get to a majority it will need to work with SD (who I can't see retaining as many seats as suggested) and a number of like minded independents. SF will take where FF left off in 2011 in the next General Election IMO.

    The fight for second place will be much more hard placed for FF and FG and neither will be like LP and enter government with SF when in second place and give up the opportunity to be leaders of the opposition, the good of the country does not exist.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,959 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    To get within 10 seats of a majority, even with an increased number of transfers, Sinn Fein will need more than 40% of the vote, possibly as much as 45% - they are like the FF of the 1980s under Haughey in terms of transferability. There are no opinion polls showing them anywhere near that level of support.

    I am not saying it is impossible, but even if they did get within 10 seats of a majority, that would be due to a wipeout of Labour, SDs and PBP. FF and FG together would probably also be only 10 short, with independents and rumps holding the balance. No stable government other than SF/FF would be possible, but even more likely would be a confidence and supply arrangement, whereby Sinn Fein could go into government, a big big risk for a naive untested party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,959 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    To get within 10 seats of a majority, even with an increased number of transfers, Sinn Fein will need more than 40% of the vote, possibly as much as 45% - they are like the FF of the 1980s under Haughey in terms of transferability. There are no opinion polls showing them anywhere near that level of support.

    I am not saying it is impossible, but even if they did get within 10 seats of a majority, that would be due to a wipeout of Labour, SDs and PBP. FF and FG together would probably also be only 10 short, with independents and rumps holding the balance. No stable government other than SF/FF would be possible, but even more likely would be a confidence and supply arrangement, whereby Sinn Fein could go into government, a big big risk for a naive untested party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,039 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    A big big risk for an untested party? Tell me now was the FG government from 2016 to 2020 not a big risk? how many independents had a seat at the cabinet table.... now that you say it perhaps that wasn't a risk we should have taken.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,904 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Can't see Martin convincing an FF full of people who think they should be Minister to do C&S again, or at least not for very long - one budget at best.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,959 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That government contained some people with cabinet experience. Sinn Fein on their own, in a confidence and supply arrangement, or with the alphabet parties of the left, is completely untried and untested in government. We will either have a complete disaster or a government run by the civil servants.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,039 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Some, but it was very much an untried type of government. It only 59 TD supporting Enda Kenny.

    I think you reading into this idea that SF are untested in government because its never had ministerial positions. Plenty of First Time Ministers.

    TBH I won't be voting SF, but your argument is pointless.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,959 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    To my recollection, that 2016 government only had 2 ministers who never even been junior ministers - Shane Ross and Katherine Zappone - I could be wrong, but they are also arguably the two ministers who achieved the least in that government, which only 100% backs up what I am saying.



Advertisement